An enduring divide: revisiting the mass and family communication dichotomy and exploring paths of integration

References

• American Psychological Association. (2021). Equity, diversity, and inclusion toolkit for journal editors. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/equity-diversity-inclusin-toolkit-journal-editors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baams, L., Overbeek, G., Dubas, J. S., Doornwaard, S. M., Rommes, E., & Van Aken, M. A. (2015). Perceived realism moderates the relation between sexualized media consumption and permissive sexual attitudes in Dutch adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 743–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0443-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. (2015). Mass communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., & Segal, L. (1982). Family systems theory: Background and implications. Journal of Communication, 32(3), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, D. O., Suter, E. A., & Floyd, K. (2018). Introduction: The landscape of meta-theory and theory in family communication research. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–16). Sage Publication, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J. A., & Bryant, J. (2006). Implications of living in a wired family: New directions in family and media research. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 297–314). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprì, T., Gugliandolo, M. C., Iannizzotto, G., Nucita, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2021). The influence of media usage on family functioning. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2644–2653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00204-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, J. T., Duck, A. R., Andrews, L. A., Butauski, M., & Petronio, S. (2015). Young adults’ management of privacy on Facebook with multiple generations of family members. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2015.1076425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., & Cheon, H. J. (2005). Children's exposure to negative Internet content: Effects of family context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(4), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4904_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaner, C. W., Bish, A. L., Butauski, M., Hays, A., Horstman, H. K., & Nelson, L. R. (2022). Communication privacy management in open adoption relationships: Negotiating co-ownership across in-person and mediated communication. Communication Research, 49(6), 816–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650221998474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Day, R. D., Harper, J., & Stockdale, L. (2014). A friend request from dear old dad: Associations between parent-child social networking and adolescent outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart, D. (2017). Team science: A qualitative study of benefits, challenges, and lessons learned. The Social Science Journal, 54(4), 458–467.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drogos, K. L., & Wilson, B. J. (2021). The media as an ecosystem for family communication. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (3rd ed., pp. 391–406). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, A. K., & Hoy, M. G. (2019). Smart devices, smart decisions? Implications of parents’ sharenting for children's online privacy: An investigation of mothers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915619858290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. M., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2014). Theory and research from the communication field: Discourses that constitute and reflect families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K. M., Braithwaite, D. O., Schrodt, P., & Bylund, C. L. (2019). Family communication: Cohesion and change (10th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. E., & Myers, S. A. (2021). Perspectives on studying family communication: Methodologies, methods, and trends. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (3rd ed., pp. 25–38). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, S., Weber, R., & Agosto, D. E. (2010). Finding that special someone: Interdisciplinary collaboration in an academic context. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 51(4), 210–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (2003). Reading realism: Audiences’ evaluations of the reality of media texts. Journal of Communication, 53(4), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Woszidlo, A. (2021). Families communicating through technology. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (3rd ed., pp. 407–421). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, C., Rauscher, E. A., Goodman, R. B., & Couvrette, M. A. (2017). Reconceptualizing the role of conformity behaviors in family communication patterns theory. Journal of Family Communication, 17(4), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2017.1347568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izrael, P. (2013). Religiousness, values, and parental mediation of children's television viewing in Slovakia. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2013.827129
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. E., & Ray, W. A. (2016). Family systems theory. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies (pp. 1–5.). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs130
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of communications. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2021). Communication in intact families. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (3rd ed., pp. 115–128). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koerner, A. F., Schrodt, P., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2018). Family communication patterns theory: A grand theory of family communication. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 142–153). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, A. (2009). What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs. interdisciplinarity debate (NCRM Working Paper Series 03/09). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7c9c048fc2b89628ebce122a6b5647d6d2d81f29
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, P. X., & Ward, L. M. (2016). Contributions of television use to beliefs about fathers and gendered family roles among first-time expectant parents. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 17(4), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, H. J., Hanson, K. G., & Anderson, D. R. (2015). The influence of television coviewing on parent language directed at toddlers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mares, M. L., Chen, Y. A., & Bond, B. J. (2022). Mutual influence in LGBTQ teens’ use of media to socialize their parents. Media Psychology, 25(3), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1969950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messaris, P., & Kerr, D. (1983). Mother’s comments about TV: Relation to family communication patterns. Communication Research, 10(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Asbury, B. (2014). Theoretical approaches to family communication. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family communication (pp. 41–57). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Metts, S., & Lamb, E. (2006). Methodological approaches to the study of family communication. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 83–105). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, C. E., Waddell, T. F., Lee. Y. H. (2022, May 26-30). Co-viewer discretion advised: Examining emerging adult willingness to co-view sensitive entertainment content with parents [Paper presentation]. International Communication Association 72nd Annual Conference, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, A. I. (2015). Media and the family: Reflections and future directions. Journal of Children and Media, 9(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.997145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W.R., Davidson, R., Joo, S., Park, Y.J., & Williams, A.E. (2008). The seven deadly sins of communication research. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W.R., & Guggenheim, L. (2011). The evolution of media effects theory: A six-stage model of cumulative research. Communication Theory, 21(2), 169–196. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikken, P. (2022). Media and the family context. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents, and media (pp. 339–346). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2019). Media and the family. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Applications and broad impact of family psychology (pp. 365–378). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000100-023
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, A., Wight, D., Hunt, K., Henderson, M., & Sargent, J. (2013). Are sexual media exposure, parental restrictions on media use and co-viewing TV and DVDs with parents and friends associated with teenagers' early sexual behaviour?. Journal of Adolescence, 36(6), 1121–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation?. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (2018). Communication privacy management theory. In D. O. Braithwaite, E. Suter, & K. Floyd (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 87–97). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S., & Child, J. T. (2020). Conceptualization and operationalization: Utility of communication privacy management theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio, S., & Durham, W. T. (2015). Communication privacy management theory: Significance for interpersonal communication. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple Perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 335–347). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, K. K., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication a false dichotomy. Human Communication Research, 15(2), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring intrapersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, L. E. (2006). Introduction: A reflective view on the development of family communication. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. xv–xx). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sabourin, T. C. (2006). Theories and metatheories to explain family communication: An overview. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 43–60). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sandstig, G., Johansson, B., & Ringsberg, K. (2013). The behavioral consequences of parents presumed media influence on restrictive mediation and co-viewing/using media. Journalism and Mass Communication, 3(7), 452–463.
   Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Messersmith, A. S. (2008). A meta-analytical review of family communication patterns and their associations with information processing, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Communication Monographs, 75(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750802256318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segrin, C., & Flora, J. (2011). Family communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shue, C. K., & Stamp, G. H. (2021). Ten years of family communication research: Theories, research perspectives, and trends. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication (3rd ed., pp. 11–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, L. (2021). Family interaction during middle childhood. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of family communication ((3rd ed, pp. 233–246). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson-Hayes, M., Gibson, D. M., Webb, L. M., Nelson, L., Smith, M. M., & Walker, A. M. (2009). College students’ perceptions of fictional television families: Perceived realism and potential for emulation. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(2), 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, L. M., Ledbetter, A. M., & Norwood, K. M. (2014). Families and technologically assisted communication. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of family communication (pp. 354–369). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. M., Martin, T. F., & Adamsons, K. (2019). Family theories: An introduction (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and social media technology in the family context. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02101.x
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2014). Mass media research (10th ed.). Cengage learning.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. (2016). Communication in the fan of disciplines. Communication Theory, 26(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar