6
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Absence as Workplace Control: A Critical Inquiry

&
Pages 59-68 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Aguren, S., Btedbacka, C., Hansson, R., Ihregren, K., & Karlsson, K. (1985). lfolvo Kalmar revisited: Ten years of experience (S. A.R.L. Social and Economic Studies, Trans.). Stockholm: Efficiency and Participation Development Council, Swedish Employers’ Con fed era lion IS AS), Landsorganisa-tionen (LO), and Privattjanstemannakartellen (PTK).
  • Baudrill aid, J. (1975). The mirror of production (M. Poster, Trans.). St. Louis: Telos.
  • Beyer, J., Dunbar, R., & Meyer, A. (1988). Comment: The concept of ideology in organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 488–489.
  • Deetz, S. (t982). Critical interpretive research in organizational communication. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 131–149.
  • Deetz, S., <St Kersten, A. (1983). Critical models of interpretive research. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 147172). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Forester, J. (1983). Critical theory and organizational analysis. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 234–246). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Giddenji A, (1979). Central problems in social theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Heydebrand, W. V. (1983). Organization and praxis, In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: Strategies for social research (pp. 306–320). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Jehenson, R. (1984). Effectiveness, expertise, and excellence as ideological fictions: A contribution to a critical phenomenology of the formal organization. Human Studies, 7, 3–21.
  • Kereten, A. (1986, May). Critical research and the problem of multi-level analysis: Notes on connecting micro events and macro structures. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
  • Kochan, T., Kalz, H.,& McKeniie, R. (1987). The transformation of American industrial relations. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lindholm, R., & Noratedt, J. (1975), The Volvo report (D. Jenkins, Trans.). Stockholm: Technical Department, Swedish Employers’ Confederation (SAS).
  • March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
  • Mum by, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. (198fla). Choosing sides: Unions and the team concept. Boston: South End.
  • Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. (1988b). Management by stress. Technology Review, 4, 37–44.
  • Perrow, C. (1972). Organizational analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Rosen, M. (1985). Breakfast at Spiro’s: Dramaturgy and dominance. Journal of Management, 11(2), 31–48.
  • Scott, M., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.
  • Scott, W. (1987), The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.
  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Fkw
  • StefTy, B., & Grimes, A. (1986). A critical theory of organization science. Academy of Management Review, 11, 322–336.
  • Stohl, C., & Redding, C. (1987). Messages and message exchange processes. In F, Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 451–502). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Therbom, G. (1980). The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Verso.
  • Tompkins, P., & Cheney, G.(1983). Account analysis of organizations: Decision making and identification. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations (pp. 123–146). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Weick, K, (1979). TTre social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Weiss, R., & Miller, L. (1988). Response: Ideas, interests and the social science of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13, 484–494.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.