A review and integration of research on serial arguments

References

• Afifi, T. D., Merrill, A. F., & Davis, S. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23(4), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afifi, T. D., Zamanzadeh, N., Harrison, K., & Torrez, D. P. (2020). Explaining the impact of differences in voting patterns on resilience and relational load in romantic relationships during the transition to the Trump presidency. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519846566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, J. K. (1989). A descriptive taxonomy of couples’ complaint interactions. Southern Communication Journal, 54(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948909372751
   Google Scholar
• Bates, C. E., & Samp, J. A. (2011). Examining the effects of planning and empathic accuracy on communication in relational and nonrelational conflict interactions. Communication Studies, 62(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2010.517597
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics (pp. xv, 285). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bernecker, K., Ghassemi, M., & Brandstätter, V. (2019). Approach and avoidance relationship goals and couples’ nonverbal communication during conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2010). Serial argument goals and conflict strategies: A comparison between romantic partners and family members. Communication Reports, 23(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934211003598734
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2014). Dyadic perceptions of goals, conflict strategies, and perceived resolvability in serial arguments. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(6), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513504653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on 30 years of research on serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821856
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Finan, A., & Kaminsky, A. (2008). Modeling serial arguments in close relationships: The serial argument process model. Human Communication Research, 34(4), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Hale, J. L., & Williams, S. L. (2004). Identifying and characterizing goals of dating partners engaging in serial argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2004.11821616
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Hefner, V., & Love, A. (2014). An exploration of topics, conflict styles, and rumination in romantic nonserial and serial arguments. Southern Communication Journal, 79(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2014.918645
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., & Sparks, L. (2014). The relationship between accurate and benevolently biased serial argument perceptions and individual negative health perceptions. Communication Research, 41(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212438391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, J. L., Tidgewell, K. D., Bagley, K. C., Cusanelli, L., Hartstern, M., Holbeck, D., & Hale, J. L. (2007). Serial argumentation goals and their relationships to perceived resolvability and choice of conflict tactics. Communication Quarterly, 55(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600998640
   Google Scholar
• Bippus, A. M., & Rollin, E. (2003). Attachment style differences in relational maintenance and conflict behaviors: Friend’s perceptions. Communication Reports, 16(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210309384494
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Jones, S. M., Brinberg, M., Joyer, A. M., Solomon, D. H., & Ram, N. (2021). Discovering the fabric of supportive conversations: A typology of speaking turns and their contingencies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20953604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, T., & Fincham, F. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosschot, J. F., Gerin, W., & Thayer, J. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J. (2003). Managing interpersonal conflict: A model of events related to strategic choices. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607133.ch13.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, D. J., Cunningham, E. M., & Cody, M. J. (1988). Goal types, gender, and locus of control in managing interpersonal conflict. Communication Research, 15(4), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, K., Schrodt, P., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2012). Rumination, conflict intensity, and perceived resolvability as predictors of motivation and likelihood of continuing serial arguments. Western Journal of Communication, 76(5), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.689086
   Google Scholar
• Carson, K. J., & Ackerman, R. A. (2018). The role of attachment-related individual differences in goal adoption for serial arguments. Personal Relationships, 25(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P. (2010). A multiple goals theory of personal relationships: Conceptual integration and program overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(6), 824–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510373262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughlin, J. P., Vangelisti, A. L., & Mikucki-Enyart, S. L. (2013). Conflict in dating and marital relationships. In The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice (pp. 161–186). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452281988.n7.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A., & Shenk, J. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(3), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., & Hample, D. (2015). Serial argument topics. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821862
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Johnson, A. J., & Bostwick, E. N. (2019). Argument interdependence: Connections to serial argument goals and tactics in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(7), 1975–1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518774933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Johnson, A. J., Bruscella, J. S., & Van Gilder, B. (2015). Taking conflict personally and the use of the demand/withdraw pattern in intraethnic serial arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821859
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Van Gilder, B., & Bruscella, J. S. (2017). Modeling serial argument goals, tactics, and their effects on arguers’ satisfaction in the case of three ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 46(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2016.1254669
   Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A., Wilson Mumpower, S. V., & Bassick, M. A. (2019). Serial argument goals, tactics, and outcomes in long-distance and geographically close romantic relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 84(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1531915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloven, D. H., & Roloff, M. E. (1993). The chilling effect of aggressive potential on the expression of complaints in intimate relationships. Communication Monographs, 60(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41–56). Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M. A., Fallis, S., & Vance, L. (1982). Multifunctional coding of conflict resolution strategies in marital dyads. Family Relations, 31(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/584202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2021). Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027232
   Google Scholar
• Gaze, C. M., Reznik, R. M., Miller, C. W., & Roloff, M. E. (2015). The role of communication and coping in emerging adults’ serial arguments with parents. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.1.02gaz
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10747-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Allen, S. (2012). Serial arguments in organizations. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.3.03ham
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Cionea, I. A. (2012). Serial arguments in inter-ethnic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (2009). On the etiology of the rebuff phenomenon: Why are persuasive messages less polite after rebuffs?. Communication Studies, 49(4), 305–321. http://doi.org/10.1080/10510979809368541
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Krueger, B. (2011). Serial arguments in classrooms. Communication Studies, 62(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.576746
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., & Richards, A. S. (2015). Attachment style, serial argument, and taking conflict personally. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.4.1.04ham
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Richards, A. S., & Na, L. (2012). A test of the conflict linkage model in the context of serial arguments. Western Journal of Communication, 76(5), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.703361
   Google Scholar
• Hample, D., Thompson-Hayes, M., Wallenfelsz, K., Wallenfelsz, P., & Knapp, C. (2005). Face-to-face arguing is an emotional experience: Triangulating methodologies and early findings. Argumentation and Advocacy, 42(2), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2005.11821643
   Google Scholar
• Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984201.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, D., Komar, J., & Lee, W. B. (2007). The dynamics of personality states, goals, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocker, J. L., & Wilmot, W. W. (1978). Interpersonal conflict. W. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2003). Imagined interaction conflict-linkage theory: Explaining the persistence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.2190/240J-1VPK-K86D-1JL8
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1980). Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., Averbeck, J. M., Kelley, K. M., & Liu, S.-J. (2011). When serial arguments predict harm: Examining the influences of argument function, topic of the argument, perceived resolvability, and argumentativeness. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47(4), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2011.11821748
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., & Cionea, I. A. (2017). Serial arguments in interpersonal relationships: Relational dynamics and interdependence. In J. A. Samp (Ed.), Communicating interpersonal conflict in close relationships (pp. 127–143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774237-17.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., Kelley, K. M., Liu, S.-J., Averbeck, J. M., King, S. D., & Bostwick, E. N. (2014). Family serial arguments: Beliefs about the argument and perceived stress from the argument. Communication Reports, 27(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2014.927517
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. P., & Samp, J. A. (2021). Stoicism and verbal aggression in serial arguments: The roles of perceived power, perceived resolvability, and frequency of arguments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37, NP11836–NP11856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521994583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (1998). Serial arguing and relational quality: Determinants and consequences of perceived resolvability. Communication Research, 25(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2000). The influence of argumentative role (initiator vs. Resistor) on perceptions of serial argument resolvability and relational harm. Argumentation, 14(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007837310258
   Google Scholar
• Keck, K. L., & Samp, J. A. (2007). The dynamic nature of goals and message production as revealed in a sequential analysis of conflict interactions. Human Communication Research, 33(1), 27–47. http://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.2007.33.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K. (1992). Communication: Inherently strategic and primarily automatic. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch, L. K., Sharabi, L. L., Delaney, A. L., & Suranne, S. M. (2016). The role of relational uncertainty in topic avoidance among couples with depression. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.998691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanza, S. T., & Linden-Carmichael, A. N. (2021). Time-varying effect modeling for the behavioral, social, and health sciences. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Roloff, M. E. (2019). Rejection sensitivity and dysfunctional communication patterns of serial arguing. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(11), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.11.247
   Google Scholar
• Liu, E., & Roloff, M. E. (2015). Stress in serial arguments: Implications of seeking mutual resolution, listening, and hostility. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821861
   Google Scholar
• Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006a). Demand/withdraw patterns in serial arguments: Implications for well-being. Human Communication Research, 32(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2006b). Features of serial arguing and coping strategies: Links with stress and well-being. In R. M. Dailey, & B. A. Le Poire (Eds.), Applied interpersonal communication matters: Family, health, and community relations (pp. 39–65). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. W., & Roloff, M. E. (2006). The perceived characteristics of irresolvable, resolvable and resolved intimate conflicts: Is there evidence of intractability? International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060610749464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. W., Roloff, M. E., & Malis, R. S. (2007). Understanding interpersonal conflicts that are difficult to resolve: A review of literature and presentation of an integrated model. Annals of the International Communication Association, 31(1), 118–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2007.11679066
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. A., & Henningsen, M. (2008). Stage theories of relationship development. In Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 363–376). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529.n27
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, S., & Schrodt, P. (2017). The perceived threat and resolvability of serial arguments as correlates of relational uncertainty in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 68(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1263224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, H. L., & Craig, R. T. (2007). Introduction. In R. T. Craig, & H. L. Muller (Eds.), Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions (pp. ix–xviii). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palomares, N. A. (2015). Goal understanding theory. In C. R. Berger, & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 714–718). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic121.
   Google Scholar
• Pusateri, K. B., Roaché, D. J., & Wang, N. (2015). The role of communication technologies in serial arguments: A communicative interdependence perspective. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821860
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (2006). Definitions and approaches to conflict and communication. In J. Oetzel, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of conflict communication: Integrating theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976176
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Bonito, J. A., Lutovsky, B. R., Nemcova, K., Tsetsi, E., Ashtaputre, A., Pavlich, C. A., & Akers, C. (2022). Mutual influence in support seeking and provision behaviors during comforting conversations: A turn-level analysis. Human Communication Research, 49(1), 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznik, R. M., Miller, C. W., Roloff, M. E., & Gaze, C. M. (2015). The impact of demand/withdraw patterns on health in emerging adults’ serial arguments with parents. Communication Research Reports, 32(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.989973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznik, R. M., & Roloff, M. E. (2011). Getting off to a bad start: The relationship between communication during an initial episode of a serial argument and argument frequency. Communication Studies, 62(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2011.555491
   Google Scholar
• Reznik, R. M., Roloff, M. E., & Miller, C. W. (2017). There is nothing as calming as a good theory: How a soulmate theory helps individuals experience less demand/withdraw and stress. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774237-10.
   Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E. (2015). Theorizing interpersonal communication: Progress and problematic practices. Communication Theory, 25(4), 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, M. E., Reznik, R. M., Miller, C. W., & Johnson, K. L. (2015). “I thought we settled this?!” Antecedents and consequences of resolution of an initial episode in a serial argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52(1), 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2015.11821858
   Google Scholar
• Rose, A. J. (2021). The costs and benefits of co-rumination. Child Development Perspectives, 15(3), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samp, J. A. (2013). Goal variability and message content during relational discussions. Communication Studies, 64(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.732186
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., Tankard, J. W., & Lasorsa, D. L. (2004). How to build social science theories. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars, A. L. (1986). Procedures for coding interpersonal conflict: The verbal tactics coding scheme (VTCS). Department of Communication Studies, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. Unpublished Coding Manual.
   Google Scholar
• Sillars, A. L. (2009). Attributions and communication in roommate conflicts. Communication Monographs, 47(3), 180–200. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637758009376031
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Brinberg, M., Bodie, G. D., Jones, S., & Ram, N. (2021). A dynamic dyadic systems approach to interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 1001–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A., & McLaren, R. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., & Priem, J. S. (2016). Outcomes of emotional support in dating relationships: Relational turbulence or sentiment override? Personal Relationships, 23(4), 698–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp, R., & Hoff, N. (1985). A model of serial argument in interpersonal relationships. Argumentation and Advocacy, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1985.11951297
   Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (1985). A theory of action identification. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802213.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt, R. R. (2020). Antecedents and consequences of communication about serial arguments: A longitudinal study of associations within and between conflict episodes [Doctoral dissertation]. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/18385rer20
   Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt, R. R., & Solomon, D. H. (2021). The role of perceived resolvability in serial arguments across the lifespan. Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12415.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. L., Murphy, M. J., Werner-Wilson, R. J., Cutrona, C. E., & Seeman, J. (2007). Sex differences in the use of demand and withdraw behavior in marriage: Examining the social structure hypothesis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 195–220). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Fink, E. L., & Cai, D. A.. (2012). The effect of conflict goals on avoidance strategies: What does not communicating communicate? Human Communication Research, 38(2), 222–252. http://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.2012.38.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, V. F., & Bell, P. A. (2008). Predicting interpersonal conflict resolution styles from personality characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. (2018). Serial arguments in college-aged dating couples [Unpublished raw data]. The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, T., Vanderbilt, R., & Liu, E. (2022). “Are you doing what I Think you’re doing?” Momentary goal projection and goal contagion in romantic conflict. Communication Research, 50), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211046239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., Dillard, J. P., & Samp, J. A. (2020). Dynamic goal processes: An agenda for interpersonal communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1843365
   Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., Liu, E., & Vanderbilt, R. (2021). Initial goals, goal trajectories, and changes in perceived resolvability during serial arguments. Personal Relationships, 28(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2016). Serial argument goals and changes in perceived conflict resolution: A dyadic analysis. Western Journal of Communication, 80(3), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1143961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2018a). Goal variability and perceived resolvability in serial argumentation. Communication Research, 45(3), 422–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2018b). Initial goals, goal trajectories, and serial argument resolvability: A growth curve analysis. Personal Relationships, 25(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, T. R., & Samp, J. A. (2018c). "Serial argument goals and changes in perceived conflict resolution: A dyadic analysis": Corrigendum. Western Journal of Communication, 82(5), 666–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2018.1495380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2004). Stability and fluctuation in adult attachment style over a 6-year period. Attachment & Human Development, 6(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461673042000303127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. (2014). Emotion matters in serial arguments: The effects of anger and compassion on perceived resolvability and relationship confidence in dating relationships. Communication Research Reports, 31(1), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2013.846256
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Andreychik, M., Sapp, D. A., & Arendt, C. (2014). The dynamic interplay of interaction goals, emotion, and conflict styles: Testing a model of intrapersonal and interpersonal effects on conflict styles. International Journal of Communication, 8(24), 534–557.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Xie, L., & Maier, G. A. (2013). The interpersonal effects of perceived partner anger and conflict strategies in serial arguments: Perceived resolvability and rumination as sensemaking mediators. Ohio Communication Journal, 51(1), 141–167.
   Google Scholar