Metacommunication: A Re-Examination and Extension

REFERENCES

• ABELES, G. Researching the unresearchable: experimentation on the double bind. In Sluzki & Ransom (Ed.). Double bind. New York: Grune & Stratton. 1976, 113–49.
   Google Scholar
• BANDLER, R. & GRINDER, J. The structure of magic I. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• BARNLUND, D.C. Toward a cosmology of communication. Paper presented to ICA-SCA, Asilomar Conference, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. Information and codification: a philosophical approach. In Ruesch and Bateson (Ed.). Communication: the soiial matrix of psychiatry, 1951, 168–211.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. Naven. (2nd ed.) Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• BATESON, G. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• BERGER, C.R. Interpersonal communication theory and research: an overview. In B.D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook I. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association, 1977. 217–28.
   Google Scholar
• BERGER, C.R., WEBER. M D., MUNLEY, M.E., & DIXON, J.T. Interpersonal relationship levels and interpersonal attraction. In B.D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook I. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communicatin Association, 1977, 245–61.
   Google Scholar
• BERNAL, G. & BAKER, J. Toward a Metacommunicational Framework of Couple Interactions. Family Process, 1979, 18(3), 293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A.P. Conceptual frontiers in the study of communication in families: an introduction to the literature. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2(4), 381–97.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A.P. Whither communication theory and research? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 3, 324–32.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A.P. On taking ourselves seriously: an analysis of some persistent problems and promising directions in interpersonal research. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4(2), 179–91.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A.P., KAMINSKI, E.P., & FITZPATRICK, M A. The conceptual domain of interpersonal communication behavior: a factor-analytic study. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3(4), 291–302.
   Google Scholar
• BOCHNER, A.P. & LENK, K.D. Interpersonal communication theory and research: an overview of inscrutable epistemologies and muddled concepts. In D. Nimmo (Ed), Communication Yearbook 3. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association 1979, 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• CARSON, R.C. Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1969.
   Google Scholar
• CLINE, T.R. A Markov analysis of strangers', roommates', and married couples' conversational focus on their relationships. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1979, 45(1), 55–68.
   Google Scholar
• COURTRIGHT, J. A., MILLAR, F.E., & ROGERS-MILLAR, E. Domineeringness and dominance: replication and expansion. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46(3), 179–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRONEN, V.E., PEARCE, W.B., & SNAVELY, L.M. A theory of rule-structure and types of episodes and a study of perceived enmeshment in undesired repetitive patterns. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association, 1979, 225–40.
   Google Scholar
• DELIA, J.G. Alternative perspectives for the study of human communication: Critique and response. Communication Quarterly, 1977, 25, 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• DUNCAN, H.D. Symbols in society. London: Oxford University Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• ELLIS, D.G. Trait predictors of relational control. In B.D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association, 1978, 185–91.
   Google Scholar
• ELLIS, D.G. Relational control in two group systems. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46(3), 153–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ERICSON, P.M. & ROGERS, E.L. New procedures for analyzing relational communication. Family Process, 1973, 12, 245–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FISHER, B. Information systems theory and research: an overview. In B.D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association, 1978, 81–108.
   Google Scholar
• FISHER, B.A. & BEACH, W.A. Content and relationship dimensions of communicative behavior: an exploratory study. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1979, 43, 201–11.
   Google Scholar
• FITZPATRICK, M.A. A typological approach to communication in relationships. In B.D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook I. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction- International Communication Association, 1977, 263–75.
   Google Scholar
• FITZPATRICK, M.A. & BEST, P. Dyadic adjustment in relational types: consensus, cohesion, affectional expression, and satisfaction in enduring relationships. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46(3), 167–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FITZPATRICK, M.A. & WINKE, J. You always hurt the one you love: strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 1979 27(1), 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• FOLGER, J.P. & SILLARS, A.L. Relational coding and perceptions of dominance. Paper presented to the Doctoral Honors Seminar, Northwestern University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• FOLGER, J.P. & SILLARS, A.L. The perceived dominance of conversational acts: three reports on the validity of relational coding procedures. Northwestern University, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• FRENTZ, T.S. & FARRELL, T.B. Language-action: a paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62(4), 333–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FROST, J.H. & WILMOT, W.W. Interpersonal conflict. Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown, Publishers, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• GRINDER, J. & BANDLER, R. The structure of magic II. Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. An interactional explanation of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1958, 1(2), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. An interactional description of schizophrenia. Psychiatry, 1959, 22, 321–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. Strategies of Psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• HALEY, J. Development of a theory: a history of a research project. In Sluzki & Ransom (Eds.), Double bind, 1976, 59–104.
   Google Scholar
• HARPER, J.M., SCORESBY, A.L., & BOYCE, W.D. The logical levels of complementary, symmetrical, and parallel interaction classes in family dyads. Family Process, 1977, 16(2), 199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARRIS, L.M., CRONEN, V.E., & MCNAMEE, S. An empirical case study of communication episodes. Paper presented to the National Council on Family Relations, Boston, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• HOPF, T.S., STEWART, J., & WILMOT, W W. Intra-/Interpersonal communication processes: a trialogue. The Communicator, 1979, 9(1), 2–17.
   Google Scholar
• KNUTSON, T.J. & KOWITZ, A.C. Effects of information type and level of orientation on consensus—achievement in substantive and affective small-group conflict. Central States Speech Journal, 1977, 28, 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• LEATHERS, D.G. The impact of multichannel message inconsistency on verbal and nonverbal decoding behaviors. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 88–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LENK, K.D., CHMIELEWSKI, H., GUM, G., & BOCHNER, A. Accuracy and role discrepancy in marriage: an analysis of multi-level perspectives and marital adjustment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communications Association, Washington, D.C., 1977.
   Google Scholar
• LIN, N. Communication effects: review and commentary. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook I. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction-International Communication Association, 1977, 55–72.
   Google Scholar
• MILLAR, F.E. Communication: discipline, process, event. The Communicator, 1979, 9(1), 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• MILLAR, F.E. & ROGERS, L.E. A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976, 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. (Ed.). Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• MILLER, G.R. & STEINBERG, M. Between people: a new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago, Ill. Science Research Associates, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• MORTON, T.L., ALEXANDER. J.F., & ALTMAN, I. Communication and relationship definition. In Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• NORTON, R.W. Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 1978, 4(2), 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• PARKS, M.R. Relational communication: theory and research. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3(4), 372–81.
   Google Scholar
• PARKS, M.R. & WILMOT, W.W. Three research models of communication: action, interaction, and transaction. Paper presented at the convention of the Western Speech Communication Association. Seattle, Wash., 1975.
   Google Scholar
• PEARCE, W.B. The coordinated management of meaning: a rules-based theory of interpersonal communication. In Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communications, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976, 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• PEARCE, W.B. & CONKLIN, F. A model of hierarchical meanings in coherent conversation and a study of “indirect responses.” Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROGERS, E.L. & FARACE, R.V. Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1975, 1, 222–39.
   Google Scholar
• ROGERS-MILLAR, E.L. & MILLAR, F.E. A transactional definition and measure of power. Paper presented to the Speech Communication Association. Washington, D.C., 1977.
   Google Scholar
• ROGERS, W.T. & JONES, S.E. Effects of dominance tendencies on floor holding and interruption behavior in dyadic interaction. Human Communication Research, 1975, 1(2), 113–22.
   Google Scholar
• ROSSITER, C.M., JR. Instruction in metacommunication. Central States Speech Journal, 1974, 25, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• ROSSITER, C.M., JR. & PEARCE, W.B. Communicating personally: a theory of interpersonal communication and human relationships. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill & Co., 1975.
   Google Scholar
• SATIR, V. Conjoint family therapy (Rev. ed.). Palo Alto: Science & Behavior Books, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• SLUZKI, C.E. & RANSOM. D.C. (Eds.) Double bind: the foundation of the communicational approach to the family. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• WATZLAWICK, P. The language of change: elements of therapeutic communication. New York: Basic Books, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• WATZLAWICK, P., BEAVIN, J.H., & JACKSON, D.D. Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W.W. Norton. 1967.
   Google Scholar
• WILDEN, A. System and structure: essays in communication and exchange. London: Tavistock Publications, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• WILDER, C. The Palo Alto group, difficulties and directions of the interactional view for human communication research. Human Communication Research, 1979, 5(2), 171–86.
   Google Scholar
• WILMOT. W.W. Dyadic communication (2nd ed.) Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• WYNNE, L.C. On the anguish, and creative passions, of not escaping double binds: a reformulation. In Sluzki and Ransom (Eds.). Double bind. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1976.
   Google Scholar