New Directions in Negotiation Research

References

• Angelmar, K., & Stem, L. U Development of a content analytic system for analysis of bargaining communication in marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 1978, 25, 93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. How to do things with words. In J. O. Urmson& M. SbesafEds.), The William James lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, S. B., St Lawler, E.J. Power and politics in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, W. A., & Dunning, D G. Pre-indexing and conversational organization. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1982, 68, 170–185.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, P.J. The use of argument by preschool children: The emergent production rules for winning arguments. In G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Proceedings of the second summer conference on argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiberg, S., & Churchill, L. Notes on confrontation in conversation. Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 1975, 4, 273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. R Face-saving and face-restoration in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Fraser, C. Speech as a marker of situation. In K. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds), Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Gilman, A. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations: A dimensional analysis. Communication Monographs, 1980, 47, 132–148.
   Google Scholar
• Danet, B., & Bogoch, B. Have you stopped beating your wife? Courtroom questions as weapons, cues and punishment. Paper presented at the Symposium on Language and Law, International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, July 16–20,1979.
   Google Scholar
• Danet, B., Hoffman, K. B., Kermisk, N.C., Rafn, H.J., & Stayman, D C. An ethnography of questioning in the courtroom. In R. W. Shuy & A. Shnukal (Eds.), Language use and the uses of language Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, H. W., Bognanno, M. G., & Estenson, D. L. Contemporary collective bargaining. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A. An empirical framework for examining negotiation processes and outcomes. Communication Monographs, 1978, 45, 247–257.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A. Analyzing negotiation tactics. Development of a negotiation interact system. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, D. Negotiations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, N. “I gotta lesson you”: Childish arguments. In G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Proceedings of the second summer conference on argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, N. Politeness phenomena: Apparent and imagined functionality. Paper presented at the Summer Conference on Language and Discourse Processes, Michigan State University, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Ervin-Tripp, S. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 1976, 5, 25–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ervin-Tripp, S Speech acts, social meaning, and social learning. In H. Giles et al. (Eds.), Language.-Socia/psychological perspective. New York: Pergamon, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. International conflict for bargainers. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, P. R, & Chandler, T. A. Collaborative production of proposals in group decision making. Paper presented at the Summer Conference on Language and Discourse Processes, Michigan State University, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. Relations in public. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. Forms o/ta/k. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, E. N. (Ed). Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M., & Carroll, S. Language and situation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P Logic in conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). New York: Academic, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. Cohesion in English London: Longmans, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, R. The taken for granted. Human Communication Research, 1981, 7, 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Backus, D. Are compliance-gaining strategies dependent on situational variables? Central States Speech Journal, 1982, 33, 469–479.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, 5., & Jacobs., S. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthy-meme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1980, 66, 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. The collaborative production of proposals in conversational argument and persuasion: A study of disagreement regulation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1981,18, 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. Strategy and structure in conversational influence. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1981, 45, 118–132.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S, & Jackson, S. Conversational argument: A discourse analytic approach. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Recent advances in argumentation theory and research. Carbon-dale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Mac-millan, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Joos, M. The five clocks. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S. L. Toward a contemporary linguistic interpretation of the concept of stasis. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1979, 16, 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. Language and woman’s place. Language in Society 1973, 2, 45–80.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. Activity types and language. Pragmatics Microfiche, 1978, 3, D2.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. Bargaining. Chicago: Teach ‘em, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Michelini, R. L. Effect of prior interaction, contact, strategy and expectation of meeting on game behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1971,15, 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. J., Brehmer, B., & Hammond K. R. Communication and conflict resolution. A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Psychology 1970, 5, 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. Studies in dialogue and discourse I: An exponential law of successive questioning. Language in Society, 1975, 4, 31–52. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. Studies in dialogue and discourse II: Types of discourse initiated by and sustained through questioning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1975, 4, 99–121. (b)
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D.J. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 1977, 13, 121–132.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley, H., & Scotton, C. What’s my line? Conversational expression of power by TV interviewers. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. Procedural messages and small group work climates: A lag-sequential analysis. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 1982,8, 262–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. B. The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. An initial investigation of the usability of con versational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Macmillan, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J., & Guetzkow, H. Bargaining and negotiation in international relations. In H. Kelman (Ed.), International behavior: A social psychological analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. & Sacks, H. Opening up closings. Semiofica, 1973, 8, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. The strategy of conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Scotton, C. The negotiation of identities in conversation: A theory of markedness and co-choice. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. Indirect speech acts. In R Cole and J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3). New York: Academic, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. McPhee, R. D., Poole, M. S. Tanita, N. E. & Canary, D.J. Argument, group influence, and decision outcomes. In G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Proceedings of the summer conference on argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfatt, T. M., Seibold, D. R., & Frye, J. K. Communication in game simulated conflicts: Two experiments. Speech Monographs, 1974,41, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. Classification of intersubjective elocutionary acts. Language in Society 1981,10, 227–249.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T., & Rosenfeld, P. Communication in bargaining and negotiation. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Persuasion. New directions in theory and research Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T. V. Conflict, power and games. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Theye, L. D., & Seiler, W. J. Interaction analysis in collective bargaining: An alternative approach to the prediction of negotiated outcomes. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, A. A., Strickland, L., & Shaver, K. G. Phrasing of concessions, difference of power, and medium of communication: Negotiation success and attributions of the opponent. Persona/ify and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1974,1, 228–230.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, A. A, Strickland, L., & Shaver, K. G. Medium of communication, differential power, and phrasing of concessions: Negotiating success and attributions to the opponent. Human Communication Research, 1976, 2, 262–270.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, S. The said and the unsaid. New York: Academic, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Walcott, C., Hopman, P. T., & King, T. D. The role of debate in negotiation. In D. Druckman (Ed.), Negotiations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Wichman, H. Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16, 114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. Language within language: Immediacy a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1968.
   Google Scholar