284
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Postwildfire Landscape Identity in Mediterranean Ecosystems: Three Study Cases from the Coastal Range of Central Chile

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1692-1704 | Received 02 Oct 2019, Accepted 08 Sep 2020, Published online: 10 Feb 2021

References

  • Altamirano, A., C. Salas, V. Yaitul, C. Smith-Ramírez, and A. Ávila. 2013. Influencia de la heterogeneidad del paisaje en la ocurrencia de incendios forestales en Chile Central [Influence of the heterogeneity of the landscape in the occurrence of forest fires in Central Chile]. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 55 (55):157–70. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34022013000200011.
  • Antrop, M. 2000. Geography and landscape science. Belgeo, Revue Belge de Géographie 1–4 (Special issue). doi: 10.4000/belgeo.13975.
  • ATLAS.Ti (version 8). Qualitative studies software. 2015. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.
  • Barbati, A., P. Corona, E. D’amato, and R. Cartisano. 2015. Is landscape a driver of short-term wildfire recurrence? Landscape Research 40 (1):99–108. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2012.761681.
  • Beeson, P. C., S. N. Martens, and D. D. Breshears. 2001. Simulating overland flow following wildfire: Mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance. Hydrological Processes 15 (15):2917–30. doi: 10.1002/hyp.382.
  • Bender, B. 2006. Place and landscape. In Handbook of material culture, ed. C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Kuechler, M. Rowlands, and P. Spyer, 303–14. London: Sage.
  • Butler, A., I. Sarlöv-Herlin, I. Knez, E. Ångman, Å. Ode Sang, and A. Åkerskog. 2018. Landscape identity, before and after a forest fire. Landscape Research 43 (6):878–912. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1344205.
  • Cabeza, A., and C. Weber. 2010. Los paisajes culturales en Chile: Conceptos, legislación y situación actual [Cultural landscapes in Chile: Concepts, legislation and current situation]. Hereditas 14:4–12. Accessed November 10, 2015. http://openarchive.icomos.org/921/1/Hereditas_14_%2812.2010%29.pdf.
  • Camus, P. 2006. Ambiente, bosques y gestión forestal en Chile. 1541–2005 [Environment, forests and forestry management in Chile 1541–2005]. Santiago: Centro de Investigaciones Barros Arana de la Dirección de Bibliotecas, Archivos y Museos - LOM Ediciones.
  • Carroll, M. S., T. Paveglio, P. J. Jakes, and L. L. Higgins. 2011. Nontribal community recovery from wildfire five years later: The case of the Rodeo–Chediski fire. Society & Natural Resources 24 (7):672–87. doi: 10.1080/08941921003681055.
  • Castillo, M., P. Pedernera, and E. Peña. 2003. Incendios forestales y medio ambiente: Una síntesis global [Forest fires and the environment: A global synthesis]. Revista Ambiente y Desarrollo de CIPMA 19 (3):44–53. http://www.keneamazon.net/Documents/Publications/Virtual-Library/Economia-Desarrollo/29.pdf.
  • Centro de Análisis de Políticas Públicas Universidad de Chile. 2016. Informe País: Estado del Medio Ambiente en Chile. Comparación 1999–2015 [Country report: State of the environment in Chile. Comparison 1999–2015]. Santiago de Chile: MAVAL Impresores. Accessed November 10, 2016. http://www.uchile.cl/documentos/informe-pais-estado-del-medio-ambiente-en-chile-comparacion-1999-2015_129586_0_1412.pdf.
  • Centro Investigaciones Periodisticas. 2018. Alertas que anunciaban la catástrofe se arrastran desde 2012. Mega incendios: El historial de omisiones de las autoridades que abonó la tragedia. Por Alberto Arellano. https://ciperchile.cl/2017/02/01/mega-incendios-el-historial-de-omisiones-de-las-autoridades-que-abono-la-tragedia/.
  • Centro Peruano de Estudios Sociales. 2015. La tierra un recurso en disputa: Instituciones, actores y procesos en Argentina, Colombia, Perú y Venezuela, ed. J. Escobedo Sánchez. Lima, Perú: International Land Coalition.
  • Charmaz, K. C. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Christensen, M., and J. Emborg. 1996. Biodiversity in natural versus managed forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management 85 (1–3):47–51. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03749-8.
  • Cid, B. 2015. Peasant economies, forestry industry and fires: Socio-natural instabilities and agriculture as means of resistance. Ambiente & Sociedade 17 (1):93–114.
  • Corporacion Nacional del Medio Ambiente–United Nations Development Program. 2003. National biodiversity strategy of the Republic of Chile. Santiago, Chile: Corporacion Nacional del Medio Ambiente–United Nations Development Program.
  • Corporación Nacional Forestal. 2015. Plan Nacional de Restauración de Paisajes [National landscape restoration plan]. Accessed March 15, 2016. http://www.conaf.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Presentaci%C3%B3n-Restauraci%C3%B3n-L.Carrasco.pdf.
  • Corporación Nacional Forestal. 2018. Estadísticas históricas de incendios forestales [Historical wildfire statistics]. Accessed December 3, 2018. http://www.conaf.cl/incendios-forestales/incendios-forestales-en-chile/estadisticas-historicas/.
  • Corporación Nacional Forestal-Ministerio de Agricultura. 2014. Política Forestal 2015–2035. Protocolo de plantaciones forestales [Forest Policy 2015-2035. Forest plantation protocol]. Santiago, Chile: Consejo de Política Forestal de Chile. Accessed November 10, 2015. https://www.corma.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/protocolo-forestal.pdf.
  • Cosgrove, D. 1985. Prospect, perspective and the evolution of the landscape idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10 (1):45–62. doi: 10.2307/622249.
  • Cottet, P. 2014. Tres versiones del diseño para investigaciones sociales [Three versions of the design for social research]. In Investigación social. Lenguajes del diseño, ed. M. Canales, 10–25. Santiago, Chile: LOM.
  • Cubitt, G. 2007. History and memory. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Darques, R. 2015. Mediterranean cities under fire: A critical approach to the wildland–urban interface. Applied Geography 59:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.008.
  • De la Barrera, F., F. Barraza, P. Faviere, V. Ruiz, and J. Quense. 2018. Mega fires in Chile 2017: Monitoring multiscale environmental impacts of burned ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 637–638:1526–36. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.119.
  • De la Maza, C., and L. Villanueva. 2011. Diseño de investigación aplicado a las ciencias del medio ambiente [Research design applied to environmental sciences]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
  • Delgado, M. 1999. El animal público [The public animal]. Barcelona, Spain: Anagrama.
  • Dempsey, N., and M. Jenks. 2010. The future of the compact city. Built Environment 36 (1):116–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23289987. doi: 10.2148/benv.36.1.116.
  • De Pablo, C. L., M. J. Roldán-Martín, and P. Martín De Agar. 2012. Magnitude and significance in landscape change. Landscape Research 37 (5):571–89. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.641949.
  • Doheny, S., and P. Milbourne. 2017. Community, rurality, and older people: Critically comparing older people's experiences across different rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies 50:129–38.
  • Edenius, L., and J. Elmberg. 1996. Landscape-level effects of modern forestry on bird communities in north Swedish boreal forests. Landscape Ecology 11 (6):325–38. doi: 10.1007/BF02447520.
  • Esposito, A. 2015. La disciplina riformatrice del paesaggio [The reforming discipline of the landscape]. Ricerche e Progetti per il Territorio, la Città e L'architettura 6 (3):1–10. doi: 10.6092/issn.2036-1602/5833.
  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Critical analysis of the discourse. Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.
  • Fernández Castillo, S. 2015. Territorio corporativo, fragmentación socioterritorial y respuestas locales en el Chile post- terremoto, Región del Biobío [Corporative territory, socioterritorial fragmentation and local responses in the post earthquake Chile's, Biobio region]. Revista Universitaria de Geografía 24 (1):41–62. Accessed January 14, 2020. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=383241100003
  • Flick, U. 2004. Introducción a la investigación cualitativa [Introduction to qualitative research]. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Morata.
  • Galleguillos, X., and C. Ojeda Leal. 2016. El paisaje en animación suspendida y su valoración como dinamizador del desarrollo rural de la comuna de Maullín, Chile [Landscape in suspended animation and its assessment as a catalyst for rural development in the commune of Maullín, Chile]. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 65:215–31. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34022016000300011.
  • Gandy, M. 2013. Landscape and infrastructure in the late-modern metropolis. In The new Blackwell companion to the city, ed. G. Bridge and S. Watson, 57–65. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Gentles, S., C. Charles, J. Ploeg, and A. McKibbon. 2015. Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report 20 (11):1772–89.
  • Girot, C. 2013. Immanent landscape. Harvard Design Magazine 36:6–16. Accessed May 20, 2017. http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/36/immanent-landscape.
  • Gómez-González, S., F. Ojeda, and P. M. Fernandes. 2018. Portugal and Chile: Longing for sustainable forestry while rising from the ashes. Environmental Science & Policy 81:104–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.006.
  • González, M. E. 2005. Fire history data as reference information in ecological restoration. Dendrochronologia 22 (3):149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2005.04.001.
  • González-Cabán, A., P. Wohlgemuth, J. B. Loomis, and D. R. Weise. 2008. Costs and benefits of reducing sediment production from wildfires through prescribed burning: The Kinneloa fire case study. Paper presented at the Second International Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning and Policy: A Global View, Córdoba, Spain, April 19–22, 2004.
  • Hagerhall, C. M., T. Purcell, and R. Taylor. 2004. Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 (2):247–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004.
  • Heilmayr, R., C. Echeverría, R. Fuentes, and E. F. Lambin. 2016. A plantation-dominated forest transition in Chile. Applied Geography 75:71–82.
  • Hojman, D. E. 1993. Change in the Chilean countryside: From Pinochet to Aylwin and beyond. New York: Springer.
  • Howard, P., I. Thompson, and E. Waterton, eds. 2013. The Routledge companion to landscape studies. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Hunter, M. 1990. Wildlife, forests, and forestry. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hurteau, M. D., J. B. Bradford, P. Z. Fulé, A. H. Taylor, and K. L. Martin. 2014. Climate change, fire management, and ecological services in the southwestern U.S. Forest Ecology and Management 327:280–89. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.007.
  • Hutto, R. L. 2008. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: Some like it hot. Ecological Applications: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America 18 (8):1827–34. doi: 10.1890/08-0895.1.
  • Instituto Forestal. 2019. Anuario forestal 2019 [Forest yearbook]. Santiago, Chile: Instituto Forestal. Accessed January 20, 2020. http://wef.infor.cl/publicaciones/anuario/2019/Anuario2019.pdf.
  • International Section of Disaster Risk. 2004. Living with risk, a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
  • Johnson, E. A., K. Miyanishi, and J. M. H. Weir. 1998. Wildfires in the western Canadian boreal forest: Landscape patterns and ecosystem management. Journal of Vegetation Science 9 (4):603–10. doi: 10.2307/3237276.
  • Jūratė, K., and J. Rolandas. 2004. Some methodological aspects of landscape visual quality preferences analysis. Environmental Research, Engineering, and Management 3 (29):51–60.
  • Kennedy, B. A. 2006. Inventing the Earth: Ideas on landscape development since 1740. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Kjaer, E. D., A. Lobo, and T. Myking. 2014. The role of exotic tree species in Nordic forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4):323–32. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.926098.
  • Kolden, C. A., and C. Henson. 2019. A socio-ecological approach to mitigating wildfire vulnerability in the wildland urban interface: A case study from the 2017 Thomas fire. Fire 2 (1):9–19. doi: 10.3390/fire2010009.
  • Kooistra, C., T. E. Hall, T. Paveglio, and M. Pickering. 2018. Understanding the factors that influence perceptions of post-wildfire landscape recovery across 25 wildfires in the northwestern United States. Environmental Management 61 (1):85–102. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0962-9.
  • Kumagai, Y., M. S. Carroll, and P. Cohn. 2004. Coping with interface wildfire as a human event: Lessons from the disaster/hazard’s literature. Journal of Forestry 102 (6):28–32. doi: 10.1093/jof/102.6.28.
  • Liepins, R. 2000. Exploring rurality through “community”: Discourses, practices, and spaces shaping Australian and New Zealand rural “communities.” Journal of Rural Studies 16 (3):325–41. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00067-4.
  • Lloret, F., E. Calvo, X. Pons, and R. Díaz-Delgado. 2002. Wildfires and landscape patterns in the Eastern Iberian Peninsula. Landscape Ecology 17 (8):745–59. doi: 10.1023/A:1022966930861.
  • Martínez, M. 2002. Hermenéutica y análisis del discurso como método de investigación social [Hermenutics and discourse analysis as a social research method]. Paradigma XXIII (1):9–30.
  • Massey, D. B. 2005. For space. London: Sage
  • McGee, T. K., and S. Russell. 2003. “It’s just a natural way of life …”: An investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Environmental Hazards 5 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.hazards.2003.04.001.
  • Ministerio de Agricultura (MINAGRI). 1974. Decreto Ley 701. Fija régimen legal de los terrenos forestales o preferentemente aptos para la forestación, y establece normas de fomento sobre la materia [Decree Law 701. It sets out the legal grounds for forestry or preferably suitable for afforestation and lays down rules for the promotion of the subject]. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. Accessed January 14, 2020. http://bcn.cl/2g8ao
  • Ministerio de Agricultura (MINAGRI). 2020. Visión de la región del Biobío [Vision of the Biobio region]. Acccessed January 14, 2020. http://biobio.minagri.gob.cl/nuestra-region/vision-de-la-region/
  • Miranda, A., A. Altamirano, L. Cayuela, A. Lara, and M. González. 2017. Native forest loss in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot: Revealing the evidence. Regional Environmental Change 17 (1):285–97. doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1010-7.
  • Mitchell, D. 2008. New axioms for reading the landscape: Paying attention to political economy and social justice. In Political economies of landscape change, ed. J. L. Westcoat and D. M. Johnston, 29–50. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Moore-Colyer, R., and A. Scott. 2005. What kind of landscape do we want? Past, present and future perspectives. Landscape Research 30 (4):501–23. doi: 10.1080/01426390500273254.
  • Moritz, M. A., M. A. Parisien, E. Batllori, M. A. Krawchuk, J. Van Dorn, D. J. Ganz, and K. Hayhoe. 2012. Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. Ecosphere 3 (6):art49. doi: 10.1890/ES11-00345.1.
  • Muñoz-Pedreros, A. 2004. Landscape evaluation: An environmental management. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 77 (1):139–56. doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X2004000100011.
  • Murray, B., and M. Fonstad. 2007. Preface: Complexity (and simplicity) in landscapes. Geomorphology 91 (3–4):173–77. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.07.011.
  • Nahuelhual, L., A. Carmona, A. Lara, C. Echeverría, and M. E. González. 2012. Land-cover change to forest plantations: Proximate causes and implications for the landscape in south-central Chile. Landscape and Urban Planning 107 (1):12–20.
  • Nahuelhual, L., P. Laterra, D. Jiménez, A. Báez, C. Echeverría, and R. Fuentes. 2018. ¿La gente prefiere paisajes naturales? Un estudio empírico en Chile [Do people prefer natural landscapes? An empirical study in Chile]. Bosque (Valdivia) 39 (2):205–16. Accessed January 20, 2020. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002018000200205.
  • Nohl, W. 2001. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception—Preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1–4):223–37. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00138-4.
  • Palacios, B., M. C. Sánchez Gómez, and A. Gutiérrez García. 2013. Evaluar la calidad en la investigación cualitativa: Guías o checklists [Assessing the quality of qualitative research: Guides or checklists]. In 2° Congreso Nacional sobre Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación, ed. M. P. Rueda, Miguel V. Mariño y T. González Hortigüela, 581–96. Valladolid, Spain: Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Jurídicas y de la Comunicación. Accessed January 20, 2020. http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/3014.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pausas, J. G., J. Llovet, A. Rodrigo, and R. Vallejo. 2008. Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin? A review. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17 (6):713–23. doi: 10.1071/WF07151.
  • Paveglio, T. B., C. Kooistra, T. Hall, and M. Pickering. 2016. Understanding the effect of large wildfires on residents’ well-being: What factors influence wildfire impact? Forest Science 62 (1):59–69. doi: 10.5849/forsci.15-021.
  • Phillipson, C. 2007. The “elected” and the “excluded”: Sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing and Society 27 (3):321–42. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X06005629.
  • Pries, S. J. 2018. A geographer looks at the landscape, once more: Toward a post humanist political ecology approach. Geography Compass 12 (10):e12401–12. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12401.
  • Pyne, S. J. 2009. The human geography of fire: A research agenda. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4):443–46. doi: 10.1177/0309132508101598.
  • Ruiz, V., J. Munizaga, and A. S. Burrows. 2017. Plantaciones forestales y su extensión hacia áreas urbanas en el área metropolitana de Valparaíso y su relación con el aumento de incendios forestales. Investigaciones Geográficas 54:23–40. doi: 10.5354/0719-5370.2017.48040.
  • Sanders, D., J. Laing, and W. Frost. 2015. Exploring the role and importance of post-disaster events in rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies 41:82–94.
  • San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., T. Durrant, R. Boca, G. Libertà, A. Branco, D. de Rigo, D. Ferrari, A. Maianti, T. Pieralberto, E. Vivancos, et al. 2017. Forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2016. EUR 28707 EN, Publications Office, Luxembourg. doi: 10.2760/17690.
  • Silveira, M. L. 2007. Los territorios corporativos de la globalización [The corporative territories of globalization]. Geograficando 3 (3). Accessed January 14, 2020. https://www.geograficando.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/GEOv03n03a01
  • Simensen, T., R. Halvorsen, and L. Erikstad. 2018. Methods for landscape characterization and mapping: A systematic review. Land Use Policy 75:557–69. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.022.
  • Stephenson, J. 2008. The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 84 (2):127–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.
  • Stobbelaar, D. J., and B. Pedroli. 2011. Perspectives on landscape identity: A conceptual challenge. Landscape Research 36 (3):321–39. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.564860.
  • Stuart Chapin, F., III, T. S. Rupp, A. M. Starfield, L. Dewilde, E. S. Zavaleta, N. Fresco, J. Henkelman, and D. Mcguire. 2003. Planning for resilience: Modeling change in human–fire interactions in the Alaskan boreal forest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1 (5):255–61. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001<0255:PFRMCI>2.0.CO;2.
  • Swanwick, C. 2009. Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 26:S62–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025.
  • Tilley, C. 2006. Introduction: Identity, place, landscape, and heritage. Journal of Material Culture 11 (1–2):7–32. doi: 10.1177/1359183506062990.
  • Torres, R., G. Azócar, J. Rojas, A. Montecinos, and P. Paredes. 2015. Vulnerability and resistance to neoliberal environmental changes: An assessment of agriculture and forestry in the Biobio region of Chile (1974–2014). Geoforum 60:107–22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.013.
  • Turco, M., J. Bedia, F. Di Liberto, P. Fiorucci, J. von Hardenberg, N. Koutsias, M.-C. Llasat, F. Xystrakis, and A. Provenzale. 2016. Decreasing fires in Mediterranean Europe. PLoS ONE 11 (3):e0150663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150663.
  • Úbeda, X., and P. Sarricolea. 2016. Wildfires in Chile: A review. Global and Planetary Change 146:152–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.10.004.
  • Van Dijk, T. 1993. Text and context: Semantics and pragmatic of the discourse. London: Longman.
  • Van Wilgen, B. W., G. G. Forsyth, H. De Klerk, S. Das, S. Khuluse, and P. Schmitz. 2010. Fire management in Mediterranean climate shrublands: A case study from the Cape Fynbos, South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 47 (3):631–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01800.x.
  • Velarde, M. D., G. Fry, and M. Tveit. 2007. Health effects of viewing landscapes—Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6 (4):199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001.
  • Viedma, O. 2008. The influence of topography and fire in controlling landscape composition and structure in Sierra de Gredos (central Spain). Landscape Ecology 23 (6):657–72. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9228-5.
  • Villagra, P. 2012. A visual perception study in landscapes subject to fires in Southeast Australia. BOSQUE 33 (3):287–92. doi: 10.4067/S0717-92002012000300010.
  • Wang, Q. 2008. On the cultural constitution of collective memory. Memory 16 (3):305–17. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801467.
  • Wheeler, R. 2014. Mining memories in a rural community: Landscape, temporality and place identity. Journal of Rural Studies 36:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.005.
  • Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2006. At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Witzel, A. 1985. Das problemzentrierte interview. Qualitative forschung in der psychologie: Grundfragen, verfahrensweisen, anwendungsfelder [The problem-centered interview. Qualitative research in psychology: Basic questions, procedures, fields of application]. Weinheim, Germany: Accessed January 20, 2020. Beltz. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-5630.
  • Zackrisson, O. 1977. Influence of forest fires on the north Swedish boreal forest. Oikos 29 (1):22–32. doi: 10.2307/3543289.
  • Zamora-Manzur, C., L. E. Parra, and E. Jaque. 2011. Distributional patterns of Geometridae of the Biobío Region, Chile: An approach for their conservation. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84 (4):465–80. doi: 10.4067/S0716-078X2011000400001.
  • Zube, E. H., J. L. Sell, and J. G. Taylor. 1982. Landscape perception: Research, application, and theory. Landscape Planning 9 (1):1–33. doi: 10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.