The Need for Inter/Subdisciplinary Thinking in Critical Conceptualizations of Displacement

References

• Alexandri, G., S. Gonzalez, and S. Hodkinson. 2016. Locating displacement in Latin American urbanism. Revista INVI 31 (88):9–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582016000300001.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhalili, N. 2019. “A forest of urbanization”: Camp Metropolis in the edge areas. Settler Colonial Studies 9 (2):207–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2017.1409398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlSayyad, N., and A. Roy, eds. 2003. Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2013. Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration controls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. 2014. Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. 2020a. Eviction as infrastructure. City 24 (1–2):143–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739417.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. 2020b. From eviction to evicting: Rethinking the technologies, lives and power sustaining displacement. Progress in Human Geography 45 (4):796–813. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520910798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, K., and L. Mayblin. 2018. Unfree labor in immigration detention: Exploitation and coercion of a captive immigrant workforce. Economy and Society 47 (2):191–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2018.1484051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, K. S. 2015. Governing through uncertainty: Experiences of being a refugee in Turkey as a country for temporary asylum. Social Analysis 59 (1):57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, J., and R. Apaolaza. 2016. Políticas y geografías del desplazamiento: Contextos y usos conceptuales para el debate sobre gentrificación [Policies and geographies of displacement. Contexts and conceptual uses for the gentrification debate]. Revista INVI 31 (88):73–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-83582016000300003.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, R. 2019. “By our metaphors you shall know us”: The “fix” of geographical political economy. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1087–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518804352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigden, N., and C. Mainwaring. 2016. Matryoshka journeys: Im/mobility during migration. Geopolitics 21 (2):407–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1122592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Çaglar, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2018. Migrants and city-making: Dispossession, displacement, and urban regeneration. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K., D. Conlon, and L. Martin. 2020. Destitution economies: Circuits of value in asylum, refuge, and migration control. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (5):1425–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1715196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., and N. Hiemstra. 2014. Examining the everyday micro-economies of migrant detention in the United States. Geographica Helvetica 69 (5):335–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-69-335-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Conlon, D., and N. Hiemstra, eds. 2017. Intimate economies of immigration detention: Critical perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, T. 2018. The urban village, agrarian transformation, and rentier capitalism in Gurgaon, India. Antipode 50 (5):1244–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley, H., and D. Skleparis. 2018. Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s “migration crisis.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (1):48–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the move: Mobility in the modern Western world. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2016. Privatising asylum: Neoliberalisation, depoliticisation, and the governance of forced migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3):230–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2017. Forced migration and the city: Irregularity, informality, and the politics of presence. Progress in Human Geography 41 (2):178–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516629004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2002. Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (1):419–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N., G. Garelli, and M. Tazzioli. 2018. Autonomy of asylum? The autonomy of migration undoing the refugee crisis script. South Atlantic Quarterly 117 (2):239–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N., and A. Roy. 2020. Practices of illegalisation. Antipode 52 (2):352–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, M., A. Gromis, L. Edmonds, J. Hendrickson, K. Krywokulski, L. Leung, and A. Porton. 2018. Eviction lab national database (Version 1.0). Technical report, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P., S. Hodkinson, H. Lewis, and L. Waite. 2016. Socio-legal status and experiences of forced labour among asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 32 (3):182–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2016.1175961.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, S., L. Lees, P. Hubbard, and N. Tate. 2020. Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification. Urban Studies 57 (2):286–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019851953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott-Cooper, A., P. Hubbard, and L. Lees. 2020. Moving beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, displacement and the violence of un-homing. Progress in Human Geography 44 (3):492–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519830511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawaz, M. 2017. Planning and the refugee crisis: Informality as a framework of analysis and reflection. Planning Theory 16 (1):99–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216647722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreri, M. 2020. Contesting displacement through radical emplacement and occupations in austerity Europe. In The handbook of displacement, ed. P. Adey, J. Bowstead, K. Brickell, V. Desai, M. Dolton, A. Pinkerton, and A. Siddiqi, 739–52. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, D., and S. Brooks. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era. New Political Economy 22 (4):423–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1259298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, V. 2017. Neoliberalism from below: Popular pragmatics and baroque economies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garelli, G., and M. Tazzioli. 2016. Beyond detention: Spatial strategies of dispersal and channels of forced transfer. Society & Space, November 8. https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/beyond-detention-spatial-strategies-of-dispersal-and-channels-of-forced-transfer.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, N., D. Conlon, D. Moran, and A. Burridge. 2018. Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography 42 (2):183–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516671823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, S. 2016. Looking comparatively at displacement and resistance to gentrification in Latin American cities. Urban Geography 37 (8):1245–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1200337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziani, T., and M. Shi. 2020. Data for justice. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 19 (1):397–412.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, D., H. S. Castles, and M. J. Miller. 2020. The age of migration: International populations movements in the modern world, 6th ed. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. The new imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N. 2013. “You don’t even know where you are”: Chaotic geographies of U.S. migrant detention and deportation. In Carceral spaces: Mobility and agency in imprisonment and migrant detention, ed. D. Moran, N. Gill, and D. Conlon, 57–77. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, S., P. Dwyer, H. Lewis, and L. Waite. 2020. Fighting or fuelling forced labour? The Modern Slavery Act 2015, irregular migrants and the vulnerabilising role of a hostile state. Critical Social Policy 41 (1):68–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018320904311.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, J., and W. Giles. 2017. Refugees in extended exile: Living on the edge. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janoschka, M., and J. Sequera. 2016. Gentrification in Latin America: Addressing the politics and geographies of displacement. Urban Geography 37 (8):1175–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1103995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J. 2016. The protracted refugee camp and the consolidation of a “humanitarian urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Accessed November 23, 2020. https://www.ijurr.org/spotlight-on/the-urban-refugee-crisis-reflections-on-cities-citizenship-and-the-displaced/the-protracted-refugee-camp-and-the-consolidation-of-a-humanitarian-urbanism/.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., P. Waley, and S. Gonzalez. 2018. “Nice apartments, no jobs”: How former villagers experienced displacement and resettlement in the western suburbs of Shanghai. Urban Studies 55 (14):3202–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017740246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. T., and B. Murton. 2007. Re/placing native science: Indigenous voices in contemporary constructions of nature. Geographical Research 45 (2):121–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00442.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuschminder, K., and A. Triandafyllidou. 2019. Smuggling, trafficking, and extortion: New conceptual and policy challenges on the Libyan route to Europe. Antipode 53 (1):206–26.
   Google Scholar
• Launius, S., and G. A. Boyce. 2021. More than metaphor: Settler colonialism, frontier logic, and the continuities of racialized dispossession in a southwest U.S. city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (1):157–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1750940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, L., H. B. Shin, and E. Lopez-Morales. 2016. Planetary gentrification. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Lemberg-Pedersen, M., and E. Haioty. 2020. Re-assembling the surveillable refugee body in the era of data-craving. Citizenship Studies 24 (5):607–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2010. To make live or let die? Rural dispossession and the protection of surplus populations. Antipode 41 (Suppl. 1):66–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00717.x.
   Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. 2019. Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society 5 (3):380–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119863146.
   Google Scholar
• Maharawal, M. M., and E. McElroy. 2018. The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter mapping and oral history toward Bay Area housing justice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):380–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1365583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 1985. Gentrification, abandonment, and displacement: Connections, causes, and policy responses in New York City. Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 28:195–240.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D., C. Minca, and I. Katz. 2020. Rethinking the camp: On spatial technologies of power and resistance. Progress in Human Geography 44 (4):743–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519856702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., and C. Harker. 2020. Finance, technology & displacement: Towards a research agenda. London: Institute for Global Prosperity.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Methmann, C. 2014. Visualizing climate-refugees: Race, vulnerability, and resilience in global liberal politics. International Political Sociology 8 (4):416–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2012. The naked and the TED. The New Republic, August 2. Accessed November 20, 2020. https://newrepublic.com/article/105703/the-naked-and-the-ted-khanna.
   Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., 2004. Embodying the nation-state: Canada’s response to human smuggling. Political Geography 23 (3):323–45.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, B. 2018. The currency of migration. South Atlantic Quarterly 117 (2):375–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-4374889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K., and E. K. Wyly. 2006. The right to stay put, revisited: Gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Urban Studies 43 (1):23–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500388710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R., and E. W. Burgess. 1984. The city: Suggestions for the study of human nature in the urban environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plájás, I. Z., A. M’charek, and H. van Baar. 2019. Knowing “the Roma”: Visual technologies of sorting populations and the policing of mobility in Europe. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (4):589–605. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819837291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, M. 2013. Humanitarian urbanism under a neoliberal regime. Lessons from Kabul (2001–2011). Paper presented at the International RC21 Conference held in Berlin (Germany), 29–31 August. https://www.academia.edu/5399058/Humanitarian_Urbanism.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan, A. 2013. Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (1):65–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00509.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risam, R. 2019. Beyond the migrant “problem”: Visualizing global migration. Television & New Media 20 (6):566–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419857679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roast, A. 2019. Peripheral modernities: Urban imaginaries, housing and informality on the edge of Chongqing. PhD diss., University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2016. Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography 40 (1):3–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515598025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, S., and B. Wilmsen. 2020. Towards a critical geography of resettlement. Progress in Human Geography 44 (2):256–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518824659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, R. 2012. Refugees and the city: An urban discussion. Geography Compass 6 (11):633–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12010.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2006. The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (4):737–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00689.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, T. 2014. Unravelling false choice urbanism. City 18 (4–5):517–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.939472.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and L. Waite. 2019. New and enduring narratives of vulnerability: rethinking stories about the figure of the refugee. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (13):2289–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. 2022. Extract, datafy and disrupt: Refugees’ subjectivities between data abundance and data disregard. Geopolitics 27 (1):70–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1822332.
   Google Scholar
• Tomiak, J. 2017. Contesting the settler city: Indigenous self-determination, new urban reserves, and the neoliberalization of colonialism. Antipode 49 (4):928–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo-Pagan, N. 2018. Self-deportation and forced choice as discursive maneuver: Force and “voluntary” migration. Language, Discourse & Society 7 (13):197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., and K. Peters. 2017. Carceral mobilities. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tyner, J. 2020. The slow and fast violence of displacement. In The handbook of displacement, ed. P. Adey, J. Bowstead, K. Brickell, V. Desai, M. Dolton, A. Pinkerton, and A. Siddiqi, 79–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2019. Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018. Accessed November 19, 2020. https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, L., G. Valentine, and H. Lewis. 2014. Multiply vulnerable populations: Creating a politics of compassion from the “capacity to hurt.” Social & Cultural Geography 15 (3):313–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2013.872286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. 2020. Beyond displacement—Exploring the variegated social impacts of urban redevelopment. Urban Geography 41 (5):703–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1734373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and F. Wu. 2019. In-situ marginalisation: Social impact of Chinese mega-projects. Antipode 51 (5):1640–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., F. Zhang, and C. Webster. 2013. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area. Urban Studies 50 (10):1919–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012466600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, B. 2020. Point-to-point labour transport: The post-lockdown securitization of mobility. COMPAS. Accessed November 21, 2020. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/2020/point-to-point-labour-transport-the-post-lockdown-securitization-of-mobility/.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, B., and J. Lindquist. 2014. Migration infrastructure. International Migration Review 48 (1_Suppl.):122–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, B., and H. L. Chee. 2016. Migrant wives, migrant workers, and the negotiation of (il) legality in Singapore. In Migrant encounters: Intimate labor, the state, and mobility across Asia, ed. S. L. Friedman and P. Mahdavi. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812291841-009
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2018a. Domicide, social suffering and symbolic violence in contemporary Shanghai, China. Urban Geography 39 (2):190–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1298978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2018b. Grabbing land for equitable development? Reengineering land dispossession through securitising land development rights in Chongqing. Antipode 50 (4):1120–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuk, M., and K. Chapple. 2015. Urban Displacement Project. Accessed November 21, 2020. http://www.urbandisplacement.org.
   Google Scholar