The Chaffee principle: the most likely effect of communication … is further communication

References

• Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barbrook-Johnson, P., Badham, J., & Gilbert, N. (2017). Uses of agent-based modeling for health communication: The TELL ME case study. Health Communication, 32(8), 939–944. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1196414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, A. K., Ford, J., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Sending and receiving safety and risk messages in hospitals: An exploration into organizational communication channels and providers’ communication overload. Health Communication, 36(13), 1697–1708. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1788498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1959). The state of communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/266840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3.0. Biostat.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00603.x
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, C., Ding, J., Millam, B., & Barnett, G. A. (2020). The uproar over gene-edited babies: A semantic network analysis of CRISPR on Twitter. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1699135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantril, H., with the assistance of Gaudet, H., & Herzog, H. (1940). The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 57–77). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Hochheimer, J. L. (1985). The beginnings of political communication research in the United States: Origins of the “limited effects” model. In E. M. Rogers & F. Balle (Eds.), The media revolution in America and Western Europe (pp. 267–296). Ablex Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. H., & Mutz, D. C. (1998). Comparing mediated and interpersonal opinion data. In R. P. Hawkings, J. M. Wieman, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 19–43). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N. (1969). Gabriel Tarde on communication and social influence. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dance, F. E. (1970). The “concept” of communication. Journal of Communication, 20(2), 201–210. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1970.tb00877.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAndrea, D. C., & Holbert, R. L. (2017). Increasing clarity where it is needed most: Articulating and evaluating theoretical contributions. ANNALS of the International Communication Association, 41(2), 168–180. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1304163
   Google Scholar
• Demetriades, S. Z., Walter, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2024). Ushering in an age of scientific principles for communication research. Human Communication Research, 50(2), 276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437–448. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2005). Observations on estimation of communication effects on political knowledge and a test of intracommunication mediation. Political Communication, 22(4), 505–509. doi:10.1080/10584600500311428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153–181. doi:10.1093/hcr/27.1.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (2001). Psychological statistics using SPSS for Windows. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosser, T. J., Lopez-Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. (2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601109360391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, M., & Kreps, G. L. (2004). Forty years of diffusion of innovations: Utility and value in public health. Journal of Health Communication, 9(S1), 3–11. doi:10.1080/10810730490271430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486–504. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., Smith, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2013). Tweeting apart: Applying network analysis to detect selective exposure clusters in Twitter. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3-4), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813922
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. L., & Park, E. (2020). Conceptualizing, organizing, and positing moderation in communication research. Communication Theory, 30(3), 227–246. doi:10.1093/ct/qtz006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I. (1948). Social communication. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 92(5), 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, G. S., Jarvie, I. C., Fuller, K. H., & Fuller, K. H. (1996). Children and the movies: Media influence and the Payne Fund controversy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J. A., Hong, S., & Hubbard, G. T. (2020). The role of storytelling in advertising: Consumer emotion, narrative engagement level, and word-of-mouth intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. (1987). Communications research since Lazarsfeld. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4 PART 2), S25–S45. doi:10.1093/poq/51.4_PART_2.S25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. doi:10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1955). Salience of membership and resistance to change of group-anchored attitudes. Human Relations, 8(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675500800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Volkart, E. H. (1952). The resistance to change of group-anchored attitudes. American Sociological Review, 17(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J-N., Park, S-C., Yoo, S-W., & Shen, H. (2010). Mapping health communication scholarship: Breadth, depth, and agenda of published research in Health Communication. Health Communication, 25(6-7), 487–503. http://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.507160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S., Mitrook, M., Wu, X., & Seltzer, T. (2006). First- and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages Among candidate news releases, media coverage, and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265–285. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4
   Google Scholar
• Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kümpel, A. S., Karnowski, V., & Keyling, T. (2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511561014–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, S., Watson, B. R., Riffe, D., & Lovejoy, J. (2015). Issues and best practices in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 791–811. doi:10.1177/1077699015607338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas: A series of addresses (pp. 37–51). Institute for Religious and Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2020). A bigger pie: The effects of high-speed Internet on political behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(3), 199–216. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmaa002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143–153. doi:10.1177/001872674700100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manago, A. M., Brown, G., Lawley, K. A., & Anderson, G. (2020). Adolescents’ daily face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: Associations with autonomy and closeness to parents and friends. Developmental Psychology, 56(1), 153–164. doi:10.1037/dev0000851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M. (2001). Steven Chaffee and the future of political communication research. Political Communication, 18(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750322989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. E., & Starr, W. B. (2021). The structure of communicative acts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 44(2), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09289-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2001). The future of political communication research: Reflections on the occasion of Steve Chaffee's retirement from Stanford University. Political Communication, 18(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846001750323005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of thought and of the science of symbolism. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A., Levine, T. R., & Weber, R. (2018). Sixty years of quantitative communication research summarized: Lessons from 149 meta-analyses. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1446350
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/267838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Chaffee, S. H. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 18–30. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, Z. S., Iyer, N., & Veenstra, A. S. (2015). Reading Lasswell's model of communication backward: Three scholarly misconceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1063666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, N. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). Meetings as networks: Applying social network analysis to team interaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.760729
   Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., & Contractor, N. S. (2013). Emergence of multidimensional social networks. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (pp. 449–474). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shumate, M., & Palazzolo, E. T. (2010). Exponential random graph (p*) models as a method for social network analysis in communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(4), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2010.527869
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 256–281. doi:10.1111/jcom.12288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1901). L’opinion et la foule. (F. Alcan, Ed.). Presses Universitaries de France.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation (E. Parsons, Trans). Henry Holt. (Original work published 1880)
   Google Scholar
• Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2022). What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1803946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassey, J., Valente, T., Barker, J., Stanton, C., Li, D., Laestadius, L.,  Cruz, T. B., & Unger, J. B. (2023). E-cigarette brands and social media influencers on Instagram: A social network analysis. Tobacco Control, 32(e2), e184–e191. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. (2019). Communication: A post-discipline. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Cody, M. J., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2018). The ebb and flow of communication research: Seven decades of publication trends and research priorities. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Holbert, R. L., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J., Suresh, S., & Fiers, F. (2023). Getting out of debt: The communication begets communication (CBC) typology as an approach to theoretical advancement in the field. International Journal of Communication, 18, 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423–441. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, B. E., Ksiazek, T. B., & Holbert, R. L. (2016). Partisan enclaves or shared media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(2), 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1164170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. (2015). Making communication theory matter. Communication Theory, 25(4), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., & Fu K. (2019). The relationship between interdisciplinarity and journal impact factor in the field of communication during 1997–2016. Journal of Communication, 69 (3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar