Smart Transportation for All? A Typology of Recent U.S. Smart Transportation Projects in Midsized Cities

References

• Angelidou, M. 2014. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities 41:S3–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthopoulos, L., and P. Fitsilis. 2013. Using classification and roadmapping techniques for smart city viability’s realization. Electronic Journal of e-Government 11 (2):326–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., K. Kockelman, and A. Singh. 2016. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 67:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M., K. W. Axhausen, F. Giannotti, A. Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, M. Wachowicz, G. Ouzounis, and Y. Portugali. 2012. Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214 (1):481–518. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benevolo, C., R. P. Dameri, and B. D’Auria. 2016. Smart mobility in smart city. In Empowering organizations, ed. T. Torre, A. M. Braccini, and R. Spinelli, 13–28. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Letaifa, S. 2015. How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model. Journal of Business Research 68 (7):1414–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caragliu, A., C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18 (2):65–82. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celsor, C., and A. Millard-Ball. 2007. Where does carsharing work?: Using geographic information systems to assess market potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1992 (1):61–69. doi: 10.3141/1992-08.
   Google Scholar
• Clewlow, R. 2016. Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay area. Transport Policy 51:158–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clewlow, R., and G. S. Mishra. 2017. Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Report No. UCD-ITS-RR-117-07, Institute of Transportation Studies, Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen,T., P. Jones, and C. Cavoli. 2017. Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles. London: University College London Transport Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Damiani, E., R. Kowalczyk, and G. Parr. 2017. Extending the outreach: From smart cities to connected communities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 18 (1):1–7. doi: 10.1145/3140543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, F., P. S. Lavieri, V. M. Garikapati, S. Astroza, R. M. Pendyala, and C. R. Bhat. 2017. A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services. Transportation 44 (6):1307–23. doi: 10.1007/s11116-017-9797-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., and K. Kockelman. 2014. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 40:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, L., J. Mason, and D. Meroux. 2017. Three revolutions in urban transportation. Accessed September 16, 2018. https://steps.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/STEPS_ITDP-3R-Report-5-10-2017-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, J. B., and S. Shaheen. 2015. Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 2 (3):74–81. doi: 10.1007/s40518-015-0038-5.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, D. 2018. Shared use mobility, transportation technology, and intercity transit services. Atlanta: Federal Transit Administration, Region IV.
   Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12 (3):303–20. doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Hulse, L. M., H. Xie, and R. Galea. 2018. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science 102:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, B. W. 2008. Significant characteristics of the urban rail renaissance in the United States: A discriminant analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 42 (2):279–95. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, B. W., S. Carley, S. Siddiki, J. Dumortier, K. Clark-Sutton, R. M. Krause, and J. D. Graham. 2018. All plug-in electric vehicles are not the same: Predictors of preference for a plug-in hybrid versus a battery-electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 65:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and H. Lee. 2014. Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Government Information Quarterly 31:S93–S105. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. 2017. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. Report of the Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Malek, K., E. Maine, and I. P. McCarthy. 2014. A typology of clean technology commercialization accelerators. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 32:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T., and T. A. Pardo. 2011. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282–91. New York: ACM. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, J. A., and F. M. Bass. 1987. A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Management Science 33 (9):1069–86. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.33.9.1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskaleva, K. 2011. The smart city: A nexus for open innovation? Intelligent Buildings International 3 (3):153–71. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2011.586672.
   Google Scholar
• Rayle, L., D. Dai, N. Chan, R. Cervero, and S. Shaheen. 2016. Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transport Policy 45:168–78. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangkapichai, M., and J. D. Saphores. 2009. Why are Californians interested in hybrid cars? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (1):79–96. doi: 10.1080/09640560802504670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman, D., B. Baccarne, L. De Marez, and P. Mechant. 2012. Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 7 (3):11–62. doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762012000300006.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, D. 2018. Three revolutions: Steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. Washington, DC: Island.
   Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, N., and M. Givoni. 2015. The autonomous car—A blessing or a curse for the future of low carbon mobility? An exploration of likely vs. desirable outcomes. European Journal of Futures Research 3 (1):14. doi: 10.1007/s40309-015-0071-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2017. 2012–2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Accessed July 1, 2018. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. Longitudinal Employer–Household Dynamics. Accessed November 15, 2018. https://lehd.ces.census.gov/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). 2016. Smart City Challenge vision statements. Accessed July 1, 2018. https://www.transportation.gov/smartcity/visionstatements/index.
   Google Scholar
• Wadud, Z., D. MacKenzie, and P. Leiby. 2016. Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 86:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., S. Guhathakurta, J. Fang, and G. Zhang. 2015. Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 19:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. 2012. Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46 (8):1372–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar