Predicting Couples’ Communication from Couples’ Self-Reports

References

• Adams, B.N. The American family. Chicago: Markman, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D., & Liker, J. K. Analyzing sequential categorical data in dyadic interaction: A comment on Gottman. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 91, 393–403. Barry, W. A. Conflict in marriage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, E. G., & Steinberg, D. P. Subtle cues between newlyweds. Journal of Communication 1977. 27, 92–97. Bernard, J. The future of marriage. New York; Bantam, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Birchler, G. Differential patterns of instrumental and affiliative behavior as a function of degree of marital distress and level of intimacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Y. M., Feinberg, S. E. & Holland, P. W. Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. Conceptual frontiers in the study of families: An introduction to the literature. Human Communication Research, 1976,2, 381–397.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. Functions of communication in interpersonal bonding. In C. Arnold & J. W. Bowers (Eds), Handbook of rhetoric and communication. Book in preparation, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Bugental, D. E, Interpretations of naturally occurring discrepancies between words and intonations: Modes of inconsistency resolution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 30, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Bugental, D. E., Kaswan, J. W., Love, L. K., & Fox, M. N. Child versus adult perceptions of evaluative messages in verbal, vocal and visual channels. Developmental Psychology, 1970, 2, 367–375.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, E. W., & Wallin, P. Courtship, engagement and marriage. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. L. Relationships in marriage and the family. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships (Vol. 1). New York: Academic, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, W. Theory construction and the sociology of the family. New York: John Wiley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Cuber, J. F., & Harroff, P. B. Sex and the significant Americans. Baltimore: Penguin, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, D., Fisher, B., Drecksel, G., Hoch, D., & Werbel, W. Codebook relational control scheme. Unpublished manuscript, University of Utah, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Farber, B. Types of family organization. In A. Rose (Ed.) Human behavior and social processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A. A typological approach to communication in re/ationsfiips. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A. A typological approach to communication in relationships. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 1. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A. A typological approach to enduring relationships: Children as audience to the parental relationship. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 1981,12, 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A. Coorientational accuracy in couple types. In L. Larsen & J. White (Eds.), Interpersonal phenomenology of the family. Book in preparation, 1983. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A. A typology of relationships. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1983. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Best, P. G. Dyadic adjustment in traditional independent, and separate relationships: A validation study. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 167–178.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., Best, P., Mabry, E. & Indvik, J. An integration of two approaches to relational conflict. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., Fallis, S.& Vance, L. Multifunctional coding of conflict resolution strategies in marital dyads. Family Relations, 1982, 31, 611–70.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Indvik, J. The instrumental and expressive domains of marital communication. Human Communication Research, 1982, 8(3), 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Vance, L. E. Attentiveness, acquiescence, and presumptuousness as expressed in the casual interaction of married couples. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Gadlin, H. Private lives and public order: A critical view of the history of intimate relations in the United States. In G. Levinger & H. Raush (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. Marital interaction. New York: Academic, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., Notarius, C., Markman, H., Banks, S., Yoppi, B, & Rubin, M. E. Behavior exchange theory and marital decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, R., & Handel, G. Family worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, M., & Piatt, M. Marital happiness and stability: A review of research in the sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1970, 32, 553–574.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N., & Martin, B. Behavioral marriage therapy: Current status. Psychological Bulletin, 1976, 83, 540–556
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, W. J., & Jackson, D. D. The mirages of marriage. New York: Norton, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Levinger, G. The embrace of lives: Changing and unchanging. In S. Levinger & H. Raush (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. 1. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family. New York: Macmillan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, H.J., Sabagh, G., & Thomes, M. M. Interfaith marriages. Social Problems, 1957, 4, 319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, G. The relationship among marital assessment procedures: A correlational study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 1556–1558.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, F., & Rogers, E. A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Navran, L. Communication and adjustment in marriage. Family Process, 1967, 6, 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Noller, P. Marital misunderstanding: A study of couples’ nonverbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 1135–1148.-
   Google Scholar
• Noller, P. Gender and marital adjustment level differences in decoding messages from spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981,41, 272–278.
   Google Scholar
• Noller, P. Channel consistency and inconsistency in the communication of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 732–741.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, F. I. Role structure arid an arta/ysis of the family. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D.H.L. Treating relationships: Trends and overview. In D.H.L. Olson (Ed.), Treating relationships. Lake Mills, IA: Graphic, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D.H.L. Family typologies: Bridging family research and family therapy, In E, E. Filsinger and R. A. Lewis (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Overall, J. E. & Klett, C. J. Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. Relational communication: Theory and research. Human Communication Research, 1977, 3, 372–381.
   Google Scholar
• Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. Communication, conflict and marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Raush, H. L., Grief, A. C.,& Nugent, J. Communication in couples and families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. 1. Nye, & I. L Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, (Vol. 1). New York: Macmillan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, S. Perspectives on American husbands and wives. In US. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Special Studies, Series P-23, No. 77. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, D. Varieties of consensual experience: A theory for relating family interaction to individual thinking. Family Process, 1971,11, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Revenstorf, D., Vogel, B., Wegener, C., Hahlweg, K., and Schindler, L. Escalation phenomena in interaction sequences: An empirical comparison of distressed and non-distressed couples. Behavior Analysis and Modification, 1980, 2, 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Riskin, J., and Faunce, E. E. An evaluative review of family interaction research. Family Process, 1972, 11, 365–455.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, M. Differences between distressed and nondistressed couples in verbal and nonverbal communication codes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ryder, R.S.A typography of early marriage. Family Process, 1970, 9, 385–402.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, G. P. The lag sequential analysis of contingency and cyclicity in behavioral interaction research. In J. Osfsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. New York: John Wiley, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, C. Communication and adjustment. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, B. V, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Shorter, E. The making of the modern family. New York: Basic Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Shostrom, E., & Kavanaugh, J. Between men and women. LosAngetes: Nash, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars, A. Communication and attributions in interpersonal conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Siliars, A. Attributions and interpersonal conflict resolution. In J. H. Harvey, W. lckes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Sneath, P. H., & Sokal, R. R. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: Freeman, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Spanier, G. B. Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenkle, D. H. A behavioral assessment of creativity, support and power in clinic and non-clinic married couples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. Manual for a taxonomy of verbal response modes. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science, 1978. ‘
   Google Scholar
• Vance, L. E. Dimensions of autonomy/interdependence reflected in casual marital interaction. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. P., Friedman, L., Nugent, J. & Messerly, L. Demand characteristics in the observation of marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 557–567.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, C., Revenstorf, D., Hahhveg, K, & Schindler, L. Empirical analysis of communication in distressed and nondistressed couples. Behavior Analysis and Modification, 1979, 3, 178–188.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, R. Relational control and communication in marital types. Doctoral dissertation in progress, University of Wisconsin, 1983.
   Google Scholar