The Plantationocene: A Lusotropical Contribution to the Theory

References

• Aikens, N., A. Clukey, A. King, and I. Wagner. 2017. South to the Plantationocene. ASAP Journal. Accessed December 20, 2019. http://asapjournal.com/south-to-the-plantationocene-natalie-aikens-amy-clukey-amy-k-king-and-isadora-wagner/.
   Google Scholar
• Alina, E. 2012. Slavery by any other name: African life under company rule in colonial Mozambique. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aston, T. H., and C. H. E. Philpin, eds. 1995. The Brenner debate: Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, I., and K. Barney. 2017. The political ecology of cross-sectoral cumulative impacts: Modern landscapes, large hydropower dams and industrial tree plantations in Laos and Cambodia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (4):769–95. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1289921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baka, J. 2017. Making space for energy: Wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions. Antipode 49 (4):977–96. doi: 10.1111/anti.12219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, T., and K. Zuéli. 2000. Environmental discourses and the Ivorian savanna. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (1):67–95. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, S. 2015. Empire of cotton: A global history. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Beckford, G. L. 1972. Persistent poverty: Underdevelopment in plantation economies of the third world. Barbados: The University of the West Indies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 1996. Agrarian questions then and now. The Journal of Peasant Studies 24 (1–2):22–59. doi: 10.1080/03066159608438630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, H. 2014. Food sovereignty via the ‘peasant way’: A sceptical view. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (6):1031–63. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besky, S. 2017. Fixity: On the inheritance and maintenance of tea plantation houses in Darjeeling, India. American Ethnologist 44 (4):617–31. doi: 10.1111/amet.12561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandar, B. 2018. Colonial lives of property: Law, land and racial regimes of ownership. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield. 2015. Land degradation and society. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bobrow-Strain, A. 2007. Intimate enemies: Landowners, power, and violence in Chiapas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, C. 2014. Property and political order in Africa: Land rights and the structure of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, S., Jr. 2009. Agrarian change and peasant studies: Changes, continuities, and challenges—An introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (1):5–31. doi: 10.1080/03066150902820297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, J. 2020. Agrarian social movements: The absurdly difficult but not impossible agenda of defeating right‐wing populism and exploring a socialist future. Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (1): 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S., Jr., and J. Franco. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (1):34–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras, S., Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, B. White, and W. Wolford. 2011. Towards a better understanding of global land-grabbing: An editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2):209–16. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, T. 1997. The agrarian myth, the “new” populism and the “new” right. Economic and Political Weekly 32 (4):27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, R. 1976. Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present 70 (1):30–75. doi: 10.1093/past/70.1.30.
   Google Scholar
• Brockway, L. H. 1979. Science and colonial expansion: The role of the British Royal Botanic Gardens. American Ethnologist 6 (3):449–65. doi: 10.1525/ae.1979.6.3.02a00030.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, J. 2005. Mining mountains: Neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods, and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (2):221–39. doi: 10.1068/a371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, J. 2001. Black rice: The African origins of rice cultivation in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, J. 2020. Subsistence in the Plantationocene: Dooryard gardens, agrobiodiversity, and the subaltern economies of slavery. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1725488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, J., and M. Watts. 1990. Manufacturing dissent: Work, gender, and the politics of meaning in a peasant society. Africa 60 (2):207–41. doi: 10.2307/1160333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2014. Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current contributions. Geography Compass 8 (7): 450–63. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12140
   Google Scholar
• Chari, S. 2005. Political work: The Holy Spirit and the labours of activism in the shadows of Durban’s refineries. Centre for Civil Society Research Report 30:1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chayanov, A. 1966. On the theory of non-capitalist economic systems. In The theory of peasant economy, ed. D. Thorner, B. Kerblay, and R. Smith, 1–28. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Chichava, S. 2013. “They can kill us, but we won’t go to the communal villages”: Peasants and the policy of “socialisation of the countryside” in Zambezia. Kronos 39 (1):112–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. B. 2019. The grass beneath: Conservation, agro-industrialization, and land-water enclosures in postcolonial Tanzania. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1484685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, F. 1982. From slaves to squatters: Plantation labour and agriculture in Zanzibar and coastal Kenya, 1890–1925. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, F., and A. Stoler, eds. 1997. Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, M., and R. Shenton. 1996. Doctrines of development. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J., and E. F. Stoermer. The “Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter 41:17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Curley, A. 2019. T’áá hwó ají t’éego and the moral economy of Navajo coal workers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (1):71–86. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1488576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J., A. A. Moulton, L. Van Sant, and B. Williams. 2019. Anthropocene, capitalocene, … plantationocene? A manifesto for ecological justice in an age of global crises. Geography Compass 13 (5):e12438–15. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., and D. Byerlee. 2011. Rising global interest in farmland: Can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? Accessed December 23, 2019. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/DEC/Resources/Rising-Global-Interest-in-Farmland.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Schutter, O. 2014. Report of the special rapporteur on the right to food: Final report. The transformative potential of the right to food. Accessed August 24, 2020. https://undocs.org/A/HRC/25/57.
   Google Scholar
• DuBois, W. E. B. 2007. Black reconstruction in America: An essay toward a history of the part which Black folk played in the attempt to reconstruct democracy in America, 1860–1880. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 2014. The division of labor in society. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M., and W. Wolford. 2017. Introduction: Critical agrarian studies in theory and practice. Antipode 49 (4):959–76. doi: 10.1111/anti.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2007. Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3):179–210. doi: 10.1080/09502380601162506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2015. Foreignization, financialization and land grab regulation. Journal of Agrarian Change 15 (4):581–91. doi: 10.1111/joac.12112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M. 2020. Fields of gold: Financing the global land rush. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest–savanna mosaic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, F. 1963. The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, S., and C. Geisler. 2012. Land expropriation and displacement in Bangladesh. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4):971–93. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.661719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, S. C., and L. E. Edwards. 2016. The “Anthropocene” epoch: Scientific decision or political statement? GSA Today 26 (3):4–10. doi: 10.1130/GSATG270A.1.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D. 2003. Every farm a factory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, C. R. R., F. O. Valdez, G. Purser, and K. Sexsmith. 2017. Milked: Immigrant dairy farmworkers in New York State. Accessed August 25, 2020. http://www.iwj.org/resources/milked-immigrant-dairy-farmworkers-in-new-york-state.
   Google Scholar
• Freyre, G. 1986. The masters and the slaves: A study in the development of Brazilian civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedma, H., and P. McMichael. 1989. Agriculture and the state system: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis 29 (2):93–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeana, F. 2020. Legitimating the state and the movement: Clientelism, brokerage, and the territorial turn in Honduras. The Journal of Latin American Geography 19 (4): 11–42. doi: 10.1353/lag.2020.0099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghertner, A. 2015. Rule by aesthetics: World-class city making in Delhi. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. E., K. Paprocki, and T. Osborne. 2019. A manifesto for a progressive land-grant mission in an authoritarian populist era. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (2):673–84. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1539648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, T. 2014. Moral economy and the upper peasant: The dynamics of land privatization in the Mekong Delta. Journal of Agrarian Change 14 (4):501–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRAIN. 2008. Seized! The 2008 land grab for food and financial security. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://www.grain.org/article/entries/93-seized-the-2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin, G. 2009. Fordlandia: The rise and fall of Henry Ford’s forgotten jungle city. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guthman, J. 2004. Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities 6 (1):159–65. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3615934.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D., N. Ishikawa, S. F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A. L. Tsing, and N. Bubandt. 2016. Anthropologists are talking—About the Anthropocene. Ethnos 81 (3):535–64. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2015.1105838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. I. 1993. Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review 106 (8):1707–91. doi: 10.2307/1341787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2001. Development critiques in the 1990s: Culs de sac and promising paths. Progress in Human Geography 25 (4):649–58. doi: 10.1191/030913201682689002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2002. Geography and development: Development/s beyond neoliberalism? Power, culture, political economy. Progress in Human Geography 26 (6):812–22. doi: 10.1191/0309132502ph405pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. 2016. Rebranding of Cornell plantations to better reflect mission, vision. Cornell Chronicle, August 25. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2016/08/rebranding-cornell-plantations-better-reflect-mission-vision
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, E. 2019. On the backs of tortoises: Darwin, the Galápagos and the fate of an evolutionary Eden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• High Level Panel of Experts. 2013. Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Accessed August 25, 2020. http://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/273868/.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, J. M. 2007. Triumph of the expert: Agrarian doctrines of development and the legacies of British colonialism. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J. 1991. The misrule of law: Land and usurpation in Brazil. Comparative Studies in Society and History 33 (4):695–725. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500017291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacman, A. F. 1996. Cotton is the mother of poverty: Peasants, work, and rural struggle in colonial Mozambique, 1938–1961. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacman, A. F., and B. Isaacman. 1983. Mozambique: From colonialism to revolution, 1900–1982. Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• James, C. L. R. 1963. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Kautsky, K. 1899. The agrarian question. London: Zwan.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E. 2015. Emergent ecologies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kull, C. A. 2004. Isle of fire: The political ecology of landscape burning in Madagascar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., I. Stengers, A. Tsing, and N. Bubandt. 2018. Anthropologists are talking—About capitalism, ecology, and apocalypse. Ethnos 83 (3):587–606. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2018.1457703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. I. [1899] 1964. The development of capitalism in Russia. In Lenin: Collected works, Vol. 4. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Accessed February 8, 2017. https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1899/devel/.
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, J. 1999. Negotiating national identity: Immigrants, minorities and the struggle for ethnicity in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M., M. J. Watts, and Y. Hairong. 2018. Agrarian Marxism. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (5–6):853–83. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2018.1534101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, A. 1955. The theory of economic growth. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School 22 (2):139–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2014. Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedrén, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32:211–18. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowder, S. K., J. Skoet, and T. Raney. 2016. The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development 87:16–29. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahowald, N. M., D. S. Ward, S. C. Doney, P. G. Hess, and J. T. Randerson. 2017. Are the impacts of land use on warming underestimated in climate policy? Environmental Research Letters 12 (9). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa836d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makki, F. 2014. Development by dispossession: Terra Nullius and the social‐ecology of new enclosures in Ethiopia. Rural Sociology 79 (1):79–103. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1857. Grundrisse: Notebook III – The chapter on capital. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1857/grundrisse/ch06.htm
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1977. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1867]. 1976. Capital. Vol. I. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch01.htm.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2002. First world political ecology: Lessons from the wise use movement. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 34 (7):1281–1302. doi: 10.1068/a3526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2005. Scale, sovereignty, and strategy in environmental governance. Antipode 37 (4):731–53. doi: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00523.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2011. On plantations, prisons and a black sense of place. Social & Cultural Geography 12 (8):947–63. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2011.624280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick, K. 2013. Plantation futures. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism 17 (3):1–15. doi: 10.1215/07990537-2378892.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. 2012. The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4):681–701. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.661369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, S. W. 1986. Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 1990. Everyday metaphors of power. Theory and Society 19 (5):545–77. doi: 10.1007/BF00147026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitman, G. 2017. President’s address: Forgotten paths of empire: Ecology, disease, and commerce in the making of Liberia’s plantation economy. Environmental History 22 (1):1–22. doi: 10.1093/envhis/emw097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. 2017. The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (3):594–630. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. 2018. The Capitalocene Part II: Accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy. The Journal of Peasant Studies 45 (2):237–43. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca, J. 1999. A experiência “socialista” em Moçambique (1975–1986) [The “socialist” experience in Mozambique (1975–1986)]. Lisbon: Instituto Piaget.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, S. 2011. Land concentration and accumulation after redistributive reform in post-settler Zimbabwe. Review of African Political Economy 38 (128):257–76. doi: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, H. 2019. Pinterest and The Knot pledge to stop promoting plantation weddings. The New York Times December 5. Accessed December 17, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/05/style/plantation-weddings-pinterest-knot-zola.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. 2012. Boundaries among kin: Sovereignty, the modern treaty process, and the rise of ethno-territorial nationalism among Yukon First Nations. Comparative Studies in Society and History 54 (3):499–532. doi: 10.1017/S0010417512000217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. 2017. Sovereignty’s entailments: First Nation state formation in the Yukon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nehring, R. 2016. Yield of dreams: Marching west and the politics of scientific knowledge at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA). Geoforum 77:206–17. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. 1995. Local challenges to global agendas: Conservation, economic liberalization, and the pastoralists’ rights movement in Tanzania. Antipode 27 (4):363–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00285.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newitt, M. 1995. A history of Mozambique. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, A. 2012. The construction of an alternative quinoa economy: Balancing solidarity, household needs, and profit in San Agustín, Bolivia. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (4):441–54. doi: 10.1007/s10460-012-9371-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofstehage, A. 2018. Farming out of place: Transnational family farmers, flexible farming, and the rupture of rural life in Bahia, Brazil. American Ethnologist 45 (3):317–29. doi: 10.1111/amet.12667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 1813. A new view of society: Or, Essays on the principle of the formation of the human character, and the application of the principle to practice. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/owen/ch02.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, J. 1978. Agrarian revolution: Social movements and export agriculture in the underdeveloped world. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paprocki, K. 2018. Threatening dystopias: Development and adaption regimes in Bangladesh. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (4):955–73. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1406330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2012. ProSavana, anti-peasant. Accessed December 23, 2019. http://rajpatel.org/2012/10/24/prosavana-antipeasant/.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and M. Watts. 1996. Liberation ecologies: Environment, development, social movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, N. L. 2017. Plantations and mines: Resource frontiers and the politics of the smallholder slot. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44 (4):834–69. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1339692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñalver, E. M. 2011. Property’s memories. Fordham Law Review 80 (3):1071–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. 1999. God, the devil and development in northeast Brazil. Praxis: The Fletcher Journal of Development Studies 15:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2010. The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (13):5786–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905455107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingali, P. 2015. Agricultural policy and nutrition outcomes—Getting beyond the preoccupation with staple grains. Food Security 7 (3):583–91. doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0461-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. [1945] 2001. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, S., S. Wolf, and W. Wolford. 2016. Knowledge and the politics of land. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (4):616–25. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15604171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proudhon, P.-J. 1876. What is property? An inquiry into the principle of right and of government. Accessed August 25, 2020. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/property/.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. 2017. Geographies of race and ethnicity II: Environmental racism, racial capitalism and state-sanctioned violence. Progress in Human Geography 41 (4):524–33. doi: 10.1177/0309132516646495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. B., and C. Lund. 2018. Reconifguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control. World Development 101:388–99. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. 1817. On the principles of political economy and taxation. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, P. 2012. Political ecology: A critical introduction. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Safransky, S. 2018. Land justice as a historical diagnostic: Thinking with Detroit. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):499–512. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1385380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. 1999. Community, forestry, and conditionality in the Gambia. Africa 69 (1):1–22. doi: 10.2307/1161075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. 1986. Sugar plantations in the formation of Brazilian society: Bahia, 1550–1835. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., R. Hall, S. M. Borras, Jr., B. White, and W. Wolford. 2013. The politics of evidence: Methodologies for understanding the global land rush. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (3):469–83. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.801341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1976. The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 2010. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, P. 1995. Ceremonies of possession in Europe’s conquest of the New World, 1492–1640. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1972. The awkward class, political sociology of peasantry in a developing society, Russia, 1910–25. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Shanin, T. 1976. Peasants and peasant societies. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Shankland, A., and E. Gonçalves. 2016. Imagining agricultural development in South–South cooperation: The contestation and transformation of ProSAVANA. World Development 81:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigaud, L. 1979. Os clandestinos e os direitos [Clandestine workers and their rights]. São Paulo, Brazil: Duas Cidades.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, C. 2001. Entangled Edens: Visions of the Amazon. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2010. The wealth of nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Hampshire, UK: Harriman House.
   Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C. 2015. Concrete revolution: Large dams, Cold War geopolitics, and the US Bureau of Reclamation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staatz, J. M., and C. K. Eicher. 1998. Agricultural development ideas in historical perspective. In International agricultural development. 3rd ed., ed. C. K. Eicher and J. M. Staatz, 8–38. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, S. 1986. Vassouras: A Brazilian coffee county, 1850–1900. The roles of planter and slave in a plantation society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolcke, V. 1988. Coffee planters, workers and wives. New York: St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. L. 1985. Capitalism and confrontation in Sumatra’s plantation belt, 1870–1979. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, J. 2003. Conservation and democratization: Constituting citizenship in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Political Geography 22 (7):715–40. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(03)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. Anthropocenic politicization: From the politics of the environment to politicizing environments. In Green utopianism, ed. K. Bradley and J. Hedrén, 23–38. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P. 1971. The moral economy of the English crowd in the 18th century. Past and Present 50 (1):76–136. doi: 10.1093/past/50.1.76.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, H. 2011. Africa as a living laboratory: Empire, development, and the problem of scientific knowledge, 1870–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstoy, L. [1886] 2010. How much land does a man need? Trans. B. Dralyuk. Calypso Editions.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2009. Food production must double by 2050 to meet demand from world’s growing population, innovative strategies needed to combat hunger, experts tell Second Committee. Accessed December 17, 2019. https://www.un.org/press/en/2009/gaef3242.doc.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K. 2003. The vanishing hectare: Property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergès, F. 2017. Racial Capitalocene. In Futures of black radicalism, ed. G. T. Johnson and A. Lubin, 72–82. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Viotti da Costa, E. [1985] 2000. The Brazilian empire: Myths and histories. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh-Dilley, M. 2013. Negotiating hybridity in highland Bolivia: Indigenous moral economy and the expanding market for quinoa. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (4):659–82. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.825770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warman, A. 2003. Corn and capitalism: How a botanical bastard grew to global dominance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2003. Development and governmentality. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24 (1):6–34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M. [1983] 2013. Silent violence: Food, famine, and peasantry in northern Nigeria. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, M. 2017. On the poverty of theory: Natural hazards research in context. In Environment: Critical essays in human geography, ed. B. Braun, 57–88. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2009. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, I. 2010. The warmth of other suns: The epic story of America’s great migration. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, T. 2014. What happened to the biggest land grab in Africa? Searching for ProSavana in Mozambique. Accessed December 23, 2019. https://foodtank.com/news/2014/12/what-happened-to-the-biggest-land-grab-in-africa-searching-for-prosavana-in/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. 1969. Peasant wars of the 20th century. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2005. Agrarian moral economies and neoliberalism in Brazil: Competing worldviews and the state in the struggle for land. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 37 (2):241–61. doi: 10.1068/a3745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2010. This land is ours now: Social mobilization and the meanings of land in Brazil. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2015. From Pangaea to partnership. Sociology of Development 1 (2):210–32. doi: 10.1525/sod.2015.1.2.210.
   Google Scholar
• Wolford, W. 2019. The colonial roots of agricultural modernization in Mozambique: The role of research from Portugal to ProSavana. The Journal of Peasant Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1680541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., S. M. Borras, Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, and B. White. 2013. Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change 44 (2):189–210. doi: 10.1111/dech.12017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolford, W., and R. Nehring. 2015. Constructing parallels: Brazilian expertise and the commodification of land, labour and money in Mozambique. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D’études du Développement 36 (2):208–23. doi: 10.1080/02255189.2015.1036010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. 1998. Development arrested: The blues and plantation power in the Mississippi Delta. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. Bridging the Atlantic: Brazil and sub-Saharan Africa, South-South partnering for growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. 1971. Novel and history, plot and plantation. Savacou 5 (June):95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff, K. 2018. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar