418
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Attentive Observation: Walking, Listening, Staying Put

ORCID Icon
Received 09 Jan 2023, Accepted 04 Apr 2024, Published online: 21 Jun 2024

References

  • Abram, D. 1997. The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage.
  • Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Amphoux, P. 2003. L’Identité sonore urbaine: une approche méthodologique croisée. [Spaces of life: Aspects of the human-environment relationship] In Espaces de Vie: Aspects de la Relation Homme-environnement, ed. G. Moser and K. Weiss, 85–112. Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Anderson, B., and J. Wylie. 2009. On geography and materiality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (2):318–35. doi: 10.1068/a3940.
  • Anderson, J. 2004. Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area 36 (3):254–61. doi: 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x.
  • Arkette, S. 2004. Sounds like city. Theory, Culture and Society 21 (1):159–68. doi: 10.1177/0263276404040486.
  • Augoyard, J. F. [1979] 2007. Step by step: Everyday walks in a French urban housing project, trans. D. A. Curtis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ballard, J. G. [1960] 1977. The sound-sweep. In The four-dimensional nightmare, 42–82. London: Penguin.
  • Barchetta, L. 2021. La rivolta del verde: Nature e rovine a Torino. [The green revolt: Nature and ruins in Turin] Milan, Italy: Agenzia X.
  • Barua, M. 2017. Nonhuman labour, encounter value, spectacular accumulation: The geographies of a lively commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (2):274–88. doi: 10.1111/tran.12170.
  • Barua, M., and A. Sinha. 2019. Animating the urban: An ethological and geographical conversation. Social & Cultural Geography 20 (8):1160–80. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2017.1409908.
  • Bates, C., and A. Rhys-Taylor, eds. 2017. Walking through social research. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Battistoni, A. 2017. Bringing in the work of nature: From natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory 45 (1):5–31. doi: 10.1177/0090591716638389.
  • Beaumont, M. 2020. The walker: On finding and losing yourself in the modern city. London: Verso.
  • Benjamin, W. [1938–1939] 2006. The writer of modern life: Essays on Charles Baudelaire, trans. H. Eiland and E. Jephcott. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Benjamin, W., and A. Lacis. [1924] 1979. Naples. In One-way street, trans. E. Jephcott, 167–76. London: Verso.
  • Boyer, C. M. 1992. Cities for sale: Merchandising history at South Street Seaport. In Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space, ed. M. Sorkin, 181–204. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Brennan, T. 2004. The transmission of affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Breton, A. [1928] 1999. Najda, trans. R. Howard. London: Penguin.
  • Brice, S. 2018. Situating skill: Contemporary observational drawing as a spatial method in geographical research. Cultural Geographies 25 (1):135–58. doi: 10.1177/1474474017702513.
  • Burckhardt, L. [1980] 2006. Warum ist Landschaft schön? Die Spaziergangswissenschaft. [Why is landscape beautiful? The science of walking] Berlin: Martin Schmitz.
  • Burckhardt, L. [1982] 2017. Documenta urbana: Sichtbar machen. In Landschafts-theoretische Aquarelle und Spaziergangs-wissenschaft, ed. N. Regenass, M. Ritter, and M. Schmitz, 225–54. Berlin: Martin Schmitz.
  • Butler, T. 2006. A walk of art: The potential of the sound walk as practice in cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography 7 (6):889–908. doi: 10.1080/14649360601055821.
  • Calhoun, D. 2020. Flowers for Baudelaire: Urban botany and allegorical writing. Nineteenth-Century French Studies 49 (1–2):17–34. doi: 10.1353/ncf.2020.0011.
  • Canales, J. 2016. Recording devices. In A companion to the history of science, ed. B. Lightman, 500–14. London: Wiley.
  • Careri, F. [2002] 2017. Walkscapes: Walking as aesthetic practice. Ames, IA: Culicidae Architectural Press.
  • Castán Broto, V., H. S. Sudhira, and H. Unnikrishnan. 2021. Walk the pipeline: Urban infrastructure landscapes in Bengaluru’s long twentieth century. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 45 (4):696–715. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12985.
  • Centemeri, L. 2017. Review de Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing, The mushroom at the end of the world. On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 8 (1):159–62.
  • Chinen, N. 2020. Keith Jarrett confronts a future without the piano. New York Times, October 21.
  • Clark, N. 2000. Botanizing on the asphalt? The complex life of cosmopolitan bodies. Body & Society 6 (3–4):12–33. doi: 10.1177/1357034X00006003002.
  • Clément, G. 2004. La sagesse du jardinier. [The wisdom of the gardener] Paris: L’Oeil neuf Éditions.
  • Collard, R. C., J. Dempsey, and J. Sundberg. 2015. A manifesto for abundant futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):322–30. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.973007.
  • Cotoi, C. 2021. We should have asked what year we were in! Wastelands and wilderness in the Văcărești park. Antipode 53 (4):975–94. doi: 10.1111/anti.12715.
  • Crary, J. 1990. Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Crary, J. 1999. Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Curry, H. A., and J. Secord. 2018. Natural history and its histories in the twenty-first century. In Worlds of natural history, ed. H. A. Curry, N. Jardine, J. A. Secord, and E. C. Spary, 535–44. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daston, L., and P. Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
  • Davies, T. 2018. Toxic space and time: Slow violence, necropolitics, and petrochemical pollution. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108 (6):1537–53. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1470924.
  • Debaise, D. [2015] 2017. Nature as event: The lure of the possible, trans. M. Halewood. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • de Certeau, M. [1980] 1984. The practice of everyday life, trans. S. F. Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Degen, M., and G. Rose. 2012. The sensory experiencing of urban design: The role of walking and perceptual memory. Urban Studies 49 (15):3271–87. doi: 10.1177/0042098012440463.
  • De Preester, H. 2021. Life is what you fill your attention with: The war for attention and the role of digital technology in the work of Bernard Stiegler. Phenomenology & Mind 20 (20):102–16. doi: 10.17454/pam-2009.
  • Dillon, B. 2014. Objects in this mirror: Essays. Berlin: Sternberg.
  • Doughty, K. 2013. Walking together: The embodied and mobile production of a therapeutic landscape. Health & Place 24:140–46. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.08.009.
  • Driver, F. 2000. Field-work in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25 (3):267–68.
  • Duffy, M., G. Waitt, and T. Harada. 2016. Making sense of sound: Visceral sonic mapping as a research tool. Emotion, Space and Society 20:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2016.06.006.
  • Duttlinger, C. 2007. Between contemplation and distraction: Configurations of attention in Walter Benjamin. German Studies Review (February):33–54.
  • Duvernoy, R. J. 2021. Affect and attention after Deleuze and Whitehead: Ecological attunement. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Erlmann, V. 2010. Reason and resonance: A history of modern aurality. New York: Zone Books.
  • Ernwein, M., and L. Matthey. 2019. Events in the affective city: Affect, attention and alignment in two ordinary urban events. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (2):283–301. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18757509.
  • Favret, M. A. 2002. Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark: Traveling with Mary Wollstonecraft. In The Cambridge companion to Wollstonecraft, ed. C. L. Johnson, 209–27. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forsyth, I. 2013. The more‐than‐human geographies of field science. Geography Compass 7 (8):527–39. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12058.
  • Fuller, M., and E. Weizman. 2021. Investigative aesthetics: Conflicts and commons in the politics of truth. London: Verso.
  • Gabrys, J. 2019. Sensors and sensing practices: Reworking experience across entities, environments, and technologies. Science, Technology, and Human Values 44 (5):723–36. doi: 10.1177/0162243919860211.
  • Gallagher, M. 2015. Sounding ruins: Reflections on the production of an “audio drift.” Cultural Geographies 22 (3):467–85. doi: 10.1177/1474474014542745.
  • Gallagher, M., and J. Prior. 2017. Listening walks: A method of multiplicity. In Walking through social research, ed. C. Bates and A. Rhys-Taylor, 162–77. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Gallagher, M., A. Kanngieser, and J. Prior. 2017. Listening geographies: Landscape, affect and geotechnologies. Progress in Human Geography 41 (5):618–37. doi: 10.1177/0309132516652952.
  • Gandy, M. 2013. Entropy by design: Gilles Clément, Parc Henri Matisse and the limits to avant-garde urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1):259–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01164.x.
  • Gandy, M. 2014. Strange accumulations: The soundscapes of late modernity in J. G. Ballard’s The sound-sweep. In The acoustic city, ed. M. Gandy and B. J. Nilsen, 33–39. Berlin: jovis.
  • Gandy, M. 2017. Urban atmospheres. Cultural Geographies 24 (3):353–74. doi: 10.1177/1474474017712995.
  • Gandy, M. 2022. Natura urbana: Ecological constellations in urban space. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Gaston, K. J. 2010. Urban ecology. In Urban ecology, ed. K. J. Gaston, 1–9. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gavin, W. 1992. William James and the reinstatement of the vague. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Gilbert, C. D., and M. Sigman. 2007. Brain states: Top-down influences in sensory processing. Neuron 54 (5):677–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.019.
  • Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Gopinath, G. 2018. Unruly visions: The aesthetic practices of queer diaspora. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Greene, E. 2011. Why keep a field notebook? In Field notes on science and nature, ed. M. R. Canfield, 251–76. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gros, F. [2011] 2015. A philosophy of walking, trans. J. Howe. London: Verso.
  • Hannah, M. G. 2013. Attention and the phenomenological politics of landscape. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 95 (3):235–50. doi: 10.1111/geob.12023.
  • Hannah, M. G. 2018. Direction and socio-spatial theory: A political economy of oriented practice. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Hard, G. 1995. Spuren und Spurenleser. Zur Theorie der Ästhetik des Spurenlesens in der Vegetation und anderswo: [Traces and trace readers: On the theory and aesthetics of trace reading for vegetation and other places] Osnabrücker Studien zur Geographie. Volume 16. Osnabrück, Germany: Rasch.
  • Hard, G. 1996. Disziplinbegegnung an einer Spur. [Disciplinary encounter on a trace] In Hard-Ware, 6–53. Notizbuch 18 der Kasseler Schule. Marburg, Germany: Mauersberger.
  • Heine, M. 2023. Resonant fabrics: Listening to urban worlds. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
  • Heinrich, B. 2011. Untangling the bank. In Field notes on science and nature, ed. M. R. Canfield, 33–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hepach, M. G. 2021. Entangled phenomenologies: Reassessing (post-) phenomenology’s promise for human geography. Progress in Human Geography 45 (5):1278–94. doi: 10.1177/0309132520987308.
  • Hubbard, P., and E. Wilkinson. 2019. Walking a lonely path: Gender, landscape and “new nature writing.” Cultural Geographies 26 (2):253–61. doi: 10.1177/1474474018811663.
  • Hyndman, J. 2001. The field as here and now, not there and then. Geographical Review 91 (1–2):262–72. doi: 10.2307/3250827.
  • Ihde, D. [1976] 2007. Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound. 2nd ed. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Ingold, T. 2010. Footprints through the weather‐world: Walking, breathing, knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (Suppl. 1):S121–S139. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01613.x.
  • Ingold, T. 2017. Anthropology contra ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (1): 21–26.
  • Ingold, T., and J. L. Vergunst, eds. 2008. Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  • James, W. 1904. A world of pure experience. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (20):533–43. doi: 10.2307/2011912.
  • Jameson, F. 2016. The modernist papers. London: Verso.
  • Kahn, D. 1999. Noise, water, meat: A history of sound in the arts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Katz, C. 1994. Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography. The Professional Geographer 46 (1):67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x.
  • Kingdon, J. 2011. In the eye of the beholder. In Field notes on science and nature, ed. M. R. Canfield, 129–60. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Kinkaid, E. 2020. Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (1):167–86. doi: 10.1177/0263775819854765.
  • Kinkaid, E. 2021. Is post-phenomenology a critical geography? Subjectivity and difference in post-phenomenological geographies. Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):298–316. doi: 10.1177/0309132520909520.
  • Kohler, R. E. 2002. Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kohler, R. E., and J. Vetter. 2016. The field. In A companion to the history of science, ed. B. Lightman, 282–95. London: Wiley.
  • Kuoni, C., and W. Lukatsch, eds. 2023. Maria Thereza Alves: Seeds of change. Amherst, MA: Amherst College Press/Vera List Center for Art and Politics.
  • Kwa, C. 2018. The visual grasp of the fragmented landscape: Plant geographers vs. plant sociologists. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 48 (2):180–222. doi: 10.1525/hsns.2018.48.2.180.
  • Lave, R. 2015. The future of environmental expertise. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2):244–52. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.988099.
  • Lefebvre, H. [1992] 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life, trans. S. Elden and G. Moore. London and New York: Continuum.
  • Lemke, T. 2021. The government of things: Foucault and the new materialisms. New York: New York University Press.
  • Lorimer, H. [2011] 2016. Walking: New forms and spaces for studies of pedestrianism. In Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects, ed. T. Cresswell and P. Merrimen, 19–34. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Löwy, M., and R. Sayre. 2011. Romanticism against the tide of modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Mason, O., J. Sarma, J. D. Sidaway, A. Bonnett, P. Hubbard, G. Jamil, J. Middleton, M. O’Neill, J. Riding, and M. Rose. 2023. Interventions in walking methods in political geography. Political Geography 106:102937. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102937.
  • Massey, D. 2003. Imagining the field. In Using social theory: Thinking through research, ed. M. Pryke, G. Rose, and S. Whatmore, 71–88. London: Sage.
  • Mazzucato, L., G. La Camera, and A. Fontanini. 2019. Expectation-induced modulation of metastable activity underlies faster coding of sensory stimuli. Nature Neuroscience 22 (5):787–96. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0364-9.
  • McCormack, D. P. 2018. Atmospheric things: On the allure of elemental envelopment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. [1945] 1962. Phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. [1964] 1969. The visible and the invisible, trans. A. Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Mui, C. L., and J. S. Murphy. 2020. The university of the future: Stiegler after Derrida. Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):455–65. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1605900.
  • Nading, A. M. 2020. Living in a toxic world. Annual Review of Anthropology 49 (1):209–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074557.
  • Nancy, J.-L. [2002] 2007. Listening? Trans. C. Mandell. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Ngai, S. 2005. Ugly feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ogborn, M. 2018. Vegetable empire. In Worlds of natural history, ed. H. A. Curry, N. Jardine, J. A. Secord, and E. C. Spary, 271–86. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Rourke, K. 2013. Walking and mapping: Artists and cartographers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Paiva, D. 2018. Sonic geographies: Themes, concepts, and deaf spots. Geography Compass 12 (7):e12375. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12375.
  • Pellegrini, P., and S. Baudry. 2014. Streets as new places to bring together both humans and plants: Examples from Paris and Montpellier (France). Social & Cultural Geography 15 (8):871–900. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2014.974067.
  • Perec, G. [1975] 2010. An attempt at exhausting a place in Paris. Cambridge, MA: Wakefield Press.
  • Petri, J. 2022. The forgotten art of walking. Toward intra-active geography of an urban landscape. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 14 (1):2156437. doi: 10.1080/20004214.2022.2156437.
  • Phillips, A. 2019. Attention seeking. London: Penguin.
  • Phillips, R. 2018. Georges Perec’s experimental fieldwork; Perecquian fieldwork. Social & Cultural Geography 19 (2):171–91. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1266027.
  • Pinder, D. 2011. Errant paths: The poetics and politics of walking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29 (4):672–92. doi: 10.1068/d10808.
  • Pocock, J. G. A. [1975] 2016. The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Prior, J. 2017. Sonic environmental aesthetics and landscape research. Landscape Research 42 (1):6–17. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1243235.
  • Reveal, J. L. 2011. The evolution and fate of botanical field books. In Field notes on science and nature, ed. M. R. Canfield, 187–201. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Revill, G. 2016. How is space made in sound? Spatial mediation, critical phenomenology and the political agency of sound. Progress in Human Geography 40 (2):240–56. doi: 10.1177/0309132515572271.
  • Ricœur, P. [2004] 2006. On translation: Thinking in action, trans. E. Brennan. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Roberts, E. F. 2021. Making better numbers through bioethnographic collaboration. American Anthropologist 123 (2):355–69. doi: 10.1111/aman.13560.
  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosa, H. 2016. Resonanz: Eine soziologie der weltbeziehung. [Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world] Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
  • Royaards, M. 2014. The space between: A cartographic experiment. In The acoustic city, ed. M Gandy and B. Nilsen, 174–83. Berlin: jovis.
  • Sauer, C. O. 1956. The education of a geographer. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 46 (3):287–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1956.tb01510.x.
  • Saville, S. M. 2021. Towards humble geographies. Area 53 (1):97–105. doi: 10.1111/area.12664.
  • Schelle, K. G. 1802. Die Spatziergänge oder die Kunst spatzieren zu gehen. [Walks or the art of walking] Leipzig, Germany: Martini.
  • Schreinert, K., ed. [1884–1898] 1954. Theodor Fontane: Briefe an Georg Friedlaender. [Theodor Fontane: Letters to Georg Friedlaender] Heidelberg, Germany: Quelle and Meyer.
  • Searle, A., J. Turnbull, and J. Lorimer. 2021. After the anthropause: Lockdown lessons for more‐than‐human geographies. The Geographical Journal 187 (1):69–77. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12373.
  • Seigworth, G. J., and M. Gregg. 2010. An inventory of shimmers. In The affect theory reader, ed. M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth, 1–28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Sidaway, J. D. 2022. Psychogeography: Walking through strategy, nature and narrative. Progress in Human Geography 46 (2):549–74. doi: 10.1177/03091325211017212.
  • Simonsen, K. 2013. In quest of a new humanism: Embodiment, experience and phenomenology as critical. Progress in Human Geography 37 (1):10–26. doi: 10.1177/0309132512467573.
  • Sletto, B., G. Barrera de la Torre, A. M. Lamina Luguana, and D. Pereira Júnior. 2021. Walking, knowing, and the limits of the map: Performing participatory cartographies in Indigenous landscapes. Cultural Geographies 28 (4):611–27. doi: 10.1177/14744740211034479.
  • Solnit, R. 2000. Wanderlust: A history of walking. London: Penguin.
  • Springgay, S., and S. E. Truman. 2017. Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Stengers, I. [2013] 2017. Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science, trans. S. Muecke. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Stenner, P. 2011. James and Whitehead: Assemblage and systematization of a deeply empiricist mosaic philosophy. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy III (1):74. doi: 10.4000/ejpap.874.
  • Stewart, K. 2007. Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Stiegler, B. [2012] 2015. States of shock: Stupidity and knowledge in the 21st century, trans. D. Ross. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Stoller, P. 1989. The taste of ethnographic things: The senses in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Streule, M. 2020. Doing mobile ethnography: Grounded, situated and comparative. Urban Studies 57 (2):421–38. doi: 10.1177/0042098018817418.
  • Sundberg, J. 2003. Masculinist epistemologies and the politics of fieldwork in Latin Americanist geography. The Professional Geographer 55 (2):180–90. doi: 10.1111/0033-0124.5502006.
  • Taussig, M. 2011. I swear I saw this: Drawings in fieldwork notebooks, namely my own. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Terranova, T. 2012. Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine 13:1–19.
  • Till, K. E. 2005. The new Berlin: Memory, politics, place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Tsing, A. [2015] 2017. Interview. Suomen Antropologi 42 (1):22–30.
  • van Dooren, T., E. Kirksey, and U. Münster. 2016. Multispecies studies: Cultivating the arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3527695.
  • Van Patter, L. E. 2023. Toward a more-than-human everyday urbanism: Rhythms and sensoria in the multispecies city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 113 (4):913–32. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2134838.
  • Vergara, C. J. 1995. The new American ghetto. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Verran, H. 2023. How to use disconcertment as ethnographic field device. In An ethnographic inventory: Field devices for anthropological enquiry, ed. T. Sánchez Criado, and A. Estalella, 43–51. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Vidler, A. 2002. Warped space: Art, architecture, and anxiety in modern culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Vigus, J. 2017. A “romantic state of uncertainty”: William Hazlitt’s “On going a journey. In Romantic ambiguities: Abodes of the modern, ed. S. Domsch, C. Reinfandt, and K. Rennhak, 97–110. Trier, Germany: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
  • Voegelin, S. 2010. Listening to noise and silence: Towards a philosophy of sound art. London: Continuum.
  • Waldenfels, B. 1985. In den Netzen der Lebenswelt. [In the networks of the living world] Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
  • Waldenfels, B. [2006] 2011. Phenomenology of the alien: Basic concepts, trans. T. Stähler and A. Kozin. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Waterton, C. 2017. Barcoding nature: Shifting cultures of taxonomy in an age of biodiversity loss. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Weil, S. [1947] 1952. Gravity and grace, trans. E. Crawford. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Westerkamp, H. 1974. Soundwalking. Sound Heritage 3 (4): 18–27.
  • Wissmann, T. 2014. Geographies of urban sound. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  • Wright, J. K. 1947. Terrae incognitae: The place of the imagination in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 37 (1):1–15. doi: 10.2307/2561211.
  • Wylie, J. 2005. A single day’s walking: Narrating self and landscape on the South West coast path. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (2):234–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00163.x.
  • Wylie, J. 2007. The spectral geographies of W.G. Sebald. Cultural Geographies 14 (2):171–88. doi: 10.1177/1474474007075353.