On Decolonizing the Anthropocene: Disobedience via Plural Constitutions

References

• Baskin, J. 2015. Paradigm dressed as epoch: The ideology of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values 24 (1):9–29. doi: 10.3197/096327115X14183182353746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawaka Country, S. Suchet-Pearson, S. Wright, K. Lloyd, M. Tofa, J. Sweeney, L. Burarrwanga, R. Ganambarr, M. Ganambarr-Stubbs, B. Ganambarr, et al. 2018. Gon Gurtha: Enacting responsibilities as situated co-becoming. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (4):682–702. doi: 10.1177/0263775818799749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. 2014a. The Anthropocene: A governance perspective. The Anthropocene Review 1 (1):57–61. doi: 10.1177/2053019613516289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. 2014b. Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., K. Abbott, S. Andresen, K. Bäckstrand, S. Bernstein, M. M. Betsill, H. Bulkeley, B. Cashore, J. Clapp, C. Folke, et al. 2012. Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth system governance. Science 335 (6074):1306–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1217255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. 2018. Earth-bound: Indigenous resurgence and environmental reconciliation. In Resurgence and reconciliation: Indigenous-settler relations and earth teachings, ed. M. Asch, J. Borrows, and J. Tully, 49–82. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. 2019. Law’s Indigenous ethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boscov-Ellen, D. 2020. Whose universalism? Dipesh Chakrabarty and the Anthropocene. Capitalism Nature Socialism 31 (1):70–83. doi: 10.1080/10455752.2018.1514060.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S., A. Gupta, C. Y. A. Inoue, A. Kalfagianni, Å. Persson, A. K. Gerlak, A. Ishii, J. Patterson, J. Pickering, M. Scobie, et al. 2019. New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance 1 (1). doi: 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (2):197–222. doi: 10.1086/596640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2012. Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change. New Literary History 43 (1):1–18. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2012.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2016. Humanities in the Anthropocene: The crisis of an enduring Kantian fable. New Literary History 47 (2–3):377–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2019. The planet: An emergent humanist category. Critical Inquiry 46 (1):1–31. doi: 10.1086/705298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, E. 2020. The Asian Anthropocene: Electricity and fossil developmentalism. The Journal of Asian Studies 79 (1):3–24. doi: 10.1017/S0021911819000573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. 2017. The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):44–60. doi: 10.1177/1368431016651874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebrook, C. 2017. We have always been post-anthropocene: The anthropocene counterfactual. In Anthropocene feminism, ed. M. Grusin, 1–20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P., and C. Schwägerl. 2011. Living in the Anthropocene: Towards a new global ethos. Accessed June 26, 2020. https://e360.yale.edu/features/living_in_the_anthropocene_toward_a_new_global_ethos.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H., and Z. Todd. 2017. On the importance of a date, or decolonising the Anthropocene. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies 16 (4):761–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., A. A. Moulton, L. Van Sant, and B. Williams. 2019. Anthropocene, capitalocene, … plantationocene? A manifesto for ecological justice in an age of global crisis. Geography Compass 13 (5). doi: 10.1111/gec3.12438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2010. Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond “politics.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (2):334–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01061.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoughrey, E. 2015. Ordinary futures: Interspecies worldings in the Anthropocene. In Global ecologies and environmental humanities: Postcolonial approaches, ed. E. DeLoughrey, J. Didur, and A. Carrigan, 352–72. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Di Chiro, G. 2017. Welcome to the white (m)anthropocene: A feminist-environmentalist critique. In Routledge handbook of gender and environment, ed. S. MacGregor, 487–505. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B. 2020. Anthropocene futures: Linking colonialism and environmentalism in an age of crisis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (1):111–28. doi: 10.1177/0263775818806514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagan, M. 2019. On the dangers of an Anthropocene epoch: Geological time, political time and post-human politics. Political Geography 70:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. 2016. The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glissant, É. 1997. Poetics of relation. Trans. B. Wing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glissant, É. 2006. Une nouvelle région du monde [A new region of the world]. Paris: Editions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Glissant, É., and A. S. Hiepko. 2011. Europe and the Antilles: An interview with Édouard Glissant. In The creolization of theory, ed. F. Lionnet and S.-M. Shih, 255–61. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Barris, M. 2017. The extractive zone: Social ecologies and decolonial perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., N. Ishikawa, S. F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A. L. Tsing, and N. Bubandt. 2016. Anthropologists are talking—About the anthropocene. Ethnos 81 (3):535–64. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayman, E. 2018. Future rivers of the Anthropocene or whose Anthropocene is it? Decolonising the Anthropocene! Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education and Society 6 (2):77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S., M. B. Kearnes, M. Degen, and S. Whatmore. 2005. Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 (5):643–58. doi: 10.1068/d351t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. 2014. Composing postcolonial geographies: Postconstructivism, ecology and overcoming ontologies of critique. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 35 (1):72–87. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., ed. 2018. Coloniality, ontology, and the problem of the posthuman. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2013. How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Last, A. 2017. We are the world? Anthropocene cultural production between geopoetics and geopolitics. Theory, Culture and Society 34 (2–3):147–68. doi: 10.1177/0263276415598626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lear, J. 2010. Radical hope: Ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. L., and M. A. Maslin. 2015. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519 (7542):171–80. doi: 10.1038/nature14258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., J. Stripple, and B. Wiman. 2009. Earth system governmentality: Reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 19 (1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martineau, J. 2015. Creative combat: Indigenous art, resurgence, and decolonization. PhD dissertation, University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2018. Mino-mnaamodzawin: Achieving Indigenous environmental justice in Canada. Environment and Society 9 (1):7–24. doi: 10.3167/ares.2018.090102.
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2013. Plantation futures. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3):1–15. doi: 10.1215/07990537-2378892.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2009. Epistemic dis-obedience, independent thought and de-colonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (7–8):1–23. doi: 10.1177/0263276409349275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2012. Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D., and C. Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A. 2018. Rooted constitutionalism: Growing political community. In Resurgence and reconciliation: Indigenous–settler relations and earth teachings, ed. M. Asch, J. Borrows, and J. Tully, 133–74. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. 2018. It’s not the Anthropocene, it’s the white supremacy scene; or, the geological color line. In After extinction, ed. R. Grusin, 123–49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. D. 2019. Provincializing the Anthropocene: Eurocentrism in the Earth system. In At nature’s edge: The global present and long-term history, ed. G. Cederlöf and M. Rangarajan, 1–16. Delhi: Oxford Scholarship Online. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780199489077.001.0001/oso-9780199489077.
   Google Scholar
• Mudimbe, V. 1988. The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy and the order of knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, B. 2018. Dark emu: Aboriginal Australia and the birth of agriculture. London: Scribe.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P., and F. Zelli, eds. 2016. Environmental politics and governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and legitimacy in a complex world. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. B. 2004. Reports from a wild country: Ethics for a decolonisation. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldhana, A. 2020. A date with destiny: Racial capitalism and the beginnings of the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (1):12–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. J. 2019. The moral geography of the Earth system. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (4):721–34. doi: 10.1111/tran.12308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, C. 2016. In the wake: On blackness and being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. 2020. The Anthropocene as colonial discourse. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (1):53–71. doi: 10.1177/0263775818764679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., A. Persson, L. Deutsch, J. Zalasiewicz, M. Williams, K. Richardson, C. Crumley, P. Crutzen, C. Folke, L. Gordon, et al. 2011. The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40 (7):739–61. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2005. The cosmopolitical proposal. In Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, ed. B. Latour and P. Weibel, 994–1004. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchet-Pearson, S., S. Wright, K. Lloyd, and L. Burarrwanga, on behalf of the Bawaka Country. 2013. Caring as country: Towards an ontology of co-becoming in natural resource management. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54 (2):185–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, Z. 2016. An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29 (1):4–22. doi: 10.1111/johs.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vàzquez, R. 2017. Precedence, Earth and the Anthropocene: Decolonizing design. Design Philosophy Papers 15 (1):77–91. doi: 10.1080/14487136.2017.1303130.
   Google Scholar
• Vergès, F. 2017. Racial capitalocene. In Futures of black radicalism, ed. G. T. Johnson and A. Lubin, 72–82. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Vizenor, G. 1999. Manifest manners: Narratives on postindian survivance. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. 2016. Is it colonial déjà-vu? Indigenous peoples and climate justice. In Humanities for the environment: Integrating knowledges, forging new constellations of practice, ed. J. Adamson, M. Davis, and H. Huang, 88–104. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. 2017. Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonising the Anthropocene. English Language Notes 55 (1–2):153–62. doi: 10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. 1971. Novel and history, plot and plantation. Savacou 5:95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. 2003. Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Toward the human, after Man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review 3 (3):257–337. doi: 10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynter, S., and K. McKittrick. 2015. Unparalleled catastrophe for our species? Or, to give humanness a different future: Conversations. In Sylvia Wynter: On being human as praxis, ed. K. McKittrick, 9–89. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2018. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar