Embracing Complexity and Uncertainty

References

• Adger, W. N., N. W. Arnell, and E. L. Tompkins. 2005. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change 15:77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Africa Development Bank. 2013. Methodology for tracking climate adaptation and mitigation. Infrastructure, Regional Integration and Private Sector Vice Presidency, Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Science. http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Generic-Documents/Methodolgy%20for%20Tracking%20Climate%20Adaptation%20and%20Mitigation%20Finance.pdf (last accessed 19 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., and E. Ostrom. 2008. Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Science 41:71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Asseng, S., F. Ewer, C. Rosenzweig, J. W. Jones, J. L. Hatfield, A. Ruane, K. J. Boote, et al. 2013. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nature Climate Change 3:827–32.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., and S. O'Neill. 2009. Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change 20:211–13.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2013. Minimizing the risk of maladaptation: A framework for analysis. In Climate adaptation futures, ed. J. Palutikof, S. L. Boulter, A. J. Ash, M. Stafford Smith, M. Parry, M. Waschka, and D. Guitart, 87–93. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barsugli, J., G. Guentchev, R. Horton, A. Wood, L. Mearns, X.-Z. Liang, J. Winkler, et al. 2013. The practitioner's dilemma—How to assess the credibility of downscaled climate projections? Eos: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 94:424–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, T. J., and C. Fogelman. 2013. Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bierbaum, R., J. B. Smith, A. Lee, M. Blair, L. Carter, F. S. Chaplin, III, P. Fleming, et al. 2013. A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: More than before, but less than needed. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18:361–406.
   Google Scholar
• Blenkinsop, S., and H. F. Fowler. 2007. Changes in drought characteristics for Europe projected by the PRUDENCE regional climate models. International Journal of Climatology 27:1595–610.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., S. Joslyn, R. Pavia, A. Hayward Walker, K. Starbird, and T. M. Leschine. 2015. Methods for communicating the complexity and uncertainty of oil spill response actions and tradeoffs. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 21:631–45.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and R. L. Wilby. 2012. An alternate approach to assessing climate risks. Eos: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 93:401–02.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. E., Jr. 1992. Global change and the new definition of progress. Geotimes 18:19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., and M. Weber. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5:325–70.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, S., L. Whitmarsh, S. A. Nicholson-Cole, and S. Shackley. 2009. A dynamic typology for stakeholder engagement within climate change research. Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 128. http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wp128.pdf (last accessed 19 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Carter, T. R., R. N. Jones, X. Lu, S. Bhadwal, C. Conde, L. O. Mearns, B. C. O'Neill, M. D. A. Rounsevell, and M. B. Zurek. 2007. New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. Linden, and C. E. Hanson, 133–71. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Challinor, A. 2014. Climate impacts: Taking action in the face of uncertainty. Living With Environmental Change (IWEC) Policy and Practice Note #5. http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/partnerships/lwec/products/ppn/ppn05/ (last accessed 19 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Challinor, A., P. Martre, S. Asseng, P. Thornton, and F. Ewert. 2014. Making the most of climate ensembles. Nature Climate Change 4:77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., F. Brissette, and P. Lucas-Picher. 2015. Assessing the limitations of bias-correcting climate model outputs for climate change impact studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120:1123–36.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, A. 2014. The communication of uncertainty is hindering climate change action. The Guardian 31 January 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/climate-change-communication-uncertainty (last accessed 19 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Demko, G. J. 1988. Geography beyond the ivory tower. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 78:575–79.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2013. Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change 23:61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Dilling, L., M. E. Daly, W. R. Travis, O. V. Wilhelmi, and R. A. Klein. 2015. The dynamics of vulnerability: Why adapting to climate variability will not always prepare us for climate change. WIREs Climate Change 6:413–25.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, L. K., K. L. Dunlap, and A. R. Godduhn. 2014. Bias, complexity, and uncertainty in ecosystem risk assessment: Pharmaceuticals, a new challenge in scale and perspective. Environmental Research Letters 9 (9): 084003.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., and A. L. Luers. 2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental studies. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31:365–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ensor, J. E., S. E. Park, E. T. Hoddy, and B. D. Ratner. 2015. A rights-based perspective on adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 31:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Falloon, P., A. Challinor, S. Dessai, L. Hoang, J. Johnson, and A.-K. Koehler. 2014. Ensembles and uncertainty in climate change impacts. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2 (Article 33).
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. 2007. Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: Climate change. Environmental Science & Technology 41:7204–08.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. S., and D. King. 2015. A framework for examining adaptation readiness. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20:505–26.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, F., and L. O. Mearns. 2002. Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the “reliability ensemble averaging” (REA) method. Journal of Climate 15:1141–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gober, P. 2000. In search of synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. W., R. J. Lempert, K. Keller, A. Hackbarth, C. Mijere, and D. J. McInerney. 2012. Robust climate policies under uncertainty: A comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Analysis 32:1657–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hallegatte, S. 2009. Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environmental Change 19:240–47.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, J. D., P. M. Reed, H. B. Zeff, and G. W. Characklis. 2015. How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 141:04015012.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, J. J., J. N. Malilay, and A. J. Parkinson. 2008. Climate change: The importance of place. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35:468–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, J. 2011. “Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity”: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global Environmental Change 21:198–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, J., and A. Bisaro. 2015. A review and classification of analytical methods for climate change adaptation. WIREs Climate Change 6:171–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkel, J., A. Bisaro, and R. Swart. 2016. Towards a diagnostic adaptation science. Regional Environmental Change 16:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Annex III: Glossary. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Midgley, 1447–65. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. Annex II: Glossary. In Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, and L. L. White, 1757–76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B., R. Nelson, N. Kuruppu, and P. Leith. 2015. An adaptive capacity guide book: Assessing, building, and evaluating the capacity of communities to adapt to a changing climate. Southern Slopes Climate Change Adaptation Research Partnership (SCARP), University of Technology Sydney and University of Tasmania. https://terranova.org.au/repository/southern-slopes-nrm-collection/an-adaptive-capacity-guide-book-assessing-building-and-evaluating-the-capacity-of-communities-to-adapt-in-a-changing-climate-3/scarp-adaptive-capacity-guide.pdf/view (last accessed 19 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Juhola, S., E. Glaas, B.-O. Linnér, and T.-S. Neset. 2016. Redefining maladaptation. Environmental Science & Policy 55:135–40.
   Google Scholar
• Juhola, S., and S. Kruse. 2015. A framework for analyzing regional adaptive capacity assessments: Challenges for methodology and policy making. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20:99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. W., P. F. Craigmile, P. Guttorp, M. Haran, B. Sansó, and M. L. Stein. 2013. Uncertainty analysis in climate change assessments. Nature Climate Change 3:769–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kiem, A. S., D. C. Verdon-Kidd, and E. K. Austin. 2014. Bridging the gap between end user needs and science capability: Decision making under uncertainty. Climate Research 61:57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kloprogge, P., and J. P. van der Sluijs. 2006. The inclusion of stakeholder knowledge and perspectives in integrated assessment of climate change. Climatic Change 75:359–89.
   Google Scholar
• Knutti, R., and J. Sedláček. 2013. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Climate Change 3:369–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H., G. Heal, M. Allen, O. Edenhofer, C. B. Field, and G. Yohe. 2013. Risk management and climate change. Nature Climate Change 3:447–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. 2013. Scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities and robust responses. Climatic Change 117:627–46.
   Google Scholar
• Liverman, D. 2016. U.S. National Climate Assessment gaps and research needs: Overview, the economy and the international context. Climatic Change 135:173–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., and L. Whitmarsh. 2014. Climate change and perceptions, behaviors, and communication research after the IPCC 5th Assessment Report—A WIREs Editorial. WIREs Climate Change 5:703–08.
   Google Scholar
• Magnan, A. F., E. L. F. Schipper, M. Burkett, S. Bharwani, I. Burton, S. Eriksen, F. Gemenne, J. Schaar, and G. Ziervogel. 2016. Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. WIREs Climate Change. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/wcc.409.
   Google Scholar
• Maibach, E., T. Myers, and A. Leiserowitz. 2014. Climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is happening. Earth's Future 2:295–98.
   Google Scholar
• Malanson, G. P. 1999. Considering complexity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89:746–53.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, E. L., and N. L. Engle. 2011. Evaluating regional vulnerability to climate change: Purposes and methods. WIREs Climate Change 2:462–74.
   Google Scholar
• Manson, S. M. 2001. Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32:405–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mather, J. R. 1993. A shared vision. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83:561–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer, J. R., and J. Gupta. 2016. The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environmental Science & Policy 57:22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, R. L. 1984. The responsibility of geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 74:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., A. Rabinovich, D. Marshall, and P. Bretschneider. 2011. The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communication. Global Environmental Change 21:103–09.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., and J. A. Ekstrom. 2010. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:22026–31.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, S. C., and J. A. Finzi Hart. 2015. The long arm of climate change: Societal teleconnections and the future of climate change impacts studies. Climatic Change 129:13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2006. Enhancing geography's role in public debate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nalau, J., B. L. Preston, and M. C. Maloney. 2015. Is adaptation a local responsibility? Environmental Science & Policy 48:89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. T. X., J. Bonetti, K. Rogers, and C. D. Woodroffe. 2016. Indicator-based assessment of climate-change impacts on coasts: A review of concepts, methodological approaches and vulnerability indices. Ocean & Coastal Management 123:18–43.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K., S. Erikesen, L. P. Nygaard, and A. Schjolden. 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy 7:73–88.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos Giménez, S., G. Garcia Galiano, and J. D. Giraldo-Osorio. 2016. Identifying a robust method to build RCMs ensemble as climate forcing for hydrological impact models. Atmospheric Research 174–175:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Overland, J. E., M. Wang, N. A. Bond, J. E. Walsh, V. M. Kattsov, and W. L. Chapman. 2011. Considerations in the selection of global climate models for regional climate projections: The Arctic as a case study. Journal of Climate 24:1583–97.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. E., N. A. Marshall, E. Jakku, A. M. Dowd, S. M. Howden, E. Mendham, and A. Fleming. 2012. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change 22:115–26.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. S. 2013. Ensemble modeling, uncertainty, and robust predictions. WIREs Climate Change 4:213–23.
   Google Scholar
• Patt, A. G., and E. U. Weber. 2014. Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy. WIREs Climate Change 5:219–32.
   Google Scholar
• Perdinan, and J. A. Winkler. 2014. Changing human landscapes under a changing climate: Considerations for climate assessments. Environmental Management 53:42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., and B. Fischhoff. 2011. The role of social and decision scientists in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 1:35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., J. Adegoke, A. Beltran-Przekurat, C. A. Hiemstra, J. Lin, U. S. Nair, D. Niyogi, and T. E. Nobis. 2007. An overview of regional land-use and land-cover impacts on rainfall. Tellus Series B 59:587–601.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., J. O. Adegoke, T. N. Chase, C. H. Marshall, T. Matsui, and D. Niyogi. 2007. A new paradigm for assessing the role of agriculture in the climate system and in climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142:234–54.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A., and R. L. Wilby. 2012. Regional climate downscaling: What's the point? Eos: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 93:52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. W., T. P. Barnett, B. D. Santer, and P. J. Gleckler. 2009. Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:8441–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda, J., N. B. Reyns, and V. R. Starczak. 2009. Complexity and simplification in understanding recruitment in benthic populations. Population Ecology 51:17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. J., and J. J. Wu. 2003. Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: Evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin. Land Economics 79:74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, C., R. L. Wilby, S. Crooks, A. L. Kay, and N. S. Reynard. 2010. Scenario-neutral approach to climate change impact studies: Application to flood risk. Journal of Hydrology 390:198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Rodima-Taylor, D., M. F. Olwig, and N. Chhetri. 2012. Adaptation as innovation, innovation as adaptation: An institutional approach to climate change. Applied Geography 33:107–11.
   Google Scholar
• Romsdahl, R. J., and C. R. Pyke. 2009. What does decision support mean to the climate change research community? Climatic Change 95:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, B., C. Vörösmarty, W. Gutowski, and A. L. Steiner. 2014. Joining scientists and stakeholders in regional earth system modeling. Eos: Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 95:247–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, C., J. W. Jones, J. L. Hatfield, A. C. Ruane, K. J. Boote, P. Thorburn, J. M. Antle, et al. 2013. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170:166–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, D. P., C. A. Senior, M. Vellinga, and R. J. Graham. 2016. Can climate projection uncertainty be constrained over Africa using metrics of contemporary performance? Climatic Change 134:621–33.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., L. Bertolini, and M. Giezen. 2013. Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making in mega infrastructure projections? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37:1984–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Scheraga, J. D., and A. E. Grambsch. 1998. Risks, opportunities, and adaptation to climate change. Climate Research 10:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. E., and R. Hilborn. 2015. Prediction, precaution, and policy under global change. Science 347:953–54.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive-capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16:282–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stainforth, D. A., T. E. Downing, R. Washington, A. Lopez, and M. New. 2007. Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 365:2163–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. D. 2011. Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change 108:811–26.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2010. Keep it complex. Nature 468:1029–31.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. K., P. J. Ericksen, M. Herrero, and A. J. Challinor. 2014. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: A review. Global Change Biology 20:3313–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tribbia, J., and S. C. Moser. 2008. More than information: What coastal managers need to prepare for climate change. Environmental Science & Policy 11:315–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., and K. J. Dooley. 2011. Introduction to the special issue: Towards the ecological style. Embracing complexity in organizational research. Organization Studies 32:729–35.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. The integrated environmental strategies handbook: A resource guide for air quality planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality and Radiation. http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P10033EF.PDF (last accessed 19 May 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, S. J., A. J. Challinor, P. K. Thornton, B. M. Campbell, N. Eriyagama, J. M. Vervoort, J. Kinyangi, et al. 2013. Addressing uncertainty in adaptation planning for agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110:8357–62.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. P., R. J. Lempert, C. Brown, J. A. Hall, D. Revell, and D. Sarewitz. 2013. Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision making: The value and demands of robust decision frameworks. WIREs Climate Change 4:39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J. 2013. Complexity and sustainability. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A., A. J. Challinor, J. Watson, K. Beven, I. Allen, H. Hanlon, A. Lopez, et al. 2015. Equipped to deal with uncertainty in climate and impacts predictions: Lessons from internal peer review. Climatic Change 132:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. J., S. J. Smith, R. A. Silva, V. Naik, Y. Zhang, Z. Adelman, M. M. Fry, S. Anenberg, L. W. Horowitz, and J. F. Lamarque. 2013. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Climate Change 3:885–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbanks, T. J., and R. W. Kates. 1999. Global change in local places: How scale matters. Climatic Change 43:601–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wilby, R. L., and S. Dessai. 2010. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65:180–85.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. A., G. S. Guentchev, M. Liszewska, Perdinan, and P.-N. Tan. 2011. Climate scenario development and applications for local/regional climate change impact assessments: An overview for the non-climate scientist. Part II: Considerations when using climate change scenarios. Geography Compass 5–6:301–28.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. A., G. S. Guentchev, Perdinan, P.-N. Tan, S. Zhong, M. Liszewska, Z. Abraham, T. Niedźwiedź, and Z. Ustrnul. 2011. Climate scenario development and applications for local/regional climate change impact assessments: An overview for the non-climate scientist. Part I: Scenario development using downscaling methods. Geography Compass 5–6:275–300.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J. A., S. Thornsbury, M. Artavio, F.-M. Chmielewski, D. Kirschke, S. Lee, M. Liszewska, et al. 2010. Multi-regional climate change assessments for international market systems with long-term investments: A conceptual framework. Climatic Change 103:445–70.
   Google Scholar