Procedural Messages and Small Group Work Climates: A Lag Sequential Analysis

REFERENCES

• Applbaum, R., Bodaken, E. M., Sereno, K. K., & Anatol, K. W. E. The process of group communication. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, J., & Messe, L. Motivational determinants of group structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 319–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Dabbs, J. M., Jr. Social interactions observed: Some approaches to the analysis of behavior streams. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976, 2, 335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F. Personality and interpersonal relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F., & Strodtback, F. L. Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951, 46, 485–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. A theory of group development. Human Relations, 1956, 9, 415–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, D. M. A thematic approach to the analysis of the task-oriented group. Central States Speech Journal, 1967, 28, 285–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. A multivariate investigation of Machiavellianism and task structure in four-man groups. Speech Monographs. 1972, 39, 276–285.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatta, E. F., & Crowther, B. A workbook for the study of social interaction processes. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. Discussion and group methods: Theory and practice. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Crowell, L., & Scheidel, T. M. Categories for analysis of idea development in discussion groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 1961, 54, 155–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forston, R. F. The decision-making process in the American civil jury: A comparative methodological investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Gouran, D. Variables related to consensus in group discussions of questions of policy. Speech Monographs, 1969, 36, 387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, A. P. Handbook of small group research. New York: Macmillan, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, J. A. An experimental study on the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus. Speech Monographs, 1972, 39, 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, C. U. Leadership emergence and attention span: A content analysis of the time-devoted-to-themes discussed in the task-oriented group. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. I. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, J. C. & Dickinson, T. Task structure, work structure and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor, G. Small groups: A general systems model. Small Group Behavior, 1980, 11, 145–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penland, P., & Fine, S. Group dynamics and individual development. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. Preference for procedural order in task-oriented small groups. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, G. P. The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osofsky (ed.), Handbook of infant development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977a.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, G. P. Measurement in observational research. In G. P. Sackett (ed.) Observing behavior, volume II: Data collection and analysis methods. Baltimore: University Park, 1977b.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, G. P., Holm, R., Crowley, C., & Henkins, A. Computer technology: A Fortran program for lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction data. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1979, 11, 366–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saine, T. J. & Bock, D. G. A comparison of the distributional and sequential structures of interaction in high and low consensus groups. Central States Speech Journal, 1973, 24, 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. Characteristics of emergent leaders of continuing problem-solving groups. Journal of Psychology, 1974, 88, 167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. Predicting emergent leaders: An exploratory study of the salience of communicative functions. Small Group Behavior, 1978, 9, 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Shure, G. H., Rogers, M. S., Larsen, I. M., & Tassone, J. Group planning and task effectiveness. Sociometry, 1962, 25, 263–282.
   Google Scholar
• Steck, E. An analysis of interaction structure in the discussion of a ranking task. Speech Monographs, 1970, 37, 249–256.
   Google Scholar