Do Autonomous Vehicles Dream of Virtual Sheep? The Displacement of Reality in the Hyperreal Visions of Autonomous Vehicles

References

• Aurrigo Driverless Technologies. 2018. Aurrigo UK Autodrive. Accessed February 21, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkllSHyjcGQ.
   Google Scholar
• Barns, S. 2018. Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Culture and Society 12 (March):5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1993. Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and simulation, trans. S. F. Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, N., T. Schwanen, and B. K. Sovacool. 2017. Imagined people, behaviour and future mobility: Insights from visions of electric vehicles and car clubs in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy 59 (October):165–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. 2017. The social life of autonomous cars. Computer 50 (2):92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Caprotti, F., and R. Cowley. 2019. Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK: Discursive logics, the state and local urban context. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (3):587–601. doi: 10.1111/tran.12284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, P. K. 1968. Do androids dream of electric sheep? New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Farocki, H. 2004. Phantom images. Public 29:13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gaboury, J. 2015. Hidden surface problems: On the digital image as material object. Journal of Visual Culture 14 (1):40–60. doi: 10.1177/1470412914562270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, N., and L. Hespanhol. 2018. SMLXL: Scaling the smart city, from metropolis to individual. City, Culture and Society 12:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. 2015. Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (1):79–92. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 1998. Spaces of surveillant simulation: New technologies, digital representations, and material geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16 (4):483–504. doi: 10.1068/d160483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, A. 2017. Radical technologies and the future of cities. Paper presented at Festival of the Future City, Bristol, October 18, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Guzel, M. 2013. Autonomous vehicle navigation using vision and Maples strategies: A survey. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2013:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, O. 2015. Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hind, S. 2019. Digital navigation and the driving-machine: Supervision, calculation, optimization, and recognition. Mobilities 14 (4):401–17. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2019.1569581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollands, R. G. 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12 (3):303–20. doi: 10.1080/13604810802479126.
   Google Scholar
• Innovate UK. 2014. Driverless cars: 4 cities get green light for everyday trials. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/driverless-cars-4-cities-get-green-light-for-everyday-trials.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K. N., N. Megoran, R. Woodward, and D. Bos. 2012. Wootton Bassett and the political spaces of remembrance and mourning. Area 44 (3):356–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01106.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2014. The evolution of urban mobility: The interplay of academic and policy perspectives. IATSS Research 38 (1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2014.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., M. Cook, and Y. Dayot. 2017. Smart cities: Towards a new citizenship regime? A discourse analysis of the British smart city standard. Journal of Urban Technology 24 (4):29–49. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1336027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., D. Kim, S. Park, Y. Jung, and K. Yi. 2016. Automated complex urban driving based on enhanced environment representation with GPS/map, radar, Lidar and vision. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 8th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Automotive Control AAC 2016, 49 (11):190–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.08.029.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsley, S. 2010. Representing “things to come”: Feeling the visions of future technologies. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42 (11):2771–90. doi: 10.1068/a42371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2014. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79 (1):1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kroger, F. 2015. Automated driving in its social, historical and cultural contexts. In Autonomous driving: Technical, legal and social aspects, ed. M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, and H. Winner, 41–68. Berlin: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. Aramis: Or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, C. 1996. Jean Baudrillard: A study in cultural metaphysics. London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, J. 2017. Pedestrians rage at autonomous pods and delivery bots on pavements. Accessed July 6, 2017. https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2017/07/pedestrians-rage-at-autonomous-pods-and-delivery-bots-on-pavements/.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, S., N. Sünderhauf, P. Newman, J. J. Leonard, D. Cox, P. Corke, and M. J. Milford. 2016. Visual place recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 32 (1):1–19. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2015.2496823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei, L., M. Masullo, A. Pascale, G. Ruggiero, and V. P. Romero. 2016. Immersive virtual reality in community planning: Acoustic and visual congruence of simulated vs real world. Sustainable Cities and Society 27:338–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2020. Co-existence or displacement: Do street trials of intelligent vehicles test society? The British Journal of Sociology 71 (3):537–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2001. On the postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., and O. Söderström. 2017. On alternative smart cities. City 21 (3–4):312–17. 10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166.
   Google Scholar
• Milton Keynes Council. 2017. MK highways—July/August 2017. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/newsletter/read/mkhighways/2673/11236.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. 1999. An introduction to visual culture. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MK:Smart. 2019. Transport. Accessed October 8, 2019. http://www.mksmart.org/transport/.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. 2014. Infrastructure free navigation: Mapping and scene navigation. Paper presented at Re:Work, London, March 30. Accessed September 11, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKlo7NUC46k.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford Robotics Institute. 2015. MK Scene Prior. Accessed September 11, 2018. http://ori.ox.ac.uk/projects/lutz-self-driving-pods/.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. 2006a. Introduction: The role of visual representation in the production of scientific reality. In Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication, ed. L. Pauwels, vii-xix. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, L. 2006b. A theoretical framework for assessing visual representational practices in knowledge building and science communications. In Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building and science communication, ed. L. Pauwels, 1–25. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pett, M. 2017. Virtual reality and transport. Paper presented at Imagine Conference and Exhibition, Milton Keynes, UK, June 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Posnar, I. 2016. Machine learning in robotics—Autonomy based on experience. Paper presented at the London Machine Learning Meetup, London. Accessed September 13, 2018. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3mIbDyAbds.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P. B. 2019. Sovereignty, the hyperreal, and “taking back control.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (6):1999–2015. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1587283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2017. Look inside: Corporate visions of the smart city. In Geomedia studies: Spaces and mobilities in mediatized worlds, ed. K. Fast, A. Jansson, J. Lindell, L. R. Bengtsson, and M. Tesfahuney, 97–113. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., and A. Willis. 2019. Seeing the smart city on Twitter: Colour and the affective territories of becoming smart. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3):411–27. 10.1177/0263775818771080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International. 2018. J3016B: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Accessed January 2, 2020. SAE International. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806/.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T. 2017. The urban geographical imagination in the age of big data. Big Data & Society 4 (1):205395171666512. doi: 10.1177/2053951716665129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W. 2001. Reading simulacra. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. G. 2003. Baudrillard’s nonrepresentational theory: Burn the signs and journey without maps. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 (1):67–84. doi: 10.1068/d280t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, O., T. Paasche, and F. Klauser. 2014. Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City 18 (3):307–20. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2017. Seeing like a Tesla: How can we anticipate self-driving worlds. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation 3:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2018. Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Social Studies of Science 48 (1):25–56. doi: 10.1177/0306312717741687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2018. Ethics. In Digital geographies, ed. J. Ash, R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski, 260–69. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Transport Systems Catapult (TSC). 2017. TSC LUTZ Pathfinder demonstration in Milton Keynes. Accessed October 11, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPXDxAMnnd8&t=27s.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S., W. Clancey, S. Helmrich, and A. Yanni. 2009. Simulation and its discontents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2014. Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51 (5):883–98. doi: 10.1177/0042098013494427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. 2016. Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures 82:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertesi, J. 2015. Seeing like a rover. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virilo, P. 1994. The vision machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Virtual eyes to boost self-driving vehicle safety. 2018. Bdaily Business News, August 29. Accessed August 29, 2018. https://bdaily.co.uk/articles/2018/08/29/virtual-eyes-to-boost-self-drivingvehicle-safety.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K., and A. Aurigi. 2018. Digital and smart cities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M. 2017. Crowd-sourcing the smart city: Using big geosocial media metrics in urban governance. Big Data & Society 4 (1):2053951717694384. doi: 10.1177/2053951717694384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar