Manipulating Diplomatic Atmospheres: The United Nations Security Council and Syria

References

• Adey, P. 2014. Security atmospheres or the crystallization of worlds. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (5):834–51. doi: 10.1068/d21312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahall, L. 2018. Affect as methodology: Feminism and the politics of emotion. International Political Sociology 12:36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2004. Collective feelings. Or, the impressions left by others? Theory, Culture and Society 21 (2):25–42. doi: 10.1177/0263276404042133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2014. Willful subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, R. 2013. Russia and Syria: Explaining alignment with a regime in crisis. International Affairs 89 (4):795–823. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2006. Becoming and being hopeful: Towards a theory of affect. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (5):733–52. doi: 10.1068/d393t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2009. Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 22 (2):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2009.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2016. Encountering affect: capacities, apparatuses, conditions. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, J. 2013. Rethinking affective atmospheres: Technology, perturbation and space times of the non-human. Geoforum 49:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bille, M., P. Bjerregaard, and T. F. Sørensen. 2015. Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture and the texture of the in-between. Emotion, Space and Society 15:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohme, G. 2006. Architektur und Atmosphare [Architecture and Atmosphere]. Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bohme, G. 2013. The art of the stage set as a paradigm for an aesthetics of atmospheres. Ambiances: International Journal of Sensory Environment, Architecture and Urban Space 315:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacorsi, I. 2018. The United Nations’ Security Council chamber: History of an icon. Accessed October 1, 2019 https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/2018/08/23/the-united-nations-security-council-chamber-history-of-an-icon.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, D. L. 2009. Five to rule them all: The UN Security Council and the making of the modern world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. 2004. The transmission of affect. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Closs Stephens, A. 2016. The affective atmospheres of nationalism. Cultural Geographies 23 (2):181–98. doi: 10.1177/1474474015569994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, culture, speed. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conradson, D., and S. Latham. 2007. The affective possibilities of London: Antipodean transnationals and the overseas experience. Mobilities 2 (2):231–54. doi: 10.1080/17450100701381573.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J., L. Bondi, and M. Smith, eds. 2005. Emotional geographies. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2014. Geopolitical assemblages and complexity. Progress in Human Geography 38 (3):385–401. doi: 10.1177/0309132513501405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. 2017. Diplomatic material: Affect, assemblage, and foreign policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 2012. Illuminated atmospheres: Anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (6):1103–22. doi: 10.1068/d12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigenbaum, A., and A. Kanngieser. 2015. For a politics of atmospheric governance. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (1):80–84. doi: 10.1177/2043820614565873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, E., and K. Kirisci. 2016. Syria’s humanitarian crisis and the failure to protect. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Fregonese, S. 2017. Affective atmospheres, urban geopolitics and conflict (de)escalation in Beirut. Political Geography 61:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T. 2003. Briefwechsel über Gefühle in Schmitz, H. Was ist Neue Phanomenologie? [Correspondence about Feelings In Schmitz, H. What is New Phenomenology] Rostock, Germany: Koch.
   Google Scholar
• Galati, D. 2002. Propettive sulle emozioni e teorie del soggetto [Perspectives on the emotions and theories of the subject]. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 2017. Urban atmospheres. Cultural Geographies 24 (3):353–74. doi: 10.1177/1474474017712995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., and G. J. Seigworth, eds. 2010. The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffero, T. 2014. Atmospheres: Aesthetics of emotional spaces. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, J. 2012. Atmosphären der Stadt [City Atmospheres]. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, I. 2007. After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. 2019. Towards an emotional geography of diplomacy: Insights from the United Nations Security Council. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and J. Clark. 2015. Mundane diplomacies for the practice of European geopolitics. Geoforum 62:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and J. Clark. 2018. Performance, emotions and diplomacy in the United Nations Assemblage in New York. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 1262–1278. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1509689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupp, E., J. Pykett, and F. M. Smith, eds. 2017. Emotional states: Sites and spaces of affective governance. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kraftl, P., and P. Adey. 2008. Architecture/affect/inhabitation: Geographies of being in buildings. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (1):213–31. doi: 10.1080/00045600701734687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2014. Geopolitics and expertise: Knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. London: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2016. To understand the place: Geographical knowledge and diplomatic practice. The Professional Geographer 68 (4):546–53. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1099450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuziemko, I., and E. Werker. 2006. How much is a seat on the Security Council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations. Journal of Political Economy 114 (5):905–30. doi: 10.1086/507155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leys, R. 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37 (3):434–72. doi: 10.1086/659353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, D. M., ed. 2004. The UN Security Council: From the Cold War to the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 1995. The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique 31:83–109. doi: 10.2307/1354446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect and sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2009. Of micrperception and micro politics: An interview with Brian Massumi. Inflexions: A Journal for Research Creation 3:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2015. Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. 2017. Liminal geopolitics: The subjectivity and spatiality of diplomacy at the margins. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (1):139–52. doi: 10.1111/tran.12156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F., and J. Dittmer. 2018. Liminality and the diplomacy of the British overseas territories: An assemblage approach. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (1):139–58. doi: 10.1177/0263775817733479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, D. P. 2008. Engineering affective atmosphere on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andree expedition. Cultural Geographies 15 (4):413–30. doi: 10.1177/1474474008094314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, C. 2015. Researching affective atmospheres. Geographica Helvetica 70 (4):255–63. doi: 10.5194/gh-70-255-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., and K. P. Kallio. 2017. Spaces of the geosocial: Exploring transnational typologies. Geopolitics 22 (1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1226809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A. 2018. Political geography III: Bodies. Progress in Human Geography 42 (5):759–69. doi: 10.1177/0309132517718642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2013. Diplomatic sites: A critical enquiry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R. 2009. Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4):466–86. doi: 10.1177/0309132508104994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, A. 2012. Die besondere Atmosphare: Asthetische Feldforschungen [The special atmosphere: aesthetic field research]. Bielefeld, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Schia, N. 2016. Horseshoe and catwalk: Power, complexity, and consensus-making in the United Nations Security Council. In Palaces of hope: The anthropology of global organizations, ed. R. Niezen and M. Sapignoli, 55–77. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H. 1978. System der Philosophie [System of Philosophy]. Bonn, Germany: Bouvier.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H. 2016. Atmospheric spaces. Ambiances: International Journal of Sensory Environment, Architecture and Urban Space.
   Google Scholar
• Schroer, S. A., and S. B. Schmitt. 2018. Exploring atmospheres ethnographically. London and New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, K. 2011. Atmospheric attunements. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (3):445–53. doi: 10.1068/d9109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumartojo, S., and S. Pink. 2019. Atmospheres and the experiential world: Theory and methods. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tass News Agency. 2017. Russia–U.S. atmosphere “getting ugly” though Trump is decent politician—PM Medvedev. Accessed September 1, 2019. http://tass.com/politics/978307.
   Google Scholar
• Tellenbach, H. 1968. Geschmack und Atmosphare [Taste and Atmosphere]. Salzburg, Austria: Otto Muller.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler Series B 86 (1):57–78. doi: 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J., A. Elliott, D. Radford, and N. Pitt. 2016. Globalisations utopia? On airport atmospherics. Emotion, Space and Society 19:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Einsiedel, S., D. M. Malone, and B. Stagno Ugarte, eds. 2015. The UN Security Council in the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, J. 2013. Chinese diplomacy and the UN Security Council: Beyond the veto. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar