A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research

References

• Arnold, G., and F. D. Fleischman. “The Influence of Organizations and Institutions on Wetland Policy Stability: The Rapanos Case.” Policy Studies Journal 41, no. 2 (2013): 343–364. doi:10.1111/psj.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastakoti, R. C., and G. P. Shivakoti. “Rules and Collective Action: An Institutional Analysis of the Performance of Irrigation Systems in Nepal.” Journal of Institutional Economics 8, no. 2 (2012): 225–246. doi:10.1017/S1744137411000452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basurto, X., G. Kingsley, K. McQueen, M. Smith, and C. M. Weible. “A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar.” Political Research Quarterly 63, no. 3 (2010): 523–537. doi:10.1177/1065912909334430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., B. D. Jones and P. B. Mortensen. "Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking". In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 55–102. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W., and P. deLeon. “The Design and Promise of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 1 (2011): 1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00402.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. P., C. M. Weible, S. N. Siddiki, and X. Basurto. “Integrating Core Concepts from the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Policy Designs: An Illustration from the Us National Organic Program Regulation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 28, no. 1 (2016): 159–185. doi:10.1177/0951629815603494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, S., S. A. Moore, and M. Lockwood. “Authority, Responsibility and Process in Australian Biodiversity Policy.” Environmental and Planning Law Journal 32, no. 2 (2015): 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S. E. S., and E. Ostrom. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 3 (1995): 582–600. doi:10.2307/2082975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. and C. M. Radaelli. “Does Policy Learning Meet the Standards of an Analytical Framework of the Policy Process.” Policy Studies Journal 46, no. S1 (2018): S48–S68. doi: 10.1111/psj.12250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, S. “Unveiling the Features of a Regulatory System: The Institutional Grammar of Tobacco Legislation in Mexico.” International Journal of Public Administration 38, no. 9 (2015): 616–631. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.952822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., C. M. Weible, D. P. Carter, C. Curley, A. Deslatte, and T. Heikkila. “Capturing Structural and Functional Diversity through Institutional Analysis: The Mayor Position in City Charters.” Urban Affairs Review 52, no. 1 (2016): 129–150. doi:10.1177/1078087414555999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H., Swedlow, B. and D. Unger. “Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16, no. 4 (2014): 313–334. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.857065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, S., and T. M. Koontz. “Rules for Collaboration: Institutional Analysis of Group Membership and Levels of Action in Watershed Partnerships.” Policy Studies Journal 37, no. 3 (2009): 393–414. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00320.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T. and C. M. Weible. "A Semiautomated Approach to Analyzing Polycentricity". Environmental Policy and Governance 28, no. 4 (2018): 308–328. doi:10.1002/eet.1817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T. and K. P. Andersson. “Policy Design and the Added-Value of the Institutional Development Framework.” Policy & Politics 46, no. 2 (2018): 309–324. doi:10.1332/030557318X15230060131727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T. and P. A. Cairney. "Comparison of Theories of the Policy Process." In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 301–328. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., K. Ingold, D. Nohrstedt, and C. M. Weible. “Policy Change in Comparative Contexts: Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework Outside of Western Europe and North America.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16, no. 4 (2014): 299–312. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.941200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., D. Nohrstedt, C. M. Weible, and K. Ingold. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program". In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 135–172. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, B., and P. Muller. L’Etat en Action. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Kamran, M. A., and G. P. Shivakoti. “Comparative Institutional Analysis of Customary Rights and Colonial Law in Spate Irrigation Systems of Pakistani Punjab.” Water International 38, no. 5 (2013): 601–619. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.828584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser, L. L. and E. Ostrom. “The Three Worlds of Action: A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches.” In Strategies of Political Inquiry, edited by Elinor Ostrom, 179–222. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. “The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences.” Policy Sciences 1, no. 1 (1970): 3–14. doi:10.1007/BF00145189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattor, K. M., and A. S. Cheng. “Contextual Factors Influencing Collaboration Levels and Outcomes in National Forest Stewardship Contracting.” Review of Policy Research 32, no. 6 (2015): 723–744. doi:10.1111/ropr.12151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. “An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework”. Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 1 (2011): 169–183. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novo, P., and A. Garrido. “From Policy Design to Implementation: An Institutional Analysis of the New Nicaraguan Water Law.” Water Policy 16, no. 6 (2014): 1009–1030. doi:10.2166/wp.2014.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. “Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 35–72. 1st ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. "Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework." In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Paul A. Sabatier, 21–64. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V. and E. Ostrom. “Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 31, no. 3/4 (1971): 203–216. doi:10.2307/974676.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 1st ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., and M. Cox. “The IAD Framework and the SES Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 215–252. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., and T. Heikkila. “Resolving Water Conflicts: A Comparative Analysis of Interstate River Compacts.” Policy Studies Journal 37, no. 3 (2009): 367–392. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00319.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter, A. and I. Theesfeld. “The Grammar of Institutions”. Rationality and Society 22, no. 4 (2010): 445–475. doi:10.1177/1043463110377299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, M. K. McBeth, and C. M. Radaelli. "The Narrative Policy Framework." In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 173–214. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S. “Assessing Policy Design and Interpretation: An Institutions‐Based Analysis in the Context of Aquaculture in Florida and Virginia, United States.” Review of Policy Research 31, no. 4 (2014): 281–303. doi:10.1111/ropr.12075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., and S. Lupton. “Assessing Nonprofit Rule Interpretation and Compliance.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45, no. 4 (2016): 156–174. doi:10.1177/0899764016643608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., C. M. Weible, X. Basurto, and J. Calanni. “Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool.” Policy Studies Journal 39, no. 1 (2011): 79–103. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., X. Basurto, and C. M. Weible. “Using the Institutional Grammar Tool to Understand Regulatory Compliance: The Case of Colorado Aquaculture.” Regulation & Governance 6, no. 2 (2012): 167–188. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01132.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smajgl, A., L. R. Izquierdo, and M. Huigen. “Modeling Endogenous Rule Changes in an Institutional Context: The Adico Sequence.” Advances in Complex Systems 11, no. 2 (2008): 199–215. doi:10.1142/S021952590800157X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., and D. P. Carter. “The Composition of Policy Change: Comparing Colorado’s 1977 and 2006 Smoking Bans.” Policy Sciences 48, no. 2 (2015): 207–231. doi:10.1007/s11077-015-9217-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. and P. A. Sabatier, eds. Theories of the Policy Process. 4th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. Governing the Commons in China. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar