580
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Modeling and Analysis of Excess Commuting with Trip Chains

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1851-1867 | Received 05 Jun 2020, Accepted 23 Aug 2020, Published online: 04 Jan 2021

References

  • Antipova, A., F. Wang, and C. Wilmot. 2011. Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach. Applied Geography 31 (3):1010–18. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.02.001.
  • Beckman, R. J., K. A. Baggerly, and M. D. Mckay. 1996. Creating synthetic baseline populations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 30 (6):415–29. doi: 10.1016/0965-8564(96)00004-3.
  • Bhat, C. R. 1997. Work travel mode choice and number of non-work commute stops. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 31 (1):41–54. doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00016-1.
  • Bradley, M., and J. L. Bowman. 2008. FDOT activity-based model design and work plan. Gannett Fleming.
  • Bradley, M., J. L. Bowman, and B. Griesenbeck. 2010. SACSIM: An applied activity-based model system with fine-level spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Choice Modelling 3 (1):5–31. doi: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70027-7.
  • Buliung, R. N., and P. S. Kanaroglou. 2002. Commute minimization in the Greater Toronto Area: Applying a modified excess commute. Journal of Transport Geography 10 (3):177–86. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00010-8.
  • Cervero, R. 1989. Jobs housing balancing and regional mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association 55 (2):136–50. doi: 10.1080/01944368908976014.
  • Charron, M. 2007. From excess commuting to commuting possibilities: More extension to the concept of excess commuting. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (5):1238–54. doi: 10.1068/a3897.
  • Chen, Z., Y. Guo, A. L. Stuart, Y. Zhang, and X. Li. 2019. Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 130:529–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.048.
  • Duncan, M. 2016. How much can trip chaining reduce VMT? A simplified method. Transportation 43 (4):643–59. doi: 10.1007/s11116-015-9610-5.
  • Evans, G. W., R. E. Wener, and D. Phillips. 2002. The morning rush hour: Predictability and stress. Environment and Behavior 34 (4):521–30. doi: 10.1177/00116502034004007.
  • Frost, M., B. Linneker, and N. Spence. 1998. Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection of British cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 32 (7):529–38. doi: 10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00016-0.
  • Gimenez-Nadal, J. I., and J. A. Molina. 2019. Daily feelings of U.S. workers and commuting time. Journal of Transport & Health 12:21–33.
  • Gurram, S., A. L. Stuart, and A. R. Pinjari. 2019. Agent-based modeling to estimate exposures to urban air pollution from transportation: Exposure disparities and impacts of high-resolution data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 75:22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.01.002.
  • Ha, J., S. Lee, and S. M. Kwon. 2018. Revisiting the relationship between urban form and excess commuting in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi: 10.1177/0739456X18787886.
  • Hamilton, B. W., and A. Röell. 1982. Wasteful commuting. Journal of Political Economy 90 (5):1035–53. doi: 10.1086/261107.
  • Horner, M. W. 2002. Extensions to the concept of excess commuting. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 34 (3):543–66. doi: 10.1068/a34126.
  • Horner, M. W. 2008. “Optimal” accessibility landscapes? Development of a new methodology for simulating and assessing jobs–housing relationships in urban regions. Urban Studies 45 (8):1583–602. doi: 10.1177/0042098008091492.
  • Horner, M. W., and A. T. Murray. 2002. Excess commuting and the modifiable areal unit problem. Urban Studies 39 (1):131–39. doi: 10.1080/00420980220099113.
  • Horner, M. W., and M. E. O’Kelly. 2007. Is non-work travel excessive? Journal of Transport Geography 15 (6):411–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.12.003.
  • Hu, Y., and J. Downs. 2019. Measuring and visualizing place-based space–time job accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography 74:278–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.12.002.
  • Hu, Y., and F. Wang. 2015. Decomposing excess commuting: A Monte Carlo simulation approach. Journal of Transport Geography 44:43–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.03.002.
  • Hu, Y., and F. Wang. 2016. Temporal trends of intraurban commuting in Baton Rouge, 1990–2010. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (2):1–479. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1113117.
  • Hu, Y., and F. Wang. 2018. GIS-based simulation and analysis of intra-urban commuting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
  • Hu, Y., C. Wang, R. Li, and F. Wang. 2020. Estimating a large drive time matrix between ZIP codes in the United States: A differential sampling approach. Journal of Transport Geography 86:102770. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102770.
  • Justen, A., F. J. Martínez, and C. E. Cortés. 2013. The use of space–time constraints for the selection of discretionary activity locations. Journal of Transport Geography 33:146–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.009.
  • Kanaroglou, P. S., C. D. Higgins, and T. A. Chowdhury. 2015. Excess commuting: A critical review and comparative analysis of concepts, indices, and policy implications. Journal of Transport Geography 44:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.02.009.
  • Kelley, S. B., B. W. Lane, B. W. Stanley, K. Kane, E. Nielsen, and S. Strachan. 2020. Smart transportation for all? A typology of recent U.S. smart transportation projects in midsized cities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):547–58. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1643702.
  • Korsu, E., and F. Le Néchet. 2017. Would fewer people drive to work in a city without excess commuting? Explorations in the Paris metropolitan area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95:259–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.030.
  • Layman, C. C., and M. W. Horner. 2010. Comparing methods for measuring excess commuting and jobs–housing balance: Empirical analysis of land use changes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2174 (1):110–17. doi: 10.3141/2174-15.
  • Lyons, G., and K. Chatterjee. 2008. A human perspective on the daily commute: Costs, benefits and trade‐offs. Transport Reviews 28 (2):181–98. doi: 10.1080/01441640701559484.
  • Ma, K. R., and D. Banister. 2006a. Excess commuting: A critical review. Transport Reviews 26 (6):749–67. doi: 10.1080/01441640600782609.
  • Ma, K. R., and D. Banister. 2006b. Extended excess commuting: A measure of the jobs–housing imbalance in Seoul. Urban Studies 43 (11):2099–2113. doi: 10.1080/00420980600945245.
  • McGuckin, N., and N. Srinivasan. 2005. The journey-to-work in the context of daily travel. Paper presented at the Census Data for Transportation Planning Conference, Irvine, CA, May.
  • McGuckin, N., J. Zmud, and Y. Nakamoto. 2005. Trip-chaining trends in the United States: Understanding travel behavior for policy making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1917 (1):199–204. doi: 10.1177/0361198105191700122.
  • Murphy, E., and J. E. Killen. 2011. Commuting economy: An alternative approach for assessing regional commuting efficiency. Urban Studies 48 (6):1255–72. doi: 10.1177/0042098010370627.
  • Niedzielski, M. A. 2006. A spatially disaggregated approach to commuting efficiency. Urban Studies 43 (13):2485–502. doi: 10.1080/00420980600970672.
  • Niedzielski, M. A., M. W. Horner, and N. Xiao. 2013. Analyzing scale independence in jobs–housing and commute efficiency metrics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 58:129–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.018.
  • Niedzielski, M. A., Y. Hu, and M. Stępniak. 2020. Temporal dynamics of the impact of land use on modal disparity in commuting efficiency. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 83:101523. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101523.
  • Noland, R. B., and J. V. Thomas. 2007. Multivariate analysis of trip-chaining behavior. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 (6):953–70. doi: 10.1068/b32120.
  • O’Kelly, M. E., and W. Lee. 2005. Disaggregate journey-to-work data: Implications for excess commuting and jobs–housing balance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (12):2233–52. doi: 10.1068/a37312.
  • Oliveira, R., K. Moura, J. Viana, R. Tigre, and B. Sampaio. 2015. Commute duration and health: Empirical evidence from Brazil. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 80:62–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.020.
  • Plan Hillsborough. 2017. HC 2040 LRTP TAZ Population and dwelling units shapefile. Accessed May 2, 2020. http://www.planhillsborough.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/TAZ2010_2040_Pop_DU.zip.
  • Schleith, D., M. J. Widener, C. Kim, and M. W. Horner. 2019. Categorizing urban form for the largest metro regions in the U.S. using the excessive commuting framework. Built Environment 45 (4):450–61. doi: 10.2148/benv.45.4.450.
  • Small, K. A., and S. Song. 1992. “Wasteful” commuting: A resolution. Journal of Political Economy 100 (4):888–98. doi: 10.1086/261844.
  • Sultana, S. 2002. Job/housing imbalance and commuting time in the Atlanta metropolitan area: Exploration of causes of longer commuting time. Urban Geography 23 (8):728–49. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.23.8.728.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation. 2001. Our nation’s travel: Current issues. FHWA-PL-05-015, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  • Wang, R. 2015. The stops made by commuters: Evidence from the 2009 U.S. National Household Travel Survey. Journal of Transport Geography 47:109–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.11.005.
  • White, M. J. 1988. Urban commuting journeys are not “wasteful.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (5):1097–110. doi: 10.1086/261579.
  • Yang, J., and J. Ferreira. 2008. Choices versus choice sets: A commuting spectrum method for representing job–housing possibilities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35 (2):364–78. doi: 10.1068/b3326.
  • Zhou, J., E. Murphy, and J. Corcoran. 2020. Integrating road carrying capacity and traffic congestion into the excess commuting framework: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47 (1):119–37. doi: 10.1177/2399808318773762.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.