Trustees of (Public) Reservations? U.S. Land Trusts and Neoliberalism as Bricolage

References

• Aronowitz, S. 2014. The death and life of American labor: Toward a new workers’ movement. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, J. 2018. Corporate power and neoliberalism. In The Sage handbook of neoliberalism, ed. D. Cahill, 446–56. Los Angeles: Sage Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 1975. The people’s land: A reader on land reform in the United States. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barraclough, L. R. 2011. Making the San Fernando Valley: Rural landscapes, urban development, and White privilege. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckman, C. M., M. Wheaton, N. Sawe, and N. M. Ardoin. 2023. Incorporating justice, equity, and access priorities into land trusts’ conservation efforts. Biological Conservation 279 (March 1):109926. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.109926.
   Google Scholar
• Black, N.. 2020. The Waverly Oaks letter turns 130: A vision from Trustees founder Charles Eliot of a greener Boston. One Waterfront. Accessed December 20, 2023. https://onewaterfront.thetrustees.org/blog-posts/2020/3/5/the-waverly-oaks-letter-turns-130-a-vision-from-trustees-founder-charles-eliot-of-a-greener-boston.
   Google Scholar
• Bockman, J. 2011. Markets in the name of socialism: The left-wing origins of neoliberalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselman, F. 2012. The twilight of national land use policy. The John Marshall Law Review 45 (2):237–51.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism.’ Antipode 34 (3):349–79. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, R. 2003. Conservancy: The land trust movement in America. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, K., J. Leshy, and N. McLaughlin. 2021. Building better conservation easements for America the beautiful. Harvard Environmental Law Review Online : 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, A. D., J. Peck, I. Alami, and H. Whiteside. 2023. Making space for the new state capitalism, part III: Thinking conjuncturally. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 55 (5):1207–17. doi: 10.1177/0308518X231185587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. S., and N. Duncan. 2004. Landscapes of privilege: The politics of the aesthetic in an American suburb. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R. 2000. The American planning tradition: Culture and policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flamm, M. W. 2008. Debating the 1960s: Liberal, conservative, and radical perspectives. Debating twentieth-century America. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2022. Cannibal capitalism: How our system is devouring democracy, care, and the planet—and what we can do about it. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Freshour, C., and B. Williams. 2022. Toward “total freedom”: Black ecologies of land, labor, and livelihoods in the Mississippi Delta. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (7):1563–72. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2103501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstle, G., A. C. Offner, and J. Ott. 2023. Is it over? Dissent 70 (3):17–26. doi: 10.1353/dss.2023.a906662.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. 2002. Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer 54 (1):15–24. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.00310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. 2009. In the shadow of the shadow state. In The revolution will not be funded, ed. INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence, 41–52. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gwin, L., J. Owley, and S. K. Fairfax. 2019. What can the apple teach the orange? Lessons U.S. land trusts can learn from the National Trust in the U.K. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 30 (1): 89–142.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2013. Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., and D. Massey. 2010. Interpreting the crisis. Soundings 44 (44):57–71. doi: 10.3898/136266210791036791.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, D., and N. Heynen. 2021. ‘“I am Sapelo”: Racialized uneven development and land politics within the Gullah Geechee corridor. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5 (1):401–25. doi: 10.1177/2514848620987366.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, G. 2023. Modalities of conjunctural analysis: “Seeing the present differently” through global lenses. Antipode 56 (1):135–64. doi: 10.1111/anti.12975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2007. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins. 2007. Neoliberal environments: False promises and unnatural consequences. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hocker, J. 2000. Land trusts: Key elements in the struggle against sprawl. Natural Resources & Environment 15 (4):244–47.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. T. 1987. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, K. 2016. Breaking the bundle of rights: Conservation easements and the legal geographies of individuating nature. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (3):504–22. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15609318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, K. 2022. “Performing developability:” Generating threat and value in private land conservation. Geoforum 128:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak, A. 2016. Acadia: A gift to the people, by the people. Mount Desert Islander, July 14. Accessed December 20, 2023. https://www.mdislander.com/archives/acadia-a-gift-to-the-people-by-the-people/article_4ff0e378-9328-5286-a820-ad437a8bca63.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstler, J. H. 1993. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America’s man-made landscape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, R. 2019. Not so neo. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Society 1:54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberknecht, K. 2009. Public access to U.S. conservation land trust properties: Results from a national survey. Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (4):479–91. doi: 10.1080/01944360903212087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, S., and G. R. Wekerle. 2008. Neoliberalizing environmental governance? Land trusts, private conservation and nature on the Oak Ridges moraine. Geoforum 39 (6):2097–2108. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, A. 2017. Charitable contributions of conservation easements. Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, G. 2017. In the long run we are all dead: Keynesianism, political economy, and revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, P. 2019. Fannie Lou Hamer’s freedom farms and Black Agrarian geographies. Antipode 51 (1):207–24. doi: 10.1111/anti.12500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, B. R. 2011. Trust in the land: New directions in tribal conservation. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. W. 2008. Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum 39 (3):1215–27. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolon, J. R. 2006. Historical overview of the American land use system: A diagnostic approach to evaluating governmental land use control. Pace Environmental Law Review 23 (3):821. doi: 10.58948/0738-6206.1098.
