Postdigital Territoriality: Disentangling from Digital Media as a Return to Place

References

• Adams, P. C. 1998. Network topologies and virtual place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (1):88–106. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, P. C. 2009. Geographies of media and communication: A critical introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, P. C., and A. Jansson. 2012. Communication geography: A bridge between disciplines. Communication Theory 22 (3):299–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, P. C. and A. Jansson. 2021. Introduction: Rethinking the entangling force of connective media. In Disentangling: The geographies of digital disconnection, ed. A. Jansson and P. C. Adams, 1–19. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A., and J. S. Duncan, eds. 1989. The power of place: Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2020. Cloud ethics: Algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. 2007. iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. 2019. Automating surveillance. Surveillance & Society 17 (1–2):7–13. doi: 10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2011. Rethinking territory. Progress in Human Geography 35 (3):422–25. doi: 10.1177/0309132510385619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., B. Anderson, R. Gordon, and P. Langley. 2018. Unit, vibration, tone: A post-phenomenological method for researching digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies 25 (1):165–81. doi: 10.1177/1474474017726556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography 42 (1):25–43. doi: 10.1177/0309132516664800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, A., and E. Cassidy. 2021. Locative disconnection: The use of location-based technologies to make disconnection easier, enforceable and exclusive. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27 (2):395–413. doi: 10.1177/1354856520956854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. doi: 10.1093/sf/soz162.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. 2019. The triumph of profiling: The self in digital culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. M. 2012. The social epistemologies of software. Social Epistemology 26 (3–4):379–98. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.727191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. M. 2014. Post-digital humanities: Computation and cultural critique in the arts and humanities. Educause Review 2014(May–June):22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom-Christen, A., and H. Grunow. 2022. What’s (in) a vignette? History, functions, and development of an elusive ethnographic sub-genre. Ethnos. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/00141844.2022.2052927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabazon, T. 2012. Time for a digital detox? From information obesity to digital dieting. Fast Capitalism 9 (1):53–74. doi: 10.32855/fcapital.201201.009.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, S. 2015. Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2020. Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning. Media, Culture and Society 42 (4):610–17. doi: 10.1177/0163443720914028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, N. 2020. College made them feel equal. The virus exposed how unequal their lives are. The New York Times, April 4. https://nyti.ms/39CsszO.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2013. Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. 2017. We are data: Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. 2017. Phenomenology and critique: Why we need a phenomenology of the digital world. In Conditions of mediation: Phenomenological perspectives on media, ed. T. Markham and S. Rodgers, 67–74. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and A. Hepp. 2017. The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and U. A. Mejias. 2019. Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media 20 (4):336–49. doi: 10.1177/1527476418796632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, F. 2015. “What is post-digital”? In Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design, ed. D. M. Berry and M. Dieter, 12–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. 2007. The biopolitical justification for geosurveillance. Geographical Review 97 (3):389–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00512.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W., K. C. Hoover, H. Smith, S. Graham, and J. C. Berbesque. 2020. Smart festivals? Security and freedom for well-being in urban smart spaces. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):360–70. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1662765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M., and S. Graham. 2007. Sentient cities: Ambient intelligence and the politics of urban space. Information, Communication and Society 10 (6):789–817. doi: 10.1080/13691180701750991.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M. R. 1997. The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (4):681–99. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, K. 2020. Total market cap for the top 10 publicly traded U.S. companies. Axios, July 27. https://www.axios.com/big-techs-power-in-4-numbers-de8a5bc3-65b6-4064-a7cb-3466c68b2ea0.html.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. 2018. The digital turn in postcolonial urbanism: Smart citizenship in the making of India’s 100 smart cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 43 (3):405–19. doi: 10.1111/tran.12225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A., and A. Thomas. 2022. Curating# AanaJaana [# ComingGoing]: Gendered authorship in the “contact zone” of Delhi’s digital and urban margins. Cultural Geographies 29 (2):233–52. doi: 10.1177/1474474021993415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D. 2015. Collecting, kitsch and the intimate geographies of social memory: A story of archival autoethnography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40 (2):209–22. doi: 10.1111/tran.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J., and E. Waterton. 2019. “You’ll go home with bruises”: Affect, embodiment and heritage on board HMS Belfast. Area 51 (4):706–18. doi: 10.1111/area.12513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2005. Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (1):162–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00454.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., and R. Kitchin. 2009. Software, objects, and home space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (6):1344–65. doi: 10.1068/a4138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edensor, T., and C. Bowdler. 2015. Site-specific dance: Revealing and contesting the ludic qualities, everyday rhythms, and embodied habits of place. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47 (3):709–26. doi: 10.1068/a140042p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2010. Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography 34 (6):799–817. doi: 10.1177/0309132510362603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2021. The limits of territory and terrain. Dialogues in Human Geography 11 (2):213–17. doi: 10.1177/20438206211001036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. 2021. Digital geographies, feminist relationality, Black and queer code studies: Thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):209–28. doi: 10.1177/0309132519899733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2013. New spatial media, new knowledge politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (4):544–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00543.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., and A. Leszczynski. 2018. Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture 25 (5):629–44. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2018.1465396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, D. X., D. Buhalis, and B. Lin. 2019. A tourist typology of online and face-to-face social contact: Destination immersion and tourism encapsulation/decapsulation. Annals of Tourism Research 78:102757. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.102757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, K. 2021. The disconnection turn: Three facets of disconnective work in post-digital capitalism. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27 (6):1615–30. doi: 10.1177/13548565211033382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, K., J. Lindell, and A. Jansson. 2021. Disconnection as distinction: A Bourdieusian study of where people withdraw from digital media. In Disentangling: The geographies of digital disconnection, ed. A. Jansson and P. C. Adams, 61–90. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faxon, H. O., and K. Kintzi. 2022. Critical geographies of smart development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/tran.12560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, A. 2017. Technology retreats and the politics of social media. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 15 (1):355–69. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v15i1.807.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, J., and J. Kalin. 2016. Here, I used to be: Mobile media and practices of place-based digital memory. Space and Culture 19 (1):43–55. doi: 10.1177/1206331215595730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, T. 2017. OFF: Your digital detox for a better life. London: Octopus.
   Google Scholar
• Goriunova, O. 2019. The digital subject: People as data as persons. Theory, Culture and Society 36 (6):125–45. doi: 10.1177/0263276419840409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. 2020. Regulate, replicate, and resist—The conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geography 41 (3):453–57. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. 1999. Geographies of surveillant simulation. In Virtual geographies: Bodies, space and relations, ed. M. Crang, P. Crang, and J. May, 131–48. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. D. N. 2005. Software-sorted geographies. Progress in Human Geography 29 (5):562–80. doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph568oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. 2011. Work’s intimacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1996. The geography of capitalist accumulation. In Human geography: An essential anthology, ed. J. Agnew, D. N. Livingstone, and A. Rogers, 600–22. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hesselberth, P. 2021. Retreat culture and therapeutic disconnection. In Disentangling: The geographies of digital disconnection, ed. A. Jansson and P. C. Adams, 253–72. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huijsmans, R. 2018. “Knowledge that moves”: Emotions and affect in policy and research with young migrants. Children’s Geographies 16 (6):628–41. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2018.1468869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iveson, K., and S. Maalsen. 2019. Social control in the networked city: Datafied dividuals, disciplined individuals and powers of assembly. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (2):331–49. doi: 10.1177/0263775818812084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, A. 2020. The transmedia tourist: A theory of how digitalization reinforces the de-differentiation of tourism and social life. Tourist Studies 20 (4):391–408. doi: 10.1177/1468797620937905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, J. 2020. Embodying plurality: Becoming more‐than‐homeless. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (3):635–48. doi: 10.1111/tran.12373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge, A. 2019. Social media, interrupted: Users recounting temporary disconnection on. Instagram. Social Media + Society 5 (4):2056305119881691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppi, T. 2018. Disconnect: Facebook's affective bonds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., and C. Schwarzenegger. 2014. “No media, less life?” Online disconnection in mediatized worlds. First Monday 19 (11). doi: 10.5210/fm.v19i11.5497.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A., and E. Treré. 2018. Repression, resistance and lifestyle: Charting (dis)connection and activism in times of accelerated capitalism. Social Movement Studies 19 (5–6):697–715.
   Google Scholar
• Kinkaid, E. 2020. Can assemblage think difference? A feminist critique of assemblage geographies. Progress in Human Geography 44 (3):457–72. doi: 10.1177/0309132519836162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkaid, E. 2021. Is post-phenomenology a critical geography? Subjectivity and difference in post-phenomenological geographies. Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):298–316. doi: 10.1177/0309132520909520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2011. Code/space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, C. 2019. How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntsman, A., and E. Miyake. 2019. The paradox and continuum of digital disengagement: Denaturalising digital sociality and technological connectivity. Media, Culture and Society 41 (6):901–13. doi: 10.1177/0163443719853732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerkvist, A. 2017. Existential media: Toward a theorization of digital thrownness. New Media & Society 19 (1):96–110. doi: 10.1177/1461444816649921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S. C., and J. T. Johnson. 2012. Toward an open sense of place: Phenomenology, affinity, and the question of being. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102 (3):632–46. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.600196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, L. F. A., and J. Rosen. 2020. Technology as ideology in urban governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):497–506. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2015. Spatial big data and anxieties of control. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33 (6):965–84. doi: 10.1177/0263775815595814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2017. Geoprivacy. In Understanding spatial media, ed. R. Kitchin, T. P. Lauriault, and M. W. Wilson, 235–44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. 2020. Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (2):189–208. doi: 10.1177/0263775819878721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A., and J. Crampton. 2016. Introduction: Spatial big data and everyday life. Big Data and Society 38 (2):189–208. doi: 10.1177/2053951716661366.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., K. Chen, and D. Wu. 2020. Challenges and opportunities for coping with the smart divide in rural America. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (2):559–70. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1694402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, B., and E. Cassidy. 2014. Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: Rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society 16 (7):1169–84. doi: 10.1177/1461444814544002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInroy, L. B., and O. W. J. Beer. 2022. Adapting vignettes for internet-based research: Eliciting realistic responses to the digital milieu. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 25 (3):335–47. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2021.1901440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, D. 2017. Communications and mobility: The migrant, the mobile phone, and the container box. London: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. 2012. Entente territorial: Sack and Raffestin on territoriality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30 (1):159–72. doi: 10.1068/d4911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport, C. 2019. Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. 2010. Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özkul, D., and L. Humphreys. 2015. Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication 3 (3):351–65. doi: 10.1177/2050157914565846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasonen, S. 2015. As networks fail: Affect, technology, and the notion of the user. Television & New Media 16 (8):701–16. doi: 10.1177/1527476414552906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollio, A. 2021. Uber, airports, and labour at the infrastructural interfaces of platform urbanism. Geoforum 118:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, N. 1985. Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. 2018. How to break up with your phone. New York: Ten Speed Press/Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. 2018. Slow media: Why “slow” is satisfying, sustainable, and smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, A. 2022. Workspaces of mediation: How digital platforms shape practices, spaces and places of creative work. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 113 (2):211–24. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 2020. Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geography 41 (3):458–61. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1717027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2017. Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (4):779–93. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G., and A. Willis. 2019. Seeing the smart city on Twitter: Colour and the affective territories of becoming smart. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3):411–27. doi: 10.1177/0263775818771080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. 1986. Human territoriality: Its theory and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2019. When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society 6 (1):205395171882054. doi: 10.1177/2053951718820549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2020. Cyberspace and cityscapes: On the emergence of platform urbanism. Urban Geography 41 (3):448–52. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1721055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., and G. R. Halegoua. 2015. The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society 17 (10):1643–60. doi: 10.1177/1461444814531364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzenegger, C., and C. Lohmeier. 2021. Creating opportunities for temporary disconnection: How tourism professionals provide alternatives to being permanently online. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27 (6):1631–47. doi: 10.1177/13548565211033385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. E., P. Jankowski, K. C. Clarke, and A. Nara. 2020. Please enter your home location: Geoprivacy attitudes and personal location masking strategies of Internet users. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (3):586–605. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1654843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., and M. Graham. 2017. An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode 49 (4):907–27. doi: 10.1111/anti.12312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. S. 2018. Explorations in place attachment. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström, O., and A. C. Mermet. 2020. When Airbnb sits in the control room: Platform urbanism as actually existing smart urbanism in Reykjavík. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2 (15):1–7. doi: 10.3389/frsc.2020.00015.
   Google Scholar
• Striphas, T. 2015. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4–5):395–412. doi: 10.1177/1367549415577392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundén, J. 2018. Queer disconnections: Affect, break, and delay in digital connectivity. Transformations 31:63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Swanlund, D., and N. Schuurman. 2016. Mechanism matters: Data production for geosurveillance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106 (5):1063–78. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1188680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanlund, D., and N. Schuurman. 2019. Resisting geosurveillance: A survey of tactics and strategies for spatial privacy. Progress in Human Geography 43 (4):596–610. doi: 10.1177/0309132518772661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T. 2017. Media resistance: Protest, dislike, abstention. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, T., and G. Enli. 2020. Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence 26 (5–6):1269–83.
   Google Scholar
• Thorén, C., M. Edenius, J. E. Lundström, and A. Kitzmann. 2019. The hipster’s dilemma: What is analogue or digital in the post-digital society? Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 25 (2):324–39. doi: 10.1177/1354856517713139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, Y.-F. 1993. Passing strange and wonderful: Aesthetics, nature, and culture. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone together. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G., S. Holloway, and N. Bingham. 2002. The digital generation? Children, ICT and the everyday nature of social exclusion. Antipode 34 (2):296–315. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. 2013. The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, D. J. 2000. Community, place and cyberspace. Australian Geographer 31 (1):5–19. doi: 10.1080/00049180093501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcockson, T. D., A. M. Osborne, and D. A. Ellis. 2019. Digital detox: The effect of smartphone abstinence on mood, anxiety, and craving. Addictive Behaviors 99:106013. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilken, R., and L. Humphreys. 2019. Constructing the check-in: Reflections on photo-taking among Foursquare users. Communication and the Public 4 (2):100–17. doi: 10.1177/2057047319853328.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. W. 2018. On being technopositional in digital geographies. Cultural Geographies 25 (1):7–21. doi: 10.1177/1474474017743030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. 1985. The plug-in drug. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. C., and M. P. Gilmore. 2014. Subaltern empowerment in the geoweb: Tensions between publicity and privacy. Antipode 46 (2):574–91. doi: 10.1111/anti.12056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zook, M., M. Dodge, Y. Aoyama, and A. Townsend. 2004. New digital geographies: Information, communication and place. In Geography and technology, ed. S. D. Brunn, S. L. Cutter, and J. W. Harrington, 123. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zook, M. A., and M. Graham. 2007. Mapping digiPlace: Geocoded Internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34 (3):466–82. doi: 10.1068/b3311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Hachette/PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar