“Diminishing returns” in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass across 94 teas in China

References

• Ackerly DD, Knight CA, Weiss SB, Barton KE, Starmer KP. 2002. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia. 130(3):449–457. doi: 10.1007/s004420100805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchet DC, Cheptou PO, Munoz F, Overbeck G. 2017. Mowing influences community-level variation in resource-use strategies and flowering phenology along an ecological succession on Mediterranean road slopes. Appl Veg Sci. 20(3):376–387. doi: 10.1111/avsc.12311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SB, Li JL, Sun J, Zhong QL, Hu DD, Cheng DL. 2023. “Diminishing returns” and leaf area-biomass scaling of ferns in subtropical ecosystems. Front Plant Sci. 14:1187704. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1187704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du YJ, Fan WL, Wu J, Zheng MX, Wang LX, Yu XY, Chigaba S. 2021. Feasibility in estimating the dry leaf mass and specific leaf area of 50 bamboo species based on nondestructive measurements. Forests. 12(11):1554. doi: 10.3390/f12111554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo XC, Shi PJ, Ü N, Hölscher D, Wang R, Liu MD, Li YR, Dong LN, Niklas KJ. 2021. “Diminishing returns” for leaves of five age-groups of Phyllostachys edulis culms. Am J Botany. 108(9):1662–1672. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao YB, Niklas KJ, Wang L, Yu KX, Li YR, Shi PJ. 2022. Influence of leaf age on the scaling relationships of lamina mass vs. area. Front Plant Sci. 13:860206. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.860206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröber W, Böhnke M, Welk E, Wirth C, Bruelheide H, Graae BJ. 2012. Leaf trait-environment relationships in a subtropical broadleaved forest in south-east China. PLOS ONE. 7(4):e35742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li GY, Yang DM, Sun SC. 2008. Allometric relationships between lamina area, lamina mass and petiole mass of 93 temperate woody species vary with leaf habit, leaf form and altitude. Funct Ecol. 22:557–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01407.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YR, Shi PJ, Niinemets Ü, Song Y, Yu KX, Schrader JL, Niklas KJ. 2022. Diminishing returns among lamina fresh and dry mass, surface area, and petiole fresh mass among nine Lauraceae species. Am J Bot. 109(3):377–392. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milla R, Reich PB. 2007. The scaling of leaf area and mass: the cost of light interception increases with leaf size. Proc R Soc B. 274(1622):2109–2115. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ, Cobb ED. 2008. Evidence for “diminishing returns” from the scaling of stem diameter and specific leaf area. Am J Bot. 95(5):549–557. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ, Cobb ED, Niinemets U, Reich PB, Sellin A, Shipley B, Wright IJ. 2007. “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of functional leaf traits across and within species groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104(21):8891–8896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701135104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ, Cobb ED, Spatz HC. 2009. Predicting the allometry of leaf surface area and dry mass. Am J Bot. 96(2):531–536. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ. 2002. Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. Am J Bot. 89(5):812–819. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.5.812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan S, Liu C, Zhang WP, Xu SS, Wang N, Li Y, Gao J, Wang Y, Wang GX, De Smet I. 2013. The scaling relationships between leaf mass and leaf area of vascular plant species change with altitude. PLOS ONE. 8(10):65–65. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Ü N, Poorter L, Wright IJ, Villar R. 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 182(3):565–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02830.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quétier F, Thébault A, Lavorel S. 2007. Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change. Ecol Monogr. 77(1):33–52. doi: 10.1890/06-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Walters MB. 1998. Leaf structure (specific leaf area) modulates photosynthesis–nitrogen relations: evidence from within and across species and functional groups. Funct Ecol. 12(6):948–958. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00274.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi PJ, Li YR, Hui C, Ratkowsky DA, Yu XJ, Ü N. 2020. Does the law of diminishing returns in leaf scaling apply to vines? – Evidence from 12 species of climbing plants. Glob Ecol Conserv. 21:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Fan R, Niklas K, Zhong Q, Yang F, Li M, Chen X, Sun M, Cheng D. 2017. “Diminishing returns” in the scaling of leaf area vs. dry mass in Wuyi Mountain bamboos, southeast China. Am J Bot. 104(7):993–998. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1700068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu GJ, Niklas KJ, Li M, Sun J, Lyu M, Chen XP, Wang MT, Zhong QL, Cheng DL. 2019. “Diminishing returns” in the scaling between leaf area and twig size in three forest communities along an elevation gradient of Wuyi Mountain, China. Forests. 10(12):1138. doi: 10.3390/f10121138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar