6
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Exploiting the Predictive Potential of Structuration Theory

Pages 313-322 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Bradley, P. H., Ham on, C. M., & Harris, A. M. (1976). Dissent in small groups, Journal of Communication, 26, 155–159.
  • Cartwright, C. (1971). Risk taking by individuals and groups: Ail assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 361–378.
  • Dion, K., Baron, R., & Milter, N. (1978), Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L, Berkowitz (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 227–229). New York: Academic Press.
  • Giddens, A, (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structitration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gouran, D.S. (1969). Variables related to consensus in group discussions of questions of policy. Speech Monographs, 36, 387–391.
  • Gouran, D. S. (1983). Communicative influences on inferential judgments in decision-making groups: A descriptive analysis. In D. Zarcfsky, M, O. Si I Sara, & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Argument in transition; Proceedings of the third summer conference on argumentation (pp. 667–684). Annondale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
  • Gouran, D, S. (1984), Communicative influences related to the Watergate coverup: The failure of collective judgment. Central States Speech Journal, 35, 260–268.
  • Hill, T. A. (1976). An experimental study of the relationship between opinionated leadership and small group consensus. Communication Monographs, 43, 246–257.
  • Hoffman, L. R. (1979). The group problem-solving process: Studies of a valence model. New York; Praeger.
  • Janis, 1. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Jarboe, S. (1988). A comparison of input-output, process-output, and input-process-output models of small group problem-solving effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 55, 121–142.
  • KelIermann, K., & Jarboe, S. (1987). Conservatism in judgment: Is the risky shifl-ee really risky, really? In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook ]0 (pp. 259–282). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McPhee, R. D., Poole, M. S., & Seibold, D. R. (1981). The valence model unveiled: A critique and reformulation. In M, Burgoon (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 259–277). New Brunswick, NJ; Transaction.
  • Meyers, R. A. (1988). Argument and group decision-making: An interactional test of persuasive arguments theory and an alternative structurational perspective (Doctoral disertation. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International 49,12A.
  • Moscovici, S., & Lecuyer, R. (1972). Studies of group decision I: Social space, patterns of communication and group consensus, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 221–244.
  • Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Paulos, J. A. (1989, January 1). The odds are you’re innumerate. New York Times Book Review, pp. 1, 16–17.
  • Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Cam* munication Monographs, 48, 1–24.
  • Poole, M. S. (1983a). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision-making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206–232.
  • Poole, M. S, (1983b). Decision development in small groups III: A multiple sequence model of group decision-mil king. Communication Monographs, 50, 321–341. Poole, M. S., McPhee, R. D., & Seibold, D. R. (1982). A comparison of normative and interactional explanations of group decision-mating: Social decision schemes versus valence distributions. Communication Monographs, 49, 1–19.
  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif M. & Nebergalt, R. E. (1965), Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: W. B, Saunders.
  • Stoner, J, A. F. (1961). A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk. Unpublished master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Vinokur, A., & Bumstein, E, (1974). Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group induced shifts: A group problem-solving approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 305–315.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Monograph Supplement, Pan 2), 1–27.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.