Perianth phyllotaxis and symmetry in Lamiales

References

• Bello MA, Rudall PJ, González F, Fernández‐Alonso JL. 2004. Floral morphology and development in Aragoa (Plantaginaceae) and related members of the order lamiales. Int J Plant Sci. 165(5):723–738. doi: 10.1086/422046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun A. 1831. Vergleichende Untersuchung über die Ordnung der Schuppen an den Tannenzapfen als Einleitung zur Untersuchung der Blattstellung überhaupt. Bonn: Thormann.
   Google Scholar
• Bravais A. 1850. Mémoire sur les systèmes formés par les points distribués régulièrement sur un plan ou dans l’espace. J Écol Pol. 19:1–128.
   Google Scholar
• Bravais L, Bravais A. 1837. Essai sur la disposition symétrique des inflorescences. Ann Sci Nat Bot. 7:193-221; 291–348.
   Google Scholar
• Bull-Hereñu K, Claßen-Bockhoff R. 2011. Open and closed inflorescences: more than simple opposites. J Exp Bot. 62(1):79–88. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull-Hereñu K, dos Santos P, Toni JFG, El Ottra JHL, Thaowetsuwan P, Jeiter J, et al. 2022. Mechanical forces in floral development. Plants. 11(5):661. doi:10.3390/plants11050661.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Doyle S, Magrath R, Coen E. 1995. Control of flower development and phyllotaxy by meristem identity genes in Antirrhinum. Plant Cell. 7(12):2001–2011. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.12.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choob V. 2022. Prophyll in monocots: the starting point of lateral shoot phyllotaxis. Front Plant Sci. 13:855146. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.855146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citerne HL, Möller M, Cronk QCB. 2000. Diversity of cycloidea-like genes in gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann Bot. 86(1):167–176. doi: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claßen-Bockhoff R, Bull-Hereñu K. 2013. Towards an ontogenetic understanding of inflorescence diversity. Ann Bot. 112(8):1523–1542. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curie P. 1894. Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique. J Phys Th App. 3:393–417. doi: 10.1051/jphystap:018940030039300.
   Google Scholar
• Douady S, Couder Y. 1996. Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self-organizing process. Part I: the spiral modes resulting from time-periodic iterations. J Th Biol. 178(3):255–273. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Eichler AW. 1875. Blüthendiagramme construirt und erläutert. Vol. Volume I, Leipzig: Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Endress PK. 1998. Antirrhinum and asteridae evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 51:133–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endress PK. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. Int J Plant Sci. 160(S6):S3–S23. doi: 10.1086/314211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galván-Ampudia C, Cerutti G, Legrand J, Brunoud G, Martin-Arevalillo R, Azais R, et al. 2020. Temporal integration of auxin information for the regulation of patterning. eLife. 9:e55832. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcês HM, Spencer VM, Kim M. 2016. Control of floret symmetry by RAY3, SvDIV1B, and SvRAD in the capitulum of Senecio vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 171(3):2055–2068. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin C, Golé C, Douady S. 2020. Phyllotaxis as geometric canalization during plant development. Development. 147(19):dev165878. doi: 10.1242/dev.165878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeister W. 1868. Allgemeine Morphologie der Gewachse. Leipzig: Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth DG, Donoghue MJ. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the “ECE” (CYC/TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103(24):9101–9106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602827103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampny CM, Dickinson TA, Dengler NG. 1993. Quantitative comparison of floral development in Veronica chamaedrys and Veronicastrum virginicum (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot. 80(4):449–460. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1993.tb13823.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitazawa MS, Fujimoto K. 2015. A dynamical phyllotaxis Model to determine floral organ number. PLOS Comp Biol. 11(5):e1004145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuth P. 1899. Handbuch der Blütenbiologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lucibelli F, Valoroso MC, Aceto S. 2020. Radial or bilateral? The molecular basis of floral symmetry. Genes. 11(4):395. doi: 10.3390/genes11040395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, Coen E. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell. 99(4):367–376. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81523-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature. 383(6603):794–799. doi: 10.1038/383794a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meicenheimer RD. 1979. Relationships between shoot growth and changing phyllotaxy of ranunculus. Am J Bot. 66(5):557–569. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1979.tb06258.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghiloo S. 2020. Patterns of symmetry expression in angiosperms: developmental and evolutionary lability. Front Ecol Evol. 8:104. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghiloo S, Dadpour MR, Gohari G, Endress PK. 2013. Comparative study of inflorescence development in oleaceae. Am J Bot. 100(4):647–663. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa A, Kitazawa MS, Fujimoto K. 2020. A design principle for floral organ number and arrangement in flowers with bilateral symmetry. Development. 147:dev182907. doi: 10.1242/dev.182907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang HB, Pang Sun QW, He SZ, Wang YZ. 2010. Expression pattern of CYC-like genes relating to a dorsalized actinomorphic flower in Tengia (gesneriaceae). J Syst Evol. 48(5):309–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00091.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston JC, Kost MA, Hileman LC. 2009. Conservation and diversification of the symmetry developmental program among close relatives of snapdragon with divergent floral morphologies. New Phyt. 182(3):751–762. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02794.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston JC, Martinez CC, Hileman LC. 2011. Gradual disintegration of the floral symmetry gene network is implicated in the evolution of a wind-pollination syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(6):2343–2348. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011361108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes E, Sauquet H, Nadot S. 2016. Perianth symmetry changed at least 199 times in angiosperm evolution. Taxon. 65(5):945–964. doi: 10.12705/655.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehr EM, Weber A. 2009. Floral ontogeny of Oleaceae and its systematic impications. Int J Plant Sci. 170(7):845–859. doi: 10.1086/599074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Hileman LC. 2022. A CYC–RAD–DIV–DRIF interaction likely pre-dates the origin of floral monosymmetry in Lamiales. EvoDevo. 13(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13227-021-00187-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoloff D, Remizowa M, Bateman R, et al. 2018. Was the ancestral angiosperm flower whorled throughout? Am J Bot. 105(1):5–15. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis D., Endress, P., Chase, M., Manchester, S., Judd, W., Mavrodiev, E, et al. 2018. Phylogeny and evolution of the angiosperms. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer V, Kim M. 2018. Re“cyc”ling molecular regulators in the evolution and development of flower symmetry. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 79:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker SC. 2003. Floral development in legumes. Plant Phys. 131(3):911–926. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.017459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent CA, Coen ES. 2004. A temporal and morphological framework for flower development in antirrhinum majus. Can J Bot. 82(5):681–690. doi: 10.1139/b04-042.
   Google Scholar
• Walch JP. 2022. Modeling phyllotaxis: from the inhibition potential to the real plant. J Th Biol. 553:111261. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111261.
   Google Scholar
• Walch JP, Blaise S. 2022a. Mathematical modeling the influence of Bracteoles on sepal arrangement. Flora. 295: 152138.
   Google Scholar
• Walch JP, Blaise S. 2022b. Modeling basal angiosperm floral phyllotaxis. Bot Let. 169(3):305–318. doi: 10.1080/23818107.2022.2067226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walch JP, Blaise S. 2023. Phyllotaxis models: a tool for evolutionary biologists. London: ISTE/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wessinger CA, Hileman LC. 2020. Parallelism in flower evolution and development. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 51(1):387–408. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-124511.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong J, Kellogg EA. 2015. Stepwise evolution of corolla symmetry in CYCLOIDEA2-like and RADIALIS-like gene expression patterns in Lamiales. Am J Bot. 102(8):1260–1267. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong J, Preston JC, Hileman LC, Kellogg EA. 2017. Repeated and diverse losses of corolla bilateral symmetry in the lamiaceae. Ann Bot. 119(7):1211–1223. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou XR, Wang YZ, Smith JF, Chen R. 2008. Altered expression patterns of TCP and MYB genes relating to the floral developmental transition from initial zygomorphy to actinomorphy in Bournea (gesneriaceae). New Phyt. 178(3):532–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02384.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar