Stream Distance-Based Geographically Weighted Regression for Exploring Watershed Characteristics and Water Quality Relationships

References

• Anselin, L. 2001. Spatial econometrics. In A companion to theoretical econometrics, ed. B. H. Baltagi, 310–33. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, C., S. Fotheringham, and M. Charlton. 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 47 (3):431–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-9884.00145.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2008. Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River Basin, South Korea. Water Research 42 (13):3285–3304. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., and M. Psaris. 2013. Local landscape predictors of maximum stream temperature and thermal sensitivity in the Columbia River Basin, USA. The Science of the Total Environment 461–462:587–600. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., M. Yasuyo, and E. Foster. 2021. Effects of land use change, wetland fragmentation, and best management practices on total suspended solids concentrations in an urbanizing Oregon watershed, USA. Journal of Environmental Management 282:111962. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, M., and A. S. Fotheringham. 2009. Geographically weighted regression white paper. National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., K. Mei, R. A. Dahlgren, T. Wang, J. Gong, and M. Zhang. 2016. Impacts of land use and population density on seasonal surface water quality using a modified geographically weighted regression. The Science of the Total Environment 572:450–66. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, E.-S., P. J. Abdulai, H. Park, Y. Kim, S. R. Ahn, and S. J. Kim. 2016. Multi-criteria assessment of spatial robust water resource vulnerability using the TOPSIS method coupled with objective and subjective weights in the Han River Basin. Sustainability 9 (1):29. doi: 10.3390/su9010029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comber, A., K. Chi, M. Q. Huy, Q. Nguyen, B. Lu, H. H. Phe, and P. Harris. 2020. Distance metric choice can both reduce and induce collinearity in geographically weighted regression. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 47 (3):489–507. doi: 10.1177/2399808318784017.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. 1988. Spatial prediction and ordinary kriging. Mathematical Geology 20 (4):405–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00892986.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, H., T. Damoulas, and S. A. Jarvis. 2019. Embedding road networks and travel time into distance metrics for urban modelling. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 33 (3):512–36. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1547386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, M. R. T., and M.-J. Fortin. 2010. From graphs to spatial graphs. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41 (1):21–38. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144718.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. J. K., and F. C. Curriero. 2019. Development and evaluation of geostatistical methods for non-euclidean-based spatial covariance matrices. Mathematical Geosciences 51 (6):767–91. doi: 10.1007/s11004-019-09791-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X. 2019. Correlations between water quality and the structure and connectivity of the river network in the Southern Jiangsu Plain, Eastern China. The Science of the Total Environment 664:583–94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. C., and P. J. A. Withers. 2008. Transport and delivery of suspended solids, nitrogen and phosphorus from various sources to freshwaters in the UK. Journal of Hydrology 350 (3–4):144–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2020. ArcGIS Desktop 10.7.1 quick start guide—ArcGIS Help | Documentation. Accessed April 16, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., C. Brunsdon, and M. Charlton. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. S., W. Yang, and W. Kang. 2017. Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (6):1247–65. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1352480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganio, L. M., C. E. Torgersen, and R. E. Gresswell. 2005. A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3 (3):138–44. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0138:AGAFDS.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han River Flood Control Office (HRFCO). 2021. Welcome to Han River FCO webpage. Accessed November 15, 2021. http://www.hrfco.go.kr/eng/service_1.do.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., A. S. Fotheringham, and S. Juggins. 2010. Robust geographically weighted regression: A technique for quantifying spatial relationships between freshwater acidification critical loads and catchment attributes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (2):286–306. doi: 10.1080/00045600903550378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, C.-Y., H. Chang, and E.-S. Chung. 2019. Comparing the functional recognition of aesthetics, hydrology, and quality in urban stream restoration through the framework of environmental perception. River Research and Applications 121:1–10. Accessed May 20, 2019. doi: 10.1002/rra.3423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., L. A. Waller, M. Z. Al-Hamdan, W. L. Crosson, M. G. Estes, S. M. Estes, D. A. Quattrochi, J. A. Sarnat, and Y. Liu. 2013. Estimating ground-level PM2.5 concentrations in the southeastern U.S. using geographically weighted regression. Environmental Research 121:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaak, D. J., E. E. Peterson, J. M. Ver Hoef, S. J. Wenger, J. A. Falke, C. E. Torgersen, C. Sowder, E. A. Steel, M.-J. Fortin, C. E. Jordan, et al. 2014. Applications of spatial statistical network models to stream data: Spatial statistical network models for stream data. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1 (3):277–94. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattwinkel, M., E. Szöcs, E. Peterson, and R. B. Schäfer. 2020. Preparing GIS data for analysis of stream monitoring data: The R package openSTARS, ed. S. Nedkov. PLoS ONE 15 (9):e0239237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushal, S. S., and K. T. Belt. 2012. The urban watershed continuum: Evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosystems 15 (2):409–35. doi: 10.1007/s11252-012-0226-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., M. C. Bruno, I. P. Vaughan, and G. Zolezzi. 2019. Testing the river continuum concept with geostatistical stream-network models. Ecological Complexity 39:100773. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., B. Majone, P. Zulian, E. Stella, A. Bellin, M. C. Bruno, and G. Zolezzi. 2021. Combining hydrologic simulations and stream‐network models to reveal flow‐ecology relationships in a large Alpine catchment. Water Resources Research 57 (4):1582–1600. doi: 10.1029/2020WR028496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K., and N. S. N. Lam. 2018. Geographically weighted elastic net: A variable-selection and modeling method under the spatially nonstationary condition. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6):1582–1600. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1425129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern, A., J. A. Webb, D. Ryu, S. Liu, U. Bende‐Michl, D. Waters, P. Leahy, P. Wilson, and A. W. Western. 2018. Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5 (1):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintern, A., J. A. Webb, D. Ryu, S. Liu, D. Waters, P. Leahy, U. Bende-Michl, and A. W. Western. 2018. What are the key catchment characteristics affecting spatial differences in riverine water quality? Water Resources Research 54 (10):7252–72. doi: 10.1029/2017WR022172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., X. Zhang, B. Wu, G. Pan, J. Xu, and S. Wu. 2017. Spatial scale and seasonal dependence of land use impacts on riverine water quality in the Huai River Basin, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 24 (26):20995–21010. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9733-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, B., C. Brunsdon, M. Charlton, and P. Harris. 2017. Geographically weighted regression with parameter-specific distance metrics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 31 (5):982–98. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1263731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, B., M. Charlton, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2011. Geographically weighted regression using a non-Euclidean distance metric with a study on London house price data. Procedia Environmental Sciences 7:92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.07.017.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, B., M. Charlton, P. Harris, and A. S. Fotheringham. 2014. Geographically weighted regression with a non-Euclidean distance metric: A case study using hedonic house price data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28 (4):660–81. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.865739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, B., P. Harris, M. Charlton, and C. Brunsdon. 2014. The GWmodel R package: Further topics for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models. Geo-Spatial Information Science 17 (2):85–101. doi: 10.1080/10095020.2014.917453.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, B., P. Harris, M. Charlton, C. Brunsdon, T. Nakaya, D. Murakami, and I. Gollini. 2019. Package ‘GWmodel.’ Accessed February 28, 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GWmodel/GWmodel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mainali, J., and H. Chang. 2018. Landscape and anthropogenic factors affecting spatial patterns of water quality trends in a large river basin, South Korea. Journal of Hydrology 564:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainali, J., and H. Chang. 2020. Putting space into modeling landscape and water quality relationships in the Han River Basin, South Korea. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 81(May):101461. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainali, J., and H. Chang. 2021. Environmental and spatial factors affecting surface water quality in a Himalayan watershed, Central Nepal. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 9:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100096.
   Google Scholar
• Mainali, J., H. Chang, and Y. Chun. 2019. A review of spatial statistical approaches to modeling water quality. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 43 (6):801–26. doi: 10.1177/0309133319852003.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, M. G., E. D’Amico, E. M. Smith, R. Polinsky, J. Ackerman, and K. Tyler. 2020. Variation in stream network relationships and geospatial predictions of watershed conductivity. Freshwater Science 39 (4):1–721. doi: 10.1086/710340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, D., B. Lu, P. Harris, C. Brunsdon, M. Charlton, T. Nakaya, and D. A. Griffith. 2019. The importance of scale in spatially varying coefficient modeling. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (1):50–70. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1462691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, A. J., D. Tetzlaff, N. J. C. Strachan, R. L. Hough, L. M. Avery, H. Watson, and C. Soulsby. 2018. Using spatial-stream-network models and long-term data to understand and predict dynamics of faecal contamination in a mixed land-use catchment. The Science of the Total Environment 612:840–52. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, D., and D. Unwin. 2010. Geographic information analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. E., and J. M. Ver Hoef. 2010. A mixed-model moving-average approach to geostatistical modeling in stream networks. Ecology 91 (3):644–51. doi: 10.1890/08-1668.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E., and J. Ver Hoef. 2014. STARS: An ArcGIS toolset used to calculate the spatial information needed to fit spatial statistical models to stream network data. Journal of Statistical Software 56 (2):1–17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v056.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, E. E., J. M. Ver Hoef, D. J. Isaak, J. A. Falke, M.-J. Fortin, C. E. Jordan, K. McNyset, P. Monestiez, A. S. Ruesch, A. Sengupta, et al. 2013. Modelling dendritic ecological networks in space: An integrated network perspective. Ecology Letters 16 (5):707–19. doi: 10.1111/ele.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, B., and H. Chang. 2012. Effects of land cover, topography, and built structure on seasonal water quality at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Hazardous Materials 209–210:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Project. 2020. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. Accessed April 16, 2020. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rimba, A. B., G. Mohan, S. K. Chapagain, A. Arumansawang, C. Payus, K. Fukushi, T. Osawa, and R. Avtar. 2021. Impact of population growth and land use and land cover (LULC) changes on water quality in tourism-dependent economies using a geographically weighted regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 28 (20):25920–38. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12285-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-González, P. M., C. García, A. Albuquerque, T. Monteiro-Henriques, C. Faria, J. B. Guimarães, D. Mendonça, F. Simões, M. T. Ferreira, A. Mendes, et al. 2019. A spatial stream-network approach assists in managing the remnant genetic diversity of riparian forests. Scientific Reports 9 (1):6741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43132-7.
   Google Scholar
• Scown, M. W., M. G. McManus, J. H. Carson, and C. T. Nietch. 2017. Improving predictive models of in-stream phosphorus concentration based on nationally-available spatial data coverages. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 53 (4):944–60. doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Z., X. Hou, W. Li, G. Aini, L. Chen, and Y. Gong. 2015. Impact of landscape pattern at multiple spatial scales on water quality: A case study in a typical urbanised watershed in China. Ecological Indicators 48:417–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Q. Guo, J. Liu, and R. Wang. 2014. Scale effects on spatially varying relationships between urban landscape patterns and water quality. Environmental Management 54 (2):272–87. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0287-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefelsdorf, M., and D. A. Griffith. 2007. Semiparametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: The eigenvector approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (5):1193–1221. doi: 10.1068/a37378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, J. 2011. Spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality across an urbanization gradient explored by geographically weighted regression. Applied Geography 31 (1):376–92. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, J., and Z. Xia. 2008. Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: Model design and evaluation. The Science of the Total Environment 407 (1):358–78. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turschwell, M. P., E. E. Peterson, S. R. Balcombe, and F. Sheldon. 2016. To aggregate or not? Capturing the spatio-temporal complexity of the thermal regime. Ecological Indicators 67:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, K. A., J. Jiang, and P. Wang. 2018. Land use impacts on surface water quality by statistical approaches. Global Journal of Environment Science and Management 4 (2):231–50.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2017. Nitrogen and water. https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/nitrogen-and-water?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2021. Sediment and suspended sediment. Accessed November 22, 2021. https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/sediment-and-suspended-sediment?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects.
   Google Scholar
• Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37 (1):130–37. doi: 10.1139/f80-017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ver Hoef, J. M., and E. E. Peterson. 2010. A moving average approach for spatial statistical models of stream networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (489):6–18. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ver Hoef, J. M., E. Peterson, and D. Theobald. 2006. Spatial statistical models that use flow and stream distance. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 13 (4):449–64. doi: 10.1007/s10651-006-0022-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAMIS. 2021. Water resources management information system. Accessed November 18, 2021. http://www.wamis.go.kr:8081/wke/wke_wqbase_lst.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A., D. Yang, and L. Tang. 2020. Spatiotemporal variation in nitrogen loads and their impacts on river water quality in the upper Yangtze River basin. Journal of Hydrology 590:125487. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEIS. 2021. Water environment information system: Main. Accessed November 18, 2021. http://water.nier.go.kr/web.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., and C. Zhang. 2021. Investigating spatially varying relationships between total organic carbon contents and pH values in European agricultural soil using geographically weighted regression. The Science of the Total Environment 752:141977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., and W. Jin. 2010. GIS-based spatial regression and prediction of water quality in river networks: A case study in Iowa. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (10):1943–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar