Exponential Decay and Damped Harmonic Oscillation as Models of the Bargaining Process

References

• Barnett, G. A., & Kincaid, D. L. (1983). Cultural convergence: A mathematical theory. In W. B Gudykunst (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives (pp. 171–194). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beisecker, T. (1970). Verbal persuasive strategies in mixed-motive interactions. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 56, 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. G. (1965). A theory of the bargaining process. American Economic Review, 55, 67–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. G. (1977). Negotiation as a learning process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 581–606.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Wood, F. S. (1980). Fitting equations to data: Computer analysis ofmultifac-tordata (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A., Diez, M. E., & Stahle, R. B. (1983). New directions in negotiation research. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 7 (pp. 249–279). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamner, W. C., & Yukl, G. A. (1977). The effectiveness of different offer strategies in bargaining, In D. Druckman (Ed), Negotiations: Social-psychological perspectives (pp. 137–160). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. W., & Smale, S. (1974). Differential equations, dynamical systems, & linear algebra. New \brk: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ikle, F. C. (1973). Bargaining and communication. In I. de Sola Pool, W. Schramm, F. W. Frey, N. Maccoby, & E. B. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of communication (pp. 836–843). Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, S. A., & Fink, E. L. (1982). Attitude change and attitudinal trajectories: A dynamic multidimensional theory. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 364–418). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, S. A., Fink, E. L., & Bauer, C. L. (1983). A dynamic model of the effect of discrepant information on unidimensional attitude change. Behavioral Science, 28, 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., Beckman, L. L., & Fischer, C. S. (1967). Negotiating the division of a reward under incomplete information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 361–398.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. J., Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J. M., Konar-Goldband, L., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, D. L., Yum, J. O., Woelfel, J., & Barnett, G. A. (1983). The cultural convergence of Korean immigrants in Hawaii: An empirical test of a mathematical theory. Quality and Quantify, 18, 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1977). Information systems theory and research: An overview. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication yearbook I (pp. 149–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction/ICA.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, N. (1974). Comment and a suggestion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 378–380.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. (1966). A social psychological approach to the study of negotiation. In R. V. Bowers (Ed.), Studies on behavior in organizations: A research symposium (pp. 101134). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., Farace, R. V., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. I., & White, L, L. (1984). The process of studying process in organizational communication. Journal of Communication, 34, 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, I. E., & Stephenson, G. M. (1977). The social psychology of bargaining. London: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. F., Jr. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, T. A., & Leap, T. L. (1981). A typology of metamodels in collective bargaining. Behavioral Science, 26, 337–345.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, T. A., Peters, M. H., & Murthy, H. S. K. (1981). A preliminary empirical test of a cusp catastrophe model in the social sciences. Behavioral Science, 26, 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Palis, J., Jr., & de Melo, W. (1982). Geometric theory of dynamical systems: An introduction (A. K. Manning, Trans.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G., & Drews, J. L. (1969). The effect of time pressure, time elapsed, and the opponent’s concession rate on behavior in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621–633.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982). The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research, 8, 262–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rainville, E. D., & Bedient, P. E. (1974). A short course in differential equations (5th ed). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rappoport, A. (1960). Fights, games, and debates. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Barnett, G. A. (1986). Group communication networking in an information environment: Applying metric multidimensional scaling. In M. L. McLaughlin, Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 315–338). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B. (1981). SPSS subprogram NONLINEAR: Nonlinear regression (SPSS No. 433). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Vogelback Computing Center.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., & Tutzauer, F. (1985, May). Looking for the golden needle in the haystack: Two tests of competing theories in integrative bargaining. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Honolulu.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. (1979). Axiomatic models of bargaining (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No. 170). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., &Fouraker, L. E. (1960). Bargaining and group decision making: Experiments in bilateral monopoly. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. L., Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1982). Matching and mismatching: The effect of own limit, other’s toughness, and time pressure on concession rate in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 876–883.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, B. H., & Rissen, H. (1978). Bargaining as trial and error: The case of the Spanish base negotiations 1963–1970. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), The negotiation process: Theories and applications (pp. 193–224). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tutzauer, F. (1985). The dynamics of bargaining in settings with integrative potential. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Tutzauer, F. (1986). Bargaining as a dynamical system. Behavioral Science, 31, 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, 0. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar