The Active Viewer and the Problem of Interpretation: Reconciling Traditional and Critical Research

References

• Adamson, W. L. (1980). Hegemony and revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. (1967). Sociology and psychology. New Left Review, 46, 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Adomo, T. W. (1968). Sociology and psychology II. New Left Review, 47, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, W. P. (1978). Social psychology as political economy. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Armistead, N. (Ed.). (1974). Reconstructing social psychology. Baltimore: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1982). Ideology and social psychology: Extremism, moderation and contradiction. New York: St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. (1976). Gramsci’s Marxism. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, M., Entman, R., & Steinman, C. (1990). The affirmative character of U.S. cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Cammett, I. M. (1967). Antonio Gramsci and the origins of Italian communism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, I. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Carragee, K. M. (1990). Interpretive media study and interpretive social science. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (1989). Defining the public sphere: Television and political discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (1990a). “Fictional” and “non-fictional” television celebrate Earth Day, or politics is comedy plus pretense. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (1990b). The method is the message: Focus groups as a means for uncovering the impact of television on political discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Delli-Carpini, M. X., Williams, B. A., & Press, A. L. (1989). Television and the socialization of political meaning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Tel Aviv.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, F. (1984). Critical mass communication research and media effects: The problem of the disappearing audience. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 219–232.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1986). Television and popular culture: Reflections on British and Australian critical practice. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3, 200–216.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1989a). Reading the popular. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1989b). Understanding popular culture. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1990). Ethnosemiotics: Some personal and theoretical reflections. Cultural Studies, 4(1), 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 26, 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1978). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. Theory and Society, 6, 205–254.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1983). Inside prime lime. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). London: LawrenceSl Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mug ging, the state, and low and order. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Harre, T., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behavior. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, N. (1985). The I. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katznelson, 1. (1981), City trenches: Urban politics and the patterning of class in the U.S. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, K. S. (Ed.). (1980). Social psychology: Crisis or failure. Monmouth, OR: Institute for Theoretical History.
   Google Scholar
• Lembo, R., & Tucker, K. H., Jr. (1990). Culture, television, and opposition: Rethinking cultural studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1987a). The implicit representation of characters in Dallas: A multidimensional scaling approach. Human Communication Research, 13, 399–420.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1987b). The representation of personal relationships in television drama: Realism, convention and morality. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for relationships: Explanation, representation and knowledge (pp. 248–268). London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1988). Why people watch soap opera: An analysis of the explanations of British viewers. European Journal of Communications, 3, 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1989). Interpretive viewers and structured programs: The implicit representation of soap opera characters. Communication Research, 16, 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Making sense of television: The psychology of audience interpretation. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (1978a). Jackie: An ideology of adolescent femininity. Birmingham, England: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (1978b). Working-class girls and the culture of femininity. In Women’s Studies Group (Ed.), Women lake issue (pp. 96–108). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. (1984). Dance and social fantasy. In A. McRobbie & M. Nava (Eds.), Gender and generation (pp. 130–223). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1980). The “Nationwide” audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, D. (1981). The “Nationwide” audience: A critical postscript. Screen Education, 39, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, H. (Ed.). (1979). Television: The critical view (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Press, A. L. (1989). Class and gender in the hegemonic process: Class differences in women’s perceptions of realism and identification with television characters. Media, Culture and Society, 11, 229–252.
   Google Scholar
• Press, A. L. (1990). Class, gender, and the female viewer: Women’s responses to Dynasty. In M. E. Brown (Ed.), Television and women’s culture (pp. 158–182). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Press, A. L. (1991). Women watching television: Gender, class, and generation in the American television experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Press, A. L., & Cole, E. (1990, August). Mass media and moral discourse: The impact of television on modes of reasoning about abortion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Radway, J. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., & Palmgreen, P. (Eds.). (1985). Media gratifications research: Current perspectives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L. (1981). Paradigms in transition: The methodology of social inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, K. C. (1987). The convergence of antagonistic traditions? The case of audience research. European Journal of Communication, 2, 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. (1964). The eclipse of community: Some glances at the education of a sociologist. In A. Vidich, J. Bensman, & M. Stein (Eds.), Reflections on community power (pp. 215–216). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, P. (1983). Critical social psychology. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1959). Culture and society 1780–1950. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (1978). Profane culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar