Organizational Space and Place beyond Container or Construction: Exploring Workspace in the Communicative Constitution of Organizations

References

• Adams, P. C., & Jansson, A. (2012). Communication geography: A bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory, 22, 299–318. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (2011). Space and place. In J. Agnew & D. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of geographical knowledge (pp. 316–330). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, S. and Valentine, G. (Eds.). (2006). Approaches to human geography. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. J., & Fustfeld, A. R. (1975). Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R&D Management, 5, 153–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1975.tb01230.x
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Wylie, J. (2009). On geography and materiality. Environment and Planning A, 41, 318–335. doi:10.1068/a3940
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: “Materializing” organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 1–64. doi:10.1080/19416520903047186
   Google Scholar
• Ball, K., & Wilson, D. C. (2000). Power, control and computer-based performance monitoring: Repertoires, resistance and subjectivities. Organization Studies, 21, 539–565. doi:10.1177/0170840600213003
   Google Scholar
• Barney, T. (2014). Diagnosing the third world: The “map doctor” and the spatialized discourses of disease and development in the Cold War. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100, 1–30. doi:10.1080/00335630.2014.887215
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E., & Forbes, L. C. (1994). Office folklore in the academic paperwork empire: The interstitial space of gendered (con)texts. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 181–196. doi:10.1080/10462939409366082
   Google Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Michels, C. (2011). The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university. Management Learning, 42, 521–536. doi:10.1177/1350507611400001
   Google Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19, 45–61. doi:10.1177/1350508411401946
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., Chugh, J. S., & Kline, T. (2002). Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal study. Environment and Behavior, 34, 279–299. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003001
   Google Scholar
• Brookes, M. J., & Kaplan, A. (1972). The office environment: Space planning and affective behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14, 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 577–594. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.17293710
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92, 141. Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. A., & Modaff, D. P. (2008). When work is home: Agency, structure, and contradictions. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 232–257. doi:10.1177/0893318908323151
   Google Scholar
• Byron, K., & Laurence, G. A. (2015). Diplomas, photos, & tchotchkes as symbolic selfrepresentations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 298–323. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0932
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, G. (2002). Aesthetics, morality and power: Design as espoused freedom and implicit control. Human Relations, 55, 799–820. doi:10.1177/0018726702055007541
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, G., McInnes, P., & Roberts, P. (2003). Organizational space/time: From imperfect panoptical to heterotopian understanding. Ephemera, 3, 126–139.
   Google Scholar
• Cantrill, J. G. (2012). Amplifiers on the commons: Using indicators to foster place-based sustainability initiatives. Environmental Communication, 6, 5–22. doi:10.1080/17524032.2011.640703
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1999). Grassrooting the space of flows. Urban Geography, 20, 294–302. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. K., Beckman, S. L., & Lawrence, P. G. (2007). Workplace design: A new managerial imperative. California Management Review, 49, 6–23. doi:10.2307/41166380
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. (2007). Cyberspace as/and space. Columbia Law Review, 107, 210–256. Collinson, D., & Collinson, M. (1997). Delayering managers: time–space surveillance and its gendered effects. Organization, 4, 375–407. doi:10.1177/135050849743005
   Google Scholar
• Connellan, K. (2013). The psychic life of white: Power and space. Organization Studies, 34, 1529–1549. doi:10.1177/0170840613495331
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J. (2008). Geographies of transnational feminisms: The politics of place and scale in the World March of Women. Social Politics, 15, 207–231. doi:10.1093/sp/jxn010
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373–393. doi:10.1177/1350508404041998
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81–100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D., & Talih, N. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 14, 265–282. doi:10.1177/0961463X05055138
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9, 119–161. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00166.x
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. (2015). Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12, 649–678. doi:10.1177/1350508405055940
   Google Scholar
• Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2007). Spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. C., Leach, D. J., & Clegg, C. W. (2011). The physical environment of the office: Contemporary and emerging issues. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 26). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119992592.ch6
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. R. V. (1984). The influence of the physical environment in offices. The Academy of Management Review, 9, 271–283. doi:10.2307/258440
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. (S. Rendall, trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F. X., & Mitev, N. (Eds.). (2013). Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., Parker, P. S., & Krone, K. J. (2011). Navigating socio-spatial difference, constructing counter-space: Insights from transnational feminist praxis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4, 201–220. doi:10.1080/17513057.2011.569973
   Google Scholar
• Dobers, P., & Strannegard, L. (2004). The cocoon—A traveling space. Organization, 11, 825–848. doi:10.1177/1350508404047253
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, C. H., & Douglas, M. R. (2005). Patient-centered improvements in healthcare built environments: Perspectives and design indicators. Health Expectations, 8, 264–276. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00336.x
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, F. (1997). The new office. London, UK: Conran Octopus.
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54, 12–20. doi:10.1080/00140139.2010.542833
   Google Scholar
• Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2014). The impact of a creativity-supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 1254–1267. doi:10.1111/jpim.12149
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. R. (2011). Remembering “a great fag”: Visualizing public memory and the construction of queer space. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97, 435–460. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.585168
   Google Scholar
• Earle, H. A. (2003). Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management, 2, 244–257. doi:10.1108/14725960410808230
   Google Scholar
• Eaves, M. H., & Leathers, D. G. (1991). Context as communication: McDonald’s vs. Burger King. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 263–289. doi:10.1080/00909889109365309
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (2003). Relating physical environment to self-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 622–654. doi:10.2307/3556639
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. (2004). Interpreting workplace identities: The role of office décor. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 99–128. doi:10.1002/job.233
   Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181–224. doi:10.1080/078559809
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2011). Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97, 257–282. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.585167
   Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J., & Ohl, J. (2013). “We are still in the desert”: Diaspora and the (de)territorialization of identity in discursive representations of the US soldier. Culture & Organization, 19, 209–226. doi:10.1080/14759551.2013.802167
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605–634. doi:10.1177/0170840606068310
   Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 336–361. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5, 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31, 35–74. doi:10.1023/A:1014404201290
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., & Larson, G. S. (2013). Making the ideal (local) entrepreneur: Place and the regional development of high-tech entrepreneurial identity. Human Relations, 67, 519–542. doi:10.1177/0018726713496829
   Google Scholar
• Golden, A. G. (2013). The structuration of information and communication technologies and work–life interrelationships: Shared organizational and family rules and resources and implications for work in a high-technology organization. Communication Monographs, 80, 101–123. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.739702
   Google Scholar
• Golden, A. G., & Geisler, C. (2007). Work-life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations, 60, 519–551. doi:10.1177/0018726707076698
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L. (1995). On the line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese model and the American worker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén, M. (1998). Scientific management’s lost aesthetic: Architecture, organization, and the Taylorized beauty of the mechanical. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 682–715.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2000). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20, 19–33. doi:10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00141.x
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2005). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27, 657–676. doi:10.1177/0170840605059453
   Google Scholar
• Haner, U. E. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 288–298. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00347.x
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haslett, B. B. (2013). Structurational interaction. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 615–622. doi:10.1177/0893318913504037
   Google Scholar
• Haug, C. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. Organization Studies, 34, 705–732. doi:10.1177/0170840613479232
   Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S., Allwood, C. M., & Martin, B. R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 196–210. doi:10.1080/10400410802060018
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2004). The spatial construction of organization. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With de Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 386–398. doi:10.1177/1056492605280225
   Google Scholar
• Hua, Y., Loftness, V., Heerwagen, J. H., & Powell, K. M. (2010). Relationship between workplace spatial settings and occupant-perceived support for collaboration. Environment and Behavior, 43, 807–826. doi:10.1177/0013916510364465
   Google Scholar
• Hurdley, R. (2010). The power of corridors: Connecting doors, mobilising materials, plotting openness. The Sociological Review, 58, 45–64. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01876.x
   Google Scholar
• Hylmö, A. (2006). Telecommuting and the contestability of choice: Employee strategies to legitimize personal decisions to work in a preferred location. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 541–569. doi:10.1177/0893318905284762
   Google Scholar
• Hylmö, A., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2002). Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: an empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery. Communication Monographs, 69, 329–356. doi:10.1080/03637750216547
   Google Scholar
• Jankowska, M., & Atlay, M. (2008). Use of creative space in enhancing students’ engagement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 271–279. doi:10.1080/14703290802176162
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, S. F. (2008). Dutch casino space or the spatial organization of entertainment. Culture and Organization, 14, 31–48. doi:10.1080/14759550701863324
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. L., Golden, A. G., Medved, C. E., Jorgenson, J., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2003). An organizational communication challenge to the discourse of work and family research: From problematics to empowerment. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 27 (pp. 1–43). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1207/s15567419cy2701_1
   Google Scholar
• Knox, H., O’Doherty, D., Vurdubakis, T., & Westrup, C. (2008). Enacting airports: Space, movement and modes of ordering. Organization, 15, 869–888. doi:10.1177/1350508408095818
   Google Scholar
• Kondo, D. K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114. doi:10.1177/0170840604046312
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. R. (2006). A “demented work ethic” and a “lifestyle firm”: Discourse, identity, and workplace time commitments. Organization Studies, 27, 1339–1358. doi:10.1177/0170840606067249
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. R. (2011). Introduction: Engaging materiality, communication and social problems. In T. R. Kuhn (Ed.), Matters of communication: Political, cultural, and technological challenges to communication theorizing (pp. 1–10). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. R. (2012). Negotiating the micro-macro divide: Thought leadership from organizational communication for theorizing organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 543–584. doi:10.1177/0893318912462004
   Google Scholar
• Larson, G. S., & Pearson, A. R. (2012). Placing identity: Place as a discursive resource for occupational identity work among high-tech entrepreneurs. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 241–266. doi:10.1177/0893318911435319
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Beijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1998). Ein Ding ist ein Thing: A philosophical platform for a left European party. Concepts and Transformation, 3, 97–111. doi:10.1075/cat.3.1-2.06lat
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing. Leiva-Lobos, E. P., De Michelis, G., & Covarrubias, E. (1997). Augmenting and multiplying spaces for creative design. Proceedings from ACM 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. (1991). Women who make the chips. Science as Culture, 2, 103–124. doi:10.1080/09505439109526294
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. (2011). In the plex: How Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, G. A. (2004). The innovative workplace: An analytical model focusing on the relationship between spatial and organisational issues. Facilities, 22, 253–258. doi:10.1108/02632770410555977
   Google Scholar
• Long, Z., Kuang, K., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). Legitimizing and elevating telework: Chinese constructions of a nonstandard work arrangement. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 243–262. doi:10.1177/1050651913479912
   Google Scholar
• Magadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 153–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00540.x
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2005). For space. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2010). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 409–426. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_11
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, J. C., & Morrow, P. C. (2010). Employee reactions to office redesign: A naturally occurring quasi-field experiment in a multi-generational setting. Human Relations, 63, 609–636. doi:10.1177/0018726709342932
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40, 561–567. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, R. D., & Zaug, P. (2000). The communicative constitution of organizations: A framework for explanation. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10(1–2). Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Routledge. Meyerson, J., & Ross, P. (2003). The 21st century office. London, UK: Laurence King.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T., Anguiano, C., Sandoval, J., Chen, Y. W., & Dickinson, E. (2011). Communicating a “new” environmental vernacular: A sense of relations-in-place. Communication Monographs, 78, 486–510. doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.618139
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A. (2001). From cyber space to cybernetic space: Rethinking the relationship between real and virtual Spaces. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7, 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00134.x
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., & Scheibe, K. P. (2012). Influencing organizational commitment through office redesign. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U. E., Janssen, S., & Van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 53–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. G. (1998). Hidden transcripts of flight attendant resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 499–535. doi:10.1177/0893318998114001
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, P., & McGuirk, P. (2003). Reconfiguring the CBD: Work and discourses of design in Sydney’s office space. Urban Studies, 40, 1751–1767. doi:10.1080/0042098032000106582
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, P., & Were, P. (2008). Observing places: Using space and material culture in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 8, 616–634. doi:10.1177/1468794108093899
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 815–827. doi:10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136
   Google Scholar
• Oldham, G. R., & Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 267–284. doi:10.2307/2392497
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (1987). Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmås, K. (2013). The production of chemical worlds: Territory and field science in global agribusiness. Culture and Organization, 19, 227–241. doi:10.1080/14759551.2013.802169
   Google Scholar
• Panayiotou, A., & Kafiris, K. (2010). Viewing the language of space: Organizational spaces, power, and resistance in popular films. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 264–284. doi:10.1177/1056492610389816
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. S. (2014). Difference and organizing. In L.L. Putnam & D.K. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 619–642). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, T. (2011). Multiple architectures and the production of organizational space in a Finnish university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 806–821. doi:10.1108/09534811111175760
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, G. L. (2008). The physical organization as equivocal message. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 318–338. doi:10.1080/00909880802104882
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378028
   Google Scholar
• Porter, N. (2013). “Single-minded, compelling, and unique”: Visual communications, landscape, and the calculated aesthetic of place branding. Environmental Communication, 7, 231–254. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.779291
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, P., & Prasad, A. (2000). Stretching the iron cage: The constitution and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organization Science, 11, 387–403. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.387.14597
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Mumby, D. K. (2014). Introduction: Advancing theory and research in organizational communication. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Nicotera, A. M., & McPhee, R. D. (2008). Introduction: Communication constitutes organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger, F., & Dickson, W. (1939). Management and the worker: An account of research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rofel, L. (1992). Rethinking modernity: Space and factory discipline in China. Cultural Anthropology, 7, 93–114. doi:10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00070
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, D., Paulsen, N., Callan, V. J., Brabant, M., Gallois, C., & Jones, E. (2010). A new role for place identity in managing organizational change. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 44–73. doi:10.1177/0893318909351434
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D. J., & Dainty, A. (2012). Understanding power within project work: The neglected role of material and embodied registers. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2, 202–215. doi:10.1080/21573727.2011.648619
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K. (2011). Creativity as social and spatial process. Facilities, 29, 6–18. doi:10.1108/02632771111101296
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K., Budgen, A., Lonsdale, N., Turner, A., & Penn, A. (2010). Pre and post occupancy evaluations in workplace environments: Theoretical reflections and practical implications. The Journal of Space Syntax, 1, 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50, 365–388. doi:10.1177/0011392102050003005
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th edn). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). Organizational context and the discursive construction of organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 363–394. doi:10.1177/0893318906298477
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C. (1993). Images of organizational communication: Root-metaphors of the organization-communication relation. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070
   Google Scholar
• Steele, F. I. (1973). Physical settings and organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, E., & Sundstrom, M. G. (1986). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6, 1–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00118.x
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 325–346. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x
   Google Scholar
• Thanem, T., Värlander, S., & Cummings, S. (2011). Open space = open minds? The ambiguities of pro-creative office design. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 4, 78–98. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2011.041532
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 139–146. doi:10.1177/0263276406063780
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y. F. (1976). Humanistic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66, 266–276. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1976.tb01089.x
   Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. K., & Norwood, K. (2013). Unbounded motherhood: Embodying a good working mother identity. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 396–424. doi:10.1177/0893318913491461
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31, 175–198. doi:10.1177/0170840609357381
   Google Scholar
• Våland, M. S. (2011). Between organisation and architecture: End-user participation in design. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 4, 42–60. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2011.041530
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, A., & Broos, M. (2012). Retail stores as brands: Performances, theatre and space. Consumption Markets & Culture, 14, 374–391. doi:10.1080/10253866.2012.659438
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk, A., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2010). Organizational spaces: Rematerializing the workaday world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Meel, J., Martens, Y., & Jan van Ree, H. (2010). Planning office spaces: A practical guide for managers and designers. London, UK: Laurence King.
   Google Scholar
• Värlander, S. (2011). Individual flexibility in the workplace: A spatial perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 48, 33–61. doi:10.1177/0021886311407666
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C. (2013). Spacing organization: Or how to be here and there at the same time. In D. Robichaud & F. Cooren (Eds.), Organization and organizing: Materiality, agency, and discourse (pp. 127–149). Newbury Park, CA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., & Cooren, F. (2013). Spacing practices: The communicative configuration of organizing through space-times. Communication Theory, 23, 25–47. doi:10.1111/comt.12003
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. (2005). Space meets status: Designing workplace performance. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vithayathawornwong, S., Danko, S., & Tolbert, P. (2003). The role of the physical environment in supporting organizational creativity. Journal of Interior Design, 29, 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.2003.tb00381.x
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E., Wang, C., & Redmond, J. (2008). Women and work-life balance: Is home-based business ownership the solution? Equal Opportunities International, 27, 258–275. doi:10.1108/02610150810860084
   Google Scholar
• Wapshott, R., & Mallett, O. (2011). The spatial implications of homeworking: A Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work. Organization, 19, 63–79. doi:10.1177/1350508411405376
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., & Arias, S. (2009). Introduction: The reinsertion of space into the social sciences and humanities. In B. Warf & S. Arias (Eds.), The Spatial Turn (pp. 1–10). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, V. (2011). To be (alike) or not to be (at all): Aesthetic isomorphism in organisational spaces. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 4, 22. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2011.041529
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. (2005). Representations of space, spatial practices and spaces of representation: An application of Lefebvre’s spatial triad. Culture and Organization, 11, 209–220. doi:10.1080/14759550500203318
   Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, E. D., & Kisselburgh, L. G. (2015). Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies, 36, 573–592. doi:10.1177/0170840614556916
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1995). Built space as story: The policy stories that buildings tell. Policy Studies Journal, 23, 407–423. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00520.x
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1998). Space stories: Studying museum buildings as organizational spaces while reflecting on interpretive methods and their narration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 7, 215–239. doi:10.1177/105649269873004
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. (2006). What is lived space? Ephemera, 6, 219–223.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Spicer, A. (2013). “Leader, you first”: The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy. Human Relations, 67, 739–762. doi:10.1177/0018726713503021
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Spicer, A., & Hancock, P. (2008). Hyper-organizational space in the work of J.G. Ballard. Organization, 15, 889–910. doi:10.1177/1350508408095819
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, C. B., & House, J. (2012). Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 3–22. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.004
   Google Scholar