Displacement without Redistribution: Practicality and Reproduction in the Digitalization of Logistics

References

• Akhter, M. 2018. Geopolitics of the belt and road: Space, state, and capital in China and Pakistan. In Logistical Asia: The labour of making a world region, ed. B. Neilson, N. Rossiter, and R. Samaddar, 221–38. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. New York: Wiley. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz162.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., and S. L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, C. 2018. Containing the ship of state: Managing mobility in an age of logistics. PhD diss., University of Minnesota. http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/200214.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, C., M. Danyluk, D. Cowen, and L. Khalili. 2018. Introduction: Turbulent circulation: Building a critical engagement with logistics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (4):617–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818783101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, D. 2014. The deadly life of logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Lara, J. 2018a. Inland shift: Race, space, and capital in Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Lara, J. 2018b. “This port is killing people”: Sustainability without justice in the neo-Keynesian green city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (2):538–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1393328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. 2010. A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. 1990. The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FNV Ports. 2019. FNV havens wil kwaliteithavens in Nederland [FNV ports wants quality ports in the Netherlands]. Federation of Dutch Trade Unions (FNV) Ports, International Transport Federation (ITF), Netherlands. http://subscriber.mailing.fnv.nl/online.php?db=1113V117&mailing=E3561V0&user=1V123.
   Google Scholar
• Harney, S., and F. Moten. 2021. All incomplete. Chico, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2019a. Electronic information exchange mandatory for ports from 8 April 2019. https://imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/06-electronic-information-exchange-.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2019b. Explanatory manual to the convention on facilitation of international maritime traffic, 1965, as amended. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Facilitation/Documents/FAL.3-CIRC.215.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2019c. FAL convention. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Facilitation/Pages/FALConvention-Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• International Taskforce on Port Call Optimization (ITPCO). 2020a. Appendix to port call process. https://portcalloptimization.org/images/Business%20process%20handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Taskforce on Port Call Optimization (ITPCO). 2020b. Port information manual: For ship-port interface data, Version 3.0. https://portcalloptimization.org/images/Port%20Information%20Manual%203.02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Taskforce on Port Call Optimization (ITPCO). n.d. International Taskforce on Port Call Optimization (Flyer). https://portcalloptimization.org/images/Flyer%20port%20call%20optimization%20201012%20(1).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, B. 2020. Digitize and punish: Racial criminalization in the digital age. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 2001. Vagabond capitalism and the necessity of social reproduction. Antipode 33 (4):709–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, L. 2020. Sinews of war and trade: Shipping and capitalism in the Arabian Peninsula. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Klose, A. 2015. The container principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/container-principle.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. 2006. The ordinary economy: Tangled up in values and geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31 (4):413–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00223.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, J. 2018. From ships to robots: The social relations of sensing the world ocean. Social Studies of Science 48 (1):57–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717743579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2011. Rendering society technical: Government through community and the ethnographic turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In Adventures in Aidland: The anthropology of professionals in international development, ed. D. Mosse, 57–80. Oxford, UK: Berghahn. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/67587.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, E. M. B. 2019. Unbecoming Silicon Valley: Techno imaginaries and materialities in postsocialist Romania. PhD diss., University of California Santa Cruz. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0vt9c4bq.
   Google Scholar
• M’charek, A. 2010. Fragile differences, relational effects: Stories about the materiality of race and sex. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4):307–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810377698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’charek, A. 2013. Beyond fact or fiction: On the materiality of race in practice. Cultural Anthropology 28 (3):420–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cuan.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2011. Distributed reproduction. In Corpus: An interdisciplinary reader on bodies and knowledge, ed. M. Casper and P. Currah, 21–38. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2017. The economization of life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. 2002. Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the Internet. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, B. 2018. Follow the software: Reflections on the logistical worlds project. In Logistical Asia: The labour of making a world region, ed. B. Neilson, N. Rossiter, and R. Samaddar, 263–89. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. 2018. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, R. 2020. IMO and international bodies sign digital data standards partnership. Smart Maritime Network (blog), April 28, 2020. https://smartmaritimenetwork.com/2020/04/28/imo-and-international-bodies-sign-digital-data-standards-partnership/.
   Google Scholar
• Peano, I. 2019. Gendering logistics: Subjectivities, biopolitics and extraction in supply chains. Into the Black Box (blog), December 20, 2019. http://www.intotheblackbox.com/articoli/gendering-logistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizza, A. 2017. Disciplining change, displacing frictions. Two structural dimensions of digital circulation across land registry database integration. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 7 (2):35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Pernia, O. 2020. Digitalizing port operations in today’s digital age. Presentation at Port Technology International webinar. https://app.livestorm.co/p/3e4ff763-9393-44e3-960b-9250a64b7b8c.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2020. Deep routeing and the making of “maritime motorways”: Beyond surficial geographies of connection for governing global shipping. Geopolitics 25 (1):43–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1567499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port of Rotterdam. 2020. Knowledge transfer between Rotterdam and SOHAR works both ways. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/knowledge-transfer-between-rotterdam-and-sohar-works-both-ways.
   Google Scholar
• PortXchange. n.d. Commitment to the environment. PortXchange. Accessed November 25, 2020. https://port-xchange.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/PortXchange-commitment-to-the-environment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Project Cargo Summit. 2020. Project Cargo Summit online. Accessed September 23, 2020. https://www.projectcargosummit.com/videos-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J. 2020. The geography of transport systems. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, N. 2014. Logistical worlds. Cultural Studies Review 20 (1):53–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v20i1.3833.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and A. Stenning. 2006. Beyond household economies: Spaces and articulations of economic practice in post-socialism. Progress in Human Geography 30 (2):190–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph601oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 2008. Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sohar Port and Freezone. 2020. We offer: Incentives. https://soharportandfreezone.com/en/we-offer/incentives-freezone.
   Google Scholar
• Sohar Port and Freezone. n.d. SOHAR freezone LLC guidance notes on labour and visas. https://soharportandfreezone.com/PDF/SOHAR_Freezone_guidance_note_on_Labour_and_Visa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stam, N. 2020. De FNV vakbondsagenda na het coronatijdperk [The FNV union agenda after the corona era]. https://mobile.twitter.com/NiekStam/status/1259404099898007552.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3):377–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P., and K. Peters. 2015. Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (2):247–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d14148p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, K. 2020. Labour geography III: Precarity, racial capitalisms and infrastructure. Progress in Human Geography 44 (6):1212–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519895308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, K., and N. Rossiter. 2019. Uneven distribution: An interview with Ned Rossiter. Public Seminar (blog), May 31, 2019. https://publicseminar.org/2019/05/uneven-distribution-an-interview-with-ned-rossiter/.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2009. Supply chains and the human condition. Rethinking Marxism 21 (2):148–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690902743088.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, N. 2017. Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society 20 (6):898–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, M. 2015. Global displacements: The making of uneven development in the Caribbean. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, M., K. Strauss, B. Parker, R. Orzeck, K. Derickson, and A. Bonds. 2017. Feminist political economy in geography: Why now, what is different, and what for? Geoforum 79 (February):1–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.11.013.
   Google Scholar