Modality switching to modality weaving: updating theoretical perspectives for expanding media affordances

References

• Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(3), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598153004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 107–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60371-8
   Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2011). The effects of other-generated and system generated cues on adolescents’ perceived attractiveness on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Walther, J. B. (2020). The hyperpersonal effect in online dating: Effects of text-based CMC vs. Videoconferencing before meeting face-to-face. Media Psychology, 23(6), 820–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1648217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, A., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Suler, J. (2008). Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1867–1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘true self’ on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1974). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., Gardner, R. R., Parks, M. R., Schulman, L., & Miller, G. R. (1976). Interpersonal epistemology and interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp. 149–171). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1-2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X93121003
   Google Scholar
• Carr, C. T. (2020). CMC is dead, long live CMC!: Situating computer-mediated communication scholarship beyond the digital age. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clatterbuck, G. W. (1979). Attributional confidence and uncertainty in initial interaction. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00630.x
   Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 420–444). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/248682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C. (2014). Advancing warranting theory. Communication Theory, 24(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Interpersonal communication after 9/11 via telephone and internet: A theory of channel complementarity. New Media & Society, 6(5), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144804047086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Anderegg, C. (2014). Romantic relationship stages and social networking sites: Uncertainty reduction strategies and perceived relational norms on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(11), 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1332418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2019). Social media. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 4th ed., (373-388) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gershon, I. (2010). Breaking up is hard to do: Media switching and media ideologies. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205285368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghlin Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hallam, L., De Backer, C. J. S., & Walrave, M. (2019). Taking it to the next level: The negligible role of trust when online dating goes offline. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, A. J., Rawlings, J., Treger, S., & Sprecher, S. (2017). Channels of computer-mediated communication and satisfaction in long-distance relationships. Interpersona, 11(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v11i2.273
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240152493065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, B. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 30(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., Tandoc, E., Kim, E. A., Kim, B., & Wise, K. (2012). The real you? The role of visual cues and comment congruence in perceptions of social attractiveness from Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
   Google Scholar
• Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. Social Cognition, 1(2), 160–190. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1982.1.2.160
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C. L., Bazarova, N., & Hancock, J. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joel, S., MacDonald, G., & Plaks, J. E. (2013). Romantic relationships conceptualized as a judgment and decision-making domain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 461–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A., & Caughlin, J. P. (2014). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2(3–4), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399209540190
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., Spears, R., & de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 526–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M. (2014). The past and future of technology in interpersonal communication theory and research. Communication Studies, 65(4), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2014.927298
   Google Scholar
• Ledbetter, A. M., Taylor, S. H., & Mazer, J. P. (2016). Enjoyment fosters media use frequency and determines its relational outcomes: Toward a synthesis of uses and gratifications theory and media multiplexity theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, B. (2015). Navigating new media networks: Understanding and managing channels in a networked society. Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B, & Fox, J. (2015). Why communication technologies matter: Developing a scale to assess the perceived social affordances of communication channels. Paper presented at a meeting of the National Communication Association. Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Mease, J. (2013). Compressed crystals: A metaphor for mediated identity expression. In C. Cunningham (Ed.), Social networking and impression management: Self-presentation in the digital age (pp. 85–106). Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, B., & Zanolla, D. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M. (1975). Between people. Anchor-Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R. (2017). Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed-media relationships. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusateri, K. B., Roaché, D. J., & Wang, N. (2015). The role of communication technologies in serial arguments: A communicative interdependence perspective. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821860
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Akers, C., Pavlich, C. A., Tsetsi, E., & Applebaum, M. (2019). Examining the quality of social support messages produced face-to-face and in computer-mediated communication: The effects of hyperpersonal communication. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1595076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Bryant, E. M. (2014). Relational reconnection on social network sites: An examination of relationship persistence and modality switching. Communication Reports, 27(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2013.851725
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. M., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2015). When online darting partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Wang, N. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A., & Zhang, S. (2007). When online meets offline: The effect of modality switching on relational communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R., & Love, G. (1986). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K. (2018). Preference for and perceived competence of communication technology affordances in face-threatening scenarios. Communication Reports, 31(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1370722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., & Burke, T. J. (2015). Complementary channel use and the role of social competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B. S., Allen, M., & Kim, S.-Y. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between computer-mediated and FtF self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., & Fulwood, C. (2020). Does recent research evidence support the hyperpersonal model of online impression management? Current Opinion in Psychology? Online First. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., & Ravenscroft, K. (2017). Bragging on Facebook: The interaction of content source and focus on online impression formation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 20(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratifications approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Hampton, A. J. (2017). Liking and other reactions after a get-acquainted interaction: A comparison of continuous FtF interaction versus interaction that progresses from text messages to FtF. Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1256334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunnafrank, M. (1988). Predicted outcome value in initial conversation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359819
   Google Scholar
• Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2015). The confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 42(2), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, E. N. (2020). Online-to-offline interactions and online community life cycles: A longitudinal study of shared leisure activities. Leisure Sciences, 42(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1392913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you want type of person you are: How one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S., Muscanell, N., & Khalid, C. (2015). Snapchat elicits more jealousy than Facebook: A comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20(4), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2009). Computer-mediated communication. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), Handbook of communication science (2nd ed., pp. 489–505). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 443–479). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and FtF affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(1), 36–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp, & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529–563). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Inventing partners in computer-mediated communication: How CMC sustains self-fulfilling prophecies and relational attributions. Social Computing and Social Media, 8, 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07632-4_49
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L., & Shulman, H. (2009). Self-generated vs. Other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, S. E., Lea, M., & Spears, R. (2002). How social is internet communication? A reappraisal of bandwidth and anonymity effects. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 61–77). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-c., Brown, B. B., & Braun, M. T. (2014). From Facebook to cell calls: Layers of electronic intimacy in college students’ interpersonal relationships. New Media & Society, 16(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812472486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar