Significance Assessment in the Application of Spatial Analytics

References

• Akyuz, M. H., T. Oncan, and I. K. Altınel. 2012. Efficient approximate solution methods for the multi-commodity capacitated multi-facility Weber problem. Computers & Operations Research 39 (2):225–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 2020. Spatial data science. In International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment, and technology, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg2015.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., A. T. Murray, and S. J. Rey. 2013. Spatial analysis. In The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, ed. T. D. Little, Vol. 2, 154–74. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., and S. J. Rey. 2014. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. Chicago: GeoDa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., J. Strickland-Munro, H. Kobryn, and S. A. Moore. 2017. Mixed methods participatory GIS: An evaluation of the validity of qualitative and quantitative mapping methods. Applied Geography 79:153–66. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, C. 2016. Quantitative methods I: Reproducible research and quantitative geography. Progress in Human Geography 40 (5):687–96. doi: 10.1177/0309132515599625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R. L. 2001. Spatial optimization models. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, ed. N. Smelser and P. Baltes, 14811–18. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Church, R. L., and R. A. Gerrard. 2003. The multi‐level location set covering model. Geographical Analysis 35 (4):277–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01115.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R. L., and A. Murray. 2018. Location covering models: History, applications and advancements. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Church, R. L., and P. Sorensen. 1996. Integrating normative location models into GIS: Problems and prospects with the p-median model. In Spatial analysis: Modelling in a GIS environment, ed. P. Longely and M. Batty. New York: GeoInformation International.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C., S. Hoppen, and L. Gaydos. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24 (2):247–61. doi: 10.1068/b240247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton, R. G., and K. Green. 2019. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practices. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., C. Kartsonaki, and R. H. Keogh. 2018. Big data: Some statistical issues. Statistics & Probability Letters 136:111–15. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2018.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, A. T., and A. B. Hailegiorgis. 2014. An agent-based modeling approach applied to the spread of cholera. Environmental Modelling & Software 62:164–77. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Smith, M. J., M. F. Goodchild, and P. A. Longley. 2020. Geospatial analysis. 6th ed. Accessed October 19, 2020. https://www.spatialanalysisonline.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, G. 1982. Worst-case analysis of greedy heuristics for integer programming with nonnegative data. Mathematics of Operations Research 7 (4):515–31. doi: 10.1287/moor.7.4.515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Y., and X. Tong. 2020. A new cellular automata framework of urban growth modeling by incorporating statistical and heuristic methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34 (1):74–97. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1648813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80 (1):185–201. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foody, G. M. 2020. Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 239:111630. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and E. Loken. 2014. The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist 102 (6):460–66. doi: 10.1511/2014.111.460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalvez, D. J., N. G. Hall, W. T. Rhee, and S. P. Siferd. 1987. Heuristic solutions and confidence intervals for the multicovering problem. European Journal of Operational Research 31 (1):94–101. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(87)90142-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, N. 2004. GIScience, geography, form, and process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (4):709–14.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, V., U. Berger, F. Bastiansen, S. Eliassen, V. Ginot, J. Giske, J. Goss-Custard, T. Grand, S. K. Heinz, G. Huse, et al. 2006. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 198 (1–2):115–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guptill, S. C., and J. L. Morrison, eds. 1995. Elements of spatial data quality. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, N. G., and D. S. Hochbaum. 1992. The multicovering problem. European Journal of Operational Research 62 (3):323–39. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90122-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., and J. R. Jensen. 1997. A machine-learning approach to automated knowledge-base building for remote sensing image analysis with GIS data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63 (10):1185–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedron, P., A. E. Frazier, A. B. Trgovac, T. Nelson, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2019. Reproducibility and replicability in geographical analysis. Geographical Analysis. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/gean.12221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., Z. Xie, K. C. Clarke, M. Li, H. Chen, J. Liang, and Z. Chen. 2019. An agent-based procedure with an embedded agent learning model for residential land growth simulation: The case study of Nanjing, China. Cities 88:155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., S. Zang, B. Zhang, S. Li, and C. Wu. 2014. A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. European Journal of Remote Sensing 47 (1):389–411. doi: 10.5721/EuJRS20144723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillesand, T., R. W. Kiefer, and J. Chipman. 2015. Remote sensing and image interpretation. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., X. Liang, X. Li, X. Xu, J. Ou, Y. Chen, S. Li, S. Wang, and F. Pei. 2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning 168:94–116. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., M. Batty, S. Wang, and J. Corcoran. 2020. Modelling urban change with cellular automata: Contemporary issues and future research directions. Progress in Human Geography.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., and T. Moore. 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: A simulated annealing approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23 (3):468–78. doi: 10.1139/x93-065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T. 2010. Quantitative geography. Journal of Regional Science 50 (1):143–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00642.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T. 2019. Geocomputation and spatial analytics. In GeoComputation 2019. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland. https://auckland.figshare.com/articles/conference_contribution/Geocomputation_and_Spatial_Analytics/9862868/files/17683649.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T. 2020a. Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems. Omega 99:102176. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T. 2020b. Spatial clustering, detection and analysis of. In International encyclopedia of human geography, ed. A. Kobayashi, vol. 12, 2nd ed., 367–73. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T. 2020c. Spatial optimization. Unpublished draft chapter.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T., and R. L. Church. 1996. Applying simulated annealing to location-planning models. Journal of Heuristics 2 (1):31–53. doi: 10.1007/BF00226292.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T., and T. K. Shyy. 2000. Integrating attribute and space characteristics in choropleth display and spatial data mining. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14 (7):649–67. doi: 10.1080/136588100424954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Reproducibility and replicability in science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, D. C., S. M. Manson, M. A. Janssen, M. J. Hoffmann, and P. Deadman. 2003. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (2):314–37. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.9302004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson, P. A. 2020. Statistical methods for geography. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roodposhti, M. S., R. J. Hewitt, and B. A. Bryan. 2020. Towards automatic calibration of neighbourhood influence in cellular automata land-use models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 79:101416. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, D., and A. T. Murray. 2012. Spatial optimization in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (6):1290–309. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.685044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, D. P., A. T. Murray, and S. R. Phinn. 2000. A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 24 (6):539–58. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00008-9.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, N. 2016. GIS algorithms: Theory and applications for geographic information science & technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S., F. Liao, J. Wu, H. J. Timmermans, H. Sun, and Z. Gao. 2020. A bi-objective timetable optimization model incorporating energy allocation and passenger assignment in an energy-regenerative metro system. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 133:85–113. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2020.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar