Bridging the Parallel Organization: A Study of Quality Circle Effectiveness

References

• Albrecht, T. (1979). The role of communication in perceptions of organizational climate. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 343–357). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, T. (1984). An overtime analysis of communication patterns and work perceptions among managers. In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook 8 (pp. 538–557). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. B. (1983). Success and failure in qualify circles. Cambridge, England: Employee Relations Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Brass, D. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 2, 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Breiger, R. L. (1982). A structural analysis of occupational mobility. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 17–31). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. (1983). Range. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 176–194). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Busche, G. (1984, August). Developmental trends of parallel structure interventions in unionized, manufacturing organizations: A set of propositions. Paper presented to the Organizational Development Division, Academy of Management Convention, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Cuffe, M. & Eyo, B. (1984). Conflict management styles of quality circle facilitators, Transactions, 96–99.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. W., (1983), An investigation of quality circles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S. G. (1985). Organizational dualism and quality circles. Academy of Management Review, 10 (3), 504–517.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In R. Collins (Ed.), Sociological theory (pp. 201–233). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. W., & Wayne, S. J. (1984, August). A field study of effective and less effective quality circles. Paper presented to the Organizational Behavior Division, Academy of Management Convention, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Ingle, S. (1982). How to avoid quality circle failure in your company. Training and Management Journal, 36 (6), 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W. G. (1983, May). A study of quality circle implementation in New Zealand. Presented at the annual conference of the Nev; Zealand Organization for Quality Assurance, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1983). The Changemasters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1985). Quality circles after the fad. Harvard Business Review, 63, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. (1976). Communication roles and communication networks in formal organizations. Human Communication Research, 4, 365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Mohrman, S. A., & Novelli, L. (1982). Learning from a quality circles program. Unpublished working paper, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M. (1985). Inside the circle: A Union Guide to QWL. Bosion: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research, 10, 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., &Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. (1984). Understanding the unique characteristics of groups within organizations. In R. Cathcart & L. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication (pp. 66–76). Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1978), Organizations as communication structures: an empirical approach. Human Communication Research, 4, 283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, M. (1984). Supervisory attitudes toward employee participation. Transactions, 114–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sealye, H. N. (1982). Quality circles in U. S. industry. Quality Circles Journal, 5, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. (1983). Group Dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, R. P., Mento, A. J., Dilla, B. L. Ovalle, N., & Lloyd, R. F. (1985). Factors influencing the success and failure of two quality circle programs. Journal of Management, 11, 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, B. A., & Kanter, R. M. (1980). Building the parallel organization: Creating mechanisms for permanent quality of work life. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16, 371–388.
   Google Scholar
• Stohl, C. (1986). Quality circles and changing patterns of communication. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 511–531). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (1982). Quality circles: How to make them work in America. New York: Amacom.
   Google Scholar
• Tichy, N. (1980). Asocial network perspective for organizational development. In T. Cum-mings (Ed.), Systems theory for organizational development (pp. 115–161). Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In B . M. Staw& G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 267–300). Chicago: St. Clair.
   Google Scholar
• Zahara, S. A., & Lundstrom, W. J. (1984). The effect of personal and organizational characteristics on participation in quality circles. Akron Business and Economic Review, 15(2), 33–38.
   Google Scholar