Wheeling Out Urban Resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, Marketization, and Local Practice

References

• Arrow, K., J. P. Dasgupta, and K.-G. Maler. 2003. Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environmental and Resource Economics 26 (4):647–85. doi: 10.1023/B:EARE.0000007353.78828.98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, M. 2019. An update from 100 Resilient Cities. 100 Resilient Cities (blog), Accessed December 2019. https://www.100resilientcities.org/update-from-100rc/.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, C., and M. Wirth. 2018. Markets, metrics, morals: The social impact bond as an emerging policy instrument. Geoforum 90:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M., and H. Bulkeley. 2007. Looking back and thinking ahead: A decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environment 12 (5):447–56. doi: 10.1080/13549830701659683.
   Google Scholar
• Betteridge, B., and S. Webber. 2019. Everyday resilience, reworking and resistance in North Jakarta’s kampungs. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 2 (4):944–66. doi: 10.1177/2514848619853985.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, C., A. Strong, N. Burger, S. Weilant, U. Saya, and A. Chandra. 2017. Resilience dividend valuation model: Framework development and initial case. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Borie, M., M. Pelling, G. Ziervogel, and K. Hyams. 2019. Mapping narratives of urban resilience in the Global South. Global Environmental Change 54:203–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1998. The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In Laws of the markets, ed. M. Callon, 1–57. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, V. 2019. 100 Resilient Cities workers seek future beyond Rockefeller. Accessed December 2019. https://www.devex.com/news/100-resilient-cities-workers-seek-future-beyond-rockefeller-94661.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, I. C. 2017. Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (8):1719–42. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16685092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I. C., and E. Sheppard. 2013. China’s eco-cities as variegated urban sustainability: Dongtan eco-city and Chongming eco-island. Journal of Urban Technology 20 (1):57–75. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2012.735104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, F. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. The Journal of Ecology 24 (1):252–84. doi: 10.2307/2256278.
   Google Scholar
• Colven, E. 2017. Understanding the allure of big infrastructure: Jakarta’s Great Garuda Sea Wall Project. Water Alternatives 10 (2):250–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., J. Lawrence, and K. Bohland. 2018. Anatomy of the resilience machine. In The resilience machine, ed. K. Bohland, S. Davoudi, and J. Lawrence, 12–28. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., K. Shaw, L. J. Haider, A. E. Quinlan, G. D. Peterson, C. Wilkinson, H. Fünfgeld, D. McEvoy, L. Porter, and S. Davoudi. 2012. Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice 13 (2):299–307. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124.
   Google Scholar
• Derickson, K. 2018. Urban geography III: Anthropocene urbanism. Progress in Human Geography 42 (3):425–35. doi: 10.1177/0309132516686012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2015. Resilience and justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (1):157–67. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. 2018. Resilience and justice: Planning for New York City. Urban Geography 39 (8):1268–75. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons, J., and C. Mitchell. 2019. Just urban futures? Exploring equity in 100 Resilient Cities. World Development 122:648–59. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, K., and M. Kooy. 2017. Worlding water supply: Thinking beyond the network in Jakarta. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (6):888–903. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giridharadas, A. 2018. Winners take all: The elite charade of changing the world. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery. 2017. City Resilience Program. https://www.gfdrr.org/en/city-resilience-program/.
   Google Scholar
• Global Infrastructure Basel. 2018. Global Infrastructure Basel. Accessed December 2019. http://www.gib-foundation.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. 2019. Flows in formation: The global-urban networks of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/0042098018807306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, A. 2014. Adaptation machines and the parasitic politics of life in Jamaican disaster resilience. Antipode 46 (3):611–28. doi: 10.1111/anti.12066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., E. Chu, and G. Ziervogel. 2018. Negotiated resilience. Resilience 6 (3):196–214. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havice, E., and A. Iles. 2015. Shaping the aquaculture sustainability assemblage: Revealing the rule-making behind the rules. Geoforum 58:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4 (1):1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
   Google Scholar
• Kooy, M., and K. Bakker. 2008. Splintered networks: The colonial and contemporary waters of Jakarta. Geoforum 39 (6):1843–58. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larner, W., and N. Laurie. 2010. Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalizing privatization in telecoms and water. Geoforum 41 (2):218–26. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., and E. Sheppard. 2018. From kampungs to condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A 50(2): 437–456. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17709279.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and E. Colven. 2017. Ecological security for whom: The politics of flood alleviation and urban environmental injustice in Jakarta, Indonesia. In The Routledge companion to the environmental humanities, ed. U. Heise, J. Christensen, and M. Niemann, 194–205. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, S. Webber, and E. Colven. 2018. Globalizing urban resilience. Urban Geography 39 (8):1276–84. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J., and J. Rice. 2019. From sustainable urbanism to climate urbanism. Urban Studies 56 (5):992–1008. doi: 10.1177/0042098018770846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., and K. Derickson. 2013. From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2):253–70. doi: 10.1177/0309132512454775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín, C., and S. McTarnaghan. 2018. Institutionalizing urban resilience: A midterm monitoring and evaluation report of 100 Resilient Cities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2013. Policy boosterism, policy mobilities and the extrospective city. Urban Geography 34 (1):5–29. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward, eds. 2011. Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., and J. P. Newell. 2019. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where and why? Urban Geography 40 (3):309–29. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., J. Newell, and M. Stults. 2016. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 147:38–49. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K., and M. Sparke. 2016. The new Washington consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode 48 (3):724–49. doi: 10.1111/anti.12203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. 1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82 (2):309–32. doi: 10.1086/226311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. 2014. Resilience and the neoliberal counter-revolution: From ecologies of control to production of the common. Resilience 2 (1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2017. Offshore: Exploring the worlds of global outsourcing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2012. Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (1):21–30. doi: 10.1068/a44179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2015. Fast policy: Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, R. 2014. Consultants and the global assemblage of culture and creativity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (1):90–101. doi: 10.1111/tran.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H., E. Pollard, G. Dutson, J. Ekstrom, S. Livingstone, H. Temple, and J. Pilgrim. 2015. A review of corporate goals of no net loss and net positive impact on biodiversity. Oryx 49 (2):232–38. doi: 10.1017/S0030605313001476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, E., and A. Hult. 2017. The travelling business of sustainable urbanism: International consultants as norm-setters. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (8):1779–96. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16686069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resilience Network Initiative. 2017. Peta Kota launches Ushahidi deployment & Indonesian language manual. Accessed December 2019. http://rni.ushahidi.com/reports/view/108.
   Google Scholar
• Resilient Cities. 2016a. Resilient Cities in action—Early insights into how cities are institutionalizing resilience. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Resilient Cities. 2016b. Resilient Semarang: Moving together towards a resilient Semarang. Accessed December 2019. https://www.100resilientcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Semarang20Resilience20Strategy20-202016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Resilient Cities. 2018a. Accessed December 2019. Frequently asked questions. http://www.100resilientcities.org/100RC-FAQ/#/-_/.
   Google Scholar
• Resilient Cities. 2018b. Jakarta agenda setting workshop. Jakarta, Indonesia: 100 Resilient Cities.
   Google Scholar
• Resilient Cities. 2019. Resilient Cities, resilient lives: Learning from the 100RC network. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. 2010. Climate, carbon, and territory: Greenhouse gas mitigation in Seattle, Washington. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (4):929–37. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.502434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation. 2017. Catalyzing the urban resilience market. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP. 2015. City resilience framework. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation. Accessed December 2019. https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20140410162455/City-Resilience-Framework-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP. n.d. City Resilience Index—Understanding and measuring city resilience. London: ARUP.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, J. 2013. 100 Resilient Cities. Accessed December 2019. http://www.100resilientcities.org/100-resilient-cities/.
   Google Scholar
• Rodin, J. 2014. The resilience dividend: Being strong in a world where things go wrong. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, E. 2019. The geographies of social finance: Poverty regulation through the “invisible heart” of markets. Progress in Human Geography 43 (1):141–62. doi: 10.1177/0309132517739142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2010. Poverty capital: Microfinance and the making of development. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruibal, M. 2017. Resilience value realization (RVR) training with 100RC Asia Pacific Team. LinkedIn. Accessed December 2019. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/resilience-value-realization-rvr-training-100rc-asia-pacific-ruibal.
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, T., and A. Aylett. 2008. The work of policy: Actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26 (4):627–46. doi: 10.1068/d6907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., and B. Waterhout. 2017. Building up resilience in cities worldwide: Rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities programme. Cities 61:109–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J., A. Sen, and J. P. Fitoussi. 2010. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris: Commission of the Government of France.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, T., S. Surminski, E. Wilkinson, R. Reid, J. Rentschler, and S. Rajput. 2015. The triple resilience dividend: Realising development goals through the multiple benefits of disaster risk management. London: The Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2018. Philanthrocapitalism: Rendering the public domain obsolete? Third World Quarterly 39 (1):51–67. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1357112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, I., and J. Peters. 2002. Building resiliency in schools. Invercargill, New Zealand: Essential Resources.
   Google Scholar
• UN Habitat. n.d. Medellin collaboration for urban resilience. Accessed December 2019. http://urbanresiliencehub.org/medellin-colaboration/.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. New urban agenda. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Habitat III.
   Google Scholar
• Ushahidi. 2017. PetaKota Semarang. Accessed December 2019. http://petasmg.com/index.php/.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, S. 2015. Mobile adaptation and sticky experiments: Circulating best practices and lessons learned in climate change adaptation. Geographical Research 53 (1):26–38. doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. 2016. Climate change adaptation as a growing development priority: Towards critical adaptation scholarship. Geography Compass 10 (10):401–13. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M. 2013. Neoliberal urban environmentalism and the adaptive city: Towards a critical urban theory and climate change. Urban Studies 50 (7):1348–67. doi: 10.1177/0042098013480965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, S., S. Meerow, M. Stults, and C. Wilkins. 2018. Adaptation to resilience planning: Alternative pathways to prepare for climate change. Journal of Planning and Education Research 1–12. doi: 10.1177/0739456X18801057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. Investing in urban resilience: Protecting and promoting development in a changing world. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018a. City Resilience Program. Accessed December 2019. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/brief/city-resilience-program.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2018b. The CityStrength diagnostic: Promoting urban resilience. Accessed December 2019. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/citystrength.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oslo. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1989. Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar