Communication for coproduction: a systematic review and research agenda

References

• Alford, John. “The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom.” Public Management Review 16, no. 3 (2014): 299–316. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, John. “Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? Toward a Contingency Theory.” Administration & Society 34, no. 1 (2002): 32–56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, José M., Rhys Andrews, Judith Clifton, and Daniel Diaz-Fuentes. “Factors Influencing Citizens’ Co-Production of Environmental Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Public Management Review (2019). doi:10.1080/147190372019.1619806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Simon Calmar, Helena Skyt Nielsen, and Mette Kjaergaard Thomsen. “How to Increase Citizen Coproduction: Replication and Extension of Existing Research.” International Public Management Journal (2018): 1–21. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1518851.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, James, and Justin M. Rao. “The Power of Asking: How Communication Affects Selfishness, Empathy, and Altruism.” Journal of Public Economics 95, no. 7–8 (2011): 513–520. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, Gerry Stoker, Tricia Jones, Elke Loeffler, and Monica Pinilla Roncancio. “Activating Collective Co-Production of Public Services: Influencing Citizens to Participate in Complex Governance Mechanisms in the UK.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, no. 1 (2016): 47–68. doi:10.1177/0020852314566009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, Taco, and Marlies Honingh. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76, no. 3 (2016): 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, Jeffrey, and Robert E. England. “Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept.” Public Administration Review 43, no. 1 (1983): 59–65. doi:10.2307/975300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buick, Fiona, Deborah Blackman, Janine O'Flynn, Michael O'Donnell, and Damian West. “Effective Practitioner—Scholar Relationships: Lessons from a Coproduction Partnership.” Public Administration Review 76, no. 1 (2016): 35–47. doi:10.1111/puar.12481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse, Kathleen, Ruth Sessler Bernstein, and Diana Bilimoria. “The Influence of Board Diversity, Board Diversity Policies and Practices, and Board Inclusion Behaviors on Nonprofit Governance Practices.” Journal of Business Ethics 133, no. 1 (2016): 179–191. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2352-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, Thad D. “Do Donors Penalize Nonprofit Organizations with Accumulated Wealth?” Public Administration Review 71, no. 6 (2011): 859–869. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaille, Charlotte, and John Marshall. “Education and anti-Immigration Attitudes: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms across Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 113, no. 1 (2019): 254–263. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Yuan (Daniel). “Exploring the Role of Nonprofits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Coproduction to Cogovernance.” Public Administration Review 79, no. 2 (2019): 203–214. doi:10.1111/puar.12970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, Robert B., and David A. Schroeder. “Increasing Compliance by Legitimizing Paltry Contributions: When Even a Penny Helps.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34, no. 4 (1976): 599–604. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Benjamin Y., Jeffrey L. Brudney, and Sung-Gheel Jang. “Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases.” Public Administration Review 73, no. 5 (2013): 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cnaan, Ram A., Kathleen Jones, Allison Dickin, and Michele Salomon. “Nonprofit Watchdogs: Do They Serve the Average Donor.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 21, no. 4 (2011): 381–397. doi:10.1002/nml.20032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, Sally, Jeffrey L. Brudney, and J. Edward Kellough. “Bureaucracy as a Representative Institution: Toward a Reconciliation of Bureaucratic Government and Democratic Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 42, no. 3 (1998): 717–744. doi:10.2307/2991727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comfort, Louise K. “Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control.” Public Administration Review 67, no. s1 (2007): 189–197. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00827.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, James M. “Coprovision: Citizen Time and Money Donations in Public Service Provision.” Public Administration Review 44, no. 4 (1984): 324–333. doi:10.2307/976078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountain, James, Wilson Campbell, Paul Epstein, and Brett Robinson. “Report on the GASB Citizen Discussion Groups on Performance Reporting.” GASB Reserch Reports. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board of the Financial Accounting Foundation, 2002. Accessed Nov 20, 2019. http://www.seagov.org/sea_gasb_project/reports_citizen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Richard G., and David S. Salkever. “Nonprofit Organizations in the Health Sector.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, no. 4 (1994): 129–144. doi:10.1257/jep.8.4.129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, George H. “Toward a New Public Administration.” In Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective, edited by Frank Marini, 309–331. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Company, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, James L., Justin Marlowe, and Sanjay K. Pandey. “Penetrating the Performance Predicament: Communication as a Mediator or Moderator of Organizational Culture’s Impact on Public Organizational Performance.” Public Administration Review 68, no. 2 (2008): 266–281. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00861.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore, Al. From Red Tape to Results: Creating A Government That Works Better & Costs Less. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Government Pringint Office, 1993. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED384294.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, Doris A. The Power of Communication: Managing Information in Public Organizations. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, Laura C. “Producing a Vision of the Self-Governing Mother: A Study of Street-Level Bureaucrat Behavior in Coproductive Interactions.” Administration & Society 50, no. 8 (2018): 1148–1174. doi:10.1177/0095399717719110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Noel. “Charity Accounting—an Empirical Study of the Information Needs of Contributors to UK Fund Raising Charities.” Financial Accountability and Management 6, no. 4 (1990): 295–307. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.1990.tb00335.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ingrams, Alex. “Mobile Phones, Smartphones, and the Transformation of Civic Behavior through Mobile Information and Connectivity.” Government Information Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2015): 506–515. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Morten, and Simon Calmar Andersen. “Coproduction and Equity in Public Service Delivery.” Public Administration Review 73, no. 5 (2013): 704–713. doi:10.1111/puar.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Morten. “Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23, no. 1 (2013): 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Oliver, and Alice Moseley. “Does Performance Information about Public Services Affect Citizens’ Perception, Satisfaction, and Voice Behaviour? Field Experiments with Absolute and Relative Performance Information.” Public Administration 92, no. 2 (2014): 493–511. doi:10.1111/padm.12066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Oliver, and Peter John. “Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17, no. 4 (2006): 567–580. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York City, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald F. Little Bites of Big Data for Public Policy. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Min-Hyu, Huafang Li, Marc Holzer, and Mengzhong Zhang. “Public Administration Research in Mainland China.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, edited by Ali Farazmand. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3717-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Min-Hyu, Huafang Li, Marc Holzer, and Mengzhong Zhang. “Public Administration Research in Mainland China: A Systematic Review of Chinese Public Administration in English Language Journals (1996–2016).” International Journal of Public Administration 49, no. 2 (2019): 753–764. doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1506936.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Mirae, Dyana P. Mason, and Huafang Li. “Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising.” In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges & Contributions, edited by Oliver James, Sebastian Jilke, and GREGG G Van Ryzin, 415–436. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kustov, Alexander, and Giuliana Pardelli. “Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)Effects of Diversity.” American Political Science Review 112, no. 4 (2018): 1096–1103. doi:10.1017/S0003055418000308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasswell, Harold D. “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society.” In Mass Communications, edited by Wilbur Schramm and Donald Roberts, 84. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, Veiko, Taco Brandsen, and Piret Tõnurist. “The Potential Impacts of Digital Technologies on Co-Production and Co-Creation.” Public Management Review 21, no. 11 (2019): 1665. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang, and Bin Chen. “Turning Challenges into Opportunities: Advancing Studies of Nonprofit Organizations in China.” Chinese Public Administration Review 9, no. 1 (2018): 1–5. doi:10.22140/cpar.v9i1.172.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang, Gregg G. Van Ryzin. “A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals.” In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges & Contributions, edited by Oliver James, Sebastian Jilke, and Gregg G. Van Ryzin, 20–36. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017. doi:10.1017/9781316676912.003.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang, and Lindsey McDougle. “Information Source Reliance and Charitable Giving Decisions.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 27, no. 4 (2017): 549–560. doi:10.1002/nml.21258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang, Chengxin Xu, and Lindsey McDougle. “Philanthropy Can Be Learned: A Qualitative Study of Student Experiences in Experiential Philanthropy Courses.” Philosophy & Education 2, no. 2 (2019): 29–52. doi:10.2979/phileduc.2.2.02.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang. “Donald Kettl, Little Bites of Big Data for Public Policy.” Chinese Public Administration Review 10, no. 1 (2019): 77–78. doi:10.22140/cpar.v10i1.194.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Huafang. “Information and Donations: A Study of Nonprofit Online Communication.” Dissertation, Rutgers University, 2017. doi:10.7282/T35T3PDQ.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Shuhua Monica, and Qianli Yuan. “The Evolution of Information and Communication Technology in Public Administration.” Public Administration and Development 35, no. 2 (2015): 140–151. doi:10.1002/pad.1717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Jiahuan. “The Philanthropic Consequence of Government Grants to Nonprofit Organizations: A Meta-Analysis.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 26, no. 4 (2016): 381–400. doi:10.1002/nml.21203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Ji, Qun Wang, Chao Dong, and Huafang Li. “The Research Infrastructure of Chinese Foundations, a Database for Chinese Civil Society Studies.” Scientific Data 4, no. 1 (2017): 170094. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Michael Craig Musheno. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McDougle, Lindsey, Danielle McDonald, Huafang Li, Whitney McIntyre Miller, and Chengxin Xu. “Can Philanthropy Be Taught?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 46, no. 2 (2017): 330–351. doi:10.1177/0899764016662355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, Evelyn A., Wei Li, and Pamela C. Smith. “An Experimental Examination of US Individual Donors’ Information Needs and Use.” Financial Accountability & Management 29, no. 3 (2013): 327–347. doi:10.1111/faam.12017.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, Albert J. “Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support.” Public Administration Review 71, no. 4 (2011): 598–607. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, Albert J. “New Media and the Coproduction of Safety: An Empirical Analysis of Dutch Practices.” The American Review of Public Administration 44, no. 1 (2014): 17–34. doi:10.1177/0275074012455843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, David, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, and Douglas G. Altman. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Medicine 6, no. 7 (2009): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxham, Claire, Ton van der Wiele, Roger Williams, and Jos van Iwaarden. “Charities: How Important is Performance to Donors?” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 26, no. 1 (2009): 5–22. doi:10.1108/02656710910924143.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald P., and Sanjay K. Pandey. “The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20, no. 4 (2010): 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Ishani, and Nilanjana Mukherjee. “Designing for Sustainable Outcomes: Espousing Behavioural Change into Co-Production Programmes.” Policy and Society 37, no. 3 (2018): 326–346. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1383032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, Tina, Alessandro Sancino, and Mariafrancesca Sicilia. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77, no. 5 (2017): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesti, Giorgia. “Co-Production for Innovation: The Urban Living Lab Experience.” Policy and Society 37, no. 3 (2018): 310–325. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Daniel Tumminelli, Dietmar Offenhuber, Jessica Baldwin-Philippi, Melissa Sands, and Eric Gordon. “Uncharted Territoriality in Coproduction: The Motivations for 311 Reporting.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27, no. 2 (2017): 320–335. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, Charles A. “Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better?” Academy of Management Journal 23, no. 4 (1980): 684–696. doi:10.5465/255556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Asmus Leth. “The Numerical Psychology of Performance Information: Implications for Citizens, Managers, and Policymakers.” Public Performance & Management Review 39, no. 1 (2015): 100–115. doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1071167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24, no. 6 (1996): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, Rocco. “Contextualizing Co-Production of Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29, no. 1 (2016): 72–90. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, Sanjay K., and James L. Garnett. “Exploring Public Sector Communication Performance: Testing a Model and Drawing Implications.” Public Administration Review 66, no. 1 (2006): 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00554.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, Roger B., Paula C. Baker, Larry Kiser, Ronald Oakerson, Elinor Ostrom, Vincent Ostrom, Stephen L. Percy, Martha B. Vandivort, Gordon P. Whitaker, and Rick Wilson. “Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9, no. 7 (1981): 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, Salvador, Gregg G. Van Ryzin, Tony Bovaird, and Elke LÖffler. “Correlates of Co-Production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens.” International Public Management Journal 16, no. 1 (2013): 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, Linda M. “Is Accounting Information from Nonprofit Organizations Useful to Donors? A Review of Charitable Giving and Value-Relevance.” Journal of Accounting Literature 22, no. 1 (2003): 104–129.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Linda M., and John M. Trussel. “Fundamental Analysis of Not-for-Profit Financial Statements: An Examination of Financial Vulnerability Measure.” Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting 12, (2008): 216–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, Victor. “Citizens and Co-Production of Welfare Services: Childcare in Eight European Countries.” Public Management Review 8, no. 4 (2006): 503–519. doi:10.1080/14719030601022882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, Victor. “Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production.” Public Management Review 16, no. 3 (2014): 383–401. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher. “Performance Information for Democracy: The Missing Link?” Evaluation 12, no. 1 (2006): 38–55. doi:10.1177/1356389006064191.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, Kathleen J., and Fred Thompson. “Managing Coprovision: Using Expectancy Theory to Overcome the Free-Rider Problem.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4, no. 2 (1994): 179–196. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037203.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, Norma M., Gregg G. Van Ryzin, and Karima Jackson. “Representative Bureaucracy, Race, and Policing: A Survey Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28, no. 4 (2018): 506–518. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, Norma M., Gregg G. Van Ryzin, and Huafang Li. “Representative Bureaucracy and the Willingness to Coproduce: An Experimental Study.” Public Administration Review 76, no. 1 (2016): 121–130. doi:10.1111/puar.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, Norma M., and Gregg G. Van Ryzin. “Representative Bureaucracy: A Lever to Enhance Social Equity, Coproduction, and Democracy.” Public Administration Review 77, no. 1 (2017): 21–30. doi:10.1111/puar.12649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, Norma M., Gregg G. Van Ryzin, and Cecilia F. Lavena. “Representative Bureaucracy in Policing: Does It Increase Perceived Legitimacy?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, no. 3 (2014): 537–551. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, Michael, and Joseph Stiglitz. “Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, no. 4 (1976): 629–649. doi:10.2307/1885326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, Gregory, Daniel Neely, and Chao Guo. “Web Disclosure and the Market for Charitable Contributions.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33, no. 2 (2014): 127–144. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, John, and Robert McGowan. Information Systems and Public Management. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sundeen, Richard A. “Coproduction and Communities: Implications for Local Administrators.” Administration & Society 16, no. 4 (1985): 387–402. doi:10.1177/009539978501600401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, Mette Kjaergaard, and Morten Jakobsen. “Influencing Citizen Coproduction by Sending Encouragement and Advice: A Field Experiment.” International Public Management Journal 18, no. 2 (2015): 286–303. doi:10.1080/10967494.2014.996628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, Mette K. “Citizen Coproduction: The Influence of Self-Efficacy Perception and Knowledge of How to Coproduce.” American Review of Public Administration 47, no. 3 (2017): 340–353. doi:10.1177/0275074015611744
   Google Scholar
• Trussel, John M., and Linda M. Parsons. “Financial Reporting Factors Affecting Donations to Charitable Organizations.” Advances in Accounting 23, (2007): 263–285. doi:10.1016/S0882-6110(07)23010-X.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, Carola, and Trui Steen. “Why Engage in Co-Production of Public Services? Mixing Theory and Empirical Evidence.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82, no. 1 (2016): 28–46. doi:10.1177/0020852314566007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, Gregg, Norma Riccucci, and Huafang Li. “Representative Bureaucracy and Its Symbolic Effect on Citizens: A Conceptual Replication.” Public Management Review 19, no. 9 (2017): 1365–1379. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1195009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, William, Sebastian Jilke, Lars Tummers, and Victor Bekkers. “Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments.” Public Administration Review 78, no. 6 (2018): 864–873. doi:10.1111/puar.12896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, William H., Victor J. J. M. Bekkers, and Lars G. Tummers. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17, no. 9 (2015): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Derrick. “Digital Member Network Implementation and Coproduction: An Investigation of an Alumni Association Network.” Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2019. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/bus_admin_diss/119.
   Google Scholar
• Weyant, James M., and Stephen L. Smith. “Getting More by Asking for Less: The Effects of Request Size on Donations of Charity1.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17, no. 4 (1987): 392–400. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00320.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, Gordon. “Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery.” Public Administration Review 40, no. 3 (1980): 240–246. doi:10.2307/975377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, Arjen de., and René Bekkers. “Government Support and Charitable Donations: A Meta-Analysis of the Crowding-out Hypothesis.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27, no. 2 (2017): 301–319. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Chengxin, Huafang Li, and Lindsey M. McDougle. “Experiential Philanthropy.” In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–7. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3048-1.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Dennis R. “Complementary, Supplementary, or Adversarial? Nonprofit-Government Relations.” In Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, 2nd ed. edited by Elizabeth T. Boris and C. Eugene Steuerle, 37–80. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar