796
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Progressive Alternatives

Populism, Emancipation, and Environmental Governance: Insights from Bolivia

ORCID Icon
Pages 624-633 | Received 01 Dec 2017, Accepted 01 Jul 2018, Published online: 20 Dec 2018

References

  • Andreucci, D. 2018. Populism, hegemony, and the politics of natural resource extraction in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Antipode 50:825–45.
  • Andreucci, D. 2017. Resources, regulation and the state: Struggles over gas extraction and passive revolution in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Political Geography 61:170–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.003.
  • Andreucci, D., and I. M. Radhuber. 2017. Limits to “counter-neoliberal” reform: Mining expansion and the marginalisation of post-extractivist forces in Evo Morales’s Bolivia. Geoforum 84:280–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.002.
  • Bakker, K. 2015. Neoliberalization of nature. In The Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 446–56. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bridge, G., J. McCarthy, and T. Perreault. 2015. Editors’ introduction. In The Routledge handbook of political ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 3–18. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Bridge, G., and T. Perreault. 2009. Environmental governance. In A companion to environmental geography, ed. N. Castree, D. Demeritt, D. Liverman, and B. Rhoads, 442–60. Malden, MA: Wiley.
  • Calvário, R., G. Velegrakis, and M. Kaika. 2017. The political ecology of austerity: An analysis of socio-environmental conflict under crisis in Greece. Capitalism Nature Socialism 28 (3):69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1260147.
  • Canessa, A. 2006. Todos Somos Indígenas: Towards a new language of national political identity. Bulletin of Latin American Research 25 (2):241–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0261-3050.2006.00162.x.
  • Collins, J. N. 2014. New left experiences in Bolivia and Ecuador and the challenge to theories of populism. Journal of Latin American Studies 46 (1):59–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X13001569.
  • Ekers, M., A. Loftus, and G. Mann. 2009. Gramsci lives! Themed issue: Gramscian political ecologies. Geoforum 40:287–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.007.
  • Errejón, Í., and J. Guijarro. 2016. Post-neoliberalism’s difficult hegemonic consolidation: A comparative analysis of the Ecuadorean and Bolivian processes. Latin American Perspectives 43 (1):34–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15579901.
  • Fraser, N. 2017. Against progressive neoliberalism, a new progressive populism. Dissent Magazine, January 28. Accessed October 10, 2018. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/nancy-fraser-against-progressive-neoliberalism-progressive-populism.
  • García-Linera, Á., M. Chávez-León, and P. Costas-Monje. 2010. Sociología de los Movimientos Sociales en Bolivia: Estructuras de movilización, repertorios culturales y acción política. [Sociology of social movements in Bolivia: Structures of mobilization, cultural repertoires, and political action]. 4th ed. La Paz, Bolivia: Plural Editores.
  • Glassman, J. 2013. Cracking hegemony: Gramsci and the dialectics of rebellion. In Gramsci: Space, nature, politics, ed. M. Ekers, G. Hart, S. Kipfer, and A. Loftus, 241–57. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Gutiérrez-Aguilar, R. 2008. Los ritmos del Pachakuti: Movilización y levantamiento popular-indígena en Bolivia (2000–2005) [Rhythms of the Pachakuti: Indigenous uprising and state power in Bolivia]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta Limón.
  • Hart, G. 2013. Gramsci, geography, and the languages of populism. In Gramsci: Space, nature, politics, ed. M. Ekers, G. Hart, S. Kipfer and A. Loftus, 301–20. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hesketh, C., and A. D. Morton. 2014. Spaces of uneven development and class struggle in Bolivia: Transformation or trasformismo? Antipode 46 (1):149–69.
  • Himley, M. 2013. Regularizing extraction in Andean Peru: Mining and social mobilization in an age of corporate social responsibility. Antipode 45 (2):394–416.
  • Jessop, B. 1990. State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Karriem, A. 2009. The rise and transformation of the Brazilian landless movement into a counter-hegemonic political actor: A Gramscian analysis. Geoforum, Themed Issue: Gramscian Political Ecologies 40 (3):316–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.10.005.
  • Kaup, B. Z. 2013. Market justice: Political economic struggle in Bolivia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaup, B. Z. 2014. Divergent paths of counter-neoliberalization: Materiality and the labor process in Bolivia’s natural resource sectors. Environment and Planning A 46 (8):1836–51.
  • Kioupkiolis, A., and G. Katsambekis. 2018. Radical left populism from the margins to the mainstream: A comparison of Syriza and Podemos, In Podemos and the new political cycle left-wing populism and anti-establishment politics, ed. G. A. Óscar and M. Briziarelli, 201–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Laclau, E. 1977. Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. London: New Left Books.
  • Laclau, E. 2005a. On populist reason. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, E. 2005b. Populism: What’s in a name? In Populism and the mirror of democracy, ed. F. Panizza, 32–49. London: Verso.
  • Loftus, A. 2014. Against a speculative leftism. In The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticization, spectres of radical politics, ed J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, 229–43. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Marston, A., and T. Perreault. 2017. Consent, coercion and cooperativismo: Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (2):252–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16674008.
  • McCarthy, J. 2005. Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode 37 (4):731–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00523.x.
  • McNeish, J.-A. 2013. Extraction, protest and indigeneity in Bolivia: The TIPNIS effect. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 8 (2):221–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2013.808495.
  • Modonesi, M. 2013. Revoluciones pasivas en América Latina: Una aproximación gramsciana a la caracterización de los gobiernos progresistas de inicio de siglo [Passive revolutions in Latin America: A Gramscian perspective on the progressive governments of the beginning of the century]. In Horizontes Gramscianos: Estudios en torno al pensamiento de Antonio Gramsci, ed. M. Modonesi, 209–36. Mexico City: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM.
  • Mouffe, C. 2005. The “end of politics” and the challenge of right-wing populism. In Populism and the mirror of democracy, ed. F. Panizza, 50–71. London: Verso.
  • Neumann, R. P. 2009. Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography 33 (3):398–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508096353.
  • Perreault, T. 2006. From the Guerra del Agua to the Guerra del Gas: Resource governance, neoliberalism and popular protest in Bolivia. Antipode 38 (1):150–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2006.00569.x.
  • Perreault, T. 2008. Custom and contradiction: Rural water governance and the politics of usos y costumbres in Bolivia’s irrigators’ movement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (4):834–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600802013502.
  • Postero, N. 2017. The indigenous state: Race, politics, and performance in plurinational Bolivia. Oakland: University of California Press.
  • Poulantzas, N. 2008. Towards a democratic socialism. In The Poulantzas reader: Marxism, law and the state, ed. J. Martin, 361–76. London: Verso.
  • Schavelzon, S. 2012. El nacimiento del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia: Etnografía de una Asamblea Constituyente [The birth of the plurinational state of Bolivia: Ethnography of a constituent assembly]. La Paz, Bolivia: Plural Editores.
  • Schavelzon, S. 2014. Mutaciones de la identificación indígena durante el debate del censo 2012 en Bolivia: Mestizaje abandonado, indigeneidad estatal y proliferación minoritaria [Mutations of indigenous identification during the debate over the 2012 census in Bolivia: Abandoned miscegenation, state indigeneity and minority proliferation]. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research 20 (3):328–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2014.995872.
  • Svampa, M. 2015. América Latina: De nuevas izquierdas a populismos de alta intensidad [Latin America: From new Left governments to high-intensity populisms]. Contrapunto 7:83–93.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2010. Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory Culture Society 27 (2–3):213–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2014. Insurgent architects, radical cities, and the promise of the political. In The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticization, spectres of radical politics, ed. J. Wilson and E. Swyngedouw, 169–88. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Tapia, L. 2011. El estado de derecho como tiranía [The rule of law as tyranny]. La Paz, Bolivia: Autodeterminación.
  • Tapia, L. 2014. La sustitución del pueblo [The substitution of the people]. La Paz, Bolivia: Autodeterminación.
  • Thomas, P. D. 2013. Hegemony, passive revolution and the modern prince. Thesis Eleven 117 (1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513613493991.
  • Valdivia, G. 2010. Agrarian capitalism and struggles over hegemony in the Bolivian lowlands. Latin American Perspectives 37 (4):67–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X10373354.
  • Wainwright, J., and G. Mann. 2015. Climate change and the adaptation of the political. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):313–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.973807.
  • Webber, J. R. 2011. From rebellion to reform in Bolivia: Class struggle, indigenous liberation, and the politics of Evo Morales. Chicago: Haymarket.
  • Webber, J. R. 2016. Evo Morales and the political economy of passive revolution in Bolivia, 2006–15. Third World Quarterly 37 (10):1855–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1175296.
  • Žižek, S. 2006. Against the populist temptation. Critical Inquiry 32 (3):551–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/505378.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.