58
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part VI. Intercultural Communication

Attribution Theory: Implications for Intercultural Communication

Pages 721-735 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Albert, R., & Adamopoulos, J. An attributional approach to cultural learning: The culture assimilator. Topics in Culture Learning, 1976,4, 53–60.
  • Brislin, R. W. Cross-cultural encounters. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981.
  • Calder, B. H., Ross, M., & Insko, C. A. Attitude change and attitude attribution: Effects of incentive, choice, competence, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973,25, 84–99.
  • Detweiler, R. A. On inferring the intentions of a person from another culture. Journal of Personality, 1975,43, 591–611.
  • Detweiler, R. A. Culture, category width, and attributions: A model-building approach to the reasons for cultural effects. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1978, 9, 259284.
  • Detweiler, R. A. Intercultural interaction and the categorization process: A conceptual analysis and behavioral outcome. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1980, 4, 275–293.
  • Duncan, B. L. Differential social penetration and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing and lower limits of stereotyping of blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 590–598.
  • Ehrenhaus, P. Actors, observers, and the attribution of intent in conversation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, 1982.
  • Ekman, P Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, 124–129. (a)
  • Ekman, P Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1971. (b)
  • Fiedler, F, Mitchell, T., & Triandis, H. Culture assimilator: An approach to cross-cultural training Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 95–102.
  • Hall, E.T, Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1977.
  • Heider, F. Psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley, 1958.
  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. Experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 1944, 57, 243–259.
  • Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz(Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
  • Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. Actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972.
  • Kanouse, D. E., & Hanson, L. R. Negativity in evaluations. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972.
  • Kelley, H. H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.
  • Kelley, H. H. Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972. (a)
  • Kelley, H. H. Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972. (b)
  • McArthur, L. Z. How and why of what: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,22, 171–193.
  • McArthur, L. Z. Lesser influence of consensus than distinctiveness information on causal attributions: A test of the person-thing hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Socio/Psychology, 1976,33, 733–742.
  • Mitchell, T., Dossett, D. L., Fiedler, RE., & Triandis, H.C. Culture training: Validation evidence for the culture assimilator. International Journal of Psychology, 1972, 7, 97–104.
  • Monson, T.C., & Snyder, M. Actors, observers, and the attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 23, 89–111.
  • Newman, H. M. Interpretation and explanation: Influences on communicative exchanges within intimate relationships. Communication Quarterly, 1981,29, 123–131.
  • Newtson, D. Attribution and the unit of perception in ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality of Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 28–38.
  • Newtson, D. Perception of ongoing behavior. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, &R.F. Kidd (Eds.). /Vent directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum
  • Pettigrew, T. E Measurement and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable. Journal of Personality, 1958, 26, 532 -544.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. Three issues in ethnicity: Boundaries, deprivations, and perceptions. In J. M, Yinger & S. J. Cutler (Eds.), Major social issues. New York: Free Press, 1978.
  • Regan, D. T. Attributional aspects of interpersonal attraction. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), Neuj directions in attribution research (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 1978.
  • Regan, D, T., & Totten, J. Empathy and attributions: Turning observers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 850–856.
  • Ross, L. Intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10), New York: Academic Press, 1977.
  • Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 1977,84, 1–66.
  • Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W Controlled and automatic human information processing: U. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977 , 84, 127–190.
  • Sillars, A. L. Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 1980, 47, 180–200.
  • Snyder, M., Stephen, W. G, & Rosenfield, D. Egotism and attribution. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,33, 435–441.
  • Storms, M. D. Videotape and attribution process: Reversing actors’ and observers’ points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, 165–175.
  • Taylor, S., & Fiske, S. Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 439–445.
  • Taylor, S., & Fiske, S. Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185, 1124–1131.
  • Zadny, J., & Gerard, H. Attributed intentions and informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1974, 10, 34–52.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.