Optimal Map Classification Incorporating Uncertainty Information

References

• Aerts, J. C., K. C. Clarke, and A. D. Keuper. 2003. Testing popular visualization techniques for representing model uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30 (3): 249–61.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. 1998. Spatial data transfer standard (SDTS)—Part 1: Logical specifications. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. P., N. Xiao, and D. A. Bennett. 2003. Using genetic algorithms to create multicriteria class intervals for choropleth maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (3): 595–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, M. K., I. Leader, B. P. Buttenfield, and S. B. Clapham. 1991. NCGIA research initiative 7: Visualization of spatial data quality. Technical Report 91-26. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, J. 1983. Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, ,aps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhalerao, A. H., and N. M. Rajpoot. 2003. Discriminant feature selection for texture classification. In Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, ed. R. Harvey and A. Bangham, 1–80. Durham, UK: British Machine Vision Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bichler, G., and S. Balchak. 2007. Address matching bias: Ignorance is not bliss. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 30 (1): 32–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayo, M. R., and T. O. Talbot. 2003. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses. International Journal of Health Geographics 2:10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiles, J. P., and P. Delfiner. 2009. Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chrisman, N. R. 1991. The error component in spatial data. In Geographical information systems: Principles and applications. Vol. 1, ed. D. J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, and D. W. Rhind, 165–74. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. B., and H. C. Andrews. 1979. Image segmentation by clustering. Proceedings of IEEE 67 (5): 773–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 2003. The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS 7 (2): 165–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, R. G. 1996. A comparison of optimal classification strategies for choroplethic displays of spatially aggregated data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10 (4): 405–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, R. G., and G. M. Campbell. 1991. Noninferior bandwidth line simplification: Algorithm and structural analysis. Geographical Analysis 23 (1): 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, D. J. 2011. Optimal routefinding with unlimited possible directions of movement. Transactions in GIS 15 (1): 87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitrick, S., and E. A. Wentz. 2015. Developing implicit uncertainty visualization methods motivated by theories in decision science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (3): 531–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, B. D. 1999. Cartography-thematic map design. Boston: WCB McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connection with graphs. Numerische Mathematik 1:269–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drecki, I. 2002. Visualisation of uncertainty in geographical data. In Spatial data quality, ed. W. Shi, P. Fisher, and M. Goodchild, 140–59. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut, E., R. L. Francis, and A. Tamir. 1992. Location problems on tree networks. Network 22:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, I. S. 1977. The selection of class intervals. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2 (1): 98–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. D. 1958. On grouping for maximum homogeneity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53:789–98.
   Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M., and P. M. Atkinson. 2002. Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. W. 2011. Improving geocoding match rates with spatially-varying block metrics. Transactions in GIS 15 (6): 829–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., B. P. Buttenfield, and J. Wood. 1994. Introduction to visualizing data validity. In Visualization in geographical information systems, ed. H. M. Hearnshaw and D. J. Unwin, 141–49. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and S. Gopal. 1989. The accuracy of spatial databases. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A. 2013. Better articulating normal curve theory for introductory mathematical statistics students: Power transformations and their back-transformations. The American Statistician 67:157–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2014. Reply to Mukhopadhyay. The American Statistician 68:67–69.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., M. Vincent, A. Hunt, M. Millones, and D. L. Johnson. 2007. Impacts of positional error on spatial regression analysis: A case study of address locations in Syracuse, New York. Transactions in GIS 11 (5): 655–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. E., N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael. 1968. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4 (2): 100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengl, T. 2003. Visualisation of uncertainty using the HSI colour model: Computations with colours. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation, ed. D. Martin, 8–17. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, G. F. 1977. Optimal data classification for choropleth maps. Occasional Paper No. 2, Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, G. F., and F. C. Caspall. 1971. Error on choroplethic maps: Definition, measurement, reduction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 61 (2): 217–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., F. Ormeling, and W. Kainz. 1995. Visualization support for fuzzy spatial analysis. In ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition Technical Papers, 291–300. Bethesda, MD: ACSM & ASPRS.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. R., and A. R. Sanderson. 2003. A next step: Visualizing errors and uncertainty. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 23 (5): 6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. 2001. Self-organizing maps. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, M., and B. P. Buttenfield. 2000. Guidelines for the display of attribute certainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27 (1): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Longley, P. A., M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind. 2011. Geographical information systems and science. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. 1992. Visualizing uncertain information. Cartographic Perspective 13 (13): 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M., C. A. Brewer, and L. W. Pickle. 1998. Visualizing georeferenced data: Representing reliability of health statistics. Environment and Planning A 30:1547–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. A., A. Robinson, S. Hopper, S. Gardner, R. Murray, M. Gahegan, and E. Hetzler. 2005. Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: What we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32 (3): 139–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mas, J. F., H. Puig, J. L. Palacio, and A. Sosa-López. 2004. Modelling deforestation using GIS and artificial neural networks. Environmental Modelling and Software 19 (5): 461–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGranaghan, M. 1983. A cartographic view of spatial data quality. Cartographica 30 (2): 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., and D. Guo. 2009. Spatial data mining and geographic knowledge discovery—An introduction. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 33 (6): 403–08.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. S. 1973. Analogs between class-interval selection and location-allocation models. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 10 (2): 123–32.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T., and T.-K. Shyy. 2000. Integrating attribute and space characteristics in choropleth display and spatial data mining. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14 (7): 649–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, A. 2001. Visualizing uncertainty in geo-spatial data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Intersections between Geospatial Information and Information Technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Committee of the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C., and A. Bhalerao. 2006. The Bhattacharyya space for feature selection and its application to texture segmentation. Pattern Recognition 39 (5): 812–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. S., and A. K. Skidmore. 2003. Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland. Remote Sensing of Environment 85 (1): 92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., R. B. McMaster, F. C. Kessler, and H. H. Howard. 2009. Thematic cartography and geovisualization. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, M., and D. W. S. Wong. 2010. Incorporating data quality information in mapping American Community Survey data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 37 (4): 285–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., D. W. Wong, and B. J. Kronenfeld. 2014. A classification method for choropleth maps incorporating data reliability information. The Professional Geographer 67 (1): 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. 2016. A heuristic multi-criteria classification approach incorporating data quality information for choropleth mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15230406.2016.1145072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toregas, C., and C. ReVelle. 1972. Optimal location under time or distance constraints. Papers of the Regional Science Association 28 (1): 131–43.
   Google Scholar
• Traun, C., and M. Loidl. 2012. Autocorrelation-based regioclassification—A self-calibrating classification approach for choropleth maps explicitly considering spatial autocorrelation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 26 (5): 923–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2009. A compass for understanding and using American Community Survey data: What researchers need to know. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, D. W., and M. Sun. 2013. Handling data quality information of survey data in GIS: A case of using the American Community Survey data. Spatial Demography 1 (1): 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, N., C. A. Calder, and M. P. Armstrong. 2007. Assessing the effect of attribute uncertainty on the robustness of choropleth map classification. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21 (2): 121–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandbergen, P. A., and T. C. Hart. 2009. Geocoding accuracy considerations in determining residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review 20 (1): 62–90.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and M. F. Goodchild. 2002. Uncertainty in geographical information. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. L. 2008. Estimating the intensity of a spatial point process from locations coarsened by incomplete geocoding. Biometrics 64 (1): 262–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. L., X. Fang, S. Mazumdar, and G. Rushton. 2007. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding. International Journal of Health Geographics 6:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar