Accessible Green Spaces? Spatial Disparities in Residential Green Space among People with Disabilities in the United States

References

• Agay-Shay, K., A. Peled, A. Crespo, C. Peretz, Y. Amitai, S. Linn, M. Friger, and M. Nieuwenhuijsen. 2014. Green spaces and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 71 (8):562–69. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D., and C. Stone. 2005. Cultural competencies of park and recreation professionals: A case study of North Carolina. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 23 (1):53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. 2019. Quantile local spatial autocorrelation. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 12 (2):155–66. doi: 10.1007/s12076-019-00234-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., and X. Li. 2019. Operational local join count statistics for cluster detection. Journal of Geographical Systems 21 (2):189–210. doi: 10.1007/s10109-019-00299-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baston, D. 2021. Exactextractr. Last modified May 27, 2021. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://github.com/isciences/exactextractr.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, H., N. Zimmermann, T. McVicar, N. Vergopolan, A. Berg, and E. Wood. 2018. Data descriptor: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5:180214. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., R. Foley, F. Houghton, A. Maddrell, and A. Williams. 2018. From therapeutic landscapes to healthy spaces, places and practices: A scoping review. Social Science & Medicine 196:123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., C. Phoenix, R. Lovell, and B. Wheeler. 2014. Green space, health and wellbeing: Making space for individual agency. Health & Place 30:287–92. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanks, A. 2020. Santa Rosa County focuses on making parks “all-inclusive” for kids with disabilities. Pensacola News Journal, November 16. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.pnj.com/story/news/2020/11/16/santa-rosa-county-focuses-making-parks-all-inclusive-kids-disabilities/6278401002/.
   Google Scholar
• Bobo, J. 2019. Mount Carmel takes first steps toward ADA compliance at City Park. Times News, May 27. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.timesnews.net/news/local-news/mount-carmel-takes-first-steps-toward-ada-compliance-at-city-park/article_5103c0e3-df83-5687-8afc-91e56ab67d94.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. n.d. NDVI, the Foundation for Remote Sensing Phenology. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/eros/phenology/science/ndvi-foundation-remote-sensing-phenology?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. 2012. When green is white: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. Geoforum 43 (3):595–611. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. 2017. Urban parks, gardens and greenspace. In The Routledge handbook of environmental justice, ed. R. Holifield, J. Chakraborty, and G. Walker, 437–48. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315678986-35.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, A., G. Sole, and H. Mulligan. 2018. The accessibility of fitness centers for people with disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Health Journal 11 (4):525–36. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazon, S., M. Gramkow, D. Poulsen, V. Lygum, G. Zhang, and U. Stigsdotter. 2019. I would really like to visit the forest, but it is just too difficult: A qualitative study on mobility disability and green spaces. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 20 (1):1–13. doi: 10.16993/sjdr.50.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts, C., M. Horner, and T. Chapin. 2010. Using geographical information system to model the effects of green space accessibility on mortality in Florida. Geocarto International 25 (6):471–84. doi: 10.1080/10106049.2010.505302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadvand, P., C. M. Villanueva, L. Font-Ribera, D. Martinez, X. Basagaña, J. Belmonte, M. Vrijheid, R. Gražulevičienė, M. Kogevinas, and M. Nieuwenhuijsen. 2014. Risks and benefits of green spaces for children: A cross-sectional study of associations with sedentary behavior, obesity, asthma, and allergy. Environmental Health Perspectives 122 (12):1329–35. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1308038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. 2011. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning 102 (4):234–44. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinnie, E., K. Brown, and S. Morris. 2013. Reprint of “Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences.” Landscape and Urban Planning 118:103–11. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, D., I. Kawachi, K. White, and D. Williams. 2013. The geography of recreational open space: Influence of neighborhood racial composition and neighborhood poverty. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 90 (4):618–31. doi: 10.1007/s11524-012-9770-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, W., S. VanLooy, S. von Schrader, and S. Bruyère. 2018. Disability, income, and rural poverty. In Disability and vocational rehabilitation in rural settings, ed. D. Harley, N. Ysasi, M. Bishop, and A. Fleming, 17–41. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64786-9_2.
   Google Scholar
• Evcil, N. 2010. Designers’ attitudes towards disabled people and the compliance of public open places: The case of Istanbul. European Planning Studies 18 (11):1863–80. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.512178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, J., T. Franke, H. McKay, and J. Sims-Gould. 2015. Therapeutic landscapes and wellbeing in later life: Impacts of blue and green spaces for older adults. Health & Place 34:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, R. 2018. Palettes of place. In Routledge handbook of health geography, ed. V. A. Crooks, G. J. Andrews, and J. Pearce, 251–58. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315104584-36.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, K., J. Hart, and P. James. 2018. A review of epidemiologic studies on greenness and health: Updated literature through 2017. Current Environmental Health Reports 5 (1):77–87. doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0179-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gesler, W. M. 1992. Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Social Science & Medicine 34 (7):735–46. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90360-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., H. A. Perkins, and P. Roy. 2006. The political ecology of uneven urban green space. Urban Affairs Review 42:3–25. doi: 10.1177/1078087406290729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., J. Liebens, and K. R. Rao. 2008. Linking stroke mortality with air pollution, income, and greenness in northwest Florida: An ecological geographical study. International Journal of Health Geographics 7 (1):20. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-7-20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang, B., C. Huang, Z. Feng, J.R. Pearce, H. Zhao, Z. Pan, and Y. Liu. 2021. Association between residential greenness and general health among older adults in rural and urban areas in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 59. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126907
   Google Scholar
• Iezzoni, L. 2011. Eliminating health and health care disparities among the growing population of people with disabilities. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 30 (10):1947–54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and P. Hall. 2001. An exploration of disability and the development process. Urban Studies 38 (2):333–50. doi: 10.1080/00420980124545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubec, S., D. Hoed, H. Ray, and A. Krishnamurthy. 2016. Mental well-being and quality-of-life benefits of inclusion in nature for adults with disabilities and their caregivers. Landscape Research 41 (6):616–27. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1197190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, P., R. Banay, J. Hart, and F. Laden. 2015. A review of the health benefits of greenness. Current Epidemiology Reports 2 (2):131–42. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0043-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, A., M. Hillsdon, and E. Coombes. 2009. Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Preventive Medicine 49 (6):500–05. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurjevich, J., A. Griffin, S. Spielman, D. Folch, M. Merrick, and N. Nagle. 2018. Navigating statistical uncertainty: How urban and regional planners understand and work with American Community Survey (ACS) data for guiding policy. Journal of the American Planning Association 84 (2):112–26. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2018.1440182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keniger, L., K. Gaston, K. Irvine, and R. Fuller. 2013. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10 (3):913–35. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10030913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek, N., A. Good, R. Madden, T. Bedirhan Üstün, S. Chatterji, C. Mathers, and A. Officer. 2013. Counting disability: Global and national estimation. Disability and Rehabilitation 35 (13):1065–69. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.720354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, D., L. Schur, S. Rogers, and M. Ameri. 2018. Why do workers with disabilities earn less? Occupational job requirements and disability discrimination. British Journal of Industrial Relations 56 (4):798–834. doi: 10.1111/bjir.12257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labib, S. M., S. Lindley, and J. Huck. 2020. Spatial dimensions of the influence of urban green-blue spaces on human health: A systematic review. Environmental Research 180:108869. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani, A., M. Norwood, D. Watling, H. Zeeman, and E. Kendall. 2019. Using the natural environment to address the psychosocial impact of neurological disability: A systematic review. Health & Place 55:188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., E. Hudson, and C. Brumfield. n.d. Why the census matters for people with disabilities: A guide to the 2020 Census operations & challenges. Accessed March 19, 2022. https://www.in.gov/idr/files/Large-Print-Why-the-Census-Matters-for-People-with-Disabilities-Large-Print.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., L. Larsen, Y. Yang, L. Wang, Y. Zhai, and W. Sullivan. 2019. Exposure to nature for children with autism spectrum disorder: Benefits, caveats, and barriers. Health & Place 55:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, J., R. Verheij, S. de Vries, P. Spreeuwenberg, F. Schellevis, and P. Groenewegen. 2009. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63 (12):967–73. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.079038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, H. 2017. Walkers with visual-impairments in the British countryside: Picturesque legacies, collective enjoyments and well-being benefits. Journal of Rural Studies 51:251–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S., J. Schroeder, D. Van Riper, and S. Ruggles. 2019. IPUMS national historical geographic information system: Version 14.0 [Database]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. doi: http://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V14.0.
   Google Scholar
• Markevych, I., J. Schoierer, T. Hartig, A. Chudnovsky, P. Hystad, A. M. Dzhambov, S. de Vries, M. Triguero-Mas, M. Brauer, M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen, et al. 2017. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research 158:301–17. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers, A. 2008. Hidden voices: The participation of people with learning disabilities in the experience of public open space. Local Environment 13 (6):515–29. doi: 10.1080/13549830802259912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., M. Davis, and R. Hudson. 1994. Geographic patterns of disability in the United States. Social Security Bulletin 57 (1):25–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mears, M., P. Brindley, A. Jorgensen, and R. Maheswaran. 2020. Population-level linkages between urban greenspace and health inequality: The case for using multiple indicators of neighbourhood greenspace. Health & Place 62:102284. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, A., and C. Ravesloot. 2016. Navigating time and space: How Americans with disabilities use time and transportation. Community Development 47 (1):75–90. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2015.1111399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, D., and E. Greenfield. 2018. Declining urban and community tree cover in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 32:32–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagán-Rodríguez, R. 2014. How do disabled individuals spend their leisure time? Disability and Health Journal 7 (2):196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsall, H., and J. Eller. 2020. Locating the green space paradox: A study of gentrification and public green space accessibility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Landscape and Urban Planning 195:103708. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penchansky, R., and J. Thomas. 1981. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care 19 (2):127–40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plane, J., and F. Klodawsky. 2013. Neighbourhood amenities and health: Examining the significance of a local park. Social Science & Medicine 99:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. The R project for statistical computing. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rigolon, A. 2016. A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 153:160–69. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, J., S. Padalabalanarayanan, L. Malone, and T. Mehta. 2017. Fitness facilities still lack accessibility for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal 10 (2):214–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer, J., B. Riley, E. Wang, A. Rauworth, and J. Jurkowski. 2004. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: Barriers and facilitators. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 26 (5):419–25. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikia, N., J. Bora, D. Jasilionis, and V. Shkolnikov. 2016. Disability divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 census. PLoS ONE 11 (8):e0159809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels-Kalow, M., S. Dorner, R. Cash, S. Dutta, B. White, G. Ciccolo, D. Brown, and C. Camargo, Jr. 2021. Neighborhood disadvantage measures and COVID-19 cases in Boston, 2020. Public Health Reports 136 (3):368–74. doi: 10.1177/00333549211002837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, S., and J. Sherman. 2012. Design professionals and the built environment: Encountering boundaries 20 years after the Americans with Disabilities Act. Disability & Society 27 (1):51–64. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2012.631797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. J., G. A. Naughton, A. C. Bundy, E. Froude, and M. A. Villeneuve. 2019. Planning for outdoor play: Government and family decision-making. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 26 (7):484–95. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1447010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauser, D. 2013. Career development, employment, and disability in rehabilitation: From theory to practice. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Szaboova, L., K. Brown, and J. Fisher. 2020. Access to ecosystem benefits: More than proximity. Society & Natural Resources 33 (2):244–60. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2018.1556759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. TIGER/line shapefiles. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/tiger-line-file.2010.html.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau Public Information Office. 2016. Nearly 1 in 5 people have a disability in the U.S., Census Bureau reports—Miscellaneous—Newsroom—U.S. Census Bureau, May. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/miscellaneous/cb12-134.html.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2020. Rural–urban commuting area codes. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. n.d. USFS tree canopy cover datasets. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/rastergateway/treecanopycover/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. n.d. Gap analysis project. Accessed August 30, 2021. https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/science/protected-areas.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. n.d. Temporally smoothed weekly AQUA Collect 6 (C6) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) at 250 meters. Accessed June 25, 2021. https://phenology.cr.usgs.gov/get_data_smNDVI.php.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. n.d. Fact sheet on persons with disabilities. Accessed August 30, 2021. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/toolaction/pwdfs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vries, S. d., S. van Dillen, P. Groenewegen, and P. Spreeuwenberg. 2013. Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine 94:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M., X. Zhang, C. Harris, J. Holt, and J. Croft. 2013. Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine 45(Suppl.1):S18–S27. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9426-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D., A. Jette, D. Felson, M. Lavalley, C. Lewis, J. Torner, M. Nevitt, and J. Keysor. 2010. Are features of the neighborhood environment associated with disability in older adults? Disability and Rehabilitation 32 (8):639–45. doi: 10.3109/09638280903254547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T., T. Logan, C. Zuo, K. Liberman, and S. Guikema. 2020. Parks and safety: A comparative study of green space access and inequity in five US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 201:103841. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolch, J., J. Byrne, and J. Newell. 2014. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough.” Landscape and Urban Planning 125:234–44. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. 2016. Geographies of medicalized welfare: Spatial analysis of supplemental security income in the U.S., 2000–2010. Social Science & Medicine 160:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S., S. McLafferty, A. Planey, and V. Preston. 2020. Disability, wages, and commuting in New York. Journal of Transport Geography 87:102818. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younker, R. 2010. Analyzing accessibility in urban parks: A case study of Spokane, Washington’s Manito Park. Master’s thesis, Washington State University.
   Google Scholar