Climate Necropolitics: Ecological Civilization and the Distributive Geographies of Extractive Violence in the Anthropocene

References

• Abrahams, D., and E. R. Carr. 2017. Understanding the connections between climate change and conflict: Contributions from geography and political ecology. Current Climate Change Reports 3 (4):233–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agamben, G. [1995] 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexis-Martin, B. 2019. The nuclear imperialism-necropolitics nexus: Contextualizing Chinese–Uyghur oppression in our nuclear age. Eurasian Geography and Economics 60 (2):152–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1968. The origins of totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Bigger, P., and B. D. Neimark. 2017. Weaponizing nature: The geopolitical ecology of the U.S. Navy’s biofuel program. Political Geography 60:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B., M. Coleman, M. Thomas, and K. Yusoff. 2015. Grounding the Anthropocene: Sites, subjects, struggles in the Bakken oil fields. Antipode Foundation, November 3. Accessed December 1, 2019. https://antipodefoundation.org/2015/11/03/grounding-the-anthropocene.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2014. The Anthropocene and geography I: The back story. Geography Compass 8 (7):436–449.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, C. J., and D. Himmelfarb. 2015. “Much in blood and money”: Necropolitical ecology on the margins of the Uganda protectorate. Antipode 47 (1):55–73. doi: 10.1111/anti.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. 2012. Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change. New Literary History 43 (1):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde, M., and G. Kallis. 2012. The global uranium rush and its Africa frontier: Effects, reactions and social movements in Namibia. Global Environmental Change 22 (3):596–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P., and F. Stoermer. 2000. Have we entered the Anthropocene? International Geosphere-Biosphere Program Newsletter 41:17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. 2018. A failed green future: Navajo green jobs and energy “transition” in the Navajo Nation. Geoforum 88:57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. 2020. Anthropocene geopolitics: Globalization, security, sustainability. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T. 2018. Toxic space and time: Slow violence, necropolitics, and petrochemical pollution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6):1537–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, T., A. Isakjee, and S. Dhesi. 2017. Violent inaction: The necropolitical experience of refugees in Europe. Antipode 49 (5):1263–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H., and Z. Todd. 2017. On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16 (4):761–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., A. A. Moulton, L. Van Sant, and B. Williams. 2019. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, … Plantationocene?: A manifesto for ecological justice in an age of global crises. Geography Compass 13 (5):e12438. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoom, M. J. 2018. Developmental fusion: Chinese investment, resource nationalism, and the distributive politics of uranium mining in Namibia. PhD diss., University of Colorado-Boulder. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/hd76s013x.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoom, M. J. 2020a. Sovereignty and climate necropolitics: The tragedy of the state system goes “green.” In Handbook on the changing geographies of the state: New spaces of geopolitics, ed. S. Moisio, A. Jonas, N. Koch, C. Lizotte, and J. Luukkonen, 276–286. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoom, M. J. 2020b. Toward a more sustainable energy transition: Lessons from Chinese investments in Namibian uranium. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 62 (1):4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Derickson, K. D., and D. MacKinnon. 2015. Toward an interim politics of resourcefulness for the Anthropocene. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):304–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erongo Regional Council. 2011. Demographics. Accessed July 12, 2020. http://www.erc.com.na/erongo-region/demographics/.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones, eds. 2013. Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature? London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. 1963. The wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, T. D. 2016. The cobalt pipeline. Washington Post, September 30. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/business/batteries/congo-cobalt-mining-for-lithium-ion-battery/.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. [1976] 2003. Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Geall, S., and A. Ely. 2018. Narratives and pathways towards an Ecological Civilization in contemporary China. The China Quarterly 236:1175–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus and crisis in globalizing California. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Carbon Project. 2018. Supplemental data of global carbon budget 2018. https://www.icos-cp.eu/global-carbon-budget-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, J. V. 2019. Savage ecology: War and geopolitics at the end of the world. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, K. J. 2010. Insuring “our common future”? Dangerous climate change and the biopolitics of environmental security. Geopolitics 15 (3):536–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günel, G. 2019. Spaceship in the desert: Energy, climate change, and urban design in Abu Dhabi. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E., H. Li, and R. Svarverud. 2018. “Ecological Civilization”: Interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Global Environmental Change 53:195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2009. Africa and the nuclear world: Labor, occupational health, and the transnational production of uranium. Comparative Studies in Society and History 51 (4):896–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2012. Being nuclear: Africans and the global uranium trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. 2018. Interscalar vehicles for an African Anthropocene. Cultural Anthropology 33 (1):109–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2018. World energy outlook 2018. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2005. Proving grounds: Project Plowshare and the unrealized dream of nuclear earthmoving. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, J. M. 2017. Rare earth frontiers: From terrestrial subsoils to lunar landscapes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuzer, M., L. Walsh, M. Schnelzer, A. Tschense, and B. Grosche. 2008. Radon and risk of extrapulmonary cancers: Results of the German uranium miners’ cohort study, 1960–2003. British Journal of Cancer 99 (11):1946–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, K., and P. Westoby. 2014. Carbon colonialism and the new land grab: Plantation forestry in Uganda and its livelihood impacts. Journal of Rural Studies 36:13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, G., and J. Wainwright. 2018. Climate Leviathan: A political theory of our planetary future. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Margulies, J. D. 2019. Making the “man-eater”: Tiger conservation as necropolitics. Political Geography 69:150–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture 15 (1):11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. 2019. Necropolitics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2013. Plantation futures. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafanezhad, M., and R. Norum. 2019. The Anthropocenic imaginary: Political ecologies of tourism in a geological epoch. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 27 (4):421–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvaney, D. 2019. Solar power: Innovation, sustainability, and environmental justice. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2011. Scientific, technical, environmental, human health and safety, and regulatory aspects of uranium mining. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. 2013. Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, D. 2017. Overview of child labour in the artisanal and small-scale mining sector. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a5f34feed915d7dfb57d02f/209-213-Child-labour-in-mining.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Lear, S., and S. Dalby, eds. 2015. Reframing climate change: Constructing ecological geopolitics. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkanen, L., and M. Farish. 2018. Nuclear landscapes. Progress in Human Geography 42 (6):862–80. doi: 10.1177/0309132517725808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pow, C. P. 2018. Building a harmonious society through greening: Ecological Civilization and aesthetic governmentality in China. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (3):864–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. 2005. Abandoned women and spaces of the exception. Antipode 37 (5):1052–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2018. Racism and the Anthropocene. In Future remains: A cabinet of curiosities for the Anthropocene, ed. G. Mitman, M. Armiero, and R. S. Emmett, 116–28. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Raleigh, C., A. Linke, and J. O’Loughlin. 2014. Extreme temperatures and violence. Nature Climate Change 4 (2):76–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reszitnyk, A. 2015. Uncovering the Anthropocenic imaginary: The metabolization of disaster in contemporary American culture. PhD dissertation, McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. 2014. Cause and response: Vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (5):667–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riofrancos, T. 2019. What green costs. Logic, December 9. https://logicmag.io/nature/what-green-costs/.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 1983 [2000]. Black Marxism: The making of the black radical tradition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddick, S. 2015. Situating the Anthropocene: Planetary urbanization and the anthropological machine. Urban Geography 36 (8):1113–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheyder, E., and Z. Shabalala. 2019. Pentagon eyes rare earth supplies in Africa. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-rareearths-pentagon-exclusive/exclusive-pentagon-eyes-rare-earth-supplies-in-africa-in-push-away-from-china-idUSKCN1T62S4.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2014. Gendering climate change: Geographical insights. The Professional Geographer 66 (3):372–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2015. Depoliticized environments and the Anthropocene. In The international handbook of political ecology, ed. R. L. Bryant, 131–46. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. A., and B. P. Warner. 2019. Weaponizing vulnerability to climate change. Global Environmental Change 57:101928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyner, J. A. 2019. Dead labor: Toward a political economy of premature death. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2019a. Supply of uranium. Accessed February 20, 2020. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/supply-of-uranium.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2019b. Uranium mining. Accessed February 20, 2020. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/supply-of-uranium.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2020. China’s nuclear fuel cycle. Accessed February 26, 2020. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/china-nuclear-fuel-cycle.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. W. 2011. Necropolitics, narcopolitics, and femicide: Gendered violence on the Mexico–U.S. border. Signs 36 (3):707–31. doi: 10.1086/657496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, J. 2017. Secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/Xi_Jinping's_report_at_19th_CPC_National_Congress.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, M. 2011. The human-as-waste, the labor theory of value and disposability in contemporary capitalism. Antipode 43 (5):1679–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, E. 2009. Greening western China: A critical view. Geoforum 40 (5):884–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2013. Geologic life: Prehistory, climate, futures in the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (5):779–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2019. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. 2015. Uranium supplies: A hitch to China’s nuclear energy plans? Or not? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71 (3):58–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. 2006. The rich consume and the poor suffer the pollution. ChinaDialogue, October 27.
   Google Scholar