The People Know Best: Situating the Counterexpertise of Populist Pipeline Opposition Movements

References

• Andreucci, D. 2018. Populism, hegemony, and the politics of natural resource extraction in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Antipode 50 (4):825–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2017. Minor political geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (4):589–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth, K. Forthcoming. “They’re treating us like Indians!”: Political ecologies of property and race in North American pipeline populism. Antipode. doi: 10.1111/anti.12426
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2016. “We, the people”: Thoughts on freedom of assembly. In What is a people?, ed. A. Badiou, J. Butler, G. Didi-Huberman, S. Khiari, J. Rancière, P. Bourdieu, B. Bosteels, and K. Olson, 49–64. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. 1981. Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, A., and A. Kruzic. 2017. Centering the commons, creating space for the collective: Ecofeminist #NoDAPL praxis in Iowa. Journal of Social Justice 7:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Crehan, K. 2016. Gramsci’s common sense: Inequality and its narratives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. 2017. Not him, us (and we aren’t populists). Theory & Event 20 (1):S38–S44.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1989. Cinema 2: The time image, trans. H. Tomlinson and R. Galeta. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, S. 1996. Public participation in environmental policy: Considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public Understanding of Science 5 (3):183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, D. 2011. On assemblage and articulation. Area 43 (2):139–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. 2015. This is our land: Grassroots environmentalism in the late twentieth century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2000. Citizens, experts, and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. 2017. The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism, and global protest. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, L. 1976. Democratic promise: The populist moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, L. 1978. The populist moment: A short history of the agrarian revolt in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grattan, L. 2016. Populism’s power: Radical grassroots democracy in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Z. 2017. Unlikely alliances: Native nations and white communities join to defend rural lands. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 2014. How the People’s Climate March became a corporate PR campaign. Accessed June 24, 2018. http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/09/19/how-the-peoples-climate-march-became-a-corporate-pr-campaign/.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1990. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2012. Gramsci, geography, and the languages of populism. In Gramsci: Space, nature, politics, ed. E. Michael, H. Gillian, K. Stefan, and L. Alex, 301–20. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, K. 2016. Chronicle of a disaster foretold: Scientific risk assessment, public participation, and the politics of imperilment in Bristol Bay, Alaska. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22 (S1):108–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, C. 2014. The last gasp of climate change liberals. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-last-gasp-of-climate-change-liberals/.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1960. The age of reform. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T. 2013. Lifeblood: Oil, freedom, and the forces of capital. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M. T. 2017. A climate policy for the people. The American Prospect, November 16. Accessed September 20, 2018. http://prospect.org/article/climate-policy-people.
   Google Scholar
• Husmann, J. 2011. Environmentalism in South Dakota: A grassroots approach. In The Plains political tradition: Essays on South Dakota political culture, ed. J. K. Lauck, J. E. Miller, and D. C. Simmons, 239–66. Pierre: South Dakota State Historical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson, K. 2014. Building a city for “the people”: The politics of alliance-building in the Sydney green ban movement. Antipode 46 (4):992–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, A. 2017. The semantic drift: Images of populism in post-war American historiography and their relevance for (European) political science. Constellations 24 (3):310–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 1996. Towards minor theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14 (4):487–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazin, M. 1998. The populist persuasion: An American history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling, K. 2007. The witch’s flight: The cinematic, the black femme, and the image of common sense. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleeb, J. F. 2016. Let’s get rural: Middle America wants less establishment, more populism. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://medium.com/@janekleeb/lets-get-rural-middle-america-wants-less-establishment-more-populism-c182224adca3.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. 2014. This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. A. 2011. Principle over party: The Farmers’ Alliance and populism in South Dakota, 1880–1900. Pierre: South Dakota State Historical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, G. 2009. Should political ecology be Marxist? A case for Gramsci’s historical materialism. Geoforum 40 (3):335–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, G. 2017. In the long run we are all dead: Keynesianism, political economy, and revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. M. 2008. Populism, paternalism and the state of environmentalism in the U.S. Environmental Politics 17 (2):219–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2016. The populist challenge. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/chantal-mouffe/populist-challenge.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostler, J. 1993. Prairie populism: The fate of agrarian radicalism in Kansas, Nebraska, and Iowa, 1880–1892. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, N. 1976. The populist response to industrial America: Midwestern populist thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postel, C. 2009. The populist vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Public Utilities Commission of South Dakota. 2009a. HP09-001 transcript of proceedings, Vol II. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://puc.sd.gov/commission/minutes/2009/hp09-001/110309vol2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Public Utilities Commission of South Dakota. 2009b. HP09-001 transcript of public input hearing. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://puc.sd.gov/commission/minutes/2009/hp09-001/110309public.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2016. The populism that is not to be found. In What is a people?, ed. A. Badiou, J. Butler, G. Didi-Huberman, S. Khiari, J. Rancière, P. Bourdieu, B. Bosteels, and K. Olson, trans. J. Gladding, 101–6. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. L., B. J. Burke, and N. Heynen. 2015. Knowing climate change, embodying climate praxis: Experiential knowledge in southern Appalachia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 105 (2):253–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riofrancos, T. 2017. Democracy without the people. N + 1. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/democracy-without-the-people/.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. K., L. Capato, M. Leonard, and R. Breaux. 2014. Lessons from direct action at the White House to stop the Keystone XL pipeline. In A line in the tar sands: Struggles for environmental justice. ed. T. Black, S. D’Arcy, T. Weis, and J. K. Russell, 167–180. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Edelman, S. M. Borras, R. Hall, W. Wolford, and B. White. 2018. Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secor, A., and J. Linz. 2017. Becoming minor. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35 (4):568–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibertin-Blanc, G. 2013. From democratic simulacrum to the fabulation of the people: Minority populism. Actuel Marx 54 (2):71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Smucker, J., and M. Premo. 2014. What’s wrong with the radical critique of the people’s climate march. The Nation, September 30. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://www.thenation.com/article/whats-wrong-radical-critique-peoples-climate-march/.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3):213–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoburn, N. 2016. The people are missing: Cramped space, social relations, and the mediators of politics. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 29 (4):367–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2013a. Keystone XL draft environmental impact statement: Public comment unique submissions, Part 01. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2013b. Keystone XL draft environmental impact statement: Public comment unique submissions, Part 03. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2013c. Summary of public comments and responses to the Keystone XL Project draft supplemental environmental impact statement. Accessed June 24, 2018. https://2012-keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/organization/221210.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wainwright, J., and K. Mercer. 2009. The dilemma of decontamination: A Gramscian analysis of the Mexican transgenic maize dispute. Geoforum 40 (3):345–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2008. In defense of lost causes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar