Increasing clarity where it is needed most: articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions

References

• Allen, M., & Reynolds, R. (1993). The elaboration likelihood model and the sleeper effect: An assessment of attitude change over time. Communication Theory, 3, 73–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468–2885.1993.tb00058.x
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2010). Preparing manuscripts for publication in psychology journals: A guide for new authors. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. (2010). What is communication science? In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. Roskos-Ewodsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. (1994/2014). A message to the 21st century. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/oct/23/message-21st-century
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J. (2002). On making progress in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28, 473–490. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00818.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., Mudambi, R., & Reeb, D. M. (2012). The blockbuster hypothesis: Influencing the boundaries of knowledge. Scientometrics, 90, 959–982. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0540-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. R. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication: A message-centered approach. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. Roskos-Ewodsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 145–163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Casmir, F. L. (1994). Building communication theories: A socio/cultural approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40–48. doi:10.1177/1745691613513470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Berger, C. R. (1987). What communication scientists do. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 99–122). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W. (2014). A moveable feast: Do mobile media technologies mobilize or normalize cultural participation? Human Communication Research, 41, 82–101. doi:10.1111/hcre.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., Reimer, T., & McComas, K. A. (2015). The SAGE handbook of risk communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1281–1303. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.28165855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delia, J. G. (1987). Communication research: A history. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 20–98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2015). Goals-plans-action theory of message production: Making influence messages. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories of interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 63–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, T. H. (2008). A bibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 505–520. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. O. (2007). Action assembly theory: Forces of creation. In L. A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 23–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T. (2013). Writing for communication theory. Communication Theory, 23, 1–9. doi:10.1111/comt.1200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, J. (2014). Easy lies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 405–410. doi:10.1177/0261927X14534657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (2011). The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2013). Discipline in crisis? The shifting paradigm of mass communication research. Communication Theory, 23, 10–24. doi:10.1111/comt.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1927/1971). Propaganda technique in world War I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. doi:10.1177/0261927X14535916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (2014). Theorizing about deception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 431–440. doi:10.1177/0261927X14536397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynham, S. A. (2000). Theory building in the human resource development profession. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 159–178. doi:10.1002/1532–1096(200022)11:2<159::AID-HRDQ5>3.0.CO;2-E
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., … Averbeck, J. M. (2013). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39, 127–155. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Specifying causal relationships in the elaboration likelihood model. Communication Theory, 3, 65–72. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1993.tb00057.x
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2008). Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 521–538. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R., & Guggenheim, L. (2011). The evolution of media effects theory: A six-stage model of cumulative research. Communication Theory, 21(2), 169–196. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, C. (2001). Philosophy of science and communication theory. Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1990). A channel approach to television influence. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 195–214. doi: 10.1080/08838159009386736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959/2000). The logic of scientific discovery (reprinted edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. Abingdon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. doi:10.1037/a0015108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetko, H. A., & Scammell, M. (2012). The SAGE handbook of political communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80. doi:10.1177/1745691613514755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Gleason, L. S. (2012). Contribution to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 215–236. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.732626
   Google Scholar
• Stiff, J. B., & Boster, F. J. (1987). Cognitive processing: Additional thoughts and a reply to Petty, Kasmer, Haugtvedt, and Cacioppo. Communication Monographs, 54, 250–256. doi:10.1080/03637758709390230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroebe, W., & Strack, F. (2014). The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 59–71. doi:10.1177/1745691613514450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. L., Parott, R., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2003). The routledge handbook of health communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2008). Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Communication Research, 35(5), 622–645. doi:10.1177/0093650208321783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. J., Sun, C., Steffen, N. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Pornography, alcohol, and Male sexual dominance. Communication Monographs, 82, 252–270. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.981558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar