Theoretical Interactions of Receivers, Sources, and Attitude Objects: “RSO” Theory

REFERENCES

• Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 1978, 84, 888–912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7. New York: Academic Press, 1974, 2–101.
   Google Scholar
• Baudhuin, S. & Davis, M. Scales for the measurement of ethos: Another attempt. Speech Monographs, 1972, 39, 296–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bern, D. Self-Perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 183–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. Cognitive theories in social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinghaus, E. The operation of congruity in an oral communication situation. Speech Monographs, 1961, 28, 131–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlo, D., Lemmert, J. & Mertz, R. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1969, 33, 563–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boring, E. A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. Motivation and argument. In G. Miller and T. Nilsen (eds.), Perspectives in Argumentation. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1966, 110–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, R. & Hurt, T. The credibility of policemen as message sources. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (unpublished), 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. Congruity principle in oral communication. Central States Speech Journal, 1963, 14, 88–91, 154–58.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. The generality of early reversals on attitudes toward communication sources. Speech Monographs 1970, 37, 152–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. & Scheidel, T. Speech as process: A case study. Speech Monographs, 1968, 35, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 1980, 39, 752–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapanis, N. & Chapanis, A. Cognitive dissonance: Five years later. Psychological Bulletin, 1964, 61, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Cronen, V. & Price, W. Affective relationships between the speaker and listener: An alternative to the approach-avoidance model. Communication Mongraphs, 1976, 43, 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronkhite, G. Autonomic correlates of dissonance and attitude change. Speech Monographs, 1966, 33, 392–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cronkhite, G. & Liksa, J. A critique of factor-analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Mongraphs, 1976, 43, 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronkhite, G. & Liksa, J. The judgement of communicant acceptibility. In M. Roloff and G. Miller (eds.), Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980, 101–139.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J. Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1977, 63, 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delia, J., Crockett, W., Press, A. & O'Keefe, D. The dependency of interpersonal evaluations on context- relevant beliefs about the other. Speech Monographs, 1975, 42, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Donohew, L., Parker, J. & McDermott, V. Psychophysical measurement of information selection: Two studies. Journal of Communication, 22, 1972,54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P. & Duncan, J. An activation model of exposure. Communication Monographs, 1980, 47, 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doob, L. The behavior of attitudes. Psychological Review, 1947, 54, 135–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N. A structural balance model of evaluative behavior. Human Relations, 1965, 18, 171–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. A consideration of beliefs and their role in attitude measurement. In Fishbein, M. (ed.), Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, New York: John Wiley, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. & Hunter, R. Summation versus balance in attitude organization and change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 69, 505–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B. & Miller, G. The effects of low-credible sources on message acceptance. Speech Monographs, 1966, 33, 127–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gulley, H. & Berlo, D. Effects of intercellular and intracellular speech structure on attitude change and learning. Speech Monographs, 1956, 23, 288–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider, F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21, 107–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurt, T. & Bostrom, R. The predictive value of the congruity theory. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association meeting, San Francisco, 1971, 40, 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hurt, T. A multiple regression approach to attitude change. Paper, International Communication Association, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Insko, C. Theories of attitude change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In. D. Levine (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1967. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967, 192–238.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrick, J. The effect of relevant and nonrelevant sources on attitude change. Journal of Social Psychology, 1958, 47, 15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, C., Collins, B. & Miller, N. Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: J. Wiley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, A. & Lott, B. A learning theory approach to interpersonal attitudes. In Greenwald, A., T. Brock & T. Ostrom (eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes. New York: Academic Press, 1968, 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Manis, M., Gleason, T. & Dawes, R. The evaluations of complex social stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 3, 404–19.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 1966, 33, 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. Recovering the structure of credibility judgments: an alternative to factor analysis. Speech Monographs, 1975, 42, 221–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. Counterattitudinal advocacy: A current appraisal. In D. Mortenson and K. Sereno (eds.), Advances in Communication Research. New York: Harper and Row, 1973, 105–51.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. & Baseheart, J. Source trustworthiness, opinionated statements, and responses to persuasive communications. Speech Monographs, 1969, 36, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. & Burgoon, M. New techniques of persuasion. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. & Burgoon, M. Persuasion research: Review and commentary. In Brent T. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books-ICA, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson, C. D. & Sereno, K. The influence of ego-involvement and discrepancy on perceptions of communication. Speech Monographs, 1970, 37, 127–34.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, E. Attitude change as a function of open- or closed-mindedness. Journalism Quarterly, 1965, 42, 571–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. The relationship of attitudes and behavior A constructivist analysis. In D. Cushman & R. McPhee (eds.), The Message-Attitude-Behavior Relationship: Theory, Methodology, and Application. New York: Academic Press, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. Constructivist approaches to persuasion: Research strategies and methodological choices. Paper, Eastern Communication Association, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. & Sypher, H. Cognitive complexity measures and the relationship of cognitive complexity to communication: A critical review. Human communication research, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. & Tannenbaum, P. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 42–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallak, M. A. & Pittman, T. General motivational effects of dissonance arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, 349–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. & Maccoby, N. Information processing and persuasion: Counterarguing behavior. In Clarke, P. (ed.), New Models for Mass Communication Research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1973, 269–301.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, K. Ego-involvement, high source credibility, and responses to a belief-discrepant communication. Speech Monographs, 1968, 35, 476–81.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, K. & Bodaken, E. Ego-involvement and attitude change: Toward a reconceptualization of persuasive effect. Speech monographs, 1972, 39, 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, K. & Hawkins, G. The effects of variations in speaker's nonfluency upon audience ratings of attitude toward the speech topic and speaker's credibility. Speech Monographs, 1967, 34, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno, K. & Mortenson, C. D. The effects of ego-involved attitudes on conflict negotiation in dyads. Speech Monographs, 1969, 36, 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., Sherif, C. & Nebergall, R. Attitude and attitude change: The social-judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Staats, A. Social behaviorism. Homewod, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Stinnet, W. An investigation into four factors of source credibility. Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio University, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, P. Attitudes toward source and concept as factors in attitude change through communication. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, P., Macaulay, J. & Norris, E. The principle of congruity and reduction of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1963, 3, 233–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, P. & Gengel, R. Generalization of attitude change through congruity principle relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. & Fishbein, M. Cognitive interaction in person perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 446–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walster, E., Berscheid, E. & Walster, G. New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 151–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, R. Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeless, L. Attitude and credibility in the prediction of attitude change: A multiple regression approach. Speech Monographs, 1974, 41, 277–81.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 1968, 54, 59–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. The concepts of balance, congruity and dissonance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960, 24, 280–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. Cognitive theories in social psychology. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology V.I. Reading, Mass: Addison, Wesley, 1968, 320–411.
   Google Scholar