   Google Scholar
• Offner, A. C. 2019. Sorting out the mixed economy: The rise and fall of welfare and developmental states in the Americas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A. 2020. Rendering settler sovereign landscapes: Race and property in the Empire State. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (5):793–810. doi: 10.1177/0263775820922233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, R. H. 1991. Land use control: Geography, law, and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, I. 1994. Labor’s struggles, 1945–1950: A participant’s view. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, D. R., and E. D. Esch. 2012. The production of difference: Race and the management of labor in U.S. history. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rome, A. W. 2001. The bulldozer in the countryside: Suburban sprawl and the rise of American environmentalism. Studies in environment and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, B. J. 1991. From cotton belt to sunbelt: Federal policy, economic development, and the transformation of the South, 1938–1980. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silber, N. 2018. A corporate form of freedom: The emergence of the modern nonprofit sector. Boulder, CO: Westview. doi: 10.4324/9780429502705.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J. 2003. Charity’s land deals to be scrutinized; senators to send letter to nature conservancy: FINAL edition. The Washington Post, May 10. https://search.proquest.com/docview/409468295?pq-origsite=primo.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., and D. Ottoway. 2003. Nature Conservancy suspends land sales: Board of nonprofit to review practices. The Washington Post, May 13.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, J., and D. B. Ottoway. 2004. IRS to audit Nature Conservancy from inside: FINAL edition. The Washington Post, January 17. https://search.proquest.com/docview/409580185?pq-origsite=primo.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, D. 1999. Smokestacks and progressives: Environmentalists, engineers and air quality in America, 1881–1951. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2021. Political ecology II: Conjunctures, crises, and critical publics. Progress in Human Geography 45 (6):1721–30. doi: 10.1177/03091325211028665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, K.-Y. 2019. Race for profit: How banks and the real estate industry undermined Black homeownership. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Trustees of Reservations. 2023a. Trustees history. Accessed December 20, 2023. https://thetrustees.org/content/trustees-history/.
   Google Scholar
• The Trustees of Reservations. 2023b. Accessed December 20, 2023. What we do. https://thetrustees.org/what-we-do/.
   Google Scholar
• The Trustees of Reservations. 1971. Annual Report 1971. Accessed May 27, 2024. https://thetrustees.access.preservica.com/index.php/IO_1c7ea150-7949-48ca-b9d6-827c11ff0e94/
   Google Scholar
• Van Sant, L., L. German, and D. J. Read. 2022. A “cultural transformation” at the U.S. Department of Agriculture? Examining racial (in)equality through federal farmland protection programs in Georgia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (4):1636–60. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2043284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sant, L., D. Hardy, and B. Nuse. 2021. Conserving what? Conservation easements and environmental justice in the coastal US South. Human Geography 14 (1):31–44. doi: 10.1177/1942778620962023.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1959. Securing open space for urban America: Conservation easements. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. A. 2017. Development arrested: The blues and plantation power in the Mississippi Delta. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. J., T. McCreary, B. Williams, and A. Bledsoe. 2020. Race, land, and the law: Black farmers and the limits of a politics of recognition. In Black food matters: Racial justice in the wake of food justice, ed. H. Garth and A. M. Reese, 228–50. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar