Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: lessons from 149 meta-analyses

References

• Allen, M. (1991). Meta-analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one-sided and two-sided messages. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55(4), 390–404. doi: 10.1080/10570319109374395
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Hale, J., Mongeau, P., Berkowtiz-Stafford, S., Stafford, S., Shanahan, W., … Ray, C. (1990). Testing a model of message sidedness: Three replications. Communication Monographs, 57(4), 275–291. doi: 10.1080/03637759009376203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M., & Preiss, R. W. (1986). Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Burrell, N. A. (2002). Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1991). Communication theories and other curios. Communication Monographs, 58(1), 101–113. doi: 10.1080/03637759109376216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. K. (1960). Process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F. J., & Mongeau, P. (1984). Fear-arousing persuasive messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 8(1), 330–375. doi: 10.1080/23808985.1984.11678581
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, N. A., Allen, M., Gayle, B. M., & Preiss, R. W. (2014). Managing interpersonal conflict: Advances through meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C., & Sollitto, M. (2017). History of organizational communication. In C. R. Scott, & L. Lewis (Eds.), Encyclopedia of organizational communication. doi: 10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc097
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics. Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2007). The selective exposure hypothesis and media choice processes. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research (pp. 103–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C., & Holbert, R. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 168–180. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Hunter, J. E., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10(4), 461–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00028.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 613–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elasmar, M. G. (1999). Opportunities and challenges of using meta-analysis in the field of international communication. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16(3), 379–384. doi: 10.1080/15295039909367103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayle, M. G., Preiss, R. W., & Allen, M. (2002). A meta-analytic interpretation of intimate and nonintimate interpersonal conflict. In M. Allen, R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, & N. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 345–368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G. (1983). The importance of being critical—in one’s own fashion. Journal of Communication, 33, 355–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Marewski, J. N. (2015). Surrogate science: The idol of a universal method for scientific inference. Journal of Management, 41(2), 421–440. doi: 10.1177/0149206314547522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X005010003
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. A., & Hunter, J. E. (1986). The effect of language intensity on receiver evaluations of message, source, and topic. In M. Allen, & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Persuasion: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 99–138). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D. (2009). Introduction: Advances in quantitative analysis. Communication Monographs, 76, 377–378. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestroni, A. (2007). Four decades of violent content on prime-time network programming: A longitudinal meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 57, 759–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00367.x
   Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C. A., & Levine, K. J. (2005). Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7(2), 207–237. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0702_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2012). Funding in published communication research. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 22. Retrieved from: http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/022/1/022124.html.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R. (2013). Quantitative communication research: Review, trends, and critique. Review of Communication Research, 1, 69–84. doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165_2013_01.01_003
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Asada, K. J., & Carpenter, C. (2009). Sample sizes and effect sizes are negatively correlated: Evidence and implications of a publication bias against nonsignificant findings. Communication Monographs, 76, 286–302. doi: 10.1080/03637750903074685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., Weber, R., Park, H. S., & Hullett, C. R. (2008). A communication researchers’ guide to null hypothesis significance testing and alternatives. Human Communication Research, 34(2), 188–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Marquart, F., Naderer, B., Arendt, F., Schmuck, D., & Adam, K. (2015). Questionable research practices in experimental communication research: A systematic analysis from 1980 to 2013. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 193–207. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 149–157. doi: 10.1080/08824090701304881
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (1993). The persuasive effects of message sidedness variations: A cautionary note concerning allen’s (1991) meta-analysis. Western Journal of Communication, 57(1), 87–97. doi: 10.1080/10570319309374432
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 943–951. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Allen, M. (2014). Threats and promises elicit cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma experiments. In N. A. Burrell, M. A. Allen, B. M. Gayle, & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Managing interpersonal conflict: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 195–212). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., Burrell, N., & Allen, M. (2006). Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., Burrell, N., Allen, M., & Bryant, J. (2007). Mass media effects research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from solomon asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 2–14. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlstein, E., & Allen, M. (2002). Sex differences in self-esteem: A meta-analytic assessment. In M. Allen, R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, & N. A. Burrell (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 59–72). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Snyder, L., & Hayes, A. F. (2006). Thinking and modeling at multiple levels: The potential contribution of multilevel modeling to communication theory and research. Human Communication Research, 32, 375–384. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385–418. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., Pigott, T. D., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 215–247. doi:10.3102/1076998609346961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, I., Beukeboom, C. J., Batenburg, A., Avramiea, A., Stoyanov, D., van de Velde, B., & Oegema, D. (2015). Blinded by the light: How a focus on statistical “significance” may cause p-value misreporting and an excess of p-values just below .05 in communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 253–279. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2015.1096333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (2015). Biology and brains - methodological innovations in communication science: Introduction to the special issue. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2014.999755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., & Fuller, R. (2013). Statistical methods for communication researcher and professionals (1st revised edition). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R., & Popova, L. (2012). Testing equivalence in communication research: Theory and application. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 190–213. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2012.703834
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. doi: 10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar