The promise of a nonhuman turn for CIFC scholarship

References

• Abetz, J. S., & Moore, J. (2018). Visualizing intersectionality through a fractal metaphor: Recursive, non-linear, and changeable. In J. C. Dunn & J. Manning (Eds.), Transgressing feminist theory and discourse: Advancing conversations across disciplines (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (2019). What is the big ‘D’? Contemporary approaches to discourse in interpersonal and family communication. Communication Theory, 29, 107–127. doi: 10.1093/ct/qty012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Moore, J. (2017). Troubling the functional/dysfunctional family binary through the articulation of functional family estrangement. Western Journal of Communication, 81, 281–299. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2016.1250156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N. (2018). A reconsidering chronos: Chronistic criticism and the first ‘Iraqi national calendar. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104(4), 361–383. doi: 10.1080/00335630.2018.1519256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: ‘Materializing’ organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 1–64. doi: 10.1080/19416520903047186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badmington, N. (2011). Posthumanism. In B. Clarke & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Routledge companion to literature and science (pp. 374–384). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthuman performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801–831. doi: 10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2013). How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organizational studies. In P. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Organization studies (pp. 16–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20, 168–187. doi: 10.1080/13534645.2014.927623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00068.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A. (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Asbury, B. (2015). Critical approaches to interpersonal communication: Charting a future. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 185–197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2002). Performing rituals as cultural performance. Communication Studies, 10, 94–109. doi: 10.1080/10417940209373223
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1017/s1537592710003464
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (2007). The creative mind: An introduction to metaphysics. Mineola, NY: Dover. First published 1946 by the Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity, MA: Malden.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2016). Posthuman critical theory. In D. Banerji & M. Paranjape (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures (pp. 13–32). New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Suter, E. A., & Floyd, K. M. (2018). Introduction: The landscape of meta-theory and theory in family communication research. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, racial matter, and queer affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M. (2008). Race and genetics from a modal materialist perspective. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(4), 383–406. doi: 10.1080/00335630802422212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 2–43). London, England: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, 373–393. doi: 10.1177/1350508404041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81–100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9780203810682
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication, 68, 278–288. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Fairhurst, G. T., & Huët, R. (2012). Why matter always matters in (organizational) communication. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 296–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., & Taylor, J. R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7(3), 219–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2014). Reading anger in early childhood intra-actions: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 734–741. doi: 10.1177/1077800414530256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press. First published 1968 as Difference et Repetition by Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doolin, B., & Lowe, A. (2002). To reveal is to critique: Actor–network theory and critical information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 69–78. doi: 10.1080/02683960210145986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck, S. (2011). Rethinking relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. (2008). Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. Polity, MA: Malden.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T. (2013). Futures for community engagement: A sociomaterial perspective. Thinking About Higher Education, 109–122. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03254-2_8
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualising professional learning and practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2012.644901
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Vintage books.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2016). Sociology, environment and health: A materialist approach. Public Health, 141, 287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigerio, A., Benozzo, A., Holmes, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2018). The doing and undoing of the ‘Autistic Child’: Cutting together and apart interview-based empirical materials. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(6), 390–402. doi: 101.101778/100747180707431571735213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, C. N., & Hanna, J. S. (2016). Figures of entanglement: Special issue introduction. Review of Communication, 16(4), 265–280. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2016.1221992
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial theory: A critical introduction. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, K. (2013). Questions for communication and critical-cultural studies: Posthumanism, network infrastructures, and sustainability. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10(2), 242–247. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2013.812596
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. (1998). African-American philosophy: Theory, politics, and pedagogy. Philosophy of Education, 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, L. (2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1999). Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures (pp. 15–28). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grusin, R. (2015). Introduction. In R. Grusin (Ed.), The nonhuman turn (pp. vii–xxix). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallenbeck, S. (2012). Toward a posthuman perspective: Feminist rhetorical methodologies and everyday practices. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1080/15362426.2012.657044
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, M. M., & Miller-Ott, A. E. (2013). The multivocality of meaning making: An exploration of the discourses college-aged daughters’ voice in talk about their mothers. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 114–131. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2013.768249
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2015). Feminist dilemmatic theorizing: New materialism in communication studies. Communication Theory, 26(2), 150–170. doi: 10.1111/comt.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A. (2016). Breast cancer’s rehtoricity: Bodily border crisis and bridge to corporeal solidarity. Review of Communication, 16(4), 281–298. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2016.120734
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. (2013). Ontologies of Indigeneity: The politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 27–32. doi: 10.1177/1474474013500226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Z. I. (2015). Outer worlds: The persistence of race in movement ‘Beyond the human’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(4), 501–520. doi: 10.1215/10642684-3123665
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(4), 261–271. doi: 10.1177/1077800412471510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. (1991). Interpersonal communication research as ideological practice. Communication Theory, 1, 179–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00014.x
   Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. (1992). Deconstructing the person and changing the subject of interpersonal studies. Communication Theory, 2, 139–148. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00033.x
   Google Scholar
• Lannamann, J. W. (1998). Social construction and materiality: The limits of indeterminacy in therapeutic settings. Family Process, 37, 393–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00393.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 264–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1984.tb00115.x
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (Eds.) (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412959384
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, K., Wright, S., Suchet-Pearson, S., Burarrwanga, L., & Bawaka Country (2012). Reframing development through collaboration: Towards a relational ontology of connection in Bawaka, North East Arnhem Land. Third World Quarterly, 33(6), 1075–1094. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2012.681496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2014). Exploring family discourses about purity pledges: Connecting relationships and popular culture. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 15, 92–99. doi: 10.1080/17459435.2014.955597
   Google Scholar
• Martine, T., Cooren, F., Bénel, A., & Zacklad, M. (2015). What does really matter in technology adoption and use? A CCO approach. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 164–187. doi: 10.1177/0893318915619012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller-Day, M., Pezalla, A., & Chesnut, R. (2013). Children are in families too! The presence of children in communication research. Journal of Family Communication, 13, 150–165. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2013.768251
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. E., & Cooren, F. (2016). Special Issue: Discursivity, relationality, and materiality in the life of the organization: Communication perspectives. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3), 267–271. doi: 10.1080/22041451.2016.1227951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2017a). Performative face theory: A critical perspective on interpersonal identity work. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 258–276. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2017.1315891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. (2017b). Where is the critical empirical interpersonal communication research? A roadmap for future inquiry into discourse and power. Communication Theory, 27, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/10570318509374177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., & Manning, J. (2019). What counts as critical interpersonal research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2019.1570825
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory, 7, 1–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, J. E. (2015). Theorizing queer inhumanisms. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21, 209–248. doi: 10.1215/10642684-2843323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, J. W. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, B. L., & Dickinson, G. (2019). Redefining rhetoric: Why matter matters. Berlin Journal of Critical Theory, 3(1), 399–406. doi: 10.4135/9781412982795.n21
   Google Scholar
• Packer, J., & Wiley, S. B. (2012). Strategies for materializing communication. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9(1), 107–113. doi: 10.1080/14791420.2011.652487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradanos, L. I., & Figueroa Helland, L. E. (2015). How to list to Pachamama’s testimonio: Lessons from indigenous voices. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature, 39(2), Article 9. doi: 10.4148/2334-4415.1841
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. (2015). Unpacking the dialectic: Alternative views on the discourse–materiality relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 706–716. doi: 10.1111/joms.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routledge, P. (2008). Acting in the network: ANT and the politics of generating associations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 199–217. doi: 10.1068/d001p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, K. M. (2018). ‘You’re not welcome here’: A grounded theory of family distancing. Communication Research, 1–29. doi: 10.1177/0093650217715542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, K. M., Thomas, L. J., & Paxman, C. G. (2015). “It was the straw that broke the camel’s back”: Exploring the distancing processes communicatively constructed in parent-child estrangement backstories. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 330–348. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1076422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D., Blaschke, S., Cooren, F., McPhee, R. D., Seidl, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(2), 285–316. doi: 10.1177/0893318914527000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative enquiry (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, J. R. (2016). Restyling the humanities curriculum of higher education for posthuman times. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(1), 62–78. doi: 10.1080/03626784.2015.1133220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillars, A., Shellan, W., McIntosh, A., & Pomegranate, M. (1997). Relational characteristic of language: Elaboration and differentiation in marital conversations. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 403–422. doi: 10.1080/10570319709374587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (2002). Complete works. Indianapolis, IN: Hacket Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, V. (2014). Desert “trash”: Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography, 39, 11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of conventions: Of being allergic to onions. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 26–56). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. (2013). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. doi: 10.1177/1474474013486067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2016). Introduction: Critical approaches to family communication research: Representation, critique, and praxis. Journal of Family Communication, 16, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/15267431.2015.1111219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A., Kellas, J. K., Webb, S. K., & Allen, J. A. (2016). A tale of two mommies: (Re)Storying family of origin narratives. Journal of Family Communication, 16(4), 303–317. doi:10.1080/15267431.2016.1184150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TallBear, K. (2015). An indigenous reflection on working beyond the human/not human. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2), 230–235. doi: 10.1215/10642684-2843323
   Google Scholar
• TallBear, K. (2017). Beyond the life/not-life binary: A feminist-indivous reading of cryptopervision, interspecies thinking, and the new materialisms. In J. Radin & E. Kowal (Eds.), Cyrptopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world (pp. 178–202). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, Z. (2016). An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22. doi: 10.1111/johs.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, L., Rivers, N. A., Rice, J., Gries, L. E., Bay, J. L., Rickert, T., & Miller, C. R. (2017). Forum: Bruno Latour on rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 47(5), 403–462. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2017.1369822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfield, K. (2016). Making the cut: An agential realist examination of selfies and touch. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–10. doi: 10.1177/2056305116641706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Huntington, O. H. (2008). ‘They’re here- I can feel them: The epistemic spaces of indigenous and western knowledges. Social and Cultural Geography, 9, 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, A., & Spicer, A. (2008). Is actor network theory critique? Organization Studies, 29(4), 611–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. (1989). Beyond the word of man: Glissant and the new discourse of the Antilles. World Literature Today, 63(4), 637. doi: 10.2307/40145557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar