Who eats who in biofilms? Exploring the drivers of microalgal and micro-meiofaunal abundance

References

• Artois, T., D. Fontaneto, W. D. Hummon, S. J. Mcinnes, M. A. Todaro, M. V. Sørensen, and A. Zullini. 2011. “Ubiquity of microscopic animals? Evidence from the morphological approach in species identifi cation.” In Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms: Is Everything Small Everywhere?, edited by D. Fontaneto, 244–83. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baars, J. W. 1983. “Autoecological investigations on freshwater diatoms. 1. Generation times of some species.” Archiv für Hydrobiologie - Supplement 67: 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, J. C., P. Caumette, P. Lebaron, R. Matheron, and P. Normand. 2011. Écologie microbienne : Microbiologie des Milieux Naturels et Anthropisés. Pau: Presses Universitaires de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour.
   Google Scholar
• Borchardt, M. A., and T. L. Bott. 1995. “Meiofaunal grazing of bacteria and algae in a piedmont stream.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14: 278–298.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, T.L. 1996. “Algae in microscopic food webs.” In Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, edited by R.J. Stevenson, M.L. Bothwell, and R.L. Lowe, p. 574–608 Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, T. L., and M. A. Borchardt. 1999. “Grazing of protozoa, bacteria, and diatoms by meiofauna in lotic epibenthic communities.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18: 499–513.
   Google Scholar
• Burkholder, J. M., R. G. Wetzel, and K. L. Klomparens. 1990. “Direct comparison of phosphate uptake by adnate and loosely attached microalgae within an intact biofilm matrix.” Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56: 2882–2890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canler, J. P., E. Cotteux, P. Duchène, and J. M. Perret. 1999. Aide au Diagnostic des Stations d'Épuration par l'Observation Microscopique des Boues Activées. Cahors: CEMAGREF editions.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J. M., P. A. Abrams, J. P. Grover, S. Diehl, P. Chesson, R. D. Holt, S. A. Richards, R. M. Nisbet, and T. J. Case. 2002. “The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis.” Ecology Letters 5: 302–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coquillé, N., G. Jan, A. Moreira, and S. Morin. 2015. “Use of diatom motility features as endpoints of metolachlor toxicity.” Aquatic Toxicology 158: 202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Puytorac, P., J. Grain, and J. P. Mignot. 1987. Précis de protistologie. Paris: Société Nouvelle des Editions Boubée.
   Google Scholar
• Descamps-Julien, B., and A. Gonzalez. 2005. “Stable coexistence in a fluctuating environment: An experimental demonstration.” Ecology 86: 2815–2824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, I., A. L. Jackson, M. T. Pusch, and K. Irvine. 2009. “Nutrient enrichment homogenizes lake benthic assemblages at local and regional scales.” Ecology Letters 90: 3470–3477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauvelle, V. 2012. “Évaluation de la contamination en pesticides des tributaires du bassin d’Arcachon et développement d’un échantillonneur passif spécifique des herbicides anioniques.” Doctorat en chimie environnementale. PhD thesis - Univ. Bordeaux I Ecole Doct. Sciences chimiques (Bordeaux).
   Google Scholar
• Foissner, W. 1996. “A user-friendly guide to the ciliate (protozoa, ciliophora) commonly used by hydrobiologists as bioindicators in rivers, lakes, and waste waters, with notes on their ecology.” Freshwater Biology 35: 375–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, E., T. B. Atwood, P. Corvalan, and D. S. Srivastava. 2015. “Behavioural responses to predation may explain shifts in community structure.” Freshwater Biology 60: 125–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1959. “The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European Pine Sawfly.” The Canadian Entomologist 91: 293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Kanavillil, N., and S. Kurissery. 2013. “Dynamics of grazing protozoa follow that of microalgae in natural biofilm communities.” Hydrobiologia 718: 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lainé, M., S. Morin, and J. Tison-Rosebery. 2014. “A multicompartment approach – diatoms, macrophytes, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish – to assess the impact of toxic industrial releases on a small French river.” PLoS ONE 9 (7): e102358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, K., A. Liess, J. J. Piggott, C. R. Townsend, and C. D. Matthaei. 2011. “Light, nutrients and grazing interact to determine stream diatom community composition and functional group structure.” Freshwater Biology 56: 264–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leflaive, J., S. Boulêtreau, E. Buffan-Dubau, and L. Ten-Hage. 2008. “Temporal patterns in epilithic biofilm – relation with a putative allelopathic activity.” Fundamental and Applied Limnology 173: 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loza, V., E. Perona, and P. Mateo. 2014. “Specific responses to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment in cyanobacteria: factors influencing changes in species dominance along eutrophic gradients.” Water Research 48: 622–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, D. H. 2010. The Ciliated Protozoa: Characterization, Classification, and Guide to the Literature. 3rd ed. Dordrecht, NLD: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Majdi, N., M. Tackx, W. Traunspurger, and E. Buffan-Dubau. 2012. “Feeding of biofilm-dwelling nematodes examined using HPLC-analysis of gut pigment contents.” Hydrobiologia 680: 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccormick, P. V. 1991. “Lotic protistan herbivore selectivity and its potential impact on benthic algal assemblages.” Journal of the North American Benthological Society 10: 238–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, S., M. Vivas-Nogues, T. T. Duong, A. Boudou, M. Coste, and F. Delmas. 2007. “Dynamics of benthic diatom colonization in a cadmium/zinc-polluted river (Riou-mort, France).” Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie 168: 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paine, R. T. 1976. “Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction.” Ecology 57: 858–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchey, O. L., P. T. Mcphearson, T. M. Casey, and P. J. Morin. 1999. “Environmental warming alters food-web structure and ecosystem function.” Nature 402 (6757): 69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. G., and R. J. Stevenson. 1990. “Post-spate development of epilithic algal communities in different current environments.” Canadian Journal of Botany 68: 2092–2105.
   Google Scholar
• Proia, L., F. Cassió, C. Pascoal, A. Tlili, and A. M. Romaní. 2012. “The use of attached microbial communities to assess ecological risks of pollutants in river ecosystems: the role of heterotrophs.” In Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, edited by H. Guasch, A. Ginebreda and A. Geiszinger, 55–83. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roubeix, V., V. Fauvelle, J. Tison-Rosebery, N. Mazzella, M. Coste, and F. Delmas. 2012. “Assessing the impact of chloroacetanilide herbicides and their metabolites on periphyton in the Leyre river (SW France) via short term growth inhibition tests on autochthonous diatoms.” Journal of Environmental Monitoring 14 (6): 1655–1663.
   Google Scholar
• Sabater, S., H. Guasch, M. Ricart, A. Romaní, G. Vidal, C. Klünder, and M. Schmitt-Jansen. 2007. “Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface.” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 387 (4): 1425–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigee, D. C. 2005. Freshwater Microbiology: Biodiversity and Dynamic Interactions of Microorganisms in the Aquatic Environment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stoks, R., and M. A. Mcpeek. 2003. “Antipredator behavior and physiology determine lestes species turnover along the pond-permanence gradient.” Ecology 84: 3327–3338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tachet, H., P. Richoux, M. Bournaud, and P. Usseglio Polatera. 2010. Invertébrés d'eau douce : Systématique, biologie, écologie. Paris: CNRS Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Tison, J., Y. S. Park, M. Coste, J. G. Wasson, L. Ector, F. Rimet, and F. Delmas. 2005. “Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydrosystem scale.” Water Research 39: 3177–3188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedry, B. 1996. Les biomasses épuratrices. Nanterre: Agence de l'eau Seine-Normandie.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson, J.G., A. Chandesris, and H. Pella. 2002. Définition des hydro-écorégions de France métropolitaine. Approche régionale de typologie des eaux courantes et éléments pour la définition des peuplements de référence d'invertébrés, 190: Technical report, Cemagref Lyon BEA/LHQ.
   Google Scholar