210
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Empowerment of Feminist Scholarship in Public Relations and the Building of a Feminist Paradigm

Pages 221-255 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Albrecht, T. L. (1988). Communication and personal control in empowering organizations. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 11 (pp. 380–390). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  • Aldoory, L. (1998). The language of leadership for female public relations professionals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 73–101.
  • Aldoory, L. (2001a). Making health messages meaningful for women: Factors that influence involvement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 163–185.
  • Aldoory, L. (2001b). The standard White woman in public relations. In E. L. Toth & L. Aldoory (Eds.), The gender challenge to media: Diverse voices from the field (pp. 105–149). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Aldoory, L., & Toth, E. L. (2002). Gender discrepancies in a gendered profession: A developing theory for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 103–126.
  • Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: BasicBooks.
  • Berkowitz, D., & Turnmire, K. (1994). Community relations and issues management: An issue orientation approach to segmenting publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 105–123.
  • Bovet, S. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: What’s happening and how to deal with it. Public Relations Journal, 49, 26–29.
  • Broom, G. M. (1982). A comparison of sex roles in public relations. Public Relations Review, 8, 17–22.
  • Broom, G. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1986). Advancement for public relations role models. Public Relations Review, 12, 37–56.
  • Broom, G. M., & Smith, G. D. (1979). Testing practitioner’s impact on clients. Public Relations Review, 5, 22–28.
  • Cameron, G. T. (1992). Memory for investor relations messages: An information-processing study of Grunig’s situational theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 45–60.
  • Chaffee, S., & Roser, C. (1986). Involvement and the consistency of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Communication Research, 13, 373–399.
  • Chiles, A. M., & Zorn, T. E. (1995). Empowerment in organizations: Employees’ perceptions of the influences on empowerment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 1–25.
  • Choi, Y., & Hon, L. C. (2002). The influence of gender composition in powerful positions on public relations practitioners’ gender-related perceptions. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 229–263.
  • Cirksena, K. (1996). Feminism after ferment: Ten years of gendered scholarship in communications. In D. Allen, R. R. Rush, & S. J. Kaufman (Eds.), Women transforming communications: Global intersections (pp. 153–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cline, C. G., & Toth, E. L. (1993). Re-visioning women in public relations: Practitioner and feminist perspectives. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication (2nd ed., pp. 183–198). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Cline, C. G., Toth, E. L., Turk, J. V., Walters, L. M., Johnson, N., & Smith, H. (1986). The velvet ghetto: The impact of the increasing percentage of women in public relations and business communication. San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  • Conrad, C. (1985). Strategic organizational communication: Cultures, situations, and adaptation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Cosgrove, S. (2002). Levels of empowerment: Marketers and microenterprise-lending NGOs in Apopa and Nejapa, El Salvador. Latin American Perspectives, 29(5), 48–65.
  • Creedon, P. J. (1989a). Public relations history misses “her story.” Journalism Educator, 44, 26–30.
  • Creedon, P. J. (1989b, June). Teaching “feminization” by reframing the perspective. Teaching Public Relations, 13, 1–2.
  • Creedon, P. J. (1991). Public relations and “women’s work”: Toward a feminist analysis of public relations roles. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 67–84.
  • Creedon, P. J. (1993). Acknowledging the infrasystem: A critical feminist analysis of systems theory. Public Relations Review, 19, 157–166.
  • Creedon, P. J. (2001, August). From making PR macho to making PR feminist: The battle over values in a female-dominated field. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
  • Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (2000). Effective public relations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • Deatherage, C. P., & Hazleton, V., Jr. (1998). Effects of organizational worldviews on the practice of public relations: A test of the theory of public relations excellence. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 57–71.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • DeRosa, D., & Wilcox, D. L. (1989). Gaps are narrowing between female and male students. Public Relations Review, 15, 80–89.
  • Devault, M. L. (1996). Talking back to sociology: Distinctive contributions of feminist methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 29–50.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1983, November). Toward a reconciliation of “role conflict” in public relations research. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Communication Educators Conference, Ful-lerton, CA.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1984). Program evaluation and roles of practitioners. Public Relations Review, 10, 13–21.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1987, May). Gender, environmental scanning, and participation in management decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1988). Breaking public relations’ glass ceiling. Public Relations Review, 14, 6–13.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1992). The organizational roles of communications and public relations practitioners. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 327–355). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dozier, D. M. (1995). Evolution of the manager role in public relations practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 3–26.
  • Dozier, D. M., & Broom, G. M. (1995). Evolution of the manager’s role in public relations practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 3–26.
  • Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1995). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ekachai, D., & Komolsevin, R. (1996). Public relations in Thailand: Its functions and practitioners’ roles. In H. M. Culbertson & N. Chen (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 155–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Elliott, W. R., Mahmoud, M. A., Sothirajah, J., & Camphor, T. (1991, August). Mass media and the third AIDS epidemic: AIDS knowledge and acceptance in a rural area. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Boston, MA.
  • Farmer, B., & Waugh, L. (1999). Gender differences in public relations students’ career attitudes: A benchmark study. Public Relations Review, 25, 235–237.
  • Ferguson, M. A. (1979). Role norms, implicit relationship attributions, and organizational communication: A study of public relations practitioners. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Flora, J. A., & Maibach, E. W. (1990). Cognitive responses to AIDS information: The effects of issue involvement and message appeal. Communication Research, 17, 759–774.
  • Foss, K. A., & Foss, S. K. (1983). The status of research on women and communication. Communication Quarterly, 31, 195–204.
  • Foos, K. A., & Foss, S. K. (1989). Incorporating the feminist perspective in communication scholarship: Aresearch commentary. In K. Carter & C. Spitzack (Eds.) Doing research on women’s communication: Perspectives on theory and method (pp.65–91). Norwod, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Foss, K. A., Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L. (1999). Feminist rhetorical theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Foss, S. K., & Ray, E. B. (1996). Introduction: Theorizing communication from marginalized perspectives. Communication Studies, 47, 253–256.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
  • Gower, K. (2000, October). Rediscovering women in public relations: Public relations women in the Public Relations Journal from 1945 through 1972. Paper presented to the American Journalism Historians Association, Pittsburg, PA.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1978). Defining publics in public relations: The case of a suburban hospital. Journalism
  • Quarterly, 55, 109–118.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1983). Communication behaviors and attitudes of environmental publics: Two studies. Journalism Monographs, 81.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1984). Organizations, environments, and models of public relations. Public Relations Research and Education, 1, 6–29.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1987, May). When active publics become activists: Extending a situational theory of publics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1989). Sierra club study shows who become activists. Public Relations Review, 15, 3–24.
  • Grunig, J. E. (Ed.). (1992a). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1992b, November). Generic and specific concepts of multi-cultural public relations. Paper presented to the Association for the Advancement of Policy, Research, and Development in the Third World, Orlando, FL.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1993). Implications of public relations for other domains of communication. Journal of Communication, 43, 164–173.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Childers, L. (1988, July). Reconstruction of a situational theory of communication: Internal and external concepts as identifiers of publics for AIDS. Paper presented to Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
  • Grunig, J. E., Clifford, L., Richburg, S. J., & White, T. J. (1988). Communication by agricultural publics: Internal and external orientations. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 26–38.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (1992). Models of public relations and communication. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 285–325). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Ipes, D. A. (1983). The anatomy of a campaign against drunk driving. Public Relations Review, 36–52.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Repper, F. C. (1992). Strategic management, publics, and issues. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 117–157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Stamm, K. R. (1979). Communication situations and cognitive strategies in resolving environmental issues: A second study. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 715–726.
  • Grunig, J. E., & White, J. (1992). The effect of worldviews on public relations theory and practice. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1988). A research agenda for women in public relations. Public Relations Review, 14, 48–57.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1989a). Sex discrimination in promotion and tenure in journalism education. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 93–100.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1989b, August). Toward a feminist transformation of public relations education and practice. Paper presented to the Public Relations Division, Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1991). Court-ordered relief from sex discrimination in the foreign service: Implications for women working in development communication. Public Relations Research Annual, 3, 85–113.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1993). The “glass ceiling” effect on mass communications students. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication (2nd ed., pp. 276–300). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1995). The consequences of culture for public relations: The case of women in the foreign service. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 139–161.
  • Grunig, L. A. (2000). A feminist phase analysis of research on women in postmodern public relations. In D. Moss, D. Vercic, & G. Warnaby (Eds.), Perspectives on public relations research (pp. 87120). London: Routledge.
  • Grunig, L. A., Toth, E. L., & Hon, L. C. (2000). Feminist values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 49–68.
  • Grunig, L. A., Toth, E. L., & Hon, L. C. (2001). Women in public relations. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Hamilton, P. K. (1989). Application of a generalized persuasion model to public relations research. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton, Jr. (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 309–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Heath, R. L., & Douglas, W. (1990). Involvement: A key variable in people’s reaction to public policy issues. In J.E. Grunig & L.A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (Vol. 2, pp. 93–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Heath, R. L., & Douglas, W. (1991). Effects of involvement on reactions to sources of messages and to message clusters. In J. E. Grunig & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (Vol. 3, pp. 179–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Heath, R. L., Liao, S. H., & Douglas, W. (1995). Effects of perceived economic harms and benefits on issue involvement, use of information sources, and actions: A study in risk communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 89–109.
  • Henry, S. (1988, July). In her own name? Public relations pioneer Doris Fleischman Bernays. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
  • Henry, S. (1996, August). The retiring feminist: Doris E. Fleischman and Doris Fleischman Bernays. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
  • Hon, L. C. (1995). Toward a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 27–88.
  • Hon, L. C., Grunig, L. A., & Dozier, D. M. (1992). Women in public relations: Problems and opportunities. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 419–438). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
  • Houston, M. (1992). The politics of difference: Race, class, and women’s communication. In L. Rakow (Ed.), Women making meaning (pp. 45–59). New York: Routledge.
  • Jacobson, H. K., & Tortorello, N. J. (1992). PRJ’s seventh annual salary survey. Public Relations Journal, 48, 9–21, 26–30.
  • Jensen, A. (2002). Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo. Feminist Economics, 8, 146–148.
  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
  • Kendall, R. (1996). Public relations campaign strategies (2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Kern-Foxworth, M. (1989a). An assessment of minority female roles and status in public relations: Trying to unlock the acrylic vault and assimilate into the velvet ghetto. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 241–286). San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  • Kern-Foxworth, M. (1989b). Public relations books fail to show women in context. Journalism Educator, 44, 31–36.
  • Kern-Foxworth, M. (1989c). Status and roles of minority public relations practitioners. Public Relations Review, 5, 14–22.
  • Kern-Foxworth, M., Gandy, O., Hines, B., & Miller, D. A. (1994). Assessing the managerial roles of Black female public relations practitioners using individual and organizational discriminants. Journal of Black Studies, 24, 416–434.
  • Kucera, M. (1994). Doing it all: Why women public relations managers tend to fulfill both the managerial and technical roles. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
  • Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lamme, M. O. (1999, October). Furious desires and victorious careers: Doris E. Fleischman, counsel on public relations and advocate for working women. Paper presented to the American Journalism Historians Association, Portland, OR.
  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Lauzen, M. (1992). Effects of gender on professional encroachment in public relations. Journalism
  • Quarterly, 69, 173–180.
  • Lesly, P. (1988). Public relations numbers are up but stature down. Public Relations Review, 14, 3–7.
  • Leyland, A. (2000, March 27). Competition drives PR salaries up 8% in ‘99. PR Week, p. 1.
  • Major, A. M. (1993). Environmental concern and situational communication theory: Implications for communicating with environmental publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5, 251–268.
  • Mathews, W. (1988). Women in PR: Progression or retrogression? Public Relations Review, 14, 24–28.
  • McElreath, M. (1993). Managing systematic and ethical public relations. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
  • Miller, K. S. (1997). Woman, man, lady, horse: Jane Stewart, public relations executive. Public Relations Review, 23, 249–269.
  • Murphy, P. (1991). The limits of symmetry: A game theory approach to symmetric and asymmetric public relations. In J. E. Grunig & L. A. Grunig (Eds.), Public relations research annual (Vol. 3, pp. 115–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Oakley, A. (2000). Experiments in knowing: Gender and method in the social sciences. New York: New Press.
  • O’Neil, J. W. (1999, August). The strategist: Positioning women as “outsiders within” the public relations profession. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
  • Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Ghanekar, D. V., & Papa, W. H. (2000). Organizing for social change through cooperative action: The [dis]empowering dimensions of women’s communication. Communication Theory, 10, 90–123.
  • Patai, D., & Koertge, N. (1994). Professing feminism. New York: BasicBooks.
  • Pincus, J. D., & Rayfield, R. E. (1989). Organizational communication and job satisfaction: A metaresearch perspective. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 183–208). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Rakow, L. F. (1989). From the feminization of public relations to the promise of feminism. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 287–298). San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  • Rakow, L. F. (1993a). A bridge to the future: How to get there from here through curriculum reform. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication (2nd ed., pp. 363–374). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Rakow, L. F. (1993b). The curriculum is the future. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 154–162.
  • Reagan, J., Anderson, R., Sumner, J., & Hill, S. (1990). A factor analysis of Broom and Smith’s public relations roles scale. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 180.
  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Roser, C., & Thompson, M. (1995). Fear appeals and the formation of active publics. Journal of Communication, 45, 103–121.
  • Rush, R. R., & Grubb-Swetnam, A. (1996). Feminist approaches. In M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 497–518)Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Salary survey of public relations professionals. (1995). New York: Simmons Market Research Bureau for the Public Relations Society of America.
  • Scrimger, J. (1989). Women communicators in Canada: A case for optimism. In E. L. Toth & C. G. Cline (Eds.), Beyond the velvet ghetto (pp. 219–240). San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  • Seideman, T., & Leyland, A. (2000, March 27). PR Week salary survey report 2000. PR Week, pp. 2325, 27, 29, 31, 33, 35.
  • Selnow, G. W., & Wilson, S. (1985). Sex roles and job satisfaction in public relations. Public Relations Review, 11, 38–47.
  • Serini, S. A., Toth, E., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. (1996). Watch for falling glass . . . women, men, and job satisfaction in public relations: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9, 99–118.
  • Serini, S. A., Toth, E., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. (1998). Power, gender, and public relations: Sexual harassment as a threat to the practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 193–218.
  • Sha, B. L. (1996, May). Does feminization of the field make public relations more ethical? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Slater, M. D., Chipman, H., Auld, G., Keefe, T., & Kendall, P. (1992). Information processing and situational theory: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4, 189–203.
  • Steeves, H. L. (2001). Liberation, feminism, and development communication. Communication Theory, 11, 397–414.
  • Tam, S. Y., Dozier, D. M., Lauzen, M. M., & Real, M. R. (1995). The impact of superior-subordinate gender on the career advancement of public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 7, 259–272.
  • Tetreault, M. K. T. (1985). Feminist phase theory. Journal of Higher Education, 56, 363–384.
  • Tillery-Larkin, R. (2000). Surveying perceived pigeonholing among African American public relations professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
  • Toth, E. L. (1988). Making peace with gender issues in public relations. Public Relations Review, 14, 36–47.
  • Toth, E. L. (1989). Whose freedom and equity in public relations? The gender balance argument. Mass Comm Review, 16, 70–76.
  • Toth, E. L. (2001). How feminist theory advanced the practice of public relations. In R. L. Heath & G. Vasquez (Eds.), Handbook of Public Relations (pp. 237–246). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Toth, E. L., & Aldoory, L. (2001, April). Year 2000 gender study: Report of the committee on work, life, and gender issues. Presentation to the Public Relations Society of America National Board, New York.
  • Toth, E. L., & Cline, C. G. (Eds.). (1989). Beyond the velvet ghetto. San Francisco: International Association of Business Communicators.
  • Toth, E. L., & Cline, C. G. (1991). Public relations practitioner attitudes toward gender issues: A benchmark study. Public Relations Review, 17, 161–174.
  • Toth, E. L., & Grunig, L. A. (1993). The missing story of women in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5, 153–175.
  • Toth, E. L., Serini, S. A., Wright, D. K., & Emig, A. G. (1998). Trends in public relations roles: 19901995. Public Relations Review, 24, 145–163.
  • Trujillo, N., & Toth, E. L. (1987). Organizational perspectives for public relations research and practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 199–281.
  • Van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Vasquez, G. M. (1993). A homo narrans paradigm for public relations: Combining Bormann’s symbolic convergence theory and Grunig’s situational theory of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5, 201–216.
  • Vasquez, G. M., & Taylor, M. (2001). Public relations: An emerging social science enters the new millennium. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 319–342). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., Cameron, G. T., Sweep, D. D. (1994). Women in higher education PR: An inkling of change? Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 125–140.
  • Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., Sallot, L., & Cameron, G. T. (1996). Justice and gender: An instrumental and symbolic explication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 107–121.
  • Wetherell, B. L. (1989). The effect of gender, masculinity, and femininity on the practice and preference for the models of public relations. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
  • Wilson, S. R., & Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 13 (pp. 374–406). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Wootton, B. H. (1997, April). Gender differences in occupational employment. Monthly Labor Review, 120, 15–24.
  • Wright, D. K., Grunig, L. A., Springston, J. K., & Toth, E. L. (1991). Under the glass ceiling: An analysis of gender issues in American public relations. New York: Public Relations Society of America.
  • Wright, D. K., & Haynes, J. R. (1999, August). An innovative look at gender in public relations: Examining relationships between gender and source credibility in employee communication messages and media. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, New Orleans, LA.
  • Wrigley, B. J. (2002). Glass ceiling? What glass ceiling? A qualitative study of how women view the glass ceiling in public relations and communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 27–55.
  • Zerbinos, E., & Clanton, G. A. (1993). Minority practitioners: Career influences, job satisfaction, and discrimination. Public Relations Review, 19, 75–91.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.