References
- Aarts, A. A, C. J. Anderson, J. E. Anderson, P. R. Attridge, A. Attwood, J. Axt, M. Babel, Š. Bahník, E. Baranski, M. Barnett-Cowan. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349 (6251):4716. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.
- Abelson, R. 2018. Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes indicted on fraud charges. The New York Times, June 15.
- Bainbridge, W. S., and M. C. Roco, eds. 2016. Handbook of science and technology convergence. New York: Springer.
- Baker, M. 2016. 1,500 Scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533 (7604):452–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
- Brunsdon, C. 2016. Quantitative methods I: Reproducible research and quantitative geography. Progress in Human Geography 40 (5):687–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515599625.
- Camerer, C. F., A. Dreber, E. Forsell, T.-H. Ho, J. Huber, M. Johannesson, M. Kirchler, J. Almenberg, A. Altmejd, T. Chan, et al. 2016. Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science 351 (6280):1433–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918.
- Finkel, A. 2019. To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions. Nature 566 (7744):297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00613-z.
- Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Gertler, P., S. Galiani, and M. Romero. 2018. How to make replication the norm. Nature 554 (7693):417–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-02108-9.
- Goodchild, M. F., H. Guo, A. Annoni, L. Bian, K. de Bie, F. Campbell, M. Craglia, M. Ehlers, J. van Genderen, D. Jackson, et al. 2012. Next-generation Digital Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (28):11088–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202383109.
- Kedron, P., A. E. Frazier, A. B. Trgovac, T. Nelson, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2019. Reproducibility and replicability in geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12221.
- Knoth, C., and D. Nüst. 2017. Reproducibility and practical adoption of GEOBIA with open-source software in Docker containers. Remote Sensing 9 (3):290. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030290.
- Kolata, G. 2018. He promised to restore damaged hearts: Harvard says his lab fabricated research. The New York Times, October 29.
- Konkol, M., C. Kray, and M. Pfeiffer. 2019. Computational reproducibility in geoscientific papers: Insights from a series of studies with geoscientists and a reproduction study. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33 (2):408–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1508687.
- Lee, G. 2018. RR: Workshop on promoting robust and reliable research practice in science of organizations. NSF Project Report, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville.
- McNutt, M. K., M. Bradford, J. M. Drazen, B. Hanson, B. Howard, K. H. Jamieson, V. Kiermer, E. Marcus, B. Kline Pope, R. Schekman, et al. 2018. Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115 (11):2557–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Reproducibility and replicability in science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Institutes of Health. 2017. Enhancing reproducibility through rigor and transparency. Accessed November 21, 2019. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/reproducibility/index.htm.
- National Science Foundation. 2018. Dear colleague letter: Achieving new insights through replicability and reproducibility. Accessed November 21, 2019. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18053/nsf18053.jsp.
- Nosek, B., J. R. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science 7 (6):615–31. doi:10.1177%2F1745691612459058.
- Ostermann, F. O., and C. Granell. 2017. Advancing science with VGI: Reproducibility and replicability of recent studies using VGI. Transactions in GIS 21 (2):224–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12195.
- Pexman, P. M., and S. J. Lupker. 1995. Effects of memory load in a word-naming task: Five failures to replicate. Memory & Cognition 23 (5):581–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197260.
- Servick, K. 2018. Social science studies get a “generous” test. Science 361 (6405):836. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.361.6405.836.
- Spatial Analysis Research Center. 2019. Replicability and reproducibility in geospatial research: A SPARC workshop. Accessed June 22, 2020. https://sgsup.asu.edu/sparc/RRWorkshop.
- Stodden, V. 2014. What computational scientists need to know about intellectual property law: A primer. In Implementing reproducible research, ed. V. Stodden, L. Friedrich, and R. D. Peng, 325–40. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
- Teytelman, L. 2018. No more excuses for non-reproducible methods. Nature 560 (7719):411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06008-w.