Textual Status, the Stigmatized Self, and Media Consumption

References

• Alexander, A., &. Fry, V. (1996, October). Interpreting viewing: Creating an acceptable context. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Culture and Communication, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. C. (1987). Reader-oriented criticism and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse: Television and contemporary criticism (pp. 74–111). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, t. (1985). Witching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen, (Original work published 1982)
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in culturalperspective (pp. 3–63). London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Attallah, P. (1984). The unwonhy discourse: Situation comedy In television. In W. Rowland, Jr., & B. Watkins (Eds.), Interpreting television; Current research perspectives (pp. 222–249). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baudritlard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign (C, Levin, Trans,), St. Louis: Telos.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, R., Achelpohl, C., & Akers, R. (1972). Correlates between observed behavior and questionnaire responses on television viewing. In E. Rubinstein, G. Comstock, & J, Murray (Eds,), Television and social behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 274–344), Washington, DC Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. (1982). Text and social process: The case of James Bond. Screen Education, 41, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1950). A. rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1979). Role of the reader: Eiplorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomingtcn; Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escarpit, P. (1977). The concept of “mass.” Journal of Communication, 27, 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1986). Television: Polysemy and popularity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3, 391–408.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, K., & Alexander, A. (1987, May). Trashing the tube. Paper presented at the annual meeting of [he International Communication Association, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Frentz, T. S., & Farrell, T, B, (1976). Language-action: A paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 333–349.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, V., Alexander, A., & Fry, D. (1989). The stigmatized self as media consumer. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 10, 333–344.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D., & Fry, V. (1986). A semiotic mode) for Lhe study of mass communication. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 443–462). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pry, D., & Fry, V. (1987). Some structural characteristics nf music television videos. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 52, 151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, V., & Fry, D. (1987), Reconceptualizing the encoding and decoding “moments” of the mas communication process. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20, 221–242.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1974), Popular culture and high culture: An analysis and evaluation of taste. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E_ (1974). Frame analysts: An essay on the organization of aperience. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E, (1986). Stigma: Notes on the management of foiled identity. New York: Simon & Sdilister. (Original work published 1963)
   Google Scholar
• Goldsen, R. K. (1975). Throwaway husbands, wives, lovers (soap opera relationships). Human Behavior, 4, 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. Id S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hawes, L. (1977, December). Conversation as sociality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Himmetweit, H., & Swift, B. (1976). Continuities and discontinuities in media usage and taste: A longitudinal study. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, B., & Tripp, D. (1986). Children and television. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, W, (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K_ B. (1987). Qualitative audience research: Ibwaid an integrative approadi to reception. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lemish, D. (1985). Soap opera viewing in college: A naturalistic inquiry, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 29, 275–293.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory. An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Motley, D. (1980). The nationwide audience. London: BFI.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1981). The national audience: A critical postscript. Screen Education, 39, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (1985). Soaps/sitcoms: Television genres as situated discourse. In J. Deeley (Ed.), Semiotics 1984 (pp. 137–146), New York: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, W. R. (1982), Television and American culture: The mass media and the pluralistic audience. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 471–487.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, H. (1984). On the dialogic aspects of mas communication. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 34–50.
   Google Scholar
• Northrop, F.S.C. (1959). The logic of the sciences and the humanities. New York: Meridian.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. E. (1987). Media consumption and girls who want to have fun. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 48, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Preteceille, E., & Ten-ail, J. (1985). Capitalism, consumption and needs (S. Matthews, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwetl.
   Google Scholar
• Railway, J. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Cohen, A, (1978). On the meaning and validity of television viewing. Human Communication Research, 4, 265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. (1997). The new validation of popular culture; Sense and sentimentality in acidemia, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 51–61
   Google Scholar
• Sigman, S. (1987). perspective on social communication. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1986). Television addiction. In I. Bryant & D. Zillman (Edfi.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 109–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. (1963). The people look at television. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences (E. A. Shils & H. N. Finch, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wren-Lewis, J. (1983). The encoding/decoding model: Criticisms add redevelopment for research on decoding. Media, Culture and Society, J, 197–198.
   Google Scholar