Television Rules of Prepartum New Families

References

• Abel, J. D. The family and child television viewing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 331–335.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. A., & Avery, R. K. An analysis of changes in voter percetion of candidates’ positions. Communication Monographs, 1978,45, 354–361.
   Google Scholar
• Barcus, E E. Parental influence on children’s television viewing. Television Quarterly, 1968 ,8, 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Blood, R. O. Social class and family control of television viewing. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1961, 7, 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & Sanders, A. K. Effects of television viewing on family interactions: An observational study. Family Relations, 1980, 29, 216–220.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., McLeod, J.M. & Atkin, C. K. Parental influences on adolescent media use. In F. G. Kline & R Clarke (Eds.), Mass communication and youth. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Tims, A. R. Interpersonal factors in adolescent television use. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32(4), 98–115.
   Google Scholar
• Collett, R The rules of conduct. In R Collett (Ed.), Social rules and social behavior. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, D., & Whiting, G. C. An approach to communication theory: Toward consensus on rules. Journal of Communication, 1972, 22, 217–238.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. The research act (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmick, J.W., McCain, T.A., & Bolton, W. T. Media use and the life span. American Behavioral Scientist, 1979,23, 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. Communications research and the concept of the mass. In W. Schramm & D. Roberts (Eds), The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. L., & McCain, T. A. Controlling children’s television viewing: Predictors of family television rules and their relationship to family communication patterns. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism Annual Conference, Boston, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, R., & Secord, PF. The explanation of social behavior. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, R. D., & Goldman, H. Parents’ views of the effect of television on their children. Child Development, 1962,33, 411–426.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. D. The study of the family. Family Process, 1965, 4, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. Mass media and family communication: An ethnography of audience behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. Choosing television programs by family vote. Communication Quarterly, 1978, 26(4), 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. The social uses of television. Human Communication Research, 1980, 6, 197209. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. Family communication patterns and the social uses of television. Communication Research, 1980, 7, 319–334. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. The rules of mass communication. Paper presented to the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Minneapolis, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. Television: Its impact on school children. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1951, 15, 421–444.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. Why do children watch television? Public Opinion Quarterly, 1954, 18, 239–244.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. A., & Benson, L. Parental perceptions of the role of television in parent-child interactions. Journal of Marriage and the family, 1970, 410–414.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, E. C. Television and the family. Sociology and Social Research, 1950, 35, 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., & Brown, J. The family environment and adolescent media use. In Ray Brown (Ed.). Children and television. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J.M., & Chaffee, S. M. The construction of social reality. In James T. Tedeschi (Ed.). The social influence process. Chicago: Aldine, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. & Gurevitch, M. Explaining audience behavior: Three approaches considered. In Jay G. Blumler & Elihu Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Messaris, R, & Sarett, C. On the consequences of television-related parent-child interactions. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 226–244.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T. P, Traudt, R J., & Anderson, J. A. Non-traditional mass communication research methods: Observational case studies of media use in natural settings. In D. Nimmo (Ed.),Communication yearbooks New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L. N. Viewing rules as mediating factors in children’s responses to commercials. Journal of Broadcasting, 1979, 23, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J.R., & Robertson, T. S. Children’s television viewing: An examination of parent-child consensus. Sociometry, 1975,38, 308–326.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. A. Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1955,19, 321–325.
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff, S. Communication rules. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Sigman, S.J. On communication rules from a social perspective. Human Communication Research, 1980, 7, 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. Television, imagination, and aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. H., Communication research and the idea of process. Speech Monographs, 1972,39, 174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Traudt, R J. Television and family viewing: An ethnography. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Utah, 1979.
   Google Scholar