282
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Part II: Reappraising Communication Frameworks, Models, Methods, and Paradigms

A Multitheoretical, Multilevel, Multidimensional Network Model of the Media System: Production, Content, and Audiences

&
Pages 67-93 | Published online: 18 May 2016

References

  • Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005, August). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U. S. election: Divided they blog. Paper presented at the 3rd International Workshop on Link discovery, Chicago, IL.
  • Aldrich, H., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ali-Hasan, N., & Adamic, L. (2007, March). Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, Colorado.
  • Allern, S. (2002). Journalistic and commercial news values. News organizations as patrons of an institution and market actors. Nordicom Review, 23(1/2), 137–152.
  • Anderson, C. W. (2010). Journalistic networks and the diffusion of local news: The brief, happy news Life of the “Francisville Four.” Political Communication, 27(3), 289–309. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.496710
  • Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. F. (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  • Arsenault, A., & Castells, M. (2008a). Switching power: Rupert Murdoch and the global business of media politics: A sociological analysis. International Sociology, 23(4), 488. doi:10.1177/0268580908090725
  • Arsenault, A., & Castells, M. (2008b). The structure and dynamics of global multimedia Business Networks. International Journal of Communication, 2, 707–748
  • Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (2002). Interorganizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 520–540). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The Origins of Individual Media-System Dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12(4), 485. doi:10.1177/009365085012004003
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1(1), 5–40. doi:10.1080/15205436.1998.9676398
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3(1), 3. doi:10.1177/009365027600300101
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Kim, Y. C., & Matei, S. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392–428. doi:10.1177/009365001028004003
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Rokeach, M., & Grube, J. W. (1984). The great American values test: Influencing behavior and belief through television. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Barnett, G. A., Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2011). Uncovering transnational hyperlink patterns and web-mediated contents: A new approach based on cracking. com domain. Social Science Computer Review, 29(3), 369–384. doi:10.1177/0894439310382519
  • Barnett, G. A., Jacobson, T. L., Choi, Y., & Sun-Miller, S. L. (1996). An examination of the international telecommunication network. Journal of International Communication, 3(2), 19–43. doi:10.1080/13216597.1996.9751833
  • Baum, J. A. C. (Ed.). (2002). The Blackwell companion to organizations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley. Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at work: Imitation in an age of information abundance.
  • Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of management, 29(6), 991. doi:10.1016/S0149–2063_03_00087–4
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On Network Theory. Organization Science, (5), 1168–1180. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 525(5916), 892. doi:10.1126/science.1165821
  • Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39–79.
  • Cairncross, F. (1997). The death of distance: how the communications revolution will change our lives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution. General Systems, 14(1), 69–85.
  • Cardoso, G. (2006). The media in the network society: Browsing, news, filters and citizenship. Liboa, Portugal: CIES-ISCTE.
  • Carley, K. M. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological methodology, 75–126. doi:10.2307/271007
  • Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (Eds.). (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277. doi:10.1037/h0046049
  • Castells, M. (2005). Informationalism, networks, and the network society: A theoretical blueprint. In M. Castells (Ed.), The network society: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–45). London, England:
  • Edward Elgar. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Chang, T. (1998). All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25(5), 528.
  • Chin, A., & Chignell, M. (2006). A social hypertext model for finding community in blogs. Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 11–22). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Chon, B. S., Choi, J. H., Barnett, G. A., Danowski, J. A., & Joo, S. H. (2003). A structural analysis of media convergence: Cross-industry mergers and acquisitions in the information industries. The Journal of Media Economics, 16(3), 141–157. doi:10.1207/S15327736ME1603_1
  • Cointet, J. P., Faure, E., & Roth, C. (2007. March). Intertemporal topic correlations in online bedia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, Colorado.
  • Cointet, J. P., & Roth, C. (2009, August). Socio-semantic dynamics in a blog network. Paper presented at the IEEE SocialCom 09 International Conference Social Computing, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Coleman, R., & McCombs, M. (2007). The young and agendaless? Exploring age-related differences in agenda setting on the youngest generation, baby boomers, and the civic generation. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 495. doi:10.1177/107769900708400306
  • Contractor, N., Monge, P., & Leonardi, P. (2011). Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682–720.
  • Danowski, J. A., & Cepela, N. T. (2009). Automatic mapping of social networks of actors from text corpora: Time series analysis. Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12, 137–142. doi:10.1109/AS0NAM.2009.71
  • Danowski, J. A., & Choi, J. H. (1999). Convergence in the information industries: Telecommunications, broadcasting, and data processing—1981–1996. In H. Sawhney & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 15, pp. 125–150). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
  • Diesner, J., & Carley, K. M. (2005). Revealing social structure from texts: Meta-matrix text analysis as a novel method for network text analysis. In V. K. Narayanan & D. J. Armstrong (Eds.), Causal mapping for research in information yechnology (pp. 81–108). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Dimmick, J. W. (2003). Media competition and coexistence: The theory of the niche. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Doerfel, M. L. (1998). What constitutes semantic network analysis? A comparison of research and methodologies. Connections, 21(2), 16–26.
  • Doerfel, M. L., & Barnett, G. A. (1999). A semantic network analysis of the International Communication Association. Human Communication Research, 25(4), 589–603. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2958.1999.tb00463.x
  • Drezner, D., & Farrell, H. (2004). Web of influence. Foreign Policy, 32–41. doi:10.2307/4152942
  • Dunaway, J. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. The Journal of Politics, 70(04), 1193–1202. doi:10.1017/S0022381608081140
  • Duplessis, R., & Li, X. (2004, May). Cross-media ownership and its effect on technological convergence of online news content — A content analysis of 100 Internet newspapers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), New Orleans, LA.
  • Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, srowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, (1), 31–41. doi:10.2307/2089716
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.1993.tb01304.x
  • Ferdig, R. E., & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere’. Technological Horizons In Education Journal, 31(7), 12–16.
  • Fowler, J. H., Heaney, M. T., Nickerson, D. W., Padgett, J. F., & Sinclair, B. (2011). Causality in political networks. American Politics Research, 39(2), 437. doi:10.1177/1532673X10396310
  • Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.
  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989) . Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear oower: A constructionist approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gruhl, D., Guha, R., Liben-Nowell, D., & Tomkins, A. (2004, May). Information diffusion through blogspace. Paper presented at the 13th international conference on World Wide Web New York, NY.
  • Gulati, R., Dialdin, D. A., & Wang, L. (2002). Organizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 281–303). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (2011, May). Network agenda setting: A third level of media effects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA), Boston, MA.
  • Hampton, K., Goulet, L., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 1, 2011, from http:www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx
  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California.
  • Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of psychology, 21(1), 112. doi:10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
  • Hellsten, I., Dawson, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Implicit media frames: Automated analysis of public debate on artificial sweeteners. Public Understanding of Science, 19(5), 590–608. doi:10.1177/0963662509343136
  • Huber, S. (2006). Media markets in Central and Eastern Europe. A network analytic investigation. In S. Huber (Ed.), Media markets in Central and Eastern Europe. An analysis on media ownership in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia (pp. 9–48). London, England; LIT Verlag.
  • Java, A. (2006). Tracking influence and opinions in social media (doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland Baltimore County.
  • Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61–78. doi:10.1086/266687
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi:10.1086/268109
  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
  • Kelly, J. (2008). Pride of place: Mainstream media and the networked public sphere Media Re:public. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kim, L. (2011). Media framing of stem cell research: a cross-national analysis of political representation of science between the UK and South Korea. Journal of Science Communication, 10 (3), 1–16.
  • Kim, Y. C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16(2), 173. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.2006.00267.x
  • Kleinberg, J. (2008). The convergence of social and technological networks. Communications of the ACM, 51, 66–72. doi:10.1145/1400214.1400232
  • Kleinberg, J., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., & Tomkins, A. (1999). The web as a graph: Measurements, models, and methods. Computing and Combinatorics, 1–17.
  • Koenig, T. (2004, July). On frames and framing: Anti-Semitism as free speech. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Media and Communication Research (IAMCR), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2009, June). Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. Paper presented at the The 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France.
  • Leskovec, J., McGlohon, M., Faloutsos, C., Glance, N., & Hurst, M. (2007, April). Cascading behavior in large blog graphs: Patterns and a model. Paper presented at the Society of Applied and Industrial Mathematics: Data Mining, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Lewis, T. G. (2009). Network Science: Theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2010). Social network analysis: An introduction. In P. Car-rington & J. Scott (Eds.), Handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Marsden, P. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 8–30). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties: Connections in the everyday lives of seven ethnic neighborhoods. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 550. doi:10.1177/0002764201045003012
  • Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2002). Belonging in geographic, ethnic, and Internet spaces. In B. Wellman & C. A. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 404–427). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • McChesney, R. W. (2000). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: US communication politics in the 21st century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  • McManus, J. H. (2008). The commercialization of news. In W.-J. K. & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp. 218–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homoph-ily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  • Meraz, S. M. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682–707. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2009.01458.x
  • Mika, P. (2007). Social networks and the semantic web. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Monge, P., Heiss, B. M., & Margolin, D. B. (2008). Communication network evolution in organizational communities. Communication Theory, 18(4), 449–477. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.2008.00330.x
  • Monge, P., & Poole, M. S. (2008). The evolution of organizational communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 679–692. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2008.00408.x
  • Murphy, P. (2001). Framing the nicotine debate: A cultural approach to risk. Health Communication, 13(2), 119–140. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1302_1
  • Murphy, P., & Maynard, M. (2000). Framing the genetic testing issue. Science Communication, 22(2), 133–153. doi:10.1177/1075547000022002002
  • Nahon, K., & Hemsley, J. (in press). Political blogs and content: Homophily in the guise of cross-linking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
  • Nakajima, S., Tatemura, J., Hara, Y., Tanaka, K., & Uemura, S. (2006). Identifying agitators as important blogger based on analyzing blog threads. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3841, 285–296. New York Times. (2009). Linked open data. Retrieved April 12, 2010, from data. nytimes.com
  • O’Hara, K., Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W., & Shadbolt, N. (2010). Use of the semantic web in e-research. In W. H. Dutton & P. W. Jeffreys (Eds.), World wide research: Reshaping the sciences and humanities (pp. 130). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Ognyanova, K. (2010). News ties: A network study of media-level agenda-setting. Journal of Social Structure, JoSS Visualization Symposium 2010, 11. Retrieved from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/issues/vizsymposium.html
  • Oh, J., Susarla, A., & Tan, Y. (2008). Examining the diffusion of user-generated content in online social networks. SSRN. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1182631
  • Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Park, H. W., Barnett, G. A., & Chung, C. J. (2011). Structural changes in the 2003–2009 global hyperlink network. Global networks, 11(4), 522–542. doi:10.1111/j.1471–0374.2011.00336.x
  • Park, H. W., Barnett, G. A., & Nam, I. Y. (2002). Hyperlink-affiliation network structure of top web sites: Examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(7), 592–601. doi:10.1002/asi.10072
  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2003.tb00223.x
  • Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2008). Link analysis: Hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ web sites in South Korea. Quality & Quantity, 42(5), 687-697. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9109-z
  • Pew Project For Excellence in Journalism. (2010). The state of the news media 2010: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Pew Project For Excellence in Journalism. (2011). The state of the news media 2011: An annual report on American journalism. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Preciado, P., Snijders, T. A. B., Burk, W. J., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2011). Does proximity matter? Distance dependence of adolescent friendships. Social Networks. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.01.002
  • Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer: How internet and cell phone users have turned news into a social experience. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 1, 2011, from http://www.journalism.org/analysis_report/understanding_participatory_news_consumer
  • Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2006.00334.x
  • Rice, R. E., & Danowski, J. A. (1993). Is it really just like a fancy answering machine? Comparing semantic networks of different types of voice mail users. Journal of Business Communication, 30(4), 369. doi:10.1177/002194369303000401
  • Rogers, E. M., Dearing, J. W., & Bregman, D. (1993). The anatomy of agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 68–84. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01263.x
  • Samkin, G., & Schneider, A. (2008). Adding scientific rigour to qualitative data analysis: an illustrative example. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 5(3), 207–238. doi:10.1108/11766090810910227
  • Schweitzer, F., Fagiolo, G., Sornette, D., Vega-Redondo, F., Vespignani, A., & White, D. R. (2009). Economic networks: The new challenges. Science, 325(5939), 422. doi:10.1126/science.1173644
  • Scott, P. (2005). Knowledge workers: Social, task and semantic network analysis. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(3), 257–277.
  • Shalizi, C. R., & Thomas, A. C. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods & Research 40(2), 211–239. doi:10.1177/0049124111404820
  • Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795–809. doi:10.1093/joc/55.4.795
  • Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006
  • Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative Web research for the social sciences (Vol. 1). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
  • Thelwall, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2004). Finding similar academic web sites with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks. Information Processing & Management, 40(3), 515–526. doi:10.1016/S0306–4573(03)00042–6
  • Tian, Y., & Stewart, C. (2005). Framing the SARS crisis: A computer-assisted text analysis of CNN and BBC online news reports of SARS. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(3), 289–301. doi:10.1080/01292980500261605
  • Tremayne, M. (2006). Applying network theory to the use of external links on news web sites. In X. Li (Ed.), Internet newspapers: The making of a mainstream medium (pp. 49–64). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Turow, J., & Tsui, L. (Eds.). (2008). The hyperlinked society: Questioning connections in the digital age. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. doi:10.2307/2393808
  • Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18 (1), 69–89. doi:10.1016/0378–8733(95)00256–1
  • Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Ruigrok, N. (2008). Parsing, semantic networks, and political authority using syntactic analysis to extract semantic relations from dutch newspaper articles. Political Analysis, 16(4), 428–446. doi:10.1093/pan/mpn006
  • Vlieger, E., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Content analysis and the measurement of meaning: The visualization of frames in collections of messages. The Public Journal of Semiotics, 1(28), 28–50
  • Ward, I., Cahill, J., & Petelin, R. (2007). Old and new media: Blogs in the third age of political communication. Australian Journal of Communication, 34(3), 1–21.
  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Watts, D. J. (2004). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342
  • Weber, M. (2012). Newspapers and the long-term implications of hyperlink-ing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(2), 187–201. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2011.01563.x
  • Weber, M., & Monge, P. (2011). The flow of digital news in a network of authorities, hubs and providers. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1062–1081. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2011.01596.x
  • Zuccala, A. (2006). Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as web colink analysis is to…? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1487–1502. doi:10.1002/asi.20468

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